Enhanced sensory processing accompanies successful detection of change for real-world sounds

NeuroImage

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 113-119

  Gregg, Melissa K ^a   Snyder, Joel S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; Auditory scene analysis; Change deafness; Change detection; Event related potentials

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; CONSCIOUSNESS LEVEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND DETECTION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861627487     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.057     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Agres K.R., Krumhansl C.L. Musical change deafness: the inability to detect change in a non-speech auditory domain. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2008, 969-974. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. B.C. Love, K. McRae, V.M. Sloutsky (Eds.).
2. Auvray M., Gallace A., Hartcher-O'Brien J., Tan H.Z., Spence C. Tactile and visual distractors induce change blindness for tactile stimuli presented on the fingertips. Brain Res. 2008, 1213:111-119.
3. Boersma P., Weenink D. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.3.2) Computer software and manual Retrieved August, 2005, from. http://www.praat.org.
4. Bosnyak D.J., Eaton R.A., Roberts L.E. Distributed auditory cortical representations are modified when non-musicians are trained at pitch discrimination with 40Hz amplitude modulated tones. Cereb. Cortex 2004, 14:1088-1099.
5. Bregman A.S. Auditory Scene Analysis 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Busch N.A., Dürschmid S., Herrmann C.S. ERP effects of change localization, change identification, and change blindness. Neuroreport 2010, 31:371-375.
7. Busch N.A., Frund I., Herrmann C.S. Electrophysiological evidence for different types of change detection and change blindness. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22:1852-1869.
8. Darriba A., Pazo-Álvarez P., Capilla A., Amenedo E. Oscillatory brain activity in the time frequency domain associated to change blindness and change detection awareness. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 24:337-350.
9. Demany L., Trost W., Serman M., Semal C. Auditory change detection: simple sounds are not memorized better than complex sounds. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 19:85-91.
10. Demany L., Semal C., Cazalets J.R., Pressnitzer D. Fundamental differences in change detection between vision and audition. Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 203:261-270.
11. Eimer M., Mazza V. Electrophysiological correlates of change detection. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:15p.
12. Eramudugolla R., Irvine D.R.F., McAnally K.I., Martin R.L., Mattingley J.B. Directed attention eliminates 'change deafness' in complex auditory scenes. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:1108-1113.
13. Gallace A., Tan H.Z., Spence C. The failure to detect tactile change: a tactile analogue of visual change blindness. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2006, 13:300-303.
14. Gamble M.L., Luck S.J. N2ac: an ERP component associated with the focusing of attention within an auditory scene. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:1057-1068.
15. Greene M.R., Oliva A. Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: seeing the forest without representing the trees. Cogn. Psychol. 2009, 58:137-176.
16. Gregg M.K., Samuel A.G. Change deafness and the organizational properties of sounds. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2008, 34:974-991.
17. Gregg M.K., Samuel A.G. The importance of semantics in auditory representations. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2009, 71:607-619.
18. Gutschalk A., Micheyl C., Oxenham A.J. Neural correlates of auditory perceptual awareness under informational masking. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:1156-1165.
19. Gygi B., Kidd G.P.K., Watson C.S. Similarity and categorization of environmental sounds. Percept. Psychophys. 2007, 69:839-855.
20. Ille N., Berg P., Scherg M. Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002, 19:113-124.
21. Koivisto M., Revonsuo A. Prechange event-related potentials predict change blindness in various attention conditions. Neuroreport 2005, 16:869-873.
22. Liégeois-Chauvel C., Musolino A., Badier J.M., Marquis P., Chauvel P. Evoked-potentials recorded from the auditory-cortex in man: evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1994, 92:204-214.
23. Loftus G.R., Masson M.E.J. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1994, 1:476-490.
24. Lyyra P., Wikgren J., Ruusuvirta T., Astikainen P. Explicit behavioral detection of visual changes develops without their implicit neurophysiological detectability. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:1-7.
25. Näätänen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24:375-425.
26. Näätänen R., Winkler I. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol. Bull. 1999, 125:826-859.
27. Oliva A., Torralba A. Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2001, 42:145-175.
28. Pavani F., Turatto M. Change perception in complex auditory scenes. Percept. Psychophys. 2008, 70:619-629.
29. Picton T.W., Hillyard S.A. Human auditory evoked potentials II: effects of attention. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1974, 36:191-199.
30. Picton T.W., Alain C., Otten L., Ritter W., Achim A. Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiol. Neurootol. 2000, 5:111-139.
31. Polich J. P3a and p3b from affective stimuli: gender and laterality. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:S13-S13.
32. Pourtois G., De Pretto M., Hauert C.-A., Vuilleumier P. Time course of brain activity during change blindness and change awareness: performance in predicted by neural events before change onset. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:2108-2129.
33. Simons D.J., Rensink R.A. Change blindness: past, present, and future. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9:16-20.
34. Snyder J.S., Alain C. Sequential auditory scene analysis is preserved in normal aging adults. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:501-512.
35. Snyder J.S., Gregg M.K. Memory for sound, with an ear toward hearing in complex auditory scenes. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2011, 73:1993-2007.
36. Snyder J.S., Alain C., Picton T.W. Effects of attention on neuroelectric correlates of auditory stream segregation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:1-13.
37. Snyder J.S., Holder W.T., Weintraub D.M., Carter O.L., Alain C. Effects of prior stimulus and prior perception on neural correlates of auditory stream segregation. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:1208-1215.
38. Snyder J.S., Gregg M.K., Weintraub D.M., Alain C. Attention, awareness, and the perception of auditory scenes. Front. Psychol. 2012, 3:15.
39. Vitevitch M.S. Change deafness: the inability to detect changes between two voices. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2003, 29:333-342.