The N1 response and its applications

Audiology and Neuro-Otology

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 281-307

  Hyde, Martyn ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Auditory late response; Electric response audiometry; Evoked potential audiometry; Functional hearing loss; Functional imaging; Long latency potentials; Nl response; Non organic hearing loss; Slow vertex potential

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; AUDIOLOGY; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPETENCE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ELECTRIC ACTIVITY; ELECTRICAL POTENTIAL PARAMETERS; ELECTRONEUROLOGY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE AUDIOMETRY; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; LATENT PERIOD; LOUDNESS; MAGNETIC FIELD; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; RELIABILITY; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH DISORDER;

EID: 0030928801     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000259253     Document Type: Article

References (130)

1. Davis H. Owen J: Brainstem auditory evoked responses; in Owen J. Davis II (eds): Evoked Potential Testing-Clinical Applications. Orlando. Grune and Stratton. 1985.
2. Davis II: Principles of electric response audiometry. Ann Otol Rhi-nol Laryngol 1976;85(suppl 28):3.
3. Gibson WP: Essentials of Clinical Electric Response Audiometry. Edinburgh. Churchill Livingstone, 1978.
4. Picton TW, Woods D, Baribeau-Braun J, Hcalev T: Evoked potential audiometry. Can J Otolaryngol 1977.6:2:90-119.
5. Polich JM, Starr A: Middle-, late-, and long-latency auditory evoked potentials; in Moore EJ (ed): Bases of Auditory Brain-Stem Evoked Responses. New York. Grune and Stratton. 1983.
6. Reneau J, Hnatiow G; Evoked Response Audiometry: A Topical and Historical Review. Baltimore. University Park Press. 1975.
7. Rapin I, Schimmel H, Cohen M: Reliability in detecting the auditory evoked response (AER) for audiometry in sleeping subjects. Electroen-ccphalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1972; 32:734-738.
8. Osterhammel PA, Davis H, Wier C, Hirsh S: Adult auditory evoked vertex potentials in sleep. Audiology 1973:12:116-128.
9. Rose DE. Keating L. Hedgecock L. Schrcurs K. Miller K: Aspects of acoustically evoked responses-ln-terjudge and intrajudge reliability. Arch Otolaryngol 1971,94:4:347-351.
10. Alberti PW: New tools for old tricks. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1970;79: 800-807.
11. Alberti PW: Non-organic hearing loss in adults; in Beagley HA (ed): Audiology and Audiological Medicine. Oxford. Oxford University Press, vol 2. 1981.
12. Bonivcr R: Interet dc l'etudc des potent icls evoques corticaux en expertise. Acta Otolaryngol 1982:36:377-381.
13. Coles RRA. Mason S: The results of cortical electric response audiometry in medicolegal investigations. Br J Audiol 1984:18:71-78.
14. Hyde ML, Alberti PW, Matsumoto N, Li Y: Auditory evoked potentials in audiometric assessment of compensation and medicolegal patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986:95: 514-519.
15. Suzuki T, Yamamoto K, Taguchi K, Sakabe N: Reliability and validity of late vertex-evoked response audiometry. Audiology 1976:15:357-369.
16. Hyde ML: The slow vertex potential: Properties and clinical applications; in Jacobson JT (ed): Principles and Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials. Needham Heights. Allyn and Bacon. 1994. pp 179-218.
17. Arlinger S, Jerlvall L. Ahrcn T, Holmgren E: Slow evoked cortical responses to linear frequency ramps of a continuous pure tone. Acta Physiol Scand 1976;98:412-424.
18. Durrani JD: Audilorv-evokcd potentials to pattern-reversal stimulation. Audiology 1987:26:123-132.
19. Jcrgcr J. Jerger S: Evoked response to intensity and frequency change. Arch Otolaryngol 1970;91:433-436.
20. Maistc AC, Piclon T: Human auditory evoked potentials to frequency-modulated tones. Ear Hear 1989:10: 153-160.
21. McEvoy L. Picton T. Champagne S. Kellett A. Kelly A: Human evoked potentials to shifts in the lateralization of a noise. Audiology 1990:29: 163-180.
22. Spoor A. Timmcr F. Odenthal D: The evoked auditory response (EAR) to intensity modulated and frequency modulated tones and tone bursts, lilt Audiol 1969;8:410-415.
23. Naatancn R: The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav Brain Sci 1990: 13:201-288.
24. Naatancn R, Picton TW: The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987: 24:375-425.
25. Clvncs M: Dynamics of the vertex evoked potentials: the R-M brain function; in Donchin E. Lindslcy DB (cds): Averaged Evoked Potentials: Methods, Results and Evaluations NASA SP-191. Washington, Government Printing Office, 1969.
26. Picton TW. Hillvard SA. Krausz HI. Galambos R: Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components. Elcctroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1974:36:179-190.
27. Milner BA: Evaluation of auditory function by computer techniques. Int Audiol 1969;8:361-370.
28. Pantev C, Eulitz C, Hampson S, Ross B, Roberts L: The auditory evoked 'off response: Sources and comparison with the ‘on’ and the 'sustained' responses. Ear Hear 1996:17:255-265.
29. Hardin WB, Castellucci V: Analysis of somatosensory', auditory' and visual averaged transcortical and scalp responses in the monkey. Elcctroencephalogr Clin Ncurophysiol 1970: 28:488-498.
30. Creutzfeldl OD, Kuhnt U: The visual evoked potential: Physiological, developmental and clinical aspects: in Cobb W. Morocutti C (cds): The Evoked Potentials. Elcctroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1967;suppl 26.
31. Ponton C, Don M, Eggermont J, Waring M, Masuda A: Maturation of human cortical auditory function: Differences between normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 1996:17: 430-437.
32. Goff WR. Matsumiya Y. Allison T. Goff G: Cross-modality comparisons of averaged evoked potentials: in Donchin E. Lindslcy DB (cds): Averaged Evoked Potentials: Methods, Results and Evaluations. NASA SP-191. Washington, Government Printing Office. 1969.
33. Regan DM: Human Brain Elcctro-physiologv: Evoked Potentials and Evoked Magnetic Fields in Science and Medicine. New York. Elsevier. 1989.
34. Picton TW. Woods D. Stuss D. Campbell K: Methodology and meaning of human evoked potential scalp distribution studies; in Otto DA (ed): Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Event-Related Brain Potential Research. Washington, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1978.
35. Wood CC. Wolpaw J: Scalp distribution of human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evidence for overlapping sources and involvement of auditory cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982:54:25-38.
36. Schcrg M: Fundamentals of dipole source potential analysis; in Gran-dori F. Hoke M. Romani G (eds): Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials. Advances in Audiology. Basel. Karger. 1990. vol 6. pp 40-69.
37. Scherg M. von Cramon D: Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroencephalogr Clin Ncurophysiol 1985:62:32-44.
38. Scherg M. Vajsar J. Picton T: A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials. J Cogn Ncurosci 1989:1:336-355.
39. Scherg M. von Cramon D: Dipole source potentialsof the auditory cortex in normal subjects and in patients with temporal lobe lesions: in Grandori F. Hoke M. Romani G (eds): Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials. Advances in Audiology. Basel. Karger. 1990. vol 6. pp 165-193.
40. Elberling C, Bak C, Kofoed B, Lebcch J, Sacrmark K: Magnetic auditory responses from the human brain. Scand Audiol 1980;9:185-190.
41. Hari R. Aittoniemi K. Jarvinen M-L. Katila T. Varpula T: Auditorv-evoked transient and sustained magnetic fields of the human brain: Localization of neural generators. Exp Brain Res 1980:40:237-240.
42. Williamson SJ. Kaufman L: Theory of neuroelcctric and neuromagnetic fields: in Grandori F. Hoke M. Romani G (cds): Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials. Advances in Audiology. Basel. Karger. 1990. vol 6. pp 1-39.
43. Hari R: The neuromagnetic method in the study of the human auditory cortex: in Grandori F. Hoke M. Romani G (eds): Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials. Advances in Audiology. Basel, Karger. 1990, vol 6, pp 222-282.
44. Sayers BMcA, Beaglcy H, Henshall W: The mechanism of auditory evoked EEG responses. Nature 1974:247:481-483.
45. Jervis BW. Nichols M. Johnson T. Allen E. Hudson N: A fundamental investigation of the composition of auditory evoked potentials. IEEE Trans Biomcd Eng 1983:30:43-50.
46. McGillem CD, Aunon J, Yu K: Signals and noise in evoked brain potentials. IEEE Trans Biomcd Eng BME-32 1985:12:1012-1016.
47. Sayers BMcA, Beaglcy H, Ross A: Auditory evoked potentials of cortical origin: in Beagley HA (cd): Auditory Investigation: The Scientific and Technological Basis. Oxford. Clarendon Press. 1979.
48. Glaser EM. Ruchkin DS: Principles of Neurobiological Signal Analysis. New York, Academic Press. 1976.
49. Hyde ML: Signal processing and analysis: in Jacobson JT (cd): Principles and Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials. Needham Heights. Allvn and Bacon. 1994, pp 47-84.
50. Onishi S, Davis H: EtTects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 1968:44:582-591.
51. Rothman HII: Effects of high frequencies and intersubject variability on the auditory evoked cortical response. J Acoust Soc Am 1970:47: 569-573.
52. Beaglcy HA. Knight J: Changes in auditor’ evoked response with intensity. J Laryngol Otol 1967:81: 861-873.
53. Kaskey GB, Salzntan L., Klorman R, Pass H: Relationships between stimulus intensity and amplitude of visual and auditor event-related potentials. Biol Psychol 1980:10:115-125.
54. Moore EJ. Rose DE: Variability of latency and amplitude of acoustically evoked responses to pure tones of moderate to high intensity. Int Au-diol 1969:8:172-181.
55. Nelson DA. Lassman FM: Effect of intersignal interval on the human auditor evoked response. J Acoust Soc Am 1968:44:1529-1532.
56. Picton TW, Goodman WS, Bryce DP: Amplitude of evoked responses to tones of high intensity. Acta Otolaryngol (Slockh) 1970:70:77-82.
57. Adler G, Adlcr J:lnfluenceofstimulus intensity on AEP components in the 80-to 200-millisecond latency range. Audiology 1989:28:316-324.
58. McCandless GA. Best L: Summed evoked responses using pure tone stimuli. J Speech Hear Res 1966:9: 266-272.
59. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lutkenhoner B, Lehnertz K, Spittka J: Causes of differences in the input-output characteristics of simultaneously recorded auditory evoked magnetic fields and potentials. Audiology 1986:25:263-276.
60. Antinoro F. Skinner P. Jones J: Relation between sound intensity and amplitude of the auditory evoked response at different stimulus frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 1969:46: 1433-1436.
61. Evans TR. Dcatherage BH: The effect of frequency on the auditory evoked response. Psychonom Sci 1969:15:95-96.
62. Davis H: Slow cortical responses evoked by acoustic stimuli. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1965:59:179-185.
63. Keidel WD. Spreng M: Neurophysiological evidence for the Stevens Power function in man. J Acoust Soc Am 1965:38:191-195.
64. Davis H. Zerlin S: Acoustic relations of the human vertex potential. J Acoust Soc Am 1966:39:109-116.
65. Davis H, Mast T, Yoshic N, Zerlin S: The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: Recovery process. Electroencephalogr Clin Ncurophysiol 1966;21:105-113.
66. Fruhstorfer H. Sovcri P. Jarvilehto T: Short-term habituation of the auditory evoked response in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1970:28:153-161.
67. Ritter W. Vaughan H. Costa L: Orientingand habituation toaudito-ry stimuli: A study of short-term changes in average evoked responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Ncurophysiol 1968:25:550-556.
68. Wastell DG: Temporal uncertainty and the recovery function of the auditory EP: in Barber C (ed): Evoked Potentials. Baltimore. University Park Press. 1980, pp 491-498.
69. Bogacz J, Vanulli A, Garcia-Austt E: Evoked responses in man. IV. Effects of habituation and conditioning upon auditory evoked responses. Acta Neurol Latinam 1962:8:244-252.
70. Rothman H. Davis H. Hay I: Slow evoked cortical potentials and temporal features of stimulation. Elec-troenccphalogr Clin Ncurophysiol 1970:29:225-232.
71. Zerlin S. Davis H: The variability of single evoked vertex potentials in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neu-rophvsiol 1967;23:468-472.
72. Butler RA, Keidel W, Spreng M: An investigation of the human cortical evoked potential under conditions of monaural and binaural stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1969:68:317-326.
73. Altman JA. Vaitulevich SF: Auditory image movement in evoked potentials. Elcctrocnephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990:75:323-333.
74. Musiek FE. Verkest S. Gollcglv K: Effects of neuromaturation on audi-tory-evoked potentials. Semin Hear 1988;9:1-13.
75. Eggermont JJ: The onset and development of auditory function: Contributions of evoked potential studies. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 1989:13:5-27.
76. Eggermont J.I, Stein L (eds): Maturation of the auditory system. Ear Hear 1996:17:359-451.
77. Davis H. Onishi S: Maturation of auditory evoked potentials. Int Audiol 1969:8:24-33.
78. Courchesne E: Chronology of postnatal human brain development: Event-related potentials, positron emission tomography, myelogene-sis. and synaptogenesis studies: in Rohrbaugh J. Parasuraman R. Johnson R (eds): Event-Related Brain Potentials: Basic Issues and Applications. New York. Oxford University Press, pp 210-241.
79. Cscpe V: On the origin and development of the mismatch negativity. Ear Hear 1995:16:90-103.
80. Goodin D. Squires K. Henderson B. Starr A: Age-related variations in evoked potentials to auditory stimuli in normal human subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Ncurophysiol 1978:44:447-458.
81. Brent GA, Smith D, Michalewski H. Thompson L: Differences in the evoked potential in young and old subjects during habituation and dis-habiluation procedures. Psychophysiology 1976:14:96-97.
82. Picton TW, Hillyard S, Galambos R: Habituation and attention in the auditory system; in Keidel WD. Neff WD (eds): Clinical and Special Topics. Berlin, Springer. 1976. vol 3: Auditory System.
83. Picton TW. Hillyard S: Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Ncurophysiol 1974:36:191-199.
84. Woldorff M. Hillyard S: Modulation of early auditory processing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991:79:170-191.
85. Picton TW, Linden R, Hamel G, Maru J: Aspects of averaging. Semin Hear 1983;4:327-341.
86. Elberling C, Don M: Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1984:13: 187-197.
87. Don M, Elberling C, Waring M: Use of quantitative measures of auditory brainstem response peak amplitude and residual background noise in the decision to stop averaging. J AcoustSoeAm 1996;99:491-499.
88. Don M, Elberling C, Waring M: Objective detection of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand Au-diol 1984:13:219-228.
89. Mason SM, Su A, Hayes R: A simple online detector of auditory evoked cortical potentials. Med Biol Eng Comp 1977;15:641-647.
90. Hyde ML, Sininger Y, Don M: Objective detection and analysis of ABR: An historical perspective. Semin Hear, in press.
91. Hoth S: Computer-aided hearing threshold determination from cortical auditory evoked potentials. Scand Audio! 1983:22:165-177.
92. Widen J: Adding objectivity to infant behavioural audiometry'. Ear Hear 1993;14:49-57.
93. Salomon G: Electric response audiometry (ERA) based on rank correlation. Audiologv 1974:13:181-194.
94. Dobie RA: Objective response detection. Ear Hear 1993;14:31-35.
95. Grandori F, Hoke M, Romani GL (eds): Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials: in 1 loke M (ed): Advances in Audiology. Basel. Karger, 1990, vol 6.
96. Jacobson GP: Brain mapping of auditory evoked potentials: in Jacobson J (ed): Principles and Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials. Needham Heights. Allyn and Bacon. 1994. pp 517-540.
97. Pratt II. Martin WEI, Kamincr-Hazon M, Blcich N: Three-channel I.issajous’ trajectories of auditory brainstem potentials; in Grandori F. Hoke M. Romani Gl. (eds): Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials. Advances in Audiology'. Basel, Karger. 1990, vol 6. pp 331-356.
98. Butler RA: The effect of changes in stimulus frequency and intensity in habituation of the human vertex potential. J Acoust Soc Am 1968:44: 945-950.
99. McCandless GE, Rose DE: Evoked cortical response to stimulus change. J Speech Hear Res 1970; 13:624-634.
100. Ungan P. Erar H. Ozturk N. Oz-men B: Human long-latency potentials evoked by monaural interruptions of a binaural click train: Connection to sound lateralization based on intcraural intensity differences. Audiology 1992:31:318-333.
101. Kevanishvili Z. Lagidze Z: Masking level difference: An electro-physiological approach. Scand Au-diol 1987:16:3-11.
102. Fowler CG, Mikami C: The effects of noise bandwidth on the late-potential masking level difference. Electrocncephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992:84:157-163.
103. Halliday R. Callaway E: Time shift evoked potentials (TSEPs): Methods and basic results. Electrocncephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978; 45:118-121.
104. Jones SJ: AEPs at the onset and offset of repetitive sound modulation. due to mismatch with the contents of an auditory' sensory store. Electrocncephalogr Clin Neurophysio! 1992;84:149-156.
105. Picton TW: Clinical usefulness of auditory evoked potentials: A critical evaluation. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 1991:15:3:3-18.
106. Picton TW: The neurophysiological evaluation of auditory discrimination. Ear Hear 1995:16:1-5.
107. Naatancn R: The mismatch negativity: A powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience. Ear Hear 1995; 16:6-18.
108. Sams M, Paavilainen P, Alho K, Naatanen R: Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electrocncephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985:62:437-448.
109. Lang AH, Eerola O, Korpilahti P. Holopainen I, Salo S. Aaltonen O: Practical issues in the clinical application of mismatch negativity. Ear Hear 1995:16:117-129.
110. Hyde ML. Davidson MJ. Alberti P: Auditory test strategy: in Jacobson JT, Northern JL (eds): Diagnostic Audiology. Austin. Pro-ed. 1991. pp 295-322.
111. Squires KC. Hecox KE: Electro-physiological evaluation of higher level auditory processing. Semin Hear 1983:4:4:415-432.
112. Kilcny P: Middle latency (MLR) and late vertex auditory evoked responses (LVAER) in central auditory dysfunction: in Pinheiro ML. Musick FE (eds): Assessment of Central Auditory Dysfunction. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins. 1985. pp 87-102.
113. Kurtzberg D: Cortical event-related potential assessment of auditory system function: in Gravel JS (ed): Assessing Auditory System Integrity in High-Risk Infants and Young Children. Semin Hear 1989:10:252-261.
114. Gravel J. Kurtzberg D. Stapells D. Vaughan H. Wallace I: Case studies: in Gravel JS (ed): Assessing Auditory System Integrity in High-Risk Infants and Young Children. Semin Hear 1989;10:272-287.
115. Stapells DR. Kurtzberg D: Evoked potential assessment of auditory system integrity in infants. Clin Perinatol 1991:18:497-518.
116. Jirsa RE. Clontz KB: Long latency auditors' event-related potentials from children with auditory processing disorders. Ear Hear 1990: 11:222-232.
117. Tonnquisl-Uhlcn I: Topography of auditory evoked cortical potentials in children with severe language impairment. Scand Audiol 1996: 25:(suppl 44).
118. Tonnquist-Uhlen I: Topography of evoked long-latency potentials in children with severe language impairment: The P2 and N2 components. Ear Hear 1996:17:314-326.
119. Knight RT, Hillyard S, Woods D, Neville H: The effects of frontal and temporal-parietal lesions on the auditors' evoked potential in man. Electrocncephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980:50:112-124.
120. Goodin D. Aminoff M: Electro-physiological differences between sub-types of dementia. Brain 1986: 109:1103-1113.
121. 1 evoked potential latency and amplitude topology. Ear Hear 1989:10:144-152.
122. Peronnet F. Michel F: The asymmetry of the auditory' evoked potentials in normal man and in patients with brain lesions: in Barber C (cd): Evoked Potentials. Baltimore. University Park Press. 1977. pp 317-324.
123. Woods D, Clayworth C, Knight L, Simpson G, Nacser M: Generators of middle-and long-latency auditory evoked potentials: Implications from studies of patients with bitemporal lesions. Electroenceph-alogr Clin Ncurophvsiol 1987:68: 132-148.
124. Kraus N, Ozdamar O, Hicr D, Stein L: Auditory middle latency responses (MLRs) in patients with cortical lesions. Elcctroenccpha-logr Clin Neurophysiol 1982:54: 275-287.
125. Kileny P, Pacciorctti D, Wilson A: Effects of cortical lesions on middle-latency evoked responses (MLR). Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987:66:108-120.
126. Neiman J, Noldy N, El-Ncsr B. McDonough M. Carlen P: Late auditory evoked potentials in alcoholics: Identifying those with a history of epileptic seizures during withdrawal. Ann NY Acad Sci 1991:620:73-81.
127. Attias J, Furman V. Shemesh Z, Bresloff I: Impaired brain processing in noise-induced tinnitus patients as measured by auditory and visual event-related potentials. Ear Hear 1996:17:327-333.
128. Ponton C: Possible application of functional imaging of the human auditory system in the study of acclimatization and late onset deprivation. Ear Hear 1996;17:78S-86S.
129. Ponton C. Don M: The mismatch negativity in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1995;16:130-143.
130. Hall JW., III: Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Needham Heights, Allyn and Bacon. 1992.