A partitioned and asynchronous cellular automata model for urban growth simulation

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 637-659

  Ke, Xinli ^a   Qi, Lingyun ^a   Zeng, Chen ^a  

^a HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

cellular automata; evolving rate; transition rule; Urban growth simulation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ALGORITHM; CELLULAR AUTOMATON; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; URBAN GROWTH;

CHINA; HUBEI; WUHAN;

EID: 84955718497     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2015.1084510     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. E.Akkaş,, et al., 2015. Application of decision tree algorithm for classification and identification of natural minerals using SEM-EDS. Computers & Geosciences, 80, 38–48. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2015.03.015
2. C.M.Almeida,, et al., 2008. Using neural networks and cellular automata for modelling intra-urban land-use dynamics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22, 943–963. doi:10.1080/13658810701731168
3. S.Angel,, et al., 2011. The dimensions of global urban expansion: estimates and projections for all countries, 2000–2050. Progress in Planning, 75, 53–107. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2011.04.001
4. J.J.Arsanjani,, et al., 2013. Integration of logistic regression, Markov chain and cellular automata models to simulate urban expansion. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 21, 265–275. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2011.12.014
5. J.F.Bárcena,, et al., 2015. Selecting model scenarios of real hydrodynamic forcings on mesotidal and macrotidal estuaries influenced by river discharges using K-means clustering. Environmental Modelling & Software, 68 (2015), 70–82. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.02.007
6. J.I.Barredo,, et al., 2004. Modelling future urban scenarios in developing countries: an application case study in Lagos, Nigeria. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31 (1), 65–84. doi:10.1068/b29103
7. M.Cao,, et al., 2015. A new discovery of transition rules for cellular automata by using cuckoo search algorithm. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29 (5), 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.033
8. M.Cao,, et al., 2013. A cellular automata model for simulating the evolution of positive–negative terrains in a small loess watershed. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (7), 1349–1363. doi:10.1080/13658816.2012.756882
9. K.R.Dahal, and T.E.Chow,, 2014. An agent-integrated irregular automata model of urban land-use dynamics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28 (11), 2281–2303. doi:10.1080/13658816.2014.917646
10. K.R.Dahal, and T.E.Chow,, 2015. Characterization of neighborhood sensitivity of an irregular cellular automata model of urban growth. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29 (3), 1–23.
11. Y.Feng, and Y.Liu,, 2013. A heuristic cellular automata approach for modelling urban land-use change based on simulated annealing. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (3), 449–466. doi:10.1080/13658816.2012.695377
12. M.A.Friedl, and C.E.Brodley,, 1997. Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 61, 399–409. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00049-7
13. A.M.García,, et al., 2013. Calibration of an urban cellular automaton model by using statistical techniques and a genetic algorithm. Application to a small urban settlement of NW Spain. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (8), 1593–1611. doi:10.1080/13658816.2012.762454
14. B.Huang,, et al., 2009. Land-use-change modeling using unbalanced support-vector machines. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36, 398–416. doi:10.1068/b33047
15. M.Kasanko,, et al., 2006. Are European cities becoming dispersed? A comparative analysis of 15 European urban areas. Landscape andUrban Planning, 77 (1–2), 111–130. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.003
16. X.Li,, et al., 2013. Knowledge transfer and adaptation for land-use simulation with a logistic cellular automaton. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (10), 1829–1848. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.825264
17. X.Li, and A.G.Yeh,, 2004. Data mining of cellular automata’s transition rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18 (8), 723–744. doi:10.1080/13658810410001705325
18. X.Li, and A.G.O.Yeh,, 2002. Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16, 323–343. doi:10.1080/13658810210137004
19. X.Li,, et al., 2012. Assimilating process context information of cellular automata into change detection for monitoring land use changes. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (9), 1667–1687. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.643803
20. J.Liao,, et al., 2014. A neighbor decay cellular automata approach for simulating urban expansion based on particle swarm intelligence. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28 (4), 720–738. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.869820
21. J.Liu,, M.Liu,, and D.Zhuang,, 2010a. Spatial pattern analysis of China’s recent land-use change. Chinese Science, 32, 1031–1040.
22. J.Liu,, et al., 2010b. Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in China during the early 21st century. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20 (4), 483–494. doi:10.1007/s11442-010-0483-4
23. X.Liu,, et al., 2008. Simulating complex urban development using kernel-based non-linear cellular automata. Ecological Modelling, 211, 169–181. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.08.024
24. X.Liu,, et al., 2014. Simulating urban growth by integrating landscape expansion index (LEI) and cellular automata. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28 (1), 148–163. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.831097
25. Y.Liu,, 2012. Modelling sustainable urban growth in a rapidly urbanising region using a fuzzy-constrained cellular automata approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (1), 151–167. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.577434
26. H.S.Moghadam, and M.Helbich,, 2013. Spatiotemporal urbanization processes in the megacity of Mumbai, India: A Markov chains-cellular automata urban growth model. Applied Geography, 40, 140–149. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.01.009
27. D.R.Nayak,, S.K.Sahu,, and J.Mohammed,, 2013. A cellular automata based optimal edge detection technique using twenty-five neighborhood model. International Journal of Computer Applications, 84 (10), 27–33.
28. K.Perzy,, M.Sitko,, and Ł.Madej,, 2014. Numerical modelling of fracture based on coupled cellular automata finite element approach. In: J. Was, G. C. Sirakoulis, and S. Bandini, eds. Cellular automata. Krakow: Springer, 156–165.
29. G.R.Pontius,, et al., 2008. Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. The Annals of Regional Science, 42 (1), 11–37. doi:10.1007/s00168-007-0138-2
30. K.C.Seto,, et al., 2011. A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLos ONE, 6, e23777. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023777.
31. K.C.Seto,, B.Guneralp,, and L.R.Hutyra,, 2012. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109 (40), 16083–16088. doi:10.1073/pnas.1211658109
32. W.R.Tobler,, 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240. doi:10.2307/143141
33. UN. 2012. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2011 Revision Highlights. New York, NY: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division. (http://esa.un.org/unup/pdf/WUP2011_Highlights.pdf).
34. J.Van Vliet,, et al., 2013. Measuring the neighbourhood effect to calibrate land use models. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 41, 55–64. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.03.006
35. J.Van Vliet,, R.White,, and S.Dragicevic,, 2009. Modelling urban growth using a variable grid cellular automaton. Computer Environment and Urban Systems, 33 (1), 3–43.
36. H.Visser, and T.De Nijs,, 2006. The map comparison kit. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21, 346–358. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.11.013
37. R.White,, I.Uljee,, and G.Engelen,, 2012. Integrated modelling of population, employment and land-use change with a multiple activity-based variable grid cellular automaton. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (7), 1251–1280. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.635146
38. J.Wu,, et al., 2011. Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization: the case of the two fastest growing metropolitan regions in the United States. Ecological Complexity, 8 (1), 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.03.002
39. J.Yang,, et al., 2013. An intelligent method to discover transition rules for cellular automata using bee colony optimisation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (10), 1849–1864. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.823498
40. Q.S.Yang,, X.Li,, and X.Shi,, 2008. Cellular automata for simulating land use changes based on support vector machines. Computers & Geosciences, 34, 592–602. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2007.08.003