An agent-integrated irregular automata model of urban land-use dynamics

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 28, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2281-2303

  Dahal, Khila R ^a   Chow, T Edwin ^a  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

agent based modeling; cellular automata; geographic information system (GIS); urban growth; vector data model

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR AUTOMATON; GIS; LAND USE; MODELING; URBAN GROWTH; URBANIZATION;

TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84912564164     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2014.917646     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Augustijn-Beckers, E., Flacke, J., and Retsios, B., 2011. Simulating informal settlement growth in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: an agent-based housing model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35 (2), 93–103. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.01.001
2. Barredo, J.I., Kasanko, M., McCormick, N., and Lavalle, C., 2003. Modeling dynamic spatial processes: simulation of urban future scenarios through cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(3), 145–160.
3. Batty, M., 2005. Cities and complexity: understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. London: The MIT Press.
4. Benenson, I. and Torrens, P.M., 2004. Geosimulation: automata-based modeling of urban phenomena. London: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Blair, J. and Premus, R., 1987. Major factors in industrial location: a review. Economic Development Quarterly, 1 (1), 72–85. doi:10.1177/089124248700100109
6. Brown, D., et al., 2008. Exurbia from the bottom-up: confronting empirical challenges to characterizing a complex system. Geoforum, 39 (2), 805–818. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.02.010
7. Brown, D.G., 2006. Agent-based models. In: H. Geist, ed. The earth’s changing land: an encyclopedia of land-use and land-cover change. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, 7–13.
8. Castle, C. and Crooks, A.T., 2006. Principles and concepts of agent-based modeling for developing geospatial simulations. Working Papers Series, 110, UCL Center for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, London.
9. Congalton, R. and Green, K., 2009. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
10. Couclelis, H., 1997. From cellular automata to urban models: new principles for model development and implementation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 165–174. doi:10.1068/b240165
11. Crooks, A., 2010. Constructing and implementing an agent-based model of residential segregation through vector GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (5), 661–675. doi:10.1080/13658810903569572
12. Dahal, K.R. and Chow, T.E., 2014. A GIS toolset for automated partitioning of urban lands. Environmental Modelling & Software, 55, 222–234. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.01.024
13. Flache, A. and Hegselmann, R., 2001. Do irregular grids make a difference? Relaxing the spatial regularity assumption in cellular models of social dynamics. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4 (4). Available from: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/4/4/6.html [Accessed 10 July 2013].
14. Itami, R., 1994. Simulating spatial dynamics: cellular automata theory. Landscape and Urban Planning, 30, 27–47. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(94)90065-5
15. Jjumba, A. and Dragićević, S., 2012. High resolution urban land-use change modeling: agent iCity approach. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 5 (4), 291–315. doi:10.1007/s12061-011-9071-y
16. Kaplan, D., Wheeler, J., and Holloway, S., 2008. Urban geography. York, PA: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Kocabas, V. and Dragicevic, S., 2009. Agent-based model validation using Bayesian networks and vector spatial data. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36 (5), 787–801. doi:10.1068/b34143t
18. Kone, D., 2006. Land development. Washington, DC: BuilderBooks, National Association of Home Builders.
19. Levinson, D. and Krizek, K., 2008. Planning for place and plexus: metropolitan land use and transport. New York: Routledge.
20. Li, X. and Liu, X., 2007. Defining agents’ behaviors to simulate complex residential development using multi-criteria evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management, 85 (4), 1063–1075. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.006
21. Moreno, N., Wang, F., and Marceau, D., 2009. Implementation of a dynamic neighborhood in a land-use vector-based cellular automata model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33 (1), 44–54. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.09.008
22. O’Sullivan, D., 2001. Exploring spatial process dynamics using irregular cellular automaton models. Geographical Analysis, 33 (1), 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2001.tb00433.x
23. O’Sullivan, D. and Torrens, P., 2000. Cellular models of urban systems. Working Papers Series, 22, UCL Center for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, London.
24. Pacione, M., 2005. Urban geography: a global perspective. London: Routledge.
25. Parker, D.C., et al., 2003. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93 (2), 314–337. doi:10.1111/1467-8306.9302004
26. Shi, W. and Pang, M., 2000. Development of Voronoi-based cellular automata—an integrated dynamic model for geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (5), 455–474. doi:10.1080/13658810050057597
27. Stevens, D. and Dragićević, S., 2007. A GIS-based irregular cellular automata model of land-use change. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34 (4), 708–724. doi:10.1068/b32098
28. Stevens, D., Dragicevic, S., and Rothley, K., 2007. Icity: a GIS–CA modelling tool for urban planning and decision making. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22 (6), 761–773.
29. Torrens, P.M. and Nara, A., 2007. Modeling gentrification dynamics: A hybrid approach. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 31 (3), 337–361. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2006.07.004
30. US Census (United States Census Bureau), 2000. Census 2000 summary file1 (SF-1). Census 2000 Gateway. Available from: http://www.census.gov/census2000/sumfile1.html [Accessed July 2012].
31. US Census (United States Census Bureau), 2012. State and county quickfacts: data derived from population estimates, American community survey, census of population and housing, county business patterns, economic census, survey of business owners, building permits, census of governments. Available from: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/48/4865600.html [Accessed July 2012].
32. Vanegas, C., et al., 2009a. Visualization of simulated urban spaces: inferring parameterized generation of streets, parcels, and aerial imagery. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15 (3), 424–435. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2008.193
33. Vanegas, C., et al., 2009b. Interactive design of urban spaces using geometrical and behavioral modeling. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 28, 1–111. doi:10.1145/1618452.1618457
34. Vaughan, J., 2008. Growth and change in a paradigmatic region: is it sustainable? Does planning make a difference? Dissertation (PhD). Texas State University, San Marcos.
35. Vliet, J., White, R., and Dragicevic, S., 2009. Modeling urban growth using a variable grid cellular automaton. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33 (1), 35–43. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.06.006
36. Waddell, P., et al., 2010. Micro-simulating parcel-level land use and activity-based travel: development of a prototype application in San Francisco. The Journal of Transport and Land Use, 3 (2), 65–84. doi:10.5198/jtlu.v3i2.124
37. White, R. and Engelen, G., 2000. High-resolution integrated modelling of the spatial dynamics of urban and regional systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24 (5), 383–400. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00012-0
38. Wu, F., 1998. Simland: a prototype to simulate land conversion through the integrated GIS and CA with AHP-derived transition rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12 (1), 63–82. doi:10.1080/136588198242012
39. Zellner, M., et al., 2009. The emergence of zoning policy games in exurban jurisdictions: informing collective action theory. Land Use Policy, 26 (2), 356–367. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.04.004