Measuring the neighbourhood effect to calibrate land use models

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 41, Issue , 2013, Pages 55-64

  van Vliet, Jasper ^a,b   Naus, Nick ^c   van Lammeren, Ron J A ^c   Bregt, Arnold K ^c   Hurkens, Jelle ^b   van Delden, Hedwig ^b  

^a Research Institute for Knowledge Systems Bv   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Calibration; Constrained cellular automata; Enrichment factors; Land use change; Neighbourhood rules

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION PERIODS; ENRICHMENT FACTORS; LAND-USE CHANGE; NEIGHBOURHOOD; PATTERN ACCURACY; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT; URBAN LAND-USE CHANGE; VALIDATION PERIODS;

CALIBRATION; CELLULAR AUTOMATA;

LAND USE;

CALIBRATION; CELLULAR AUTOMATON; LAND USE CHANGE; NEIGHBORHOOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; URBAN AREA;

GERMANY;

EID: 84877908142     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alonso W. Location and land use 1964, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
2. Anas A., Arnott R., Small K.A. Urban spatial structure. Journal of Economic Literature 1998, 36:1426-1464.
3. Arai T., Akiyama T. Empirical analysis for estimating land use transition potential functions - Case study in the Tokyo metropolitan region. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 2004, 28:65-84.
4. Batty M., Torrens P.M. Modeling and prediction in a complex world. Futures 2005, 37:745-766.
5. Brown D.G., Page S., Riolo R., Zellner M., Rand W. Path dependence and the validation of agent based spatial models of land use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2005, 19(2):153-174.
6. Chen Y. Derivation of the functional relations between fractal dimension of and shape index of urban form. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2011, 35:442-451.
7. De Nijs A.C.M., Pebesma E.J. Estimating the influence of the neighborhood in the development of residential areas in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B 2010, 37:21-41.
8. Geertman S., Hagoort M., Ottens H. Spatial-temporal specific neighborhood rules for cellular automata land use modeling. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2007, 21(5):547-568.
9. Haase D., Seppelt R., Haase A. Land use impacts of demographic change - Lessons from eastern German urban regions. Use of landscape sciences for the assessment of environmental security 2008, 329-344. Springer, 2007. I. Petrosillo, F. Müller, K.B. Jones, G. Zurlini, K. Krauze, S. Victorov, B.L. Li, W.G. Kepner (Eds.).
10. Hagoort M., Geertman S., Ottens H. Spatial externalities, neighborhood rules and CA land use modeling. Annals of Regional Science 2008, 42:39-56.
11. Haines-Young, R., & Weber, J. L. (2006). Land accounts for Europe 1990-2000. EEA report 11/2006. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
12. Hansen H.S. Empirically derived neighborhood rules for urban land use modeling. Environment and Planning B 2012, 39(2):213-228.
13. Hansen H.S. An adaptive land use simulation model for integrated coastal zone planning. The European information society: Leading the way with geo-information 2007, 35-53. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. S.I. Fabrikant, M. Wachowicz (Eds.).
14. Huang J., Lu X.X., Sellers J.M. A global comparative analysis of urban form: Applying spatial metrics and remote sensing. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 82:182-197.
15. Irwin E.G., Bockstael N.E. Interacting agents, spatial externalities and the evolution of residential land use patterns. Journal of Economic Geography 2002, 2:31-54.
16. Jenerette G.D., Wu J. Analysis and simulation of land use change in the central Arizona - Phoenix region, USA. Landscape Ecology 2001, 16(7):611-626.
17. Li X., Yeh A.G. Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2002, 16(4):323-343.
18. Li X., Yeh A.G.O. Data mining of cellular automata's transition rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2004, 18(8):723-744.
19. Manson S.M. Challenges in evaluating models of geographic complexity. Environment and Planning B 2007, 34:245-260.
20. McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. A., Neel, M. C., & Ene, E. (2002). FRAGSTATS v3: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
21. Poelmans L., van Rompay A. Complexity and performance of urban expansion models. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2010, 34(1):17-27.
22. Pontius R.G., Shusas E., McEachren M. Detecting important categorical land changes while accounting for persistence. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2004, 101:251-268.
23. Rutherford G.N., Bebi P., Edwards P.J., Zimmerman N. Assessing land use statistics to model land cover change in a mountainous landscape in the European Alps. Ecological Modelling 2008, 212(3-4):460-471.
24. Schwarz N. Urban form revisited - Selecting indicators for characterising European cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 2010, 96:29-47.
25. Straatman B., White R., Engelen G. Towards an automatic calibration procedure for constrained cellular automata. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2004, 28:149-170.
26. Tobler W. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 1970, 46(2):234-240.
27. Torrens P.M. Calibrating and validating cellular automata models of urbanization. Urban remote sensing: Monitoring, synthesis and modeling in the urban environment 2011, 335-345. John Wiley & sons, Chichester. Y. Xiaojun (Ed.).
28. Van Delden, H., & Hurkens, J. (2011). A generic integrated spatial decision support system for urban and regional planning. In Chan, F., Marinova, D., & Anderssen, R. S. (Eds.), MODSIM2011, 19th International congress on modelling and simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand (pp. 127-139), December 2011.
29. Van Delden H., Stuczynski T., Ciaian P., Paracchini M.L., Hurkens J., Lopatka A., et al. Integrated assessment of agricultural policies with dynamic land use change modelling. Ecological Modelling 2010, 221(18):2153-2166.
30. Van Delden H., van Vliet J., Ruthledge D.T., Kirkby M.J. Comparison of scale and scaling issues in integrated land use models for policy support. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2011, 142:18-28.
31. Van Vliet J., Bregt A.K., Hagen-Zanker A. Revisiting Kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land use change models. Ecological Modelling 2011, 222(8):1367-1375.
32. Van Vliet J., White R., Dragicevic S. Modelling urban growth in a variable grid cellular automaton. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2009, 33(1):35-43.
33. Verburg P.H., de Nijs A.C.M., van Ritsema Eck J.R., Visser H., de Jong K. A method to analyse neighbourhood characteristics of land use patterns. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 2004, 28(6):667-690.
34. Verburg P.H., Overmars K.P. Combining top-down and bottom-up dynamics in land use modeling: Exploring the future of abandoned farmlands in Europe with the Dyna-CLUE model. Landscape Ecology 2009, 24:1167-1181.
35. Verburg P.H., Ritsema van Eck J.R., de Nijs A.C.M., Dijst M.J., Schot P. Determinants of land use change patterns in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B 2004, 31:125-150.
36. Von Thünen, J. H. (1826). Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung der Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie. In Hall, P. (Ed.), English translation: Von Thünen's Isolated State. Pergamon, Oxford.
37. Wang F., Hasbani J.-G., Wang X., Marceau D. Identifying dominant factors for the calibration of a land use cellular automata model using Rough Set Theory. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2011, 35(2):116-125.
38. White, R., & Engelen, G. (2003). A calibration procedure for constrained large neigh-bourhood cellular automata based land use models. In Paper presented at the 13th European colloquium on theoretical and quantitative geography, Lucca, Italy.
39. White R., Engelen G., Uljee I. The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modeling of urban land use dynamics. Environment and Planning B 1997, 24:323-343.
40. Zhang Q., Ban Y., Liu J., Hu Y. Simulating and analysis of urban growth scenarios of the Greater Shanghai Area, China. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2011, 35(2):126-139.