Characterization of neighborhood sensitivity of an irregular cellular automata model of urban growth

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 475-497

  Dahal, Khila R ^a   Chow, T Edwin ^a  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cellular automata; geocomputation; geographic information systems; geosimulation; urban applications

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR AUTOMATON; GIS; MODELING; NEIGHBORHOOD; RASTER; URBAN AREA; URBAN GROWTH;

TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84929842410     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2014.987779     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. F.Aguilera,, L.Valenzuela,, and A.Botequilha-Leitão,, 2011. Landscape metrics in the analysis of urban land use patterns: a case study in a Spanish metropolitan area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99 (3–4), 226–238. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.10.004
2. K.Al-Ahmadia,, et al., 2009. Calibration of a fuzzy cellular automata model of urban dynamics in Saudi Arabia. Ecological Complexity, 6 (2), 80–101. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2008.09.004
3. J.M.Baetens, and B.De Baets,, 2011. On the topological sensitivity of cellular automata. Chaos, 21, 023108. doi:10.1063/1.3535581
4. J.M.Baetens, and B.De Baets,, 2012. Cellular automata on irregular tessellations. Dynamical Systems, 27 (4), 411–430. doi:10.1080/14689367.2012.711300
5. J.M.Baetens, and B.De Baets,, 2013. Topology-induced phase transitions in totalistic cellular automata. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 249, 16–24. doi:10.1016/j.physd.2013.01.004
6. J.M.Baetens,, K.De Loof,, and B.De Baets,, 2013. Influence of the topology of a cellular automaton on its dynamical properties. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulations, 18 (3), 651–668. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.08.018
7. J.M.Baetens,, P.Van Derweeën,, and B.De Baets,, 2012. Effect of asynchronous updating on the stability of cellular automata. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 45 (4), 383–394. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2012.01.002
8. F.Ballestores, and Z.Qui,, 2012. An integrated parcel-based land use change model using cellular automata and decision tree. Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2 (2), 53–69.
9. J.I.Barredo,, et al., 2003. Modelling dynamic spatial processes: simulation of urban future scenarios through cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64 (3), 145–160. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00218-9
10. M.Batty,, 1997. Cellular automata and urban form: a primer. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63 (2), 266–274. doi:10.1080/01944369708975918
11. I.Benenson,, I.Omer,, and E.Hatna,, 2002. Entity-based modeling of urban residential dynamics: the case of Yaffo, Tel Aviv. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29 (4), 491–512. doi:10.1068/b1287
12. I.Benenson, and P.M.Torrens,, 2004. Geosimulation: automata-based modeling of urban phenomena. London: John Wiley & Sons.
13. S.Berling-Wolf, and J.Wu,, 2004. Modeling urban landscape dynamics: a case study in Phoenix, USA. Urban Ecosystems, 7, 215–240. doi:10.1023/B:UECO.0000044037.23965.45
14. E.W.Burgess,, 1925. The growth of city: an introduction to a research project. In: R.Park, E.Burgess, and R.McKenzie, eds. The city. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 47–62.
15. K.C.Clarke,, S.Hoppen,, and L.J.Gaydos,, 1997. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco bay area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24 (2), 247–261. doi:10.1068/b240247
16. R.Congalton, and K.Green,, 2009. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
17. A.Crooks,, 2010. Constructing and implementing an agent-based model of residential segregation through vector GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (5), 661–675. doi:10.1080/13658810903569572
18. K.Dahal, and T.Chow,, 2014a. A GIS toolset for automated partitioning of urban lands. Environmental Modelling & Software, 55, 222–234. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.01.024
19. K.R.Dahal, and T.E.Chow,, 2014b. An agent-integrated irregular automata model of urban land use dynamics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. doi:10.1080/13658816.2014.917646
20. C.Dietzel,, et al., 2005. Spatio-temporal dynamics in California’s Central Valley: empirical links to urban theory. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19 (2), 175–195. doi:10.1080/13658810410001713407
21. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). (2014) ArcGIS help 10.1: spatial autocorrelation (Global Moran’s I – Spatial statistics) [online]. Available from: http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.1/index.html#//005p0000000n000000 [Accessed 25Sep 2014].
22. A.García,, et al., 2011. An analysis of the effect of the stochastic component of urban cellular automata models. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35 (4), 289–296. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.11.001
23. M.Herold,, J.Scepan,, and K.C.Clarke,, 2002. The use of remote sensing and landscape metrics to describe structures and changes in urban land uses. Environment andPlanning A, 34, 1443–1458. doi:10.1068/a3496
24. C.Jantz, and S.Goetz,, 2005. Analysis of scale dependencies in an urban land-use-change model. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19 (2), 217–241. doi:10.1080/13658810410001713425
25. A.Jjumba, and S.Dragićević,, 2012. High resolution urban land-use change modeling: agent iCity approach. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 5 (4), 291–315. doi:10.1007/s12061-011-9071-y
26. J.H.Kim,, 2013. Spatiotemporal scale dependency and other sensitivities in dynamic land-use change simulations. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (9), 1782–1803. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.787145
27. V.Kocabas, and S.Dragicevic,, 2006. Assessing cellular automata model behaviour using a sensitivity analysis approach. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30 (6), 921–953. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2006.01.001
28. C.Li,, J.Li,, and J.Wu,, 2013. Quantifying the speed, growth modes, and landscape pattern changes of urbanization: a hierarchical patch dynamics approach. Landscape Ecology, 28, 1875–1888. doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9933-6
29. X.Li, and X.Liu,, 2006. An extended cellular automaton using case-based reasoning for simulating urban development in a large complex region. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20, 1109–1136. doi:10.1080/13658810600816870
30. X.Li, and X.Liu,, 2007. Defining agents’ behaviors to simulate complex residential development using multi-criteria evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management, 85 (4), 1063–1075. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.006
31. K.McGarigal,, et al., 2002. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Version 3 (v3). 1st ed. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
32. A.Ménard, and D.Marceau,, 2005. Exploration of spatial scale sensitivity in geographic cellular automata. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32 (5), 693–714. doi:10.1068/b31163
33. N.Moreno,, 2008. A vector-based geographical cellular automata model to mitigate scale sensitivity and to allow objects’ geometric transformation. Dissertation (PhD). Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, AB.
34. N.Moreno,, A.Ménard,, and D.Marceau,, 2008. VecGCA: a vector-based geographic cellular automata model allowing geometric transformations of objects. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35 (4), 647–665. doi:10.1068/b33093
35. N.Moreno,, F.Wang,, and D.Marceau,, 2009. Implementation of a dynamic neighborhood in a land-use vector-based cellular automata model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33 (1), 44–54. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.09.008
36. D.O’Sullivan,, 2001. Exploring spatial process dynamics using irregular cellular automaton models. Geographical Analysis, 33 (1), 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2001.tb00433.x
37. D.O’Sullivan, and P.Torrens,, 2000. Cellular models of urban systems. Working Papers Series, 22. London: UCL Center for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London.
38. M.Pacione,, 2005. Urban geography: a global perspective. London: Rutledge.
39. Y.Pan,, et al., 2010. The impact of variation in scale on the behavior of a cellular automata used for land use change modeling. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34 (5), 400–408. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.03.003
40. N.Samat,, 2006. Characterizing the scale sensitivity of the cellular automata simulated urban growth: a case study of the Seberang Perai Region, Penang State, Malaysia. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30 (6), 905–920. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2005.11.002
41. K.Seto, and M.Fragkias,, 2005. Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urban land-use change in four cities of China with time series landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology, 20 (7), 871–888. doi:10.1007/s10980-005-5238-8
42. W.Shi, and M.Pang,, 2000. Development of Voronoi-based cellular automata – an integrated dynamic model for geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (5), 455–474. doi:10.1080/13658810050057597
43. D.Stevens, and S.Dragićević,, 2007. A GIS-based irregular cellular automata model of land-use change. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34 (4), 708–724. doi:10.1068/b32098
44. G.Tian,, et al., 2011. Simulating spatiotemporal dynamics of urbanization with multi-agent systems – a case study of Phoenix metropolitan region, USA. Ecology and Society, 222 (5), 1129–1138.
45. United Nations (UN). 2005. World urbanization prospects: the 2005 revision. New York: Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, UN.
46. J.Von Neumann,, 1963. The general and logical theory of automata. In: A.H.Taub, ed. Collected work 5. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 288–328.
47. F.Wang,, et al., 2011. Identifying dominant factors for the calibration of a land-use cellular automata model using Rough Set Theory. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35 (2), 116–125. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.10.003
48. R.White, and G.Engelen,, 2000. High-resolution integrated modelling of the spatial dynamics of urban and regional systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24 (5), 383–400. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00012-0
49. R.White,, G.Engelen,, and I.Uljee,, 1997. The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24 (3), 323–343. doi:10.1068/b240323
50. S.Wolfram,, 1984. Cellular automata as models of complexity. Nature, 311 (5985), 419–424. doi:10.1038/311419a0
51. J.Wu,, et al., 2011. Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization: the case of the two fastest growing metropolitan regions in the United States. Ecological Complexity, 8 (1), 1–8.
52. C.Xu,, et al., 2007. The spatiotemporal dynamics of rapid urban growth in the Nanjing metropolitan region of China. Landscape Ecology, 22 (6), 925–937. doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9079-5
53. A.G.-O.Yeh, and X.Li,, 2003. Simulation of development alternatives using neural networks, cellular automata, and GIS for urban planning. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69 (9), 1043–1052. doi:10.14358/PERS.69.9.1043