Spatiotemporal urbanization processes in the megacity of Mumbai, India: A Markov chains-cellular automata urban growth model

Applied Geography

Volumn 40, Issue , 2013, Pages 140-149

  Shafizadeh Moghadam, Hossein ^a,b   Helbich, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cellular automata; Markov chain; Multi criteria evaluation; Mumbai (India); Urban growth

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR AUTOMATON; GROWTH RATE; MARKOV CHAIN; MEGACITY; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH; URBANIZATION;

INDIA; MAHARASHTRA; MUMBAI;

EID: 84875577395     PISSN: 01436228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.01.009     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Araya Y.H., Cabral P. Analysis and modelling of urban land cover change in Setúbal and Sesimbra, Portugal. Remote Sensing 2010, 2:1549-1563.
2. Bagan H., Yamagata Y. Landsat analysis of urban growth: how Tokyo became the world's largest megacity during the last 40 years. Remote Sensing of Environment 2012, 127:210-222.
3. Basawaraja R., Chari K.B., Mise S.R., Chetti S.B. Analysis of the impact of urban sprawl in altering the land-use, land-cover pattern of Raichur City, India, using geospatial technologies. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning 2011, 4:455-462.
4. Batty M. Cities and complexity: Understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge.
5. Bhagat R.B. Emerging pattern of Urbanization in India. Economic & Political Weekly 2011, 46:10-13.
6. Bhata B. Analysis of urban growth pattern using remote sensing and GIS: a case study of Kolkata, India. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2009, 30:4733-4746.
7. Bhatta B., Saraswati S., Bandyopadhyay D. Quantifying the degree-of-freedom, degree-of-sprawl, and degree-of-goodness of urban growth from remote sensing data. Applied Geography 2010, 30:96-111.
8. Bhatta B., Saraswati S., Bandyopadhyay D. Urban sprawl measurement from remote sensing data. Applied Geography 2010, 30:731-740.
9. Brueckner J.K. Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review 2000, 23:160-171.
10. Burgess R., Jenks M. Compact cities: Sustainable urban forms for developing countries 2007, Spon, London.
11. Chakrabarti P.G. Urban crisis in India: new initiatives for sustainable cities. Development in Practice 2001, 11:260-272.
12. Czamanski D., Benenson I., Malkinson D., Marinov M., Roth R., Wittenberg L. Urban sprawl and ecosystems - can nature survive?. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 2008, 2:321-366.
13. Diggle P. Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns 2003, Hodder Arnold, London.
14. Eastman J.R. IDRISI 16: The Andes edition 2009, Clark University, Worcester, MA.
15. Estoque R.C., Murayama Y. Examining the potential impact of land use/cover changes on the ecosystem services of Baguio city, the Philippines: a scenario-based analysis. Applied Geography 2012, 35:316-326.
16. Ewing R., Pendall R., Chen D. Measuring sprawl and its impact: the character and consequences of metropolitan expansion 2002, Smart Growth America, Washington, DC, Accessed 15.11.12. http://www.smartgrowthamerica.com/.
17. Feizizadeh B., Helali H. Comparison pixel-based, object based image analysis and effective parameters in classification land cover - land use of west province Azerbaijan. Journal of Geographic Research 2010, 47:73-84.
18. Girard L.F., Cerreta M., de Toro P., Forte F. The human sustainable city: values, approaches and evaluative tools. Sustainable urban development 2: The environmental assessment methods 2007, 65-93. Routledge, London. M. Deakin, G. Mitchell, P. Nijkamp, R. Vreeker (Eds.).
19. Guan D., Li H., Inohae T., Su W., Nagaie T., Hokao K. Modelling urban land use change by the integration of cellular automaton and Markov model. Ecological Modelling 2011, 222:3761-3772.
20. Han J., Hayashi Y., Cao X., Imura H. Application of an integrated system dynamics and cellular automata model for urban growth assessment: a case study of Shanghai, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 2009, 91:133-141.
21. Helbich M. Beyond postsuburbia? Multifunctional service agglomeration in Vienna's urban fringe. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 2012, 103:39-52.
22. Helbich M., Brunauer W., Hagenauer J., Leitner M. Data-driven regionalization of housing markets 2012, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, online first. 10.1080/00045608.2012.707587.
23. Helbich M., Leitner M. Spatial analysis of the urban-to-rural migration determinants in the Viennese metropolitan area: a transition from sub- to postsuburbia?. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 2009, 2:237-260.
24. He J., Liu Y., Yu Y., Tang W., Xiang W., Liu D. A counterfactual scenario simulation approach for assessing the impact of farmland preservation policies on urban sprawl and food security in a major grain-producing area of China. Applied Geography 2013, 37:127-138.
25. Huang J., Pontius R.G., Li Q., Thang Y. Use of intensity analysis to link patterns with processes of land change from 1986 to 2007 in a coastal watershed of southeast China. Applied Geography 2012, 34:371-384.
26. Hu Z., Lo C. Modeling urban growth in Atlanta using logistic regression. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2007, 31:667-688.
27. Jokar Arsanjani J., Helbich M., Kainz W., Darvishi A. Integration of logistic regression, Markov chain and cellular automata models to simulate urban expansion - the case of Tehran. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and. Geoinformation 2013, 21:265-275.
28. Jokar Arsanjani J., Kainz W., Mousivand A. Tracking dynamic land-use change using spatially explicit Markov Chain based on cellular automata: the case of Tehran. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion 2011, 2:329-345.
29. Kamusoko C., Aniya M., Adi B., Manjoro M. Rural sustainability under threat in Zimbabwe - simulation of future land use/cover changes in the Bindura district based on the Markov-cellular automata model. Applied Geography 2009, 29:435-447.
30. Koomen E., Stillwell J., Bakema A., Scholten H.J. Modelling land-use change: Progress and applications 2007, Springer, Dordrecht.
31. Kumar A., Pandey A.C., Hoda N., Jeyaseelan A.T. Evaluation of urban sprawl pattern in the tribal-dominated cities of Jharkhand state, India. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2011, 32:7651-7675.
32. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. International Journal of Biometrics 1977, 33:159-174.
33. López E., Boccoa G., Mendozaa M., Duhau E. Predicting land-cover and land-use change in the urban fringe. A case in Morelia city, Mexico. Landscape Urban Planning 2001, 55:271-285.
34. Mahiny A.S., Clarke K.C. Guiding SLEUTH land-use/land-cover change modeling using multicriteria evaluation: towards dynamic sustainable land-use planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2012, 39:925-944.
35. Malczewski J. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis 1999, Wiley, New York.
36. McDonald J.,F. Fundamentals of urban economics 1997, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
37. Overmars K.P., Verburg P.H. Multilevel modeling of land use from field to village level in the Philippines. Agricultural Systems 2006, 80:435-456.
38. Pathan S.K., Sastry S.V.C., Dhinwa P.S., Rao M., Majumdar K.L., Kumar D.S., et al. Urban growth trend analysis using GIS techniques - a case study of the Bombay metropolitan region. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1993, 14:3169-3179.
39. Patino J.E., Duque J.C. A review of regional science applications of satellite remote sensing in urban settings. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2013, 37:1-17.
40. Pontius R.G., Huffaker D., Denman K. Useful techniques of validation for spatially explicit land-change models. Ecological Modelling 2004, 179:445-461.
41. Saaty T.L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 1990, 48:9-26.
42. Schneider A., Woodcock C.E. Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Studies 2008, 45:659-692.
43. Megacities: Urban form, governance and sustainability 2011, Springer, New York. A. Sorensen, J. Okata (Eds.).
44. Taubenböck H., Esch T., Felbier A., Wiesner M., Roth A., Dech A. Monitoring urbanization in mega cities from space. Remote Sensing of Environment 2012, 117:162-176.
45. Taubenböck H., Wegmann M., Roth A., Mehl H., Dech S. Urbanization in India - spatiotemporal analysis using remote sensing data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2009, 33:179-188.
46. United Nations World urbanization prospects. The 2011 Revision 2012, New York.
47. Van Ginkel H. Urban future. The cities of the developing world are spectacularly ill-prepared for the explosion in urban living. Nature 2008, 456:32-33.
48. Vaz E., Nijkamp P., Painho M., Caetano M. A multi-scenario forecast of urban change: a study on urban growth in the Algarve. Landscape and Urban Planning 2012, 104:201-211.
49. White R., Engelen G. The use of constrained cellular automata for high resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics. Environment and Planning A 1997, 24:323-343.
50. World Bank Doing business in India 2009, Accessed 10.10.12. http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploreeconomies/india.
51. Zadeh L. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 1965, 8:338-353.