Inexpensive Method for Selecting Receptor Structures for Virtual Screening

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 21-34

  Huang, Zunnan ^a   Wong, Chung F ^b  

^a GUANGDONG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; FATTY ACIDS; PROTEINS;

ADRENERGIC RECEPTORS; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; CYTOCHROME P450-3A4; FATTY ACID-BINDING PROTEINS; PERFORMANCE METRICS; RECEIVER OPERATOR CHARACTERISTICS; SCREENING PERFORMANCE; THYROID HORMONE RECEPTOR;

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE;

PROTEIN;

CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRECLINICAL STUDY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; TIME FACTOR;

DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; TIME FACTORS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84955498031     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00299     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Breda, A.; Basso, L. A.; Santos, D. S.; de Azevedo, W. F. Virtual Screening of Drugs: Score Functions, Docking, and Drug Design Curr. Comput.-Aided Drug Des. 2008, 4, 265-272 10.2174/157340908786786047
2. Andricopulo, A. D.; Salum, L. B.; Abraham, D. J. Structure-Based Drug Design Strategies in Medicinal Chemistry Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2009, 9, 771-790 10.2174/156802609789207127
3. Lionta, E.; Spyrou, G.; Vassilatis, D. K.; Cournia, Z. Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Drug Discovery: Principles, Applications and Recent Advances Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2014, 14, 1923-1938 10.2174/1568026614666140929124445
4. Verma, S.; Prabhakar, Y. S. Target Based Drug Design-a Reality in Virtual Sphere Curr. Med. Chem. 2015, 22, 1603-1630 10.2174/0929867322666150209151209
5. Rueda, M.; Bottegoni, G.; Abagyan, R. Recipes for the Selection of Experimental Protein Conformations for Virtual Screening J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 186-193 10.1021/ci9003943
6. Li, Y.; Kim, D. J.; Ma, W.; Lubet, R. A.; Bode, A. M.; Dong, Z. Discovery of Novel Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibitors by Virtual Screening Based on Multiple Crystal Structures J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 2904-2914 10.1021/ci200257b
7. Xu, M.; Lill, M. A. Utilizing Experimental Data for Reducing Ensemble Size in Flexible-Protein Docking J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012, 52, 187-198 10.1021/ci200428t
8. Tang, H.; Wang, X. S.; Hsieh, J. H.; Tropsha, A. Do Crystal Structures Obviate the Need for Theoretical Models of Gpcrs for Structure-Based Virtual Screening? Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2012, 80, 1503-1521 10.1002/prot.24035
9. Mordalski, S.; Witek, J.; Smusz, S.; Rataj, K.; Bojarski, A. J. Multiple Conformational States in Retrospective Virtual Screening-Homology Models Vs. Crystal Structures: Beta-2 Adrenergic Receptor Case Study J. Cheminf. 2015, 7, 13 10.1186/s13321-015-0062-x
10. Kuhn, B.; Kollman, P. A. Binding of a Diverse Set of Ligands to Avidin and Streptavidin: An Accurate Quantitative Prediction of Their Relative Affinities by a Combination of Molecular Mechanics and Continuum Solvent Models J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3786-3791 10.1021/jm000241h
11. Truchon, J. F.; Bayly, C. I. Evaluating Virtual Screening Methods: Good and Bad Metrics for the "Early Recognition" Problem J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 488-508 10.1021/ci600426e
12. Triballeau, N.; Acher, F.; Brabet, I.; Pin, J.-P.; Bertrand, H.-O. Virtual Screening Workflow Development Guided by the "Receiver Operating Characteristic" Curve Approach. Application to High-Throughput Docking on Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 4 J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 2534 10.1021/jm049092j
13. Jacobsson, M.; Liden, P.; Stjernschantz, E.; Bostrom, H.; Norinder, U. Improving Structure-Based Virtual Screening by Multivariate Analysis of Scoring Data J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 5781-5789 10.1021/jm030896t
14. Sheridan, R. P.; Singh, S. B.; Fluder, E. M.; Kearsley, S. K. Protocols for Bridging the Peptide to Nonpeptide Gap in Topological Similarity Searches J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2001, 41, 1395-1406 10.1021/ci0100144
15. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242 10.1093/nar/28.1.235
16. Mysinger, M. M.; Carchia, M.; Irwin, J. J.; Shoichet, B. K. Directory of Useful Decoys, Enhanced (Dud-E): Better Ligands and Decoys for Better Benchmarking J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 6582-6594 10.1021/jm300687e
17. Schrödinger Suite 2014-3: Protein Preparation Wizard, Epik Version 2.9, Impact Version 6.4, Prime Version 3.7; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, NY, 2014.
18. Schrödinger Release 2014-3: Maestro Version 9.9; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, NY, 2014.
19. Schrödinger Release 2014-3: Glide Version 6.4; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, NY, 2014.
20. Schrödinger Release 2014-3; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, NY, 2014.
21. Friesner, R. A.; Banks, J. L.; Murphy, R. B.; Halgren, T. A.; Klicic, J. J.; Mainz, D. T.; Repasky, M. P.; Knoll, E. H.; Shelley, M.; Perry, J. K.; Shaw, D. E.; Francis, P.; Shenkin, P. S. Glide: A New Approach for Rapid, Accurate Docking and Scoring. 1. Method and Assessment of Docking Accuracy J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1739-1749 10.1021/jm0306430
22. Friesner, R. A.; Murphy, R. B.; Repasky, M. P.; Frye, L. L.; Greenwood, J. R.; Halgren, T. A.; Sanschagrin, P. C.; Mainz, D. T. Extra Precision Glide: Docking and Scoring Incorporating a Model of Hydrophobic Enclosure for Protein-Ligand Complexes J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6177-6196 10.1021/jm051256o
23. Kirchmair, J.; Markt, P.; Distinto, S.; Wolber, G.; Langer, T. Evaluation of the Performance of 3d Virtual Screening Protocols: Rmsd Comparisons, Enrichment Assessments, and Decoy Selection-What Can We Learn from Earlier Mistakes J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 213-228 10.1007/s10822-007-9163-6
24. Gkeka, P.; Eleftheratos, S.; Kolocouris, A.; Cournia, Z. Free Energy Calculations Reveal the Origin of Binding Preference for Aminoadamantane Blockers of Influenza a/M2tm Pore J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 1272-1281 10.1021/ct300899n
25. Kelley, L. A.; Gardner, S. P.; Sutcliffe, M. J. An Automated Approach for Clustering an Ensemble of Nmr-Derived Protein Structures into Conformationally Related Subfamilies Protein Eng., Des. Sel. 1996, 9, 1063-1065 10.1093/protein/9.11.1063
26. Kelley, L. A.; Gardner, S. P.; Sutcliffe, M. J. An Automated Approach for Defining Core Atoms and Domains in an Ensemble of Nmr-Derived Protein Structures Protein Eng., Des. Sel. 1997, 10, 737-741 10.1093/protein/10.6.737
27. Lorber, D. M.; Shoichet, B. K. Flexible Ligand Docking Using Conformational Ensembles Protein Sci. 1998, 7, 938-950 10.1002/pro.5560070411
28. Claussen, H.; Buning, C.; Rarey, M.; Lengauer, T. Flexe: Efficient Molecular Docking Considering Protein Structure Variations J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 308, 377-395 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4551
29. Huang, S. Y.; Zou, X. Ensemble Docking of Multiple Protein Structures: Considering Protein Structural Variations in Molecular Docking Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2007, 66, 399-421 10.1002/prot.21214
30. Totrov, M.; Abagyan, R. Flexible Ligand Docking to Multiple Receptor Conformations: A Practical Alternative Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18, 178-184 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.01.004
31. Fukunishi, Y. Structural Ensemble in Computational Drug Screening Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2010, 6, 835-849 10.1517/17425255.2010.486399
32. Korb, O.; Olsson, T. S.; Bowden, S. J.; Hall, R. J.; Verdonk, M. L.; Liebeschuetz, J. W.; Cole, J. C. Potential and Limitations of Ensemble Docking J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012, 52, 1262-1274 10.1021/ci2005934
33. Tian, S.; Sun, H.; Pan, P.; Li, D.; Zhen, X.; Li, Y.; Hou, T. Assessing an Ensemble Docking-Based Virtual Screening Strategy for Kinase Targets by Considering Protein Flexibility J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2014, 54, 2664-2679 10.1021/ci500414b
34. Ellingson, S. R.; Miao, Y.; Baudry, J.; Smith, J. C. Multi-Conformer Ensemble Docking to Difficult Protein Targets J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 1026-1034 10.1021/jp506511p
35. Ferrari, A. M.; Wei, B. Q.; Costantino, L.; Shoichet, B. K. Soft Docking and Multiple Receptor Conformations in Virtual Screening J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 5076-5084 10.1021/jm049756p
36. Cavasotto, C. N.; Abagyan, R. A. Protein Flexibility in Ligand Docking and Virtual Screening to Protein Kinases J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 337, 209-225 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.01.003
37. Bolstad, E. S.; Anderson, A. C. In Pursuit of Virtual Lead Optimization: The Role of the Receptor Structure and Ensembles in Accurate Docking Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2008, 73, 566-580 10.1002/prot.22081
38. Barril, X.; Morley, S. D. Unveiling the Full Potential of Flexible Receptor Docking Using Multiple Crystallographic Structures J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4432-4443 10.1021/jm048972v
39. Kalenkiewicz, A.; Grant, B. J.; Yang, C. Y. Enrichment of Druggable Conformations from Apo Protein Structures Using Cosolvent-Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Biology (Basel, Switz.) 2015, 4, 344-366 10.3390/biology4020344
40. McGovern, S. L.; Shoichet, B. K. Information Decay in Molecular Docking Screeens Again Holo, Apo, and Modeled Conformations of Enzymes J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 2895-2907 10.1021/jm0300330