LEADS-PEP: A Benchmark Data Set for Assessment of Peptide Docking Performance

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 188-200

  Hauser, Alexander Sebastian ^a   Windshügel, Björn ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND APPLIED ECOLOGY IME   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; BINDING ENERGY; CONFORMATIONS; MOLECULAR MODELING; MOLECULES;

COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH; DOCKING PROGRAMS; NEAR-NATIVE CONFORMATIONS; PEPTIDE COMPLEX; PEPTIDE CONFORMATION; PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE; SCORING FUNCTIONS; SMALL MOLECULES;

PEPTIDES;

OLIGOPEPTIDE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BENCHMARKING; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BENCHMARKING; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; OLIGOPEPTIDES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 84955443785     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00234     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Petsalaki, E.; Russell, R. B. Peptide-Mediated Interactions in Biological Systems: New Discoveries and Applications Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2008, 19, 344-350 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.06.004
2. Vlieghe, P.; Lisowski, V.; Martinez, J.; Khrestchatisky, M. Synthetic Therapeutic Peptides: Science and Market Drug Discovery Today 2010, 15, 40-56 10.1016/j.drudis.2009.10.009
3. Craik, D. J.; Fairlie, D. P.; Liras, S.; Price, D. The Future of Peptide-Based Drugs Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2013, 81, 136-147 10.1111/cbdd.12055
4. Kaspar, A. A.; Reichert, J. M. Future Directions for Peptide Therapeutics Development Drug Discovery Today 2013, 18, 807-817 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.05.011
5. deLemos, A. S.; Chung, R. T. Hepatitis C Treatment: An Incipient Therapeutic Revolution Trends Mol. Med. 2014, 20, 315-321 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.02.002
6. Talele, T. T.; Khedkar, S. A.; Rigby, A. C. Successful Applications of Computer Aided Drug Discovery: Moving Drugs from Concept to the Clinic Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2010, 10, 127-141 10.2174/156802610790232251
7. Audie, J.; Swanson, J. Recent Work in the Development and Application of Protein-peptide Docking Future Med. Chem. 2012, 4, 1619-1644 10.4155/fmc.12.99
8. London, N.; Raveh, B.; Schueler-Furman, O. Modeling Peptide-Protein Interactions Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 857, 375-398 10.1007/978-1-61779-588-6-17
9. Raveh, B.; London, N.; Schueler-Furman, O. Sub-Angstrom Modeling of Complexes between Flexible Peptides and Globular Proteins Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2010, 78, 2029-2040 10.1002/prot.22716
10. Raveh, B.; London, N.; Zimmerman, L.; Schueler-Furman, O. Rosetta FlexPepDock Ab-Initio: Simultaneous Folding, Docking and Refinement of Peptides onto Their Receptors PLoS One 2011, 6, e18934 10.1371/journal.pone.0018934
11. Antes, I. DynaDock: A New Molecular Dynamics-Based Algorithm for Protein-Peptide Docking Including Receptor Flexibility Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2010, 78, 1084-1104 10.1002/prot.22629
12. Hetényi, C.; van der Spoel, D. Efficient Docking of Peptides to Proteins without Prior Knowledge of the Binding Site Protein Sci. 2002, 11, 1729-1737 10.1110/ps.0202302
13. Tubert-Brohman, I.; Sherman, W.; Repasky, M.; Beuming, T. Improved Docking of Polypeptides with Glide J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013, 53, 1689-1699 10.1021/ci400128m
14. Hartshorn, M. J.; Verdonk, M. L.; Chessari, G.; Brewerton, S. C.; Mooij, W. T. M.; Mortenson, P. N.; Murray, C. W. Diverse, High-Quality Test Set for the Validation of Protein-Ligand Docking Performance J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 726-741 10.1021/jm061277y
15. Huang, N.; Shoichet, B. K.; Irwin, J. J. Benchmarking Sets for Molecular Docking J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6789-6801 10.1021/jm0608356
16. Cross, J. B.; Thompson, D. C.; Rai, B. K.; Baber, J. C.; Fan, K. Y.; Hu, Y.; Humblet, C. Comparison of Several Molecular Docking Programs: Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening Accuracy J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 1455-1474 10.1021/ci900056c
17. Vogel, S. M.; Bauer, M. R.; Boeckler, F. M. DEKOIS: Demanding Evaluation Kits for Objective in Silico Screening-A Versatile Tool for Benchmarking Docking Programs and Scoring Functions J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 2650-2665 10.1021/ci2001549
18. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242
19. Laskowski, R. A.; MacArthur, M. W.; Moss, D. S.; Thornton, J. M. PROCHECK: A Program to Check the Stereochemical Quality of Protein Structures J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993, 26, 283-291 10.1107/S0021889892009944
20. Huang, Y.; Niu, B.; Gao, Y.; Fu, L.; Li, W. CD-HIT Suite: A Web Server for Clustering and Comparing Biological Sequences Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 680-682 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq003
21. Jain, A. N. Surflex: Fully Automatic Flexible Molecular Docking Using a Molecular Similarity-Based Search Engine J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 499-511 10.1021/jm020406h
22. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C. Molecular Recognition of Receptor Sites Using a Genetic Algorithm with a Description of Desolvation J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 245, 43-53 10.1016/S0022-2836(95)80037-9
23. Goodsell, D. S.; Morris, G. M.; Olson, A. J. Automated Docking of Flexible Ligands: Applications of AutoDock J. Mol. Recognit. 1996, 9, 1-5 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1352(199601)9:1<1::AID-JMR241>3.0.CO;2-6
24. Trott, O.; Olson, A. J. AutoDock Vina: Improving the Speed and Accuracy of Docking with a New Scoring Function, Efficient Optimization and Multithreading J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 455-461 10.1002/jcc.21334
25. Jain, A. N. Scoring Noncovalent Protein-Ligand Interactions: A Continuous Differentiable Function Tuned to Compute Binding Affinities J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1996, 10, 427-440 10.1007/BF00124474
26. Eldridge, M. D.; Murray, C. W.; Auton, T. R.; Paolini, G. V.; Mee, R. P. Empirical Scoring Functions: I. The Development of a Fast Empirical Scoring Function to Estimate the Binding Affinity of Ligands in Receptor Complexes J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 425-445 10.1023/A:1007996124545
27. Böhm, H. J. The Development of a Simple Empirical Scoring Function to Estimate the Binding Constant for a Protein-Ligand Complex of Known Three-Dimensional Structure J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 243-256 10.1007/BF00126743
28. Mooij, W. T. M.; Verdonk, M. L. General and Targeted Statistical Potentials for Protein-Ligand Interactions Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2005, 61, 272-287 10.1002/prot.20588
29. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and Validation of a Genetic Algorithm for Flexible Docking J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897
30. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: Visual Molecular Dynamics J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 33-38 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
31. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J. Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 1997, 23, 3-25 10.1016/S0169-409X(96)00423-1
32. Villoutreix, B. O.; Labbe, C.; Lagorce, D.; Laconde, G.; Sperandio, O. A Leap into the Chemical Space of Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors Curr. Pharm. Des. 2012, 18, 4648-4667 10.2174/138161212802651571
33. Plewczynski, D.; Łaźniewski, M.; Augustyniak, R.; Ginalski, K. Can We Trust Docking Results? Evaluation of Seven Commonly Used Programs on PDBbind Database J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 742-755 10.1002/jcc.21643
34. Li, Y.; Han, L.; Liu, Z.; Wang, R. Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on an Updated Benchmark: 2. Evaluation Methods and General Results J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2014, 54, 1717-1736 10.1021/ci500081m
35. Chen, L.; Calin, G. A.; Zhang, S. Novel Insights of Structure-Based Modeling for RNA-Targeted Drug Discovery J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012, 52, 2741-2753 10.1021/ci300320t
36. Perola, E.; Walters, W. P.; Charifson, P. S. A Detailed Comparison of Current Docking and Scoring Methods on Systems of Pharmaceutical Relevance Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2004, 56, 235-249 10.1002/prot.20088
37. Janin, J. Assessing Predictions of Protein-Protein Interaction: The CAPRI Experiment Protein Sci. 2005, 14, 278-283 10.1110/ps.041081905
38. Huang, S. Y.; Grinter, S. Z.; Zou, X. Scoring Functions and their Evaluation Methods for Protein-Ligand Docking: Recent Advances and Future Directions Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 12899-12908 10.1039/c0cp00151a