The effect of speech distortion on the excitability of articulatory motor cortex

NeuroImage

Volumn 128, Issue , 2016, Pages 218-226

  Nuttall, Helen E ^a   Kennedy Higgins, Daniel ^a   Hogan, John ^a   Devlin, Joseph T ^a   Adank, Patti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Motor cortex; Motor evoked potentials; Speech perception; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIP; MALE; NERVE EXCITABILITY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; INNERVATION; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIAL; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIP; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84954432236     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.038     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adank P., Davis M.H., Hagoort P. Neural dissociation in processing noise and accent in spoken language comprehension. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:77-84. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.024.
2. Baldissera F., Cavallari P., Craighero L., Fadiga L. Modulation of spinal excitability during observation of hand actions in humans. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2001, 13:190-194.
3. Bartoli E., D'Ausilio A., Berry J., Badino L., Bever T., Fadiga L. Listener-Speaker Perceived Distance Predicts the Degree of Motor Contribution to Speech Perception. Cereb. Cortex 2015, 25:281-288. 10.1093/cercor/bht257.
4. Boersma P. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot Int. 2001, 5:341-345.
5. Braitenberg V., Pulvermüller F. Model of a neurological theory of speech. Naturwissenschaften 1992, 79:103-117.
6. British Society of Audiology (BSA) Recommended procedure: Pure-tone air-conduction and bone-conduction threshold audiometry with and without masking 2011, (Retrieved from http://www.thebsa.org.uk/resources/. Last accessed October 2015).
7. Calvo-Merino B., Glaser D.E., Grèzes J., Passingham R.E., Haggard P. Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:1243-1249. 10.1093/cercor/bhi007.
8. Cattaneo L., Voss M., Brochier T., Prabhu G., Wolpert D.M., Lemon R.N. A cortico-cortical mechanism mediating object-driven grasp in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005, 102:898-903. 10.1073/pnas.0409182102.
9. D'Ausilio A., Bufalari I., Salmas P., Fadiga L. The role of the motor system in discriminating normal and degraded speech sounds. Cortex 2012, 48:882-887. 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.05.017.
10. D'Ausilio A., Maffongelli L., Bartoli E., Campanella M., Ferrari E., Berry J., Fadiga L. Listening to speech recruits specific tongue motor synergies as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation and tissue-Doppler ultrasound imaging. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 369. (20130418). 10.1098/rstb.2013.0418.
11. D'Ausilio A., Pulvermüller F., Salmas P., Bufalari I., Begliomini C., Fadiga L. The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:381-385. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.017.
12. Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S. Hearing speech sounds: top-down influences on the interface between audition and speech perception. Hear. Res. 2007, 229:132-147. 10.1016/j.heares.2007.01.014.
13. Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S. Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:3423-3431.
14. Diehl R.L., Lotto A.J., Holt L.L. Speech perception. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2004, 55:149-179. 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142028.
15. Du Y., Buchsbaum B.R., Grady C.L., Alain C. Noise differentially impacts phoneme representations in the auditory and speech motor systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111:7126-7131. 10.1073/pnas.1318738111.
16. Fadiga L., Craighero L., Buccino G., Rizzolatti G. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2002, 15:399-402.
17. Godschalk M., Lemon R.N., Kuypers H.G.J.M., Van Der Steen J. The involvement of monkey premotor cortex neurones in preparation of visually cued arm movements. Behav. Brain Res. 1985, 18:143-157. 10.1016/0166-4328(85)90070-1.
18. Halsband U., Passingham R.E. Premotor cortex and the conditions for movement in monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Behav. Brain Res. 1985, 18:269-277. 10.1016/0166-4328(85)90035-X.
19. Hervais-Adelman A.G., Carlyon R.P., Johnsrude I.S., Davis M.H. Brain regions recruited for the effortful comprehension of noise-vocoded words. Lang. Cogn. Process. 2012, 27:1145-1166. 10.1080/01690965.2012.662280.
20. Hickok G., Houde J., Rong F. Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: computational basis and neural organization. Neuron 2011, 69:407-422. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.019.
21. Hickok G., Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8:393-402. 10.1038/nrn2113.
22. Jusczyk P.W., Smith L.B., Murphy C. The perceptual classification of speech. Percept. Psychophys. 1981, 30:10-23.
23. Keysers C., Gazzola V. Towards a unifying neural theory of social cognition. Prog. Brain Res. 2006, 156:379-401. 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56021-2.
24. Liberman A.M., Cooper F.S., Shankweiler D.P., Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychol. Rev. 1967, 74:431-461.
25. Liberman A.M., Mattingly I.G. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 1985, 21:1-36.
26. Meister I.G., Wilson S.M., Deblieck C., Wu A.D., Iacoboni M. The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:1692-1696. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.064.
27. Möttönen R., Farmer H., Watkins K.E. Lateralization of motor excitability during observation of bimanual signs. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3173-3177. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.033.
28. Möttönen R., Watkins K.E. Motor representations of articulators contribute to categorical perception of speech sounds. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:9819-9825. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6018-08.2009.
29. Murakami T., Kell C.A., Restle J., Ugawa Y., Ziemann U. Left dorsal speech stream components and their contribution to phonological processing. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35:1411-1422. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0246-14.2015.
30. Murakami T., Restle J., Ziemann U. Observation-execution matching and action inhibition in human primary motor cortex during viewing of speech-related lip movements or listening to speech. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:2045-2054. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.034.
31. Nuttall H.E., Moore D.R., Barry J.G., Krumbholz K., de Boer J. The influence of cochlear spectral processing on the timing and amplitude of the speech-evoked auditory brain stem response. J. Neurophysiol. 2015, 113:3683-3691. 10.1152/jn.00548.2014.
32. Osnes B., Hugdahl K., Specht K. Effective connectivity analysis demonstrates involvement of premotor cortex during speech perception. NeuroImage 2011, 54:2437-2445. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.078.
33. Pickering M.J., Garrod S. An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behav. Brain Sci. 2013, 36:329-347. 10.1017/S0140525X12001495.
34. Pickering M.J., Garrod S. Authors' response: forward models and their implications for production, comprehension, and dialogue. Behav. Brain Sci. 2013, 36:377-392.
35. Rauschecker J.P., Scott S.K. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12:718-724. 10.1038/nn.2331.
36. Rossini P.M., Barker A.T., Berardelli A., Caramia M.D., Caruso G., Cracco R.Q., Dimitrijevic M.R., Hallett M., Katayama Y., Lucking C.H. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1994, 91:79-92.
37. Sato M., Buccino G., Gentilucci M., Cattaneo L. On the tip of the tongue: modulation of the primary motor cortex during audiovisual speech perception. Speech Comm. 2010, 52:533-541. 10.1016/j.specom.2009.12.004.
38. Sato M., Tremblay P., Gracco V.L. A mediating role of the premotor cortex in phoneme segmentation. Brain Lang. 2009, 111:1-7. 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.03.002.
39. Schomers M.R., Kirilina E., Weigand A., Bajbouj M., Pulvermüller F. Causal Influence of Articulatory Motor Cortex on Comprehending Single Spoken Words: TMS Evidence. Cereb. Cortex 2014, 10.1093/cercor/bhu274.
40. Schwartz J.-L., Basirat A., Ménard L., Sato M. The perception-for-action-control theory (PACT): a perceptuo-motor theory of speech perception. J. Neurolinguistics 2012, 25:336-354. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.12.004.
41. Scott S.K., McGettigan C., Eisner F. A little more conversation, a little less action-candidate roles for the motor cortex in speech perception. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10:295-302. 10.1038/nrn2603.
42. Shahin A.J., Bishop C.W., Miller L.M. Neural mechanisms for illusory filling-in of degraded speech. NeuroImage 2009, 44:1133-1143. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.045.
43. Shimazu H., Maier M.A., Cerri G., Kirkwood P.A., Lemon R.N. Macaque ventral premotor cortex exerts powerful facilitation of motor cortex outputs to upper limb motoneurons. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:1200-1211. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4731-03.2004.
44. Swaminathan S., MacSweeney M., Boyles R., Waters D., Watkins K.E., Möttönen R. Motor excitability during visual perception of known and unknown spoken languages. Brain Lang. 2013, 126:1-7. 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.03.002.
45. Szenkovits G., Peelle J.E., Norris D., Davis M.H. Individual differences in premotor and motor recruitment during speech perception. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:1380-1392. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.023.
46. Turkeltaub P.E., Coslett H.B. Localization of sublexical speech perception components. Brain Lang. 2010, 114:1-15. 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.03.008.
47. Watkins K., Paus T. Modulation of motor excitability during speech perception: the role of broca's area. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16:978-987. 10.1162/0898929041502616.
48. Watkins K.E., Strafella a.P., Paus T. Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:989-994. 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00316-0.
49. Wild C.J., Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S. Human auditory cortex is sensitive to the perceived clarity of speech. NeuroImage 2012, 60:1490-1502. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.035.
50. Wild C.J., Yusuf A., Wilson D.E., Peelle J.E., Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S. Effortful listening: the processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:14010-14021. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1528-12.2012.
51. Wilson M., Knoblich G. The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychol. Bull. 2005, 131:460-473. 10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.460.