Noise differentially impacts phoneme representations in the auditory and speech motor systems

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 19, 2014, Pages 7126-7131

  Du, Yi ^a   Buchsbaum, Bradley R ^a,b   Grady, Cheryl L ^a,b   Alain, Claude ^a,b  

^a ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

FMRI; Forward sensorimotor mapping; Multivariate pattern analysis; Speech categorization

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; BOLD SIGNAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NOISE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHONEME; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; WORKING MEMORY;

FMRI; FORWARD SENSORIMOTOR MAPPING; MULTIVARIATE PATTERN ANALYSIS; SPEECH CATEGORIZATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NOISE; PHONETICS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84900513237     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1318738111     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Hickok G, Poeppel D (2007) The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 8(5):393-402.
2. Rauschecker JP, Scott SK (2009) Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: Nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat Neurosci 12(6):718-724.
3. Scott SK, Johnsrude IS (2003) The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends Neurosci 26(2):100-107.
4. Wilson SM, Saygin AP, Sereno MI, Iacoboni M (2004) Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nat Neurosci 7(7):701-702.
5. Binder JR, Liebenthal E, Possing ET, Medler DA, Ward BD (2004) Neural correlates of sensory and decision processes in auditory object identification. Nat Neurosci 7(3):295-301.
6. Pulvermüller F, et al. (2006) Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(20):7865-7870.
7. Callan D, Callan A, Gamez M, Sato MA, Kawato M (2010) Premotor cortex mediates perceptual performance. Neuroimage 51(2):844-858.
8. Chevillet MA, Jiang X, Rauschecker JP, Riesenhuber M (2013) Automatic phoneme category selectivity in the dorsal auditory stream. J Neurosci 33(12):5208-5215.
9. Herman AB, Houde JF, Vinogradov S, Nagarajan SS (2013) Parsing the phonological loop: Activation timing in the dorsal speech stream determines accuracy in speech reproduction. J Neurosci 33(13):5439-5453.
10. Edwards E, et al. (2010) Spatiotemporal imaging of cortical activation during verb generation and picture naming. Neuroimage 50(1):291-301.
11. Meister IG, Wilson SM, Deblieck C, Wu AD, Iacoboni M (2007) The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception. Curr Biol 17(19):1692-1696.
12. Sato M, Tremblay P, Gracco VL (2009) A mediating role of the premotor cortex in phoneme segmentation. Brain Lang 111(1):1-7.
13. Liberman AM, Mattingly IG (1985) The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21(1):1-36.
14. Rizzolatti G, Arbib MA (1998) Language within our grasp. Trends Neurosci 21(5): 188-194.
15. Lotto AJ, Hickok GS, Holt LL (2009) Reflections on mirror neurons and speech perception. Trends Cogn Sci 13(3):110-114.
16. Hickok G, Houde J, Rong F (2011) Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: Computational basis and neural organization. Neuron 69(3):407-422.
17. Callan DE, Jones JA, Callan AM, Akahane-Yamada R (2004) Phonetic perceptual identification by native-and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articu-latory-auditory/orosensory internal models. Neuroimage 22(3):1182-1194.
18. Wilson SM, Iacoboni M (2006) Neural responses to non-native phonemes varying in producibility: Evidence for the sensorimotor nature of speech perception. Neuro-image 33(1):316-325.
19. Osnes B, Hugdahl K, Specht K (2011) Effective connectivity analysis demonstrates involvement of premotor cortex during speech perception. Neuroimage 54(3): 2437-2445.
20. Poldrack RA, et al. (2001) Relations between the neural bases of dynamic auditory processing and phonological processing: Evidence from fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci 13(5):687-697.
21. Scott SK, Rosen S, Wickham L, Wise RJ (2004) A positron emission tomography study of the neural basis of informational and energetic masking effects in speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am 115(2):813-821.
22. Haxby JV, et al. (2001) Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 293(5539):2425-2430.
23. Kriegeskorte N, Bandettini P (2007) Analyzing for information, not activation, to exploit high-resolution fMRI. Neuroimage 38(4):649-662.
24. Linke AC, Vicente-Grabovetsky A, Cusack R (2011) Stimulus-specific suppression preserves information in auditory short-term memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(31): 12961-12966.
25. Lee YS, Turkeltaub P, Granger R, Raizada RD (2012) Categorical speech processing in Broca's area: An fMRI study using multivariate pattern-based analysis. J Neurosci 32(11):3942-3948.
26. Buchsbaum BR, et al. (2011) Conduction aphasia, sensory-motor integration, and phonological short-term memory-An aggregate analysis of lesion and fMRI data. Brain Lang 119(3):119-128.
27. Poldrack RA, et al. (1999) Functional specialization for semantic and phonological processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage 10(1):15-35.
28. Liebenthal E, Sabri M, Beardsley SA, Mangalathu-Arumana J, Desai A (2013) Neural dynamics of phonological processing in the dorsal auditory stream. J Neurosci 33(39): 15414-15424.
29. Buchsbaum BR, et al. (2005) Reading, hearing, and the planum temporale. Neuroimage 24(2):444-454.
30. Obleser J, Wise RJ, Alex Dresner M, Scott SK (2007) Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions. J Neurosci 27(9):2283-2289.
31. Bidelman GM, Moreno S, Alain C (2013) Tracing the emergence of categorical speech perception in the human auditory system. Neuroimage 79:201-212.
32. Chang EF, et al. (2010) Categorical speech representation in human superior temporal gyrus. Nat Neurosci 13(11):1428-1432.
33. Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(3):201-215.
34. Venezia JH, Saberi K, Chubb C, Hickok G (2012) Response bias modulates the SMS during syllable discrimination. Front Psychol 3:157.
35. Dubno JR, Schaefer AB (1992) Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 91(4 Pt 1):2110-2121.
36. Thompson R, Correia M, Cusack R (2011) Vascular contributions to pattern analysis: Comparing gradient and spin echo fMRI at 3T. Neuroimage 56(2):643-650.
37. Garrido L, Vaziri-Pashkam M, Nakayama K, Wilmer J (2013) The consequences of subtracting the mean pattern in fMRI multivariate correlation analyses. Front Neurosci 7:174.