DNA loops generate intracentromere tension in mitosis

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 210, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 553-564

  Lawrimore, Josh ^a   Vasquez, Paula A ^e   Falvo, Michael R ^b   Taylor, Russell M ^c   Vicci, Leandra ^c   Yeh, Elaine ^a   Forest, Gregory ^d   Bloom, Kerry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHESIN; CONDENSIN; DNA; DNA TOPOISOMERASE; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; CHROMATIN; FUNGAL DNA;

ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CENTROSOME; GENE LOCUS; HETEROCHROMATIN; METAPHASE; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SISTER CHROMATID; CHROMATIN; CONFORMATION; CYTOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPINDLE APPARATUS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

CENTROMERE; CHROMATIN; DNA, FUNGAL; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

EID: 84954332467     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201502046     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Araki, H., N. Nakanishi, B.R. Evans, H. Matsuzaki, M. Jayaram, and Y. Oshima. 1992. Site-specific recombinase, R, encoded by yeast plasmid pSR1. J. Mol. Biol. 225:25-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(92)91023-I
2. Bloom, K.S. 2014. Centromeric heterochromatin: the primordial segregation machine. Annu. Rev. Genet. 48:457-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092033
3. Blumberg, S., A.V. Tkachenko, and J.C. Meiners. 2005. Disruption of protein-mediated DNA looping by tension in the substrate DNA. Biophys. J. 88:1692-1701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.054486
4. Bouzigues, C., and M. Dahan. 2007. Transient directed motions of GABA(A) receptors in growth cones detected by a speed correlation index. Biophys. J. 92:654-660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.106.094524
5. Brower-Toland, B.D., C.L. Smith, R.C. Yeh, J.T. Lis, C.L. Peterson, and M.D. Wang. 2002. Mechanical disruption of individual nucleosomes reveals a reversible multistage release of DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:1960-1965. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.022638399
6. de Gennes, P.G. 1979. Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York.319 pp.
7. Dewar, H., K. Tanaka, K. Nasmyth, and T.U. Tanaka. 2004. Tension between two kinetochores suffices for their bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Nature. 428:93-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02328
8. Gardner, M.K., C.G. Pearson, B.L. Sprague, T.R. Zarzar, K. Bloom, E.D. Salmon, and D.J. Odde. 2005. Tension-dependent regulation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores can explain metaphase congression in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:3764-3775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E05-04-0275
9. Goshima, G., and M. Yanagida. 2000. Establishing biorientation occurs with precocious separation of the sister kinetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast. Cell. 100:619-633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80699-6
10. Haase, J., A. Stephens, J. Verdaasdonk, E. Yeh, and K. Bloom. 2012. Bub1 kinase and Sgo1 modulate pericentric chromatin in response to altered microtubule dynamics. Curr. Biol. 22:471-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.006
11. He, X., S. Asthana, and P.K. Sorger. 2000. Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast. Cell. 101:763-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80888-0
12. Hertwig, O. 1906. Lehrbuch der Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen und der Wirbeltiere (Textbook of developmental history of humans and vertebrates). Nabu Press, Charleston, South Carolina. 548 pp.
13. Hsu, J.M., J. Huang, P.B. Meluh, and B.C. Laurent. 2003. The yeast RSC chromatin-remodeling complex is required for kinetochore function in chromosome segregation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:3202-3215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.9.3202-3215.2003
14. Kawashima, S.A., Y. Yamagishi, T. Honda, K. Ishiguro, and Y. Watanabe. 2010. Phosphorylation of H2A by Bub1 prevents chromosomal instability through localizing shugoshin. Science. 327:172-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1180189
15. Kendall, A., M.W. Hull, E. Bertrand, P.D. Good, R.H. Singer, and D.R. Engelke. 2000. A CBF5 mutation that disrupts nucleolar localization of early tRNA biosynthesis in yeast also suppresses tRNA gene-mediated transcriptional silencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:13108-13113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.240454997
16. Kleckner, N. 2006. Chiasma formation: chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex. Chromosoma. 115:175-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-006-0055-7
17. Kleckner, N., D. Zickler, and G. Witz. 2013. Molecular biology. Chromosome capture brings it all together. Science. 342:940-941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1247514
18. Kopski, K.M., and T.C. Huffaker. 1997. Suppressors of the ndc10-2 mutation: a role for the ubiquitin system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochore function. Genetics. 147:409-420.
19. Kosco, K.A., C.G. Pearson, P.S. Maddox, P.J. Wang, I.R. Adams, E.D. Salmon, K. Bloom, and T.C. Huffaker. 2001. Control of microtubule dynamics by Stu2p is essential for spindle orientation and metaphase chromosome alignment in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12:2870-2880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.12.9.2870
20. Lebedeva, N.V., A. Nese, F.C. Sun, K. Matyjaszewski, and S.S. Sheiko. 2012. Anti-Arrhenius cleavage of covalent bonds in bottlebrush macromolecules on substrate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:9276-9280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118517109
21. Lobachev, K., E. Vitriol, J. Stemple, M.A. Resnick, and K. Bloom. 2004. Chromosome fragmentation after induction of a double-strand break is an active process prevented by the RMX repair complex. Curr. Biol. 14:2107-2112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.051
22. Lowary, P.T., and J. Widom. 1998. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 276:19-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1494
23. Maeshima, K., and U.K. Laemmli. 2003. A two-step scaffolding model for mitotic chromosome assembly. Dev. Cell. 4:467-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00092-3
24. Michaelis, C., R. Ciosk, and K. Nasmyth. 1997. Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell. 91:35-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)80007-6
25. Naumova, N., M. Imakaev, G. Fudenberg, Y. Zhan, B.R. Lajoie, L.A. Mirny, and J. Dekker. 2013. Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science. 342:948-953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1236083
26. Panyukov, S., E.B. Zhulina, S.S. Sheiko, G.C. Randall, J. Brock, and M. Rubinstein. 2009a. Tension amplification in molecular brushes in solutions and on substrates. J. Phys. Chem. B. 113:3750-3768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp807671b
27. Panyukov, S.V., S.S. Sheiko, and M. Rubinstein. 2009b. Amplification of tension in branched macromolecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102:148301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.148301
28. Paulson, J.R., and U.K. Laemmli. 1977. The structure of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes. Cell. 12:817-828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(77)90280-X
29. Pearson, C.G., P.S. Maddox, E.D. Salmon, and K. Bloom. 2001. Budding yeast chromosome structure and dynamics during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 152:1255-1266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.152.6.1255
30. Pearson, C.G., P.S. Maddox, T.R. Zarzar, E.D. Salmon, and K. Bloom. 2003. Yeast kinetochores do not stabilize Stu2p-dependent spindle microtubule dynamics. Mol. Biol. Cell. 14:4181-4195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E03-03-0180
31. Rao, S.S., M.H. Huntley, N.C. Durand, E.K. Stamenova, I.D. Bochkov, J.T. Robinson, A.L. Sanborn, I. Machol, A.D. Omer, E.S. Lander, and E.L. Aiden. 2014. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 159:1665-1680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021
32. Roberts, B.T., K.A. Farr, and M.A. Hoyt. 1994. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint gene BUB1 encodes a novel protein kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:8282-8291.
33. Snider, C.E., A.D. Stephens, J.G. Kirkland, O. Hamdani, R.T. Kamakaka, and K. Bloom. 2014. Dyskerin, tRNA genes, and condensin tether pericentric chromatin to the spindle axis in mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 207:189-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201405028
34. Stephens, A.D., J. Haase, L. Vicci, R.M. Taylor II, and K. Bloom. 2011. Cohesin, condensin, and the intramolecular centromere loop together generate the mitotic chromatin spring. J. Cell Biol. 193:1167-1180.
35. Stephens, A.D., R.A. Haggerty, P.A. Vasquez, L. Vicci, C.E. Snider, F. Shi, C. Quammen, C. Mullins, J. Haase, R.M. Taylor II, et al. 2013. Pericentric chromatin loops function as a nonlinear spring in mitotic force balance. J. Cell Biol. 200:757-772.
36. Straight, A.F., A.S. Belmont, C.C. Robinett, and A.W. Murray. 1996. GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol. 6:1599-1608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)70783-5
37. Tanaka, T.U., N. Rachidi, C. Janke, G. Pereira, M. Galova, E. Schiebel, M.J. Stark, and K. Nasmyth. 2002. Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell. 108:317-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00633-5
38. Thrower, D.A., and K. Bloom. 2001. Dicentric chromosome stretching during anaphase reveals roles of Sir2/Ku in chromatin compaction in budding yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12:2800-2812. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.12.9.2800
39. Vasquez, P.A., and K. Bloom. 2014. Polymer models of interphase chromosomes. Nucleus. 5:376-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/nucl.36275
40. Verdaasdonk, J.S., P.A. Vasquez, R.M. Barry, T. Barry, S. Goodwin, M.G. Forest, and K. Bloom. 2013. Centromere tethering confines chromosome domains. Mol. Cell. 52:819-831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.10.021
41. Wach, A., A. Brachat, C. Alberti-Segui, C. Rebischung, and P. Philippsen. 1997. Heterologous HIS3 marker and GFP reporter modules for PCR-targeting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 13:1065-1075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19970915)13:111065::AID-YEA1593.0.CO;2-K
42. Wan, X., R.P. O'Quinn, H.L. Pierce, A.P. Joglekar, W.E. Gall, J.G. DeLuca, C.W. Carroll, S.T. Liu, T.J. Yen, B.F. McEwen, et al. 2009. Protein architecture of the human kinetochore microtubule attachment site. Cell. 137:672-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.035
43. Wan, X., D. Cimini, L.A. Cameron, and E.D. Salmon. 2012. The coupling between sister kinetochore directional instability and oscillations in centromere stretch in metaphase PtK1 cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 23:1035-1046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-09-0767
44. Weber, S.C., A.J. Spakowitz, and J.A. Theriot. 2012. Nonthermal ATP-dependent fluctuations contribute to the in vivo motion of chromosomal loci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:7338-7343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119505109
45. Xue, Y., J.C. Canman, C.S. Lee, Z. Nie, D. Yang, G.T. Moreno, M.K. Young, E.D. Salmon, and W. Wang. 2000. The human SWI/SNF-B chromatin-remodeling complex is related to yeast rsc and localizes at kinetochores of mitotic chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:13015-13020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.240208597
46. Yan, J., T.J. Maresca, D. Skoko, C.D. Adams, B. Xiao, M.O. Christensen, R. Heald, and J.F. Marko. 2007. Micromanipulation studies of chromatin fibers in Xenopus egg extracts reveal ATP-dependent chromatin assembly dynamics. Mol. Biol. Cell. 18:464-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E06-09-0800
47. Yeh, E., J. Haase, L.V. Paliulis, A. Joglekar, L. Bond, D. Bouck, E.D. Salmon, and K.S. Bloom. 2008. Pericentric chromatin is organized into an intramolecular loop in mitosis. Curr. Biol. 18:81-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.12.019
48. Zickler, D., and N. Kleckner. 1999. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33:603-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.603