Polymer models of interphase chromosomes

Nucleus

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 376-390

  Vasquez, Paula A ^a   Bloom, Kerry ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromosome territories; Chromosome tethers; DNA damage; Interphase dynamics; Polymer models

Indexed keywords

POLYPEPTIDE; CHROMATIN; POLYMER;

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR GENETICS; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; GENE INTERACTION; GENE SILENCING; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR CROWDING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEOSOME; PROGERIA; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; TELOMERE; TEMPORAL BEHAVIOR; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME; DNA DAMAGE; GENETICS; GENOME; INTERPHASE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOMES; DNA DAMAGE; GENOME; HUMANS; INTERPHASE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POLYMERS;

EID: 84908173587     PISSN: 19491034     EISSN: 19491042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/nucl.36275     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Dekker J, Marti-Renom MA, Mirny LA. Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data. Nat Rev Genet 2013; 14:390-403; PMID:23657480; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg3454
2. Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 2002; 295:1306-11; PMID:11847345; http://dx.doi. org/10.1126/science.1067799
3. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, Amit I, Lajoie BR, Sabo PJ, Dorschner MO, et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 2009; 326:289-93; PMID:19815776; http://dx.doi. org/10.1126/science.1181369
4. Meaburn KJ, Misteli T. Cell biology: chromosome territories. Nature 2007; 445:379-781; PMID:17251970; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/445379a
5. Cremer T, Cremer C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2:292-301; PMID:11283701; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35066075
6. Cremer T, Cremer M, Dietzel S, Müller S, Solovei I, Fakan S. Chromosome territories--a functional nuclear landscape. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2006; 18:307-16; PMID:16687245; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ceb.2006.04.007
7. Taddei A, Van Houwe G, Hediger F, Kalck V, Cubizolles F, Schober H, Gasser SM. Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene. Nature 2006; 441:774-8; PMID:16760983; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature04845
8. Roix JJ, McQueen PG, Munson PJ, Parada LA, Misteli T. Spatial proximity of translocation-prone gene loci in human lymphomas. Nat Genet 2003; 34:287-91; PMID:12808455; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/ng1177
9. D’Ambrosio C, Schmidt CK, Katou Y, Kelly G, Itoh T, Shirahige K, Uhlmann F. Identification of cis-acting sites for condensin loading onto budding yeast chromosomes. Genes Dev 2008; 22:2215-27; PMID:18708580; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/ gad.1675708
10. Stephens AD, Haase J, Vicci L, Taylor RM, Bloom K. Cohesin, condensin, and the intramolecular centromere loop together generate the mitotic chromatin spring. J Cell Biol 2011; 193:1167-80; PMID:21708976; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/ jcb.201103138
11. Stephens AD, Quammen CW, Chang B, Haase J, Taylor RM, Bloom K. The spatial segregation of pericentric cohesin and condensin in the mitotic spindle. Mol Biol Cell 2013; 24:3909-19; PMID:24152737; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E13-06-0325
12. Hirano T. At the heart of the chromosome: SMC proteins in action. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:311-22; PMID:16633335; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nrm1909
13. Nasmyth K, Haering CH. Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annu Rev Genet 2009; 43:525-58; PMID:19886810; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-genet-102108-134233
14. Onn I, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Guacci V, Unal E, Koshland DE. Sister chromatid cohesion: a simple concept with a complex reality. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2008; 24:105-29; PMID:18616427; http://dx.doi. org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175350
15. Martins RP, Finan JD, Guilak F, Lee DA. Mechanical regulation of nuclear structure and function. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2012; 14:431-55; PMID:22655599; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-bioeng-071910-124638
16. Bustamante C, Bryant Z, Smith SB. Ten years of tension: single-molecule DNA mechanics. Nature 2003; 421:423-7; PMID:12540915; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/nature01405
17. Zlatanova J, Leuba SH. Stretching and imaging single DNA molecules and chromatin. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 2002; 23:377-95; PMID:12785092; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023498120458
18. Leuba SH, Karymov MA, Tomschik M, Ramjit R, Smith P, Zlatanova J. Assembly of single chromatin fibers depends on the tension in the DNA molecule: magnetic tweezers study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100:495-500; PMID:12522259; http://dx.doi. org/10.1073/pnas.0136890100
19. Fisher JK, Ballenger M, O’Brien ET, Haase J, Superfine R, Bloom K. DNA relaxation dynamics as a probe for the intracellular environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:9250-5; PMID:19478070; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812723106
20. Song W, Gawel M, Dominska M, Greenwell PW, Hazkani-Covo E, Bloom K, Petes TD. Nonrandom distribution of interhomolog recombination events induced by breakage of a dicentric chromosome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2013; 194:69-80; PMID:23410835; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/ genetics.113.150144
21. Cheutin T, Cavalli G. Polycomb silencing: from linear chromatin domains to 3D chromosome folding. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2014; 25:30-7; PMID:24434548; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2013.11.016
22. Nora EP, Lajoie BR, Schulz EG, Giorgetti L, Okamoto I, Servant N, Piolot T, van Berkum NL, Meisig J, Sedat J, et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 2012; 485:381-5; PMID:22495304; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11049
23. Lamond AI, Sleeman JE. Nuclear substructure and dynamics. Curr Biol 2003; 13:R825-8; PMID:14588256; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cub.2003.10.012
24. Sleeman JE, Trinkle-Mulcahy L. Nuclear bodies: new insights into assembly/dynamics and disease relevance. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2014; 28:76-83; PMID:24704702; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ceb.2014.03.004
25. Underhill PT, Doyle PS. On the coarse-graining of polymers into bead-spring chains. J Non-Newt Fluid Mech 2004; 122:3-31; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jnnfm.2003.10.006
26. Verdaasdonk JS, Vasquez PA, Barry RM, Barry T, Goodwin S, Forest MG, Bloom K. Centromere tethering confines chromosome domains. Mol Cell 2013; 52:819-31; PMID:24268574; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.10.021
27. Prakash JR. Rouse chains with excluded volume interactions in steady simple shear flow. Journal of Rheology 2002; 46:1353-80; http://dx.doi. org/10.1122/1.1514054
28. Berg HC. Random walks in biology. Princeton University Press, 1993.
29. Weber SC, Spakowitz AJ, Theriot JA. Bacterial chromosomal loci move subdiffusively through a viscoelastic cytoplasm. Phys Rev Lett 2010; 104:238102; PMID:20867274; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.104.238102
30. Weber SC, Spakowitz AJ, Theriot JA. Nonthermal ATP-dependent fluctuations contribute to the in vivo motion of chromosomal loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:7338-43; PMID:22517744; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119505109
31. Goodman A, Tseng Y, Wirtz D. Effect of length, topology, and concentration on the microviscosity and microheterogeneity of DNA solutions. J Mol Biol 2002; 323:199-215; PMID:12381315; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00893-8
32. Doi M, Edwards S. The theory of polymer dynamics, 1986. Claredon, Oxford ISBN 0-19-852033-6 1986.
33. Münkel C, Eils R, Dietzel S, Zink D, Mehring C, Wedemann G, Cremer T, Langowski J. Compartmentalization of interphase chromosomes observed in simulation and experiment. J Mol Biol 1999; 285:1053-65; PMID:9887267; http://dx.doi. org/10.1006/jmbi.1998.2361
34. Broedersz CP, Brangwynne CP. Nuclear mechanics: lamin webs and pathological blebs. Nucleus 2013; 4:156-9; PMID:23697996; http://dx.doi. org/10.4161/nucl.25019
35. Dion V, Kalck V, Horigome C, Towbin BD, Gasser SM. Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery. Nat Cell Biol 2012; 14:502-9; PMID:22484486; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ ncb2465
36. Miné-Hattab J, Rothstein R. Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination. Nat Cell Biol 2012; 14:510-7; PMID:22484485; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ ncb2472