Evolving Perspectives on Monopolization and Priority Effects

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 136-146

  De Meester, Luc ^a   Vanoverbeke, Joost ^a,b   Kilsdonk, Laurens J ^a   Urban, Mark C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Institute for Nature and Forest Research   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BIOGEOGRAPHY; COLONIZATION; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; CONSERVATION STATUS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEMOGRAPHY; EVOLUTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DEMOGRAPHY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84954306210     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.009     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Lawton J.H. Are there general laws in ecology?. Oikos 1999, 84:177-192.
2. Strauss S.Y., et al. Toward a more trait-centered approach to diffuse (co)evolution. New Phytol. 2005, 165:81-90.
3. Hubbell S.P. The Unified Neutral Theory of Species Abundance and Diversity 2001, Princeton University Press.
4. Leibold M.A., McPeek M.A. Coexistence of the niche and neutral perspectives in community ecology. Ecology 2006, 87:1399-1410.
5. Matthews T.J., Whittaker R.J. Neutral theory and the species abundance distribution: recent developments and prospects for unifying niche and neutral perspectives. Ecol. Evol. 2014, 4:2263-2277.
6. Leibold M.A., et al. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:601-613.
7. Nosil P., et al. Heterogeneous genomic differentiation between walking-stick ecotypes: 'isolation by adaptation' and multiple roles for divergent selection. Evolution 2008, 62:316-336.
8. Connell J.H., Slatyer R.O. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am. Nat. 1977, 111:1119-1144.
9. Fukami T. Historical contingency in community assembly: integrating niches, species pools, and priority effects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2015, Published online July 30, 2015. 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160340.
10. Waters J.M., et al. Founder takes all: density-dependent processes structure biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28:78-85.
11. Mayr E. Systematics and the Origin of Species 1942, Columbia University Press.
12. Schoener T.W. The newest synthesis: understanding the interplay of evolutionary and ecological dynamics. Science 2011, 331:426-429.
13. Pelletier F., et al. Eco-evolutionary dynamics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2009, 364:1483-1489.
14. Ellner S.P., et al. Does rapid evolution matter? Measuring the rate of contemporary evolution and its impacts on ecological dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:603-614.
15. De Meester L., et al. The monopolization hypothesis and the dispersal-gene flow paradox in aquatic organisms. Acta Oecol. 2002, 23:121-135.
16. Urban M.C., et al. The evolutionary ecology of metacommunities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:311-317.
17. Urban M.C., De Meester L. Community monopolization: local adaptation enhances priority effects in an evolving metacommunity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2009, 276:4129-4138.
18. Loeuille N., Leibold M.A. Evolution in metacommunities: on the relative importance of species sorting and monopolization in structuring communities. Am. Nat. 2008, 171:788-799.
19. Roughgarden J. Evolution of niche width. Am. Nat. 1972, 106:683-718.
20. Vanoverbeke J., et al. Community assembly is a race between immigration and adaptation: eco-evolutionary interactions across spatial scales. Ecography 2015, Published online November 9, 2015. 10.1111/ecog.01394.
21. Wilson E.O. The nature of the taxon cycle in the Melanesian ant fauna. Am. Nat. 1961, 95:169-193.
22. Losos J.B., Ricklefs R.E. Adaptation and diversification on islands. Nature 2009, 457:830-836.
23. Servedio M.R., et al. Magic traits in speciation: 'magic'but not rare?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:389-397.
24. Schluter D. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation 2000, Oxford University Press.
25. Wilson E.O. Adaptive shift and dispersal in a tropical ant fauna. Evolution 1959, 13:122-144.
26. Tanentzap A.J., et al. When do plant radiations influence community assembly? The importance of historical contingency in the race for niche space. New Phytol. 2015, 207:468-479.
27. Richardson J.L., et al. Microgeographic adaptation and the spatial scale of evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014, 29:165-176.
28. Knope M.L., et al. Evolutionary history, immigration history, and the extent of diversification in community assembly. Front. Evol. Genomic Microbiol. 2011, 2:273.
29. Fukami T., et al. Immigration history controls diversification in experimental adaptive radiation. Nature 2007, 446:436-439.
30. De Meester L., et al. Genetic composition of resident populations influences establishment success of immigrant species. Oecologia 2007, 153:431-440.
31. Pantel J.H., et al. Rapid local adaptation mediates zooplankton community assembly in experimental mesocosms. Ecol. Lett. 2015, 18:992-1000.
32. Gillespie R. Community assembly through adaptive radiation in Hawaiian spiders. Science 2004, 303:356-359.
33. de Mazancourt C., et al. Biodiversity inhibits species' evolutionary responses to changing environments. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:380-388.
34. Altermatt F., et al. Parasites promote host gene flow in a metapopulation. Evol. Ecol. 2007, 21:561-575.
35. Ebert D., et al. A selective advantage to immigrant genes in a Daphnia metapopulation. Science 2002, 295:485-488.
36. Rasanen K., Hendry A.P. Disentangling interactions between adaptive divergence and gene flow when ecology drives diversification. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:624-636.
37. Moore J-S., Hendry A.P. Both selection and gene flow are necessary to explain adaptive divergence: evidence from clinal variation in stream stickleback. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2005, 7:871-886.
38. Hendry A.P., Taylor E.B. How much of the variation in adaptive divergence can be explained by gene flow? an evaluation using lake-stream stickleback pairs. Evolution 2004, 58:2319-2331.
39. Nosil P., et al. Reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants from divergent habitats. Evolution 2005, 59:705-719.
40. Orsini L., et al. Drivers of population genetic differentiation in the wild: isolation by dispersal limitation, isolation by adaptation and isolation by colonization. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22:5983-5999.
41. Reed D.H., Frankham R. How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? a meta-analysis. Evolution 2001, 55:1095-1103.
42. Whitlock R. Relationships between adaptive and neutral genetic diversity and ecological structure and functioning: a meta-analysis. J. Ecol. 2014, 102:857-872.
43. Hewitt G. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 2000, 405:907-913.
44. Barton N., Hewitt G.M. Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones. Nature 1989, 341:497-503.
45. Boo S.M., et al. Complex phylogeographic patterns in the freshwater alga Synura provide new insights into ubiquity vs. endemism in microbial eukaryotes. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:4328-4338.
46. Cottenie K. Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:1175-1182.
47. Svenning J.C., et al. The influence of interspecific interactions on species range expansion rates. Ecography 2014, 37:1198-1209.
48. Hillebrand H. On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Am. Nat. 2004, 163:192-211.
49. Urban M.C., et al. A crucial step toward realism: responses to climate change from an evolving metacommunity perspective. Evol. Appl. 2012, 5:154-167.
50. Merckx V.S., et al. Evolution of endemism on a young tropical mountain. Nature 2015, 524:347-350.
51. Warren B.H., et al. Islands as model systems in ecology and evolution: prospects fifty years after MacArthur-Wilson. Ecol. lett. 2015, 18:200-217.
52. Crutsinger G.M., et al. Intraspecific diversity and dominant genotypes resist plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:16-23.
53. Urban M.C. Evolution mediates the effects of apex predation on aquatic food webs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2013, 280:1-9.
54. Hubbell S.P. Neutral theory and the evolution of ecological equivalence. Ecology 2006, 87:1387-1398.
55. Louette G., et al. Establishment success in young cladoceran communities: an experimental test. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2006, 51:1021-1030.
56. Shurin J.B. Dispersal limitation, invasion resistance, and the structure of pond zooplankton communities. Ecology 2000, 81:3074-3086.
57. Sultan S.E., et al. A resurrection study reveals rapid adaptive evolution within populations of an invasive plant. Evol. Appl. 2013, 6:266-278.
58. Kerfoot W.C., Weider L.J. Experimental paleoecology (resurrection ecology): chasing Van Valen's Red Queen hypothesis. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2004, 49:1300-1316.
59. Cousyn C., et al. Rapid, local adaptation of zooplankton behavior to changes in predation pressure in the absence of neutral genetic changes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:6256-6260.
60. Orsini L., et al. The evolutionary time machine: using dormant propagules to forecast how populations can adapt to changing environments. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28:274-282.
61. Holt R.D., Polis G.A. A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. Am. Nat. 1997, 149:745-764.
62. Mordecai E.A. Consequences of pathogen spillover for cheatgrass-invaded grasslands: coexistence, competitive exclusion, or priority effects. Am. Nat. 2013, 181:737-747.
63. Becks L., et al. The functional genomics of an eco-evolutionary feedback loop: linking gene expression, trait evolution, and community dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 2012, 15:492-501.
64. Ostfeld R.S., Keesing F. Effects of host diversity on infectious disease. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2012, 43:157.
65. Orsini L., et al. The role of selection in driving landscape genomic structure of the waterflea Daphnia magna. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22:583-601.
66. Coyne J.A., Price T.D. Little evidence for sympatric speciation in island birds. Evolution 2000, 54:2166-2171.
67. Frankino W.A., et al. Natural selection and developmental constraints in the evolution of allometries. Science 2005, 307:718-720.
68. Brakefield P.M. Evo-devo and constraints on selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:362-368.
69. Emery N.C., Ackerly D. Ecological release exposes genetically based niche variation. Ecol. Lett. 2014, 17:1149-1157.
70. Hendry A.P., et al. Human influences on rates of phenotypic change in wild animal populations. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:20-29.
71. Wiens J.J., Graham C.H. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2005, 36:519-539.
72. Verschuren D., et al. Rainfall and drought in equatorial east Africa during the past 1,100 years. Nature 2000, 403:410-414.
73. Scheffer M., Carpenter S.R. Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18:648-656.
74. Scheffer M., et al. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 2001, 413:591-596.
75. Wright S. Evolution and the genetics of populations. The Theory of Gene Frequencies 1969, Vol. 2. University of Chicago Press.