The use of logistic model tree (LMT) for pixel- and object-based classifications using high-resolution WorldView-2 imagery

Geocarto International

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 71-86

  Colkesen, Ismail ^a   Kavzoglu, Taskin ^a  

^a GEBZE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

boosting; decision tree; Logistic model tree; object based classification; random forest

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ALGORITHM; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE RESOLUTION; IMAGERY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PIXEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; WORLDVIEW;

EID: 84954224388     PISSN: 10106049     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2015.1128486     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Baatz M, Schape A. 2000. Multi resolution segmentation-an optimization approach for high quality multi scale image segmentation. Angewandte Geographische Informations verarbeitung XII; Karlsruhe, Germany; p. 12–23.
2. Belgiu M, Drǎguţ L, Strobl J. 2014. Quantitative evaluation of variations in rule-based classifications of land cover in urban neighbourhoods using WorldView-2 imagery. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 87:205–215.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.11.007
3. Benz UC, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M. 2004. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 58:239–258.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.10.002
4. Blaschke T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 65:2–16.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004
5. Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45:5–32.10.1023/A:1010933404324
6. Cho MA, Malahlela O, Ramoelo A. 2015. Assessing the utility WorldView-2 imagery for tree species mapping in South African subtropical humid forest and the conservation implications:Dukuduku forest patch as case study. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 38:349–357.10.1016/j.jag.2015.01.015
7. Congalton R, Green K. 2009. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data:principles and practices. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL):CRC Press.
8. De Fries RS, Hansen M, Townshend JRG, Sohlberg R. 1998. Global land cover classifications at 8 km spatial resolution:the use of training data derived from Landsat imagery in decision tree classifiers. Int J Remote Sens. 19:3141–3168.10.1080/014311698214235
9. Dietterich TG. 2000. An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees:bagging, boosting, and randomization. Mach Learn. 40:139–157.10.1023/A:1007607513941
10. Doetsch P, Buck C, Golik P, Hoppe N, Kramp M, Laudenberg J, Oderdörfer C, Steingrube P, Forster J, Mauser A. 2009. Logistic model trees with AUC split criterion for the KDD Cup 2009 small challenge. J Mach Learn Res Proc. 7:77–78.
11. Drǎguţ L, Tiede D, Levick SR. 2010. ESP:a tool to estimate scale parameter for multiresolution image segmentation of remotely sensed data. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 24:859–871.10.1080/13658810903174803
12. Foody GM. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens Environ. 80:185–201.10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00295-4
13. Frank E, Wang Y, Inglis S, Holmes G, Witten IH. 1998. Technical note:using model trees for classification. Mach Learn. 32:63–76.10.1023/A:1007421302149
14. Freund Y, Schapire RE. 1997. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J Comput Syst Sci. 55:119–139.10.1006/jcss.1997.1504
15. Friedl MA, Brodley CE. 1997. Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ. 61:399–409.10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00049-7
16. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. 2000. Additive logistic regression:a statistical view of boosting (with discussion and a rejoinder by the authors). Ann Stat. 28:337–407.10.1214/aos/1016218223
17. Gama J. 2004. Functional trees. Mach Learn. 55:219–250.10.1023/B:MACH.0000027782.67192.13
18. Ghosh A, Joshi PK. 2013. Assessment of pan-sharpened very high-resolution WorldView-2 images. Int J Remote Sens. 34:8336–8359.10.1080/01431161.2013.838706
19. Ghosh A, Joshi PK. 2014. A comparison of selected classification algorithms for mapping bamboo patches in lower Gangetic plains using very high resolution WorldView 2 imagery. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 26:298–311.10.1016/j.jag.2013.08.011
20. Guan HY, Li J, Chapman M, Deng F, Ji Z, Yang X. 2013. Integration of orthoimagery and lidar data for object-based urban thematic mapping using random forests. Int J Remote Sens. 34:5166–5186.10.1080/01431161.2013.788261
21. Hansen MC, Defries RS, Townshend JRG, Sohlberg R. 2000. Global land cover classification at 1 km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach. Int J Remote Sens. 21:1331–1364.10.1080/014311600210209
22. Hansen M, Dubayah R, Defrıes R. 1996. Classification trees:an alternative to traditional land cover classifiers. Int J Remote Sens. 17:1075–1081.10.1080/01431169608949069
23. Hayes MM, Miller SN, Murphy MA. 2014. High-resolution land cover classification using Random Forest. Remote Sens Lett. 5:112–121.10.1080/2150704X.2014.882526
24. Heinl M, Walde J, Tappeiner G, Tappeiner U. 2009. Classifiers vs. input variables-the drivers in image classification for land cover mapping. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 11:423–430.10.1016/j.jag.2009.08.002
25. Heumann BW. 2011. An object-based classification of mangroves using a hybrid decision tree-support vector machine approach. Remote Sens. 3:2440–2460.10.3390/rs3112440
26. Japkowicz N, Shah M. 2011. Evaluating learning algorithms. New York (NY):Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921803
27. Jawak SD, Luis AJ. 2013. A comprehensive evaluation of PAN-sharpening algorithms coupled with resampling methods for image synthesis of very high resolution remotely sensed satellite data. Adv Rem S. 2:332–344.
28. Jensen JR. 2000. Remote sensing of the environment:an earth resource perspective. Upper Saddle River (NJ):Prentice-Hall.
29. Kamal M, Phinn S, Johansen K. 2015. Object-based approach for multi-scale mangrove composition mapping using multi-resolution image datasets. Remote Sens. 7:4753–4783.10.3390/rs70404753
30. Karabulut EM, Ibrikci T. 2014. Effective automated prediction of vertebral column pathologies based on logistic model tree with SMOTE preprocessing. J Med Syst. 38:1–9. Article No:50. http://link.springer.com/journal/10916/38/5/page/1
31. Kavzoglu T, Colkesen I. 2009. A kernel functions analysis for support vector machines for land cover classification. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 11:352–359.10.1016/j.jag.2009.06.002
32. Kavzoglu T, Colkesen I. 2012. The effects of training set size for the performance of support vector machines and decision trees. Paper presented at:10th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences; Florianópolis, BR.
33. Kavzoglu T, Colkesen I. 2013. An assessment of the effectiveness of a rotation forest ensemble for land-use and land-cover mapping. Int J Remote Sens. 34:4224–4241.10.1080/01431161.2013.774099
34. Kavzoglu T, Colkesen I, Yomralioglu T. 2015. Object based classification with rotation forest ensemble learning algorithm using very high resolution WorldView-2 image. Remote Sens Lett. 6:834–843.10.1080/2150704X.2015.1084550
35. Kohavi R. 1996. Scaling up the accuracy of naive Bayes classifiers:a decision-tree hybrid. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; Menlo Park, CA:AAAI Press; p. 202–207.
36. Landwehr N, Hall M, Frank E. 2005. Logistic model trees. Mach Learn. 59:161–205.10.1007/s10994-005-0466-3
37. Li CC, Wang J, Wang L, Hu LY, Gong P. 2014. Comparison of classification algorithms and training sample sizes in urban land classification with Landsat thematic mapper imagery. Remote Sens. 6:964–983.10.3390/rs6020964
38. Liu CR, Frazier P, Kumar L. 2007. Comparative assessment of the measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote Sens Environ. 107:606–616.10.1016/j.rse.2006.10.010
39. Lu D, Weng Q. 2007. A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. Int J Remote Sens. 28:823–870.10.1080/01431160600746456
40. Maxwell AE, Warner TA, Strager MP, Conley JF, Sharp AL. 2015. Assessing machine-learning algorithms and image- and lidar-derived variables for GEOBIA classification of mining and mine reclamation. Int J Remote Sens. 36:954–978.10.1080/01431161.2014.1001086
41. Pal M. 2005. Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification. Int J Remote Sens. 26:217–222.10.1080/01431160412331269698
42. Pal M, Mather PM. 2003. An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sens Environ. 86:554–565.10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00132-9
43. Pal M, Mather PM. 2004. Assessment of the effectiveness of support vector machines for hyperspectral data. Future Gener Comput Syst. 20:1215–1225.10.1016/j.future.2003.11.011
44. Pontius RG, Millones M. 2011. Death to Kappa:birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Int J Remote Sens. 32:4407–4429.10.1080/01431161.2011.552923
45. Quinlan, R., 1993. C45:programs for machine learning. Burlington (MA):Morgan Kaufman.
46. Rogan J, Chen DM. 2004. Remote sensing technology for mapping and monitoring land-cover and land-use change. Progr Plann. 61:301–325.10.1016/S0305-9006(03)00066-7
47. Shoombuatong W, Hongjaisee S, Barin F, Chaijaruwanich J, Samleerat T. 2012. HIV-1 CRF01_AE coreceptor usage prediction using kernel methods based logistic model trees. Comput Biol Med. 42:885–889.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2012.06.011
48. Sridharan H, Qiu F. 2013. Developing an object-based hyperspatial image classifier with a case study using WorldView-2 data. Photogram Eng Remote Sens. 79:1027–1036.10.14358/PERS.79.11.1027
49. Stehman SV. 1997. Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote Sens Environ. 62:77–89.10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00083-7
50. Sumner M, Frank E, Hall M. 2005. Speeding up logistic model tree induction. In:Jorge A, Torgo L, Brazdil PB, Camacho R, Gama J, editors. Knowledge Discovery in Databases:PKDD 2005. Heidelberg:Springer; p. 675–683.
51. Thomas N, Hendrix C, Congalton RG. 2003. A comparison of urban mapping methods using high-resolution digital imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 69:963–972.10.14358/PERS.69.9.963
52. Tso B, Mather PM. 2009. Classification methods for remotely sensed data. 2nd ed. London:Taylor & Francis.10.1201/9781420090741
53. Tzotsos A, Karantzalos K, Argialas D. 2011. Object-based image analysis through nonlinear scale-space filtering. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 66:2–16.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.07.001
54. Vieira MA, Formaggio AR, Rennó CD, Atzberger C, Aguiar DA, Mello MP. 2012. Object based image analysis and data mining applied to a remotely sensed Landsat time-series to map sugarcane over large areas. Remote Sens Environ. 123:553–562.10.1016/j.rse.2012.04.011
55. Warrens MJ. 2015. Properties of the quantity disagreement and the allocation disagreement. Int J Remote Sens. 36:1439–1446.10.1080/01431161.2015.1011794
56. Witten IH, Frank E, Hall MA. 2011. Data mining:practical machine learning tools and techniques. 3rd ed. Burlington (MA):Morgan Kaufman.
57. Wolf N. 2013. Object features for pixel-based classification of urban areas comparing different machine learning algorithms. Photogramm Fernerkun. 149–161.10.1127/1432-8364/2013/0166
58. Zhou YH, Qiu F. 2015. Fusion of high spatial resolution WorldView-2 imagery and LiDAR pseudo-waveform for object-based image analysis. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 101:221–232.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.12.013
59. Zimmermann A. 2008. Ensemble-trees:leveraging ensemble power inside decision trees. Discovery Sci Proceed. 5255:76–87.10.1007/978-3-540-88411-8