Community priming-Effects of sequential stressors on microbial assemblages

FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Rillig, Matthias C ^a,b   Rolff, Jens ^a,b   Tietjen, Britta ^a,b   Wehner, Jeannine ^a,b   Andrade Linares, Diana R ^a,b  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b BERLIN BRANDENBURG INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH BBIB   (Germany)

Author keywords

Model systems; Predictive response strategy; Stress

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIOLOGY; NUMERICAL MODEL; REACTION KINETICS; SURVIVAL; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ECOSYSTEM; FUNGUS; GRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIUM; GRAM POSITIVE BACTERIUM; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ECOSYSTEM; FUNGI; GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA; GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA; MODELS, THEORETICAL; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84954207080     PISSN: 01686496     EISSN: 15746941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiv040     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Acar M, Mettetal JT, Oudenaarden A. Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in luctuating environments. Nat Genet 2008;40:471-5.
2. Aragon AD, Rodriguez AL, Meirelles O, et al. Characterization of differentiated quiescent and non-quiescent cells in yeast stationary-phase cultures. Mol Biol Cell 2008;19:1271-80.
3. Arce A, Johnston PR, Smiseth PT, et al. Mechanisms and itness effects of antibacterial defences in a carrion beetle. J Evolution Biol 2012;25:930-7.
4. Balaban NQ, Merrin J, Chait R, et al. Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science 2004;305:1622-5.
5. BegleyM, Gahan CGM,Hill C. Bile stress response in Listeriamono- cytogenes LO28: adaptation, cross-protection and identiica- tion of genetic Loci involved in bile resistance. Appl Environ Microb 2002;68:6005-12.
6. Bergholz TM, Tang S, Wiedmann M, et al. Nisin resistance of Listeria monocytogenes is increased by exposure to salt stress and is mediated via LiaR. Appl Environ Microb 2013;79: 5682-8.
7. Berry DB, Gasch AP. Stress-activated genomic expression changes serve a preparative role for impending stress in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2008;19:4580-7.
8. Berry DB, Guan Q, Hose J, et al. Multiple means to the same end: the genetic basis of acquired stress resistance in yeast. PLoS Genet 2011;7:e1002353.
9. Brunke S, Hube B. Adaptive prediction as a strategy in microbial infections. PLoS Pathog 2014;10:e1004356.
10. Courchamp F, Dunne JA, Le Maho Y, et al. Fundamental ecology is fundamental. Trends Ecol Evol 2015;30:9-16.
11. Döll K, Chatterjee S, Scheu S, et al. Fungal metabolic plastic- ity and sexual development mediate induced resistance to arthropod fungivory. PRSocB 2013;280:2013-1219.
12. Fischer E, Sauer U. Large-scale in vivo lux analysis shows rigidity and suboptimal performance of Bacillus subtilis metabolism. Nat Genet 2005;37:636-40.
13. Hol FJH, Dekker C. Zooming in to see the bigger picture: using nanofabrication to study bacteria. Science 2014;346:1251821.
14. Jessup CM, Kassen R, Forde SE, et al. Big questions, small worlds: microbial model systems in ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 2004;19:189-97.
15. Johnson LR. Microcolony and bioilm formation as a survival strategy for bacteria. J Theor Biol 2008;251:24-34.
16. Jones SE, Lennon JT. Dormancy contributes to the maintenance of microbial diversity. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:5881-6.
17. Kandror O, Bretschneider N, Kreydin E, et al. Yeast adapt to near- freezing temperatures by STRE/Msn2,4-dependent induction of trehalose synthesis and certain molecular chaperones. Mol Cell 2004;13:771-81.
18. Lardon LA, Merkey BV, Martins S, et al. iDynoMiCS: next- generation individual-based modelling of bioilms. Environ Microbiol 2011;13:2416-34.
19. Levy SF, Ziv N, Siegal ML. Bet hedging in yeast by heteroge- neous, age-correlated expression of a stress protectant. PLoS Biol 2012;10:e1001325.
20. Leyer GJ, Johnson EA. Acid adaptation induces cross-protection against environmental stresses in Salmonella typhimurium. Appl Environ Microb 1993;59:1842-7.
21. Metcalf JL,Wegener Parfrey L, Gonzalez A, et al. Amicrobial clock provides an accurate estimate of the postmortem interval in a mouse model system. eLife 2013;2:e01104.
22. Mitchell A, Pilpel Y. A mathematical model for adaptive pre- diction of environmental changes by microorganisms. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:7271-6.
23. Mitchell A, Romano GH, Groisman B, et al. Adaptive predic- tion of environmental changes by microorganisms. Nature 2009;460:220-4.
24. Newman JR, Ghaemmaghami S, Ihmels J, et al. Single-cell pro- teomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of bi- ological noise. Nature 2006;441:840-6.
25. Peay KG, Belisle M, Fukami T. Phylogenetic relatedness predicts priority effects in nectar yeast communities. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 2012;279:749-58.
26. Rodaki A, Bohovych IM, Enjalbert B, et al. Glucose promotes stress resistance in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans.Mol Biol Cell 2009;20:4845-55.
27. Runde S, Moliere N, Heinz A, et al. The role of thiol oxidative stress response in heat-induced protein aggregate forma- tion during thermotolerance in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 2014;91:1036-52.
28. Saleem M, Fetzer I, Harms H, et al. Diversity of protists and bac- teria determines predation performance and stability. ISME J 2013;7:1912-21.
29. Schild S, Tamayo R, Nelson EJ, et al. Genes induced late in infec- tion increase itness of Vibrio cholerae after release into the environment. Cell Host Microbe 2007;11:264-77.
30. Schimel J, Balser TC, Wallenstein M. Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystemfunction. Ecol- ogy 2007;88:1386-94.
31. Tagkopoulos I, Liu YC, Tavazoie S. Predictive behavior withinmi- crobial genetic networks. Science 2008;320:1313-17.
32. Tucker CM, Fukami T. Environmental variability counter- acts priority effects to facilitate species coexistence: evi- dencefromnectarmicrobes. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 2014;281: 20132637.
33. Van Vliet S, Hol FJH, Weenink T, et al. The effects of chemi- cal interactions and culture history on the colonization of structured habitats by competing bacterial populations. BMC Microbiol 2014;14:116.
34. Vilaprinyo E, Alves R, Sorribas A. Minimization of biosynthetic costs in adaptive gene expression responses of yeast to en- vironmental changes. PLoS Comput Biol 2010;6:e1000674.
35. Wittebolle L, Marzorati M, Clement L, et al. Initial community evenness favours functionality under selective stress. Nature 2009;458:623-6.
36. Wolfe BE, Button JE, Santarelli M, et al. Cheese rind communities provide tractable systems for in situ and in vitro studies of microbial diversity. Cell 2014;158:422-33.
37. Wolfe BE, Dutton RJ. Fermented foods as experimentally tractable microbial ecosystems. Cell 2015;161:49-55.
38. Zakrzewska A, van Eikenhorst G, Burggraaff JEC, et al. Genome- wide analysis of yeast stress survival and tolerance acquisi- tion to analyze the central trade-off between growth rate and cellular robustness. Mol Biol Cell 2011;22:4435-46.