Phylogenetic relatedness predicts priority effects in nectar yeast communities

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 279, Issue 1729, 2012, Pages 749-758

  Peay, Kabir G ^a,b   Belisle, Melinda ^a   Fukami, Tadashi ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Darwin's naturalization hypothesis; Historical contingency; Priority effect

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; CARBON; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; NECTAR; PHYLOGENETICS; RELATEDNESS; SHRUB; YEAST;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84855644469     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1230     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Davis, M. B. 1986 Climatic instability, time lags, and community disequilibrium. In Community ecology (eds J. M. Diamond & T. J. Case), pp. 269-284. New York, NY: Harper & Roy.
2. Latham, T. E. & Ricklefs, R. E. 1993 Continental comparisons of temperate-zone tree species diversity. In Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives (eds R. E. Ricklefs & D. Schluter). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3. Clements, F. E. 1936 Nature and structure of the climax. J. Ecol. 24, 252-284. (doi:10.2307/2256278)
4. Fukami, T. 2010 Community assembly dynamics in space. In Community ecology: processes, models and applications (eds H. A. Verhoef & P. J. Morin), pp. 45-54. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. Chase, J. M. 2003 Community assembly: when should history matter? Oecologia 136, 489-498. (doi:10.1007/ s00442-003-1311-7)
6. Gleason, H. A. 1926 The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull. Torrey Botanic. Club 53, 7-26. (doi:10.2307/2479933)
7. Santayana, G. 1905 Life of reason: reason in common sense. New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.
8. Connell, J. H. & Sousa, W. P. 1983 On the evidence needed to judge ecological stability or persistence. Am. Nat. 121, 789-824. (doi:10.1086/284105)
9. Samuels, C. L. & Drake, J. A. 1997 Divergent perspectives on community convergence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 427-432. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01182-8)
10. Schröder, A., Persson, L. & De Roos, A. M. 2005 Direct experimental evidence for alternative stable states: a review. Oikos 110, 3-19. (doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13962.x)
11. Alford, R. A. & Wilbur, H. M. 1985 Priority effects in experimental pond communities: competition between Bufo and Rana. Ecology 66, 1097-1105. (doi:10.2307/1939161)
12. Wilbur, H. M. & Alford, R. A. 1985 Priority effects in experimental pond communities: responses of Hyla to Bufo and Rana. Ecology 66, 1106-1114. (doi:10.2307/1939162)
13. Darwin, C. 1859 On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London, UK: John Murray.
14. Park, T. 1954 Experimental studies of interspecies competition. II. Temperature, humidity, and competition in two species of Tribolium. Phys. Zool. 27, 177-238.
15. Tilman, D. 1976 Ecological competition between algae: experimental confirmation of resource-based competition theory. Science 192, 463-465. (doi:10.1126/science.192.4238.463)
16. Hutchinson, G. E. 1961 The paradox of the plankton. Am. Nat. 95, 137-145. (doi:10.1086/282171)
17. Burns, J. H. & Strauss, S. Y. 2011 More closely related species are more ecologically similar in an experimental test. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5302-5307. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1013003108)
18. Jiang, L., Tan, J. & Pu, Z. 2010 An experimental test of Darwin's naturalization hypothesis. Am. Nat. 175, 415-423. (doi:10.1086/650720)
19. Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A. & Donoghue, M. J. 2002 Phylogenies and community ecology. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 475-505. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448)
20. Anderson, T. M., Lachance, M. A. & Starmer, W. T. 2004 The relationship of phylogeny to community structure: the cactus yeast community. Am. Nat. 164, 709-721. (doi:10.1086/425372)
21. Cavender-Bares, J., Kozak, K. H., Fine, P. V. A. & Kembel, S. W. 2009 The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol. Lett. 12, 693-715. (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x)
22. Kennedy, P. G., Peay, K. G. & Bruns, T. D. 2009 Root tip competition among ectomycorrhizal fungi: are priority effects a rule or an exception? Ecology 90, 2098-2107. (doi:10.1890/08-1291.1)
23. Louette, G. & De Meester, L. 2007 Predation and priority effects in experimental zooplankton communities. Oikos 116, 419-426. (doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.15381.x)
24. Brysch-Herzberg, M. 2004 Ecology of yeasts in plantbumblebee mutualism in central Europe. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 50, 87-100. (doi:10.1016/j.femsec.2004.06.003)
25. Pozo, M. I., Herrera, C. M. & Bazaga, P. 2010 Species richness of yeast communities in floral nectar of southern Spanish plants. Microbial Ecol. 10, 82-91.
26. Lachance, M. A., Starmer, W. T., Rosa, C. A., Bowles, J. M., Barker, J. S. F. & Janzen, D. H. 2001 Biogeography of the yeasts of ephemeral flowers and their insects. FEMS Yeast Res. 1, 1-8.
27. Herrera, C. M., Garcia, I. M. & Perez, R. 2008 Invisible floral larcenies: microbial communities degrade floral nectar of bumblebee-pollinated plants. Ecology 89, 2369-2376. (doi:10.1890/08-0241.1)
28. Pozo, M. I., de Vega, C., Canto, A. & Herrera, C. M. 2009 Presence of yeasts in floral nectar is consistent with the hypothesis of microbial-mediated signaling in plant-pollinator interactions. Plant Signal. Behav. 4, 1102-1104. (doi:10.4161/psb.4.11.9874)
29. Beslisle, M., Peay, K. G. & Fukami, T. Submitted. Flowers as micro-islands: distribution of nectar-living microfungi in a California landscape. Microb. Ecol.
30. Cornwell, W. K. & Ackerly, D. D. 2009 Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California. Ecol. Monogr. 79, 109-126. (doi:10.1890/07-1134.1)
31. Mooney, H. A., Ehrlich, P. R., Lincoln, D. E. & Williams, K. S. 1980 Environmental controls on the seasonality of a drought deciduous shrub, Diplacus aurantiacus and its predator, the checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas chalcedona. Oecologia 45, 143-146. (doi:10.1007/BF00346452)
32. Fetscher, A. E. & Kohn, J. R. 1999 Stigma behavior in Mimulus aurantiacus (Scrophulariaceae). Am. J. Bot. 86, 1130-1135. (doi:10.2307/2656976)
33. O'Donnell, K. 1993 Fusarium and it's near relatives. In The fungal holomorph: mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics (eds D. R. Reynolds & J. W. Taylor), pp. 225-233. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
34. Yarrow, D. 1998 Methods for the isolation, maintenance and identification of yeasts. In The yeasts, a taxonomic study (eds C. P. Kurtzman & J. W. Fell), pp. 77-100. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
35. Kahm, M., Hasenbrink, G., Lichtenberg-Frate, H., Ludwig, J. & Kshischo, M. 2010 Grofit: fitting biological growth curves with R. J. Statist. Softw. 33, 1-21.
36. Toussaint, M. & Conconi, A. 2006 High-throughput sensitive assay to measure yeast cell growth: a bench protocol for testing genotoxic agents. Nat. Protocols 1, 1922-1928. (doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.304)
37. Rice, W. R. 1989 Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43, 223-225. (doi:10.2307/2409177)
38. Suh, S. O., Blackwell, M., Kurtzman, C. P. & Lachance, M. A. 2006 Phylogenetics of Saccharomycetales, the ascomycete yeasts. Mycologia 98, 1006-1017. (doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.6.1006)
39. Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K. & Miyata, T. 2002 MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059-3066. (doi:10.1093/nar/gkf436)
40. Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. 2003 A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52, 696-704. (doi:10.1080/10635150390235520)
41. Oksanen, J. et al. 2008 Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 1.15-1. See http://cc.oulu.fi/_jarioksa/opetus/metodi/vegantutor.pdf.
42. Peres-Neto, P. R. & Jackson, D. A. 2001 How well do multivariate data sets match? The robustness and flexibility of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia 129, 169-178. (doi:10.1007/ s004420100720)
43. Rosa, C. A. & Lachance, M. A. 1998 The yeast genus Starmerella gen. nov. and Starmerella bombicola sp. nov., the teleomorph of Candida bombicola (Spencer, Gorin & Tullock) Meyer & Yarrow. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48, 1413-1417. (doi:10.1099/00207713-48-4-1413)
44. Herrera, C. M., Canto, A., Pozo, M. I. & Bazaga, P. 2009 Inhospitable sweetness: nectar filtering of pollinatorborne inocula leads to impoverished, phylogenetically clustered yeast communities. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 747-754. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1485)
45. Carter, C. & Thornburg, R. W. 2004 Is the nectar redox cycle a floral defense against microbial attack? Trends Plant Sci. 9, 320-324. (doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2004.05.008)
46. Lokvam, J. & Braddock, J. F. 1999 Anti-bacterial function in the sexually dimorphic pollinator rewards of Clusia grandiflora (Clusiaceae). Oecologia 119, 534-540. (doi:10.1007/s004420050816)
47. Levin, S. A. 1992 The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73, 1943-1967. (doi:10.2307/1941447)
48. Baker, H. G. & Baker, I. 1986 The occurrence and significance of amino-acids in floral nectar. Plant Syst. Evol. 151, 175-186. (doi:10.1007/BF02430273)
49. Cavender-Bares, J., Kitajima, K. & Bazzaz, F. A. 2004 Multiple trait associations in relation to habitat differentiation among 17 Floridian oak species. Ecol. Monogr. 74, 635-662. (doi:10.1890/03-4007)
50. Cadotte, M. W., Cardinale, B. J. & Oakley, T. H. 2008 Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17012-17017. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0805962105)