Temporal Information of Directed Causal Connectivity in Multi-Trial ERP Data using Partial Granger Causality

Neuroinformatics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 99-120

  Youssofzadeh, Vahab ^a   Prasad, Girijesh ^a   Naeem, Muhammad ^b   Wong Lin, KongFatt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Auditory oddball paradigm (AOP); Conditional Granger causality (CGC); Event related potential (ERP); Mismatch negativity (MMN); Partial Granger causality (PGC)

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIAL; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; HEARING; HUMAN; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84953837503     PISSN: 15392791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12021-015-9281-6     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. Acunzo, D. J., Mackenzie, G., & van Rossum, M. C. W. (2012). Systematic biases in early ERP and ERF components as a result of high-pass filtering. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 209, 212–8. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.06.011.
2. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723. doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705.
3. Alho, K. (1995). Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes. Ear and Hearing, 16, 38–51. doi:10.1097/00003446-199502000-00004.
4. Ancona N, Marinazzo D, Stramaglia S (2004) Radial basis function approach to nonlinear Granger causality of time series. Phys Rev E, Stat nonlinear, soft matter Phys 70:56221. 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.056221
5. Arnold, M., Miltner, W. H. R., Witte, H., et al. (1998). Adaptive AR modeling of nonstationary time series by means of kaiman filtering. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 45, 545–552. doi:10.1109/10.668739.
6. Astolfi, L., Cincotti, F., Mattia, D., et al. (2007). Comparison of different cortical connectivity estimators for high-resolution EEG recordings. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 143–157. doi:10.1002/hbm.20263.
7. Babiloni, C., Ferri, R., Binetti, G., et al. (2009). Directionality of EEG synchronization in Alzheimer’s disease subjects. Neurobiology of Aging, 30, 93–102. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.05.007.
8. Baccalá, L. A., & Sameshima, K. (2001a). Overcoming the limitations of correlation analysis for many simultaneously processed neural structures. Progress in Brain Research, 130, 33–47. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(01)30004-3.
9. Baccalá, L. A., & Sameshima, K. (2001b). Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biological Cybernetics, 84, 463–474. doi:10.1007/PL00007990.
10. Barnett, L., & Seth, A. K. (2011). Behaviour of Granger causality under filtering: theoretical invariance and practical application. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 201, 404–19. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.08.010.
11. Barnett L, Barrett AB, Seth AK (2009) Granger causality and transfer entropy are equivalent for Gaussian variables. Phys Rev Lett. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.238701
12. Barrett, A. B. A., Barnett, L., & Seth, A. A. K. (2010). Multivariate granger causality and generalized variance. Physical Review E, 81, 41907. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.81.041907.
13. Barrett, A. B., Murphy, M., Bruno, M. A., et al. (2012). Granger causality analysis of steady-state electroencephalographic signals during propofol-induced anaesthesia. PloS One, 7, e29072. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029072.
14. Bastos, A. M., Usrey, W. M., Adams, R. A., et al. (2012). Canonical microcircuits for predictive coding. Neuron, 76, 695–711. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.038.
15. Bernasconi, C., & KoÈnig, P. (1999). On the directionality of cortical interactions studied by structural analysis of electrophysiological recordings. Biological Cybernetics, 210, 199–210. doi:10.1007/s004220050556.
16. Blinowska, K. J. (2011). Review of the methods of determination of directed connectivity from multichannel data. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 49, 521–9. doi:10.1007/s11517-011-0739-x.
17. Bressler, S. S. L., & Seth, A. A. K. (2011). Wiener-granger causality: a well established methodology. NeuroImage, 58, 323–9. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.059.
18. Brovelli, A., Ding, M., Ledberg, A., et al. (2004). Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by granger causality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 9849–54. doi:10.1073/pnas.0308538101.
19. Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences (Regul Ed), 4, 215–222. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01483-2.
20. Cohen, M. X., van Gaal, S., & van Gaal, S. (2012). Dynamic interactions between large-scale brain networks predict behavioral adaptation after perceptual errors. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 1061–72. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs069.
21. Crottaz-Herbette, S., & Menon, V. (2006). Where and when the anterior cingulate cortex modulates attentional response: combined fMRI and ERP evidence. Journal Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 766–780. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.766.
22. David, O., & Friston, K. J. (2003). A neural mass model for MEG/EEG: coupling and neuronal dynamics. NeuroImage, 20, 1743–1755. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.015.
23. David, O., Cosmelli, D., & Friston, K. J. (2004). Evaluation of different measures of functional connectivity using a neural mass model. NeuroImage, 21, 659–73. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.006.
24. David, O., Harrison, L., & Friston, K. J. (2005). Modelling event-related responses in the brain. NeuroImage, 25, 756–70. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.030.
25. David, O., Kiebel, S. J., Harrison, L. M., et al. (2006). Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG. NeuroImage, 30, 1255–72. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.045.
26. David, O., Guillemain, I., Saillet, S., et al. (2008). Identifying neural drivers with functional MRI: an electrophysiological validation. PLoS Biology, 6, 2683–97. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060315.
27. Dhamala, M., Rangarajan, G., & Ding, M. (2008). Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric granger causality. NeuroImage, 41, 354–362. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.020.
28. Ding, M., Bressler, S. L., Yang, W., & Liang, H. (2000). Short-window spectral analysis of cortical event-related potentials by adaptive multivariate autoregressive modeling: data preprocessing, model validation, and variability assessment. Biological Cybernetics, 83, 35–45. doi:10.1007/s004229900137.
29. Ding, M., Chen, Y., & Bressler, S. S. L. (2006). Granger causality: basic theory and application to neuroscience. In B. Schelter, M. Winterhalder, & J. Timmer (Eds.), Handbook of time series analysis (pp. 437–460). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
30. Douglas, R. J., & Martin, K. A. C. (2004). Neuronal circuits of the neocortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 419–51. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144152.
31. Durbin, J., & Watson, G. S. (1951). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression II. Biometrika, 38, 159–178. doi:10.2307/2332325.
32. Essl, M., & Rappelsberger, P. (1998). EEG coherence and reference signals: experimental results and mathematical explanations. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 36, 399–406. doi:10.1007/BF02523206.
33. Faes L, Nollo G (2010) Extended causal modeling to assess Partial Directed Coherence in multiple time series with significant instantaneous interactions. Biological Cybernetics, 103, 387–400.
34. Friston, K. J. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 360, 815–36. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622.
35. Friston, K. J. (2011). Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connectivity, 1, 13–36. doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0008.
36. Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003). Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage, 19, 1273–1302. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7.
37. Friston, K. J., Moran, R., & Seth, A. K. (2013). Analysing connectivity with granger causality and dynamic causal modelling. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23, 172–178. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.010.
38. Friston, K. J., Bastos, A. M., Oswal, A., et al. (2014). Granger causality revisited. NeuroImage, 101, 796–808. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.062.
39. Gaillard, R., Dehaene, S., Adam, C., et al. (2009). Converging intracranial markers of conscious access. PLoS Biology, 7, e61. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000061.
40. Gao, J., Wong-Lin, K., Holmes, P., et al. (2009). Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time tasks: decomposition and synthesis of mechanisms. Neural Computation, 21, 2407–36. doi:10.1162/neco.2009.09-08-866.
41. Garrido, M. I., Kilner, J. M., Kiebel, S. J., et al. (2007a). Dynamic causal modelling of evoked potentials: a reproducibility study. NeuroImage, 36, 571–580. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.014.
42. Garrido, M. I., Kilner, J. M., Kiebel, S. J., & Friston, K. J. (2007b). Evoked brain responses are generated by feedback loops. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 20961–20966. doi:10.1073/pnas.0706274105.
43. Garrido, M. I., Kilner, J. M., Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2009). The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 453–63. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.029.
44. Geweke, J. (1982). Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 304. doi:10.2307/2287238.
45. Geweke, J. F. (1984). Measures of conditional linear dependence and feedback between time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 907–915. doi:10.2307/2288723.
46. Giard, M. H., Perrin, F., Pernier, J., & Bouchet, P. (1990). Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: a topographic event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 27, 627–640. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb03184.x.
47. Gómez-Herrero, G., Atienza, M., Egiazarian, K., & Cantero, J. L. (2008). Measuring directional coupling between EEG sources. NeuroImage, 43, 497–508. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.032.
48. Granger, C. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Economics Journal Economics and Sociology, 37, 424–438. doi:10.2307/1912791.
49. Guo, S., Seth, A. K., Kendrick, K. M., et al. (2008a). Partial Granger causality--eliminating exogenous inputs and latent variables. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 172, 79–93. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.04.011.
50. Guo, S., Wu, J., Ding, M., & Feng, J. (2008b). Uncovering interactions in the frequency domain. PLoS Computational Biology, 4, e1000087. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000087.
51. Guo S, Ladroue C, Feng J (2010) Granger causality: theory and applications. In: Feng J, Fu W, Sun F (eds) Frontiers in Computational and Systems Biology Computational Biology. Springer London, pp 83–111
52. Hämäläinen, M. S., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (1994). Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 32, 35–42. doi:10.1007/BF02512476.
53. Haufe, S., Nikulin, V. V., Müller, K.-R., & Nolte, G. (2013). A critical assessment of connectivity measures for EEG data: a simulation study. NeuroImage, 64, 120–33. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.036.
54. Havlicek, M., Jan, J., Brazdil, M., & Calhoun, V. D. (2010). Dynamic granger causality based on kalman filter for evaluation of functional network connectivity in fMRI data. NeuroImage, 53, 65–77. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.063.
55. Hesse, W., Möller, E., Arnold, M., & Schack, B. (2003). The use of time-variant EEG granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 124, 27–44. doi:10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00366-7.
56. Hu, M., & Liang, H. (2014). A copula approach to assessing granger causality. NeuroImage, 100, 125–134. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.013.
57. Huettel, S. A., Mack, P. B., & McCarthy, G. (2002). Perceiving patterns in random series: dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 485–490. doi:10.1038/nn841.
58. Jansen, B., & Rit, V. (1995). Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns. Biological Cybernetics, 73, 357–366. doi:10.1007/BF00199471.
59. Kaiser, J., Lutzenberger, W., Preissl, H., et al. (2000). Right-hemisphere dominance for the processing of sound-source lateralization. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 6631–9.
60. Kaminski M, Szerling P, Blinowska K (2010) Comparison of methods for estimation of time-varying transmission in multichannel data. Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.
61. Kiebel, S. J., David, O., & Friston, K. J. (2006). Dynamic causal modelling of evoked responses in EEG/MEG with lead field parameterization. NeuroImage, 30, 1273–84. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.055.
62. Kiebel, S. J., Daunizeau, J., Phillips, C., & Friston, K. J. (2008). Variational bayesian inversion of the equivalent current dipole model in EEG/MEG. NeuroImage, 39, 728–41. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.005.
63. Kortelainen, J., Silfverhuth, M. J., Hintsala, H., & Seppänen, T. (2012). Experimental comparison of connectivity measures with simulated EEG signals. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 50, 683–688. doi:10.1007/s11517-012-0911-y.
64. Korzeniewska, A., Kasicki, S., Kamiński, M., & Blinowska, K. J. (1997). Information flow between hippocampus and related structures during various types of rat’s behavior. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 73, 49–60. doi:10.1016/S0165-0270(96)02212-1.
65. Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. (1951). On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22, 79–86. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694.
66. Kuś, R., Kamiński, M., & Blinowska, K. J. (2004). Determination of EEG activity propagation: pair-wise versus multichannel estimate. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 51, 1501–1510. doi:10.1109/TBME.2004.827929.
67. Litvak, V., Mattout, J., Kiebel, S., et al. (2011). EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, 852961–852993. doi:10.1155/2011/852961.
68. Liu, Y., Keil, A., & Ding, M. (2012). Effects of emotional conditioning on early visual processing: temporal dynamics revealed by ERP single-trial analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 909–919. doi:10.1002/hbm.21259.
69. Lopes da Silva, F., Pijn, J. P., Boeijinga, P., & da Silva, F. (1989). Interdependence of EEG signals: linear vs. nonlinear associations and the significance of time delays and phase shifts. Brain Topography, 2, 9–18. doi:10.1007/BF01128839.
70. Luo, Q., Lu, W., Cheng, W., et al. (2013). Spatio-temporal granger causality: a new framework. NeuroImage, 79, 241–63. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.091.
71. Machens, C. K., Romo, R., & Brody, C. D. (2005). Flexible control of mutual inhibition: a neural model of two-interval discrimination. Science, 307, 1121–1124. doi:10.1126/science.1104171.
72. Mardia, K. V., Goodall, C., Redfern, E. J., & Alonso, F. J. (1998). The kriged kalman filter. Test, 7, 217–282. doi:10.1007/BF02565111.
73. Marinazzo, D., Pellicoro, M., & Stramaglia, S. (2006). Nonlinear parametric model for granger causality of time series. Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.73.066216.
74. Marinazzo, D., Liao, W., Chen, H., & Stramaglia, S. (2011). Nonlinear connectivity by granger causality. NeuroImage, 58, 330–8. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.099.
75. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167.
76. Möller, E., Schack, B., Arnold, M., & Witte, H. (2001). Instantaneous multivariate EEG coherence analysis by means of adaptive high-dimensional autoregressive models. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 105, 143–158. doi:10.1016/S0165-0270(00)00350-2.
77. Moran, R. J., Kiebel, S. J., Stephan, K. E., et al. (2007). A neural mass model of spectral responses in electrophysiology. NeuroImage, 37, 706–20. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.032.
78. Moran, R. J., Symmonds, M., Stephan, K. E., et al. (2011). An in vivo assay of synaptic function mediating human cognition. Current Biology, 21, 1320–5. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.053.
79. Morf, M., Vieira, A., Lee, L. D., et al. (1978). Recursive multichannel maximum entropy spectral estimation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics, 16, 85–94. doi:10.1109/TGE.1978.294569.
80. Mosher, J. C., Leahy, R. M., & Lewis, P. S. (1999). EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 46, 245–259. doi:10.1109/10.748978.
81. Mountcastle, V. B. (1957). Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat’s somatic sensory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 20, 408–434.
82. Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 201–233. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00078407.
83. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2544–90. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026.
84. Nedungadi, A. G., Rangarajan, G., Jain, N., & Ding, M. (2009). Analyzing multiple spike trains with nonparametric granger causality. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 27, 55–64. doi:10.1007/s10827-008-0126-2.
85. Netoff, T. I., Carroll, T. L., Pecora, L., & Schif, S. J. (2006). Detecting coupling in the presence of noise and nonlinearity. In B. Schelter, M. Winterhalder, & J. Timmer (Eds.), Handbook of time series analysis (pp. 265–282). KGaA: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.
86. Niyogi, R. K., & Wong-Lin, K. (2013). Dynamic excitatory and inhibitory gain modulation can produce flexible, robust and optimal decision-making. PLoS Computational Biology, 9, e1003099. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003099.
87. Paavilainen, P. (2013). The mismatch-negativity (MMN) component of the auditory event-related potential to violations of abstract regularities: A review. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 88, 109–23. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.03.015.
88. Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., et al. (1991). Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 466–479. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(91)90064-B.
89. Psaradakis, Z., Ravn, M. O., & Sola, M. (2005). Markov switching causality and the money-output relationship. Journal of Applied Ecology, 20, 665–683. doi:10.1002/jae.819.
90. Quiroga, R. Q., Kreuz, T., & Grassberger, P. (2002). Event synchronization: a simple and fast method to measure synchronicity and time delay patterns. Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.66.041904.
91. Reimann, M. W., Anastassiou, C. A., Perin, R., et al. (2013). A biophysically detailed model of neocortical local field potentials predicts the critical role of active membrane currents. Neuron, 79, 375–90. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.023.
92. Roebroeck, A., Formisano, E., & Goebel, R. (2005). Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. NeuroImage, 25, 230–242. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.017.
93. Roelstraete, B., & Rosseel, Y. (2012). Does partial granger causality really eliminate the influence of exogenous inputs and latent variables? Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 206, 73–7. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.01.010.
94. Sanei, S. (2013). Connectivity of brain regions. Adaptive processing of brain signals (pp. 178–209). Hoboken: Wiley.
95. Sato, J. R., Junior, E. A., Takahashi, D. Y., et al. (2006). A method to produce evolving functional connectivity maps during the course of an fMRI experiment using wavelet-based time-varying Granger causality. NeuroImage, 31, 187–96. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.039.
96. Schack, B., Rappelsberger, P., Weiss, S., & Möller, E. (1999). Adaptive phase estimation and its application in EEG analysis of word processing. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 93, 49–59. doi:10.1016/S0165-0270(99)00117-X.
97. Schelter, B., Timmer, J., & Eichler, M. (2009). Assessing the strength of directed influences among neural signals using renormalized partial directed coherence. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 179, 121–30. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.01.006.
98. Schlögl, A., & Supp, G. (2006). Analyzing event-related EEG data with multivariate autoregressive parameters. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 135–147. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)59009-0.
99. Schoffelen, J.-M., & Gross, J. (2009). Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1857–1865. doi:10.1002/hbm.20745.
100. Schreiber, T. (2000). Measuring information transfer. Physical Review Letters, 85, 461–4. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.461.
101. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136.
102. Seth, A. K. (2010). A MATLAB toolbox for Granger causal connectivity analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 186, 262–73. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.11.020.
103. Seth, A. K., Chorley, P., & Barnett, L. C. (2013). Granger causality analysis of fMRI BOLD signals is invariant to hemodynamic convolution but not downsampling. NeuroImage, 65, 540–55. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.049.
104. Smith, S. M., Miller, K. L., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., et al. (2011). Network modelling methods for FMRI. NeuroImage, 54, 875–91. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.063.
105. Sommerlade, L., Thiel, M., Platt, B., et al. (2014). Time-variant estimation of connectivity and Kalman’s filter. In K. Sameshima & L. Baccala (Eds.), Methods in brain connectivity inference through multivariate time series analysis (pp. 161–177). New York: CRC Press.
106. Stevens, M. C., Calhoun, V. D., & Kiehl, K. A. (2005). Hemispheric differences in hemodynamics elicited by auditory oddball stimuli. NeuroImage, 26, 782–92. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.044.
107. Thomson, A. M., & Bannister, A. P. (2003). Interlaminar connections in the neocortex. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 5–14. doi:10.1093/cercor/13.1.5.
108. Tiitinen, H., May, P., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen, R. (1994). Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature, 372, 90–92. doi:10.1038/372090a0.
109. Wacongne, C., Changeux, J.-P., & Dehaene, S. (2012). A neuronal model of predictive coding accounting for the mismatch negativity. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 3665–78. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5003-11.2012.
110. Wang, X., Chen, Y., & Ding, M. (2008). Estimating Granger causality after stimulus onset: a cautionary note. NeuroImage, 41, 767–776. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.025.Estimating.
111. Weiss, T., Hesse, W., Ungureanu, M., et al. (2008). How do brain areas communicate during the processing of noxious stimuli? an analysis of laser-evoked event-related potentials using the granger causality index. Journal of Neurophysiology, 99, 2220–31. doi:10.1152/jn.00912.2007.
112. Wiener, N. (1956). The theory of prediction (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
113. Winkler, I., & Czigler, I. (2012). Evidence from auditory and visual event-related potential (ERP) studies of deviance detection (MMN and vMMN) linking predictive coding theories and perceptual object representations. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 132–43. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.001.
114. Wong, K.-F., & Huk, A. C. (2008). Temporal dynamics underlying perceptual decision making: insights from the interplay between an attractor model and parietal neurophysiology. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2, 245–54. doi:10.3389/neuro.01.028.2008.
115. Wong, K.-F., & Wang, X.-J. (2006). A recurrent network mechanism of time integration in perceptual decisions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 1314–28. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3733-05.2006.
116. Xu, L., Stoica, P., Li, J., et al. (2009). ASEO: a method for the simultaneous estimation of brain activities. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 56, 111–121. doi:10.1109/TBME.2008.2008166.
117. Youssofzadeh V, Prasad G, Naeem M, Wong-Lin K (2013) Partial Granger Causality Analysis for Brain Connectivity based on Event Related Potentials. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics. Conference Abstract: Neuroinformatics 2013.
118. Youssofzadeh V, Zanotto D, Stegall P, et al. (2014) Directed neural connectivity changes in robot-assisted gait training: A partial Granger causality analysis. IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC’14). pp 7–10
119. Youssofzadeh, V., Prasad, G., & Wong-Lin, K. (2015). On self-feedback connectivity in neural mass models applied to event-related potentials. NeuroImage, 108, 364–376. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.067.