Markov switching causality and the money-output relationship

Journal of Applied Econometrics

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 665-683

  Psaradakis, Zacharias ^a,e   Ravn, Morten O ^b,c   Sola, Martin ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c CEPR   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSIDAD TORCUATO DI TELLA   (Argentina)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844474561     PISSN: 08837252     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jae.819     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Andrews DWK. 1993. Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica 61: 821-856.
2. Andrews DWK, Ploberger W. 1994. Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica 62: 1383-1414.
3. Backus DK, Kehoe PJ. 1992. International evidence on the historical properties of business cycles. American Economic Review 82: 864-888.
4. Bai J. 1999. Likelihood ratio tests for multiple structural changes. Journal of Econometrics 91: 299-323.
5. Bai J, Perron P. 1998. Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica 66: 47-78.
6. Banerjee A, Lumsdaine RL, Stock JH. 1992. Recursive and sequential tests of the unit root and trend-break hypotheses: theory and international evidence. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10: 271-287.
7. Bernanke BS. 1986. Alternative explanations of the money-income correlation. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 25: 49-99.
8. Carrasco M. 2002. Misspecified structural change, threshold, and Markov-switching models. Journal of Econometrics 109: 239-273.
9. Christiano LJ, Ljungqvist L. 1988. Money does Granger-cause output in the bivariate money-output relation. Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 217-235.
10. Cooley TF, Dwyer M. 1998. Business cycle analysis without much theory: a look at structural VARs. Journal of Econometrics 83: 57-88.
11. Cooley TF, LeRoy SF. 1985. Atheoretical macroeconomics: a critique. Journal of Monetary Economics 16: 283-308.
12. Eichenbaum M, Singleton KJ. 1986. Do equilibrium real business cycle theories explain postwar U.S. business cycles? In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1986, Fischer S (ed.). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA; 91-135.
13. Friedman BM, Kuttner KN. 1992. Money, income, prices, and interest rates. American Economic Review 82: 472-492.
14. Friedman BM, Kuttner KN. 1993. Another look at the evidence on money-income causality. Journal of Econometrics 57: 189-203.
15. Gavin WT, Kydland FE. 1999. Endogenous money supply and the business cycle. Review of Economic Dynamics 2: 347-369.
16. Hamilton JD. 1994. Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
17. Hansen BE. 1990. Lagrange multiplier tests of parameter instability in non-linear models. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Rochester.
18. Hansen BE. 1999. The grid bootstrap and the autoregressive model. Review of Economics and Statistics 81: 594-607.
19. Kapetanios G. 2001. Model selection in threshold models. Journal of Time Series Analysis 22: 733-754.
20. Kim C-J, Nelson CR. 1999. State-Space Models with Regime Switching: Classical and Gibbs-Sampling Approaches with Applications. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
21. Krol R, Ohanian LE. 1990. The impact of stochastic and deterministic trends on money-output causality: a multi-country investigation. Journal of Econometrics 45: 291-308.
22. Krolzig H-M. 1997. Markov-Switching Vector Autoregressions: Modelling, Statistical Inference, and Application to Business Cycle Analysis. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems No. 454. Springer-Verlag: Berlin.
23. Krolzig H-M. 2000. Predicting Markov-switching vector autoregressive processes. Unpublished manuscript, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
24. Litterman RB, Weiss L. 1985. Money, real-interest rates, and output: a reinterpretation of postwar U.S. data. Econometrica 53: 128-156.
25. Ljung GM, Box GEP. 1978. On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika 65: 297-303.
26. Ng S, Perron P. 1995. Unit root tests in ARMA models with data-dependent methods for the selection of the truncation lag. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90: 268-281.
27. Nyblom J. 1989. Testing for the constancy of parameters over time. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84: 223-230.
28. Phillips PCB, Ploberger W. 1994. Posterior odds testing for a unit root with data-based model selection. Econometric Theory 10: 774-808.
29. Romano JP, Wolf M. 2001. Subsampling intervals in autoregressive models with linear time trend. Econo-meirica 69: 1283-1314.
30. Savin NE. 1980. The Bonferroni and the Scheffé multiple comparison procedures. Review of Economic Studies 47: 255-273.
31. Sims CA. 1972. Money, income and causality. American Economic Review 62: 540-552.
32. Sims CA. 1980. Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48: 1-48.
33. Sola M, Driffill J. 1994. Testing the term structure of interest rates using a stationary vector autoregression with regime switching. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 18: 601-628.
34. Stock JH, Watson MW. 1989. Interpreting the evidence on money-income causality. Journal of Econometrics 40: 161-181.
35. Stock JH, Watson MW. 1996. Evidence on structural instability in macroeconomic time series relations. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 14: 11-30.
36. Swanson NR. 1998. Money and output through a rolling window. Journal of Monetary Economics 41: 455-473.
37. Thoma MA. 1994. Subsample instability and asymmetries in money-income causality. Journal of Econometrics 64: 279-306.
38. Warne A. 1999. Causality and regime inference in a Markov switching VAR. Unpublished manuscript, Research Department, Sveriges Riksbank, Stockholm.