A copula approach to assessing Granger causality

NeuroImage

Volumn 100, Issue , 2014, Pages 125-134

  Hu, Meng ^a   Liang, Hualou ^a  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Copula; Granger causality; Neural data analysis

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; GRANGER CAUSALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LINEAR SYSTEM; MACACA; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL CONCEPTS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL STIMULATION; ANIMAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; ILLUSION; NEUROSCIENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; ILLUSIONS; MACACA; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEUROSCIENCES; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 84903879995     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Aas K., Czado C., Frigessi A., Bakken H. Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence. Insur.: Math. Mech. 2009, 44:182-198.
2. Acar E.F., Genest C., Neslehova J. Beyond simplified pair-copula constructions. J. Multivar. Anal. 2012, 110:74-90.
3. Ancona N., Marinazzo D., Stramaglia S. Radial basis function approach to nonlinear Granger causality of time series. Phys. Rev. E. 2004, 70:056221.
4. Asai M., McAleer M., Yu J. Multivariate stochastic volatility: a review. Econ. Rev. 2006, 25:145-175.
5. Barndorff-Nielsen O.E., Cox D.R. Edgeworth and saddlepoint approximations with statistical applications. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1979, 41:279-312.
6. Barnett L., Bossomaier T. Transfer entropy as a log-likelihood ratio. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109:138105.
7. Bouezmarni T., Rombouts J.V.K., Taamouti A. Nonparametric copula based test for conditional independence with applications to Granger causality. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 2012, 30(2):275-287.
8. Bressler S.L., Seth A.K. Wiener-Granger causality: a well establishedmethodology. NeuroImage 2011, 58:323-329.
9. Brovelli A., Ding M., Ledberg A., Chen Y., Nakamura R., Bressler S.L. Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: Directional influences revealed by Granger causality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101(26):9849-9854.
10. Buzsáki G., Mizuseki K. The log-dynamic brain: how skewed distributions affect network operations. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 15:264-278.
11. Chen Y., Rangarajan G., Feng J., Ding M. Analyzing multiple nonlinear time series with extended Granger causality. Phys. Lett. A 2004, 324:26-35.
12. Cheung Y., Ng L.K. A causality-in-variance test and its application to financial market prices. J. Econ. 1996, 72:33-48.
13. Cornish E.A., Fisher R.A. Moments and Cumulants in the Specification of Distributions. Rev. Int. Stat. Inst. 1938, 5(4):307-320.
14. Cui J., Xu L., Bressler S.L., Ding M. and Liang H. BSMART: a Matlab/C toolbox for analysis of multichannel neural time series. Neural Networks Spec. Issue Neuroinformatics 2008, 21:1094-1104.
15. Ding M., Chen Y., Bressler S.L. Granger causality: basic theory and application to neuroscience. Handbook of Time Series Analysis-Recent Theoretical Developments and Applications 2006, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. B. Schelter, M. Winterhalder, J. Timmer (Eds.).
16. Elidan G. Copula Bayesian networks. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2010, 23:559-567.
17. Fan J., Yao Q., Tong H. Estimation of conditional densities and sensitivity measures in nonlinear dynamical systems. Biometrika 1996, 83(1):189-206.
18. Fraser A.M., Swinney H.L. Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Phys. Rev. A 1986, 33(2):1134-1140.
19. Friston K., Moran R., Seth A. Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2012, 23:1-7.
20. Geweke J. Inference and Causality in Economic Time Series Models. Handbook of Econometrics 1984, 1101-1144. (Amsterdam: NorthHolland). Z. Grilliches, M. Intriligator (Eds.).
21. Gijbels I., Veraverbeke N., Omelka M. Conditional copulas, association measures and their applications. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2011, 55:1919-1932.
22. Gijbels I., Omelka M., Veraverbeke N. Multivariate and functional covariates and conditional copulas. Elec. J. Stat. 2012, 6:1273-1306.
23. Granger C.W.J. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 1969, 37(3):424-438.
24. Granger C.W.J., Terasvirta T., Patton A.J. Common factors in conditional distributions for bivariate time series. J. Econ. 2006, 132:43-57.
25. Gregoriou G.G., Gotts S.J., Zhou H., Desimone R. High-frequency, long-range coupling between prefrontal and visual cortex during attention. Science 2009, 324:1207-1210.
26. Hafer C.M., Herwartz H. Testing for causality in variance using multivariate GARCH models. Ann. Econ. Stat. 2008, 89:215-241.
27. Hu M., Liang H. Perceptual suppression revealed by adaptive multiscale entropy analysis of local field potential in monkey visual cortex. Int. J. Neural Syst. 2013, 23(2):1350005.
28. Hu S., Dai G., Worrell G., Dai Q., Liang H. Causality Analysis of Neural Connectivity: Critical Examination of Existing Methods and Advances of New Methods. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 2011, 22(6):829-844.
29. Joe H. Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts 1997, Chapman & Hall Ltd.
30. Johnson N.L., Kotz S., Balakrishnan N. Continuous Univariate Distributions 1994, vol. 1. Wiley-Interscience.
31. Kendall M., Stuart A. The advanced theory of statistics. Distribution theory 1977, vol. 1. Macmillan, New York.
32. Kirshner S. Learning with tree-averaged densities and distributions. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2007, 20.
33. Kruger G., Kastrup A., Glover G.H. Neuroimaging at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001, 45:595-604.
34. Krupskii P., Joe H. Factor copula models for multivariate data. J. Multivar. Anal. 2013, 120:85-101.
35. Li X., Mikusinski P., Taylor M.D. Strong approximation of copulas. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1998, 225:608-623.
36. Luo Q., Ge T., Grabehorst F., Feng J., Rolls E.T. Attention-dependent modulation of cortical taste circuits revealed by Granger causality with signal-dependent noise. PLoS Computional Biol. 2013, 9(10):e1003265.
37. Marinazzo D., Pellicoro M., Stramaglia S. Kernel method for nonlinear Granger causality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100:144103.
38. Nelsen R.B. An introduction to Copulas 2006, Springer.
39. Oh D.H., Patton A.J. Modelling dependence in high dimensions with factor copulas. Working Paper 2011, Duke University.
40. Paparoditis E., Politis D.N. The local bootstrap for kernel estimators under general dependence conditions. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 2000, 52:139-159.
41. Pearl J. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference 2000, Cambridge Univ. Press, U.K.
42. Runge J., Heitzig J., Petoukhov V., Kurths J. Escaping the curse of dimensionality in estimating multivariate transfer entropy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108:258701.
43. Saalmann Y.B., Pinsk M.A., Wang L., Li X., Kastner S. The pulvinar regulates information transmission between cortical areas based on attention demands. Science 2012, 337:753-756.
44. Sancetta A., Satchell S. The Bernstein copula and its applications to modeling and approximations of multivariate distributions. Econ. Theory 2004, 20(3):535-562.
45. Schreiber T. Measuring information transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85(2):461-464.
46. Seth A.K. A MATLAB toolbox for Granger causal connectivity analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 2010, 186(2):262-273.
47. Seth S., Principe J.C. Assessing Granger non-causality using nonparametric measure of conditional independence. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. 2012, 23(1):47-59.
48. Silverman B.W. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 1986, Chapman and Hall.
49. Sklar A. Random variables, joint distributions, and copulas. Kybernetica 1973, 9:449-460.
50. Trivedi P.K., Zimmer D.M. Copula modeling: an introduction for practitioners. Found. Trends Econ. 2005, 1(1):1-111.
51. Valdes-Sosa P.A., Roebroeck A., Daunizeau J., Friston K. Effective connectivity: influence, causality and biophysical modeling. NeuroImage 2011, 58:339-361.
52. Wiener N. The theory of prediction. Modern Mathermatics for Engineers 1956, McGraw-Hill, New York, (Chapter 8). E.F. Beckenbach (Ed.).
53. Wilke M., Logothetis N.K., Leopold D.A. Generalized flash suppression of salient visual target. Neuron 2003, 39(6):1043-1052.
54. Wilke M., Logothetis N.K., Leopold D.A. Local field potential reflects perceptual suppression in monkey visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:17507-17512.