For the mind's eye the world is two-dimensional

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 36-40

  Lobmaier, Janek S ^a,b   Mast, Fred W ^a,c   Hecht, Heiko ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^d JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; MALE; ROTATION; VISION;

ADULT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; ROTATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74849097199     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.36     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Amorim, M.-A., Glasauer, S., Corpinot, K., & Berthoz, A. (1997). Updating an object's orientation and location during nonvisual navigation: A comparison between two processing modes. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 404-418.
2. Blanz, V., Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1999). What object attributes determine canonical views? Perception, 28, 575-599.
3. Bülthoff, H. H., Edelman, S. Y., & Tarr, M. J. (1995). How are 3-D objects represented in the brain? Cerebral Cortex, 5, 247-260.
4. Cline, M. G. (1967). The perception of where a person is looking. American Journal of Psychology, 80, 41-50.
5. Cutting, J. E. (1987). Rigidity in cinema seen from the front row, side aisle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 323-334.
6. Cutting, J. E. (1988). Affine distortions of pictorial space: Some predictions for Goldstein (1987) that La Gournerie (1859) might have made. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 305-311.
7. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Goldstein, E. B. (1979). Rotation of objects in pictures viewed at an angle: Evidence for different properties of two types of pictorial space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 78-87.
9. Goldstein, E. B. (1987). Spatial layout, orientation relative to the observer, and perceived projection in pictures viewed at an angle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 256-266.
10. Goldstein, E. B. (1988). Geometry or not geometry? Perceived orientation and spatial layout in pictures viewed at an angle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 312-314.
11. Hecht, H., Schwartz, R., & Atherton, M. (eDs.) (2003). Looking into pictures: An interdisciplinary approach to pictorial space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Helmholtz, H. von (1971). The origin and correct interpretation of our sense impressions. In R. Hahl (Ed.), Selected writings of Hermann von Helmholtz (pp. 501-512). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
13. Klein, I., Dubois, J., Mangin, J.-F., Kherif, F., Flandin, G., Poline, J. B., et al. (2004). Retinotopic organization of visual mental images as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 26-31.
14. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (2003). 'Pictorial space. In H. Hecht, R. Schwartz, & M. Atherton (Eds.), Looking into pictures: An interdisciplinary approach to pictorial space (pp. 239-299). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., Kappers, A. M., & Todd, J. T. (2004). Pointing out of the picture. Perception, 33, 513-530.
16. Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M., & Reiser, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 4, 47-60.
17. Kosslyn, S. M., & Thompson, W. L. (2003). When is early visual cortex activated during visual mental imagery? Psychological Bulletin, 129, 723-746.
18. Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Kim, I. J., & Alpert, N. M. (1995). Topographical representations of mental images in primary visual cortex. Nature, 378, 496-498.
19. Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory & Cognition, 29, 745-756.
20. Loomis, J. M., Lippa, Y., Golledge, R. G., & Klatzky, R. L. (2002). Spatial updating of locations specified by 3-D sound and spatial language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 335-345.
21. Pinker, S. (1980). Mental imagery and the third dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 354-371.
22. Pirenne, M. H. (1970). Optics, painting and photography. London: Cambridge University Press.
23. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2002). Mental imagery: In search of a theory. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 25, 157-182; discussion, 182-237.
24. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2003). Return of the mental image: Are there really pictures in the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 113-118.
25. Rock, I. (1983). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Schwaninger, A., Lobmaier, J. S., & Fischer, M. H. (2005). The inversion effect on gaze perception reflects processing of component information. Experimental Brain Research, 167, 49-55.
27. Shepard, R., & Metzler, D. (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of dimensionality of objects and type of task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 3-11.