Testing Conditions for Viewpoint Invariance in Object Recognition

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 1511-1521

  Hayward, William G ^a   Tarr, Michael J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; NOTE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RECALL;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0031254430     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.5.1511     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
2. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991). Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception, 20, 585-593.
3. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
4. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein. P. C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1506-1514.
5. Bricolo, E., Poggio, T., & Logothetis, N. (in press). 3D object recognition: A model of view-tuned neurons. In M. C. Mozer, M. I. Jordan, & T. Petsche (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 9. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
6. Bülthoff, H. H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a 2-D view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89, 60-64.
7. Bülthoff, H. H., Edelman, S. Y., & Tarr, M. J. (1995). How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cerebral Cortex, 5, 247-260.
8. Cohen, D., & Kubovy, M. (1993). Mental rotation, mental representation, and flat slopes. Cognitive Psychology 25, 351-382.
9. Cooper, L. A., Schacter, D. L., Ballesteros, S., & Moore, C. (1992). Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of size and reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 43-57.
10. Edelman, S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
11. Ellis, R., & Allport, D. A. (1986). Multiple levels of representation for visual objects: A behavioural study. In A. G. Cohn & J. R. Thomas (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and its applications (pp. 245-257). New York: Wiley.
12. Hayward, W. G. (in press). Effects of outline shape in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
13. Hummel, J. E. (1994). Reference frames and relations in computational models of object recognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 111-116.
14. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
15. Hummel, J. E., & Stankiewicz, B. J. (1996). An architecture for rapid hierarchical structural description. In T. Inui & J. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 93-121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Humphrey, G. K., & Khan, S. C. (1992). Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 170-190.
17. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
18. Jolicoeur, P. (1988). Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 461-478.
19. Jolicoeur, P. (1990). Identification of disoriented objects: A dual-systems theory. Mind and Language, 5, 387-410.
20. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1979). The internal representation of solid shape with respect to vision. Biological Cybernetics, 32, 211-216.
21. Liter, J. C. (1995) Features affecting orientation-invariant recognition of novel objects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
22. Logothetis, N. K., & Pauls, J. (1995). Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representation in the primate. Cerebral Cortex, 3, 270-288.
23. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., & Poggio, T. (1995). Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology, 5, 552-563.
24. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 200, 269-294.
25. Plaut, D. C., & Farah, M. J. (1990). Visual object representation: Interpreting neurophysiological data within a computational framework. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 320-343.
26. Poggio, T., & Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263-206.
27. Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
29. Srinivas, K. (1993). Perceptual specificity in nonverbal priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 582-602.
30. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study of the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 55-82.
31. Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon-structural-descriptions or by multiple-views? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
32. Tarr, M. J., Bülthoff, H. H., Zabinski, M., & Blanz, V. (in press). To what extent do unique parts influence recognition across changes in viewpoint? Psychological Science.
33. Tarr, M. J., Hayward, W. G., Gauthier, I., & Williams, P. (1994, November). Geon recognition is viewpoint-dependent. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
34. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
35. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1991). Orientation-dependent mechanisms in shape recognition: Further issues. Psychological Science, 2, 207-209.
36. Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32, 193-254.
37. Van Effelterre, T. (1994). Aspect graphs for visual recognition of three-dimensional objects. Perception, 23, 563-582.
38. Zhu, S. C., & Yuille, A. L. (1996). FORMS: A flexible object recognition and modeling system. International Journal of Computer Vision, 20, 187-212.