Correlation between Initial BIC and the Insertion Torque/Depth Integral Recorded with an Instantaneous Torque-Measuring Implant Motor: An in vivo Study

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 17, Issue , 2015, Pages e613-e620

  Capparé, Paolo ^a   Vinci, Raffaele ^a   Di Stefano, Danilo Alessio ^a   Traini, Tonino ^a   Pantaleo, Giuseppe ^a   Gherlone, Enrico Felice ^a   Gastaldi, Giorgio ^b  

^a VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bone density; Bone to implant contact; Dental implant; Histomorphometry; Implant stability; Insertion torque; Primary stability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE; BONE DENSITY; BONE IMPLANT INTERFACE; DENTAL PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SURGERY; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TORQUE;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BONE DENSITY; BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACE; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TORQUE;

EID: 84952991646     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12294     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Brånemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50:399-410.
2. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:391-401.
3. Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. Clin Mater 1992; 10:153-201.
4. Brunski JB. Avoid pitfalls of overloading and micromotion of intraosseous implants. Dent Implantol Update 1993; 4:77-81.
5. Szmukler-Moncler S, Salama H, Reingewirtz Y, Dubruille JH. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 43:192-203. Summer.
6. Sakka S, Baroudi K, Nassani MZ. Factors associated with early and late failure of dental implants. J Investig Clin Dent 2012; 3:258-261.
7. Javed F, Ahmed HB, Crespi R, Romanos GE. Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: factors of influence and evaluation. Interv Med Appl Sci 2013; 5:162-167.
8. Chong L, Khocht A, Suzuki JB, Gaughan J. Effect of implant design on initial stability of tapered implants. J Oral Implantol 2009; 35:130-135.
9. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4, 641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6:142-146.
10. Johansson B, Back T, Hirsch JM. Cutting torque measurements in conjunction with implant placement in grafted and nongrafted maxillas as an objective evaluation of bone density: a possible method for identifying early implant failures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004; 6:9-15.
11. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:491-501.
12. Sennerby L, Roos J. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:408-420.
13. Roos J, Sennerby L, Albrektsson T. An update on the clinical documentation on currently used bone anchored endosseous oral implants. Dent Update 1997; 24:194-200.
14. Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for presurgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003; 31:825-833.
15. Shahlaie M, Gantes B, Schulz E, Riggs M, Crigger M. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 1. Quantitative computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:224-231.
16. Turkyilmaz I, Tözüm TF, Tumer C. Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34:267-272.
17. De Oliveira RC, Leles CR, Normanha LM, Lindh C, Ribeiro-Rotta RF. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105:231-238.
18. Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12:79-84.
19. Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM, Griffin TJ, Rand WM. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:290-297.
20. Valiyaparambil JV, Yamany I, Ortiz D, etal. Bone quality evaluation: comparison of cone beam computed tomography and subjective surgical assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27:1271-1277.
21. Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39:323-335.
22. Nomura Y, Watanabe H, Honda E, Kurabayashi T. Reliability of voxel values from cone-beam computed tomography for dental use in evaluating bone mineral density. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21:558-562.
23. Misch CE. Density of bone: effect of treatment planning, surgical approach, and healing. In: Misch CE, ed. Contemporary implant dentistry. St Louis, MO: Mosby Year-Book, 1993:469-485.
24. Trisi P, Rao W. Bone classification: clinical-histomorphometric comparison. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10:1-7.
25. Prosper L, Crespi R, Valenti E, Cappare P, Gherlone E. Five-year follow-up of wide-diameter implants placed in fresh molar extraction sockets in the mandible: immediate versus delayed loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25:607-612.
26. Crespi R, Capparé P, Gherlone E, Romanos GE. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the maxillary esthetic zone: a clinical comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23:753-758.
27. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7:261-267.
28. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28:297-303.
29. Olive J, Aparicio C. Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5:390-400.
30. Teerlinck J, Quirynen M, Darius P, van Steenberghe D. Periotest: an objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition toward implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6:55-61.
31. Degidi M, Daprile G, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. Development of a new implant primary stability parameter: insertion torque revisited. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 15:637-644.
32. Hsu JT, Huang HL, Chang CH, Tsai MT, Hung WC, Fuh LJ. Relationship of three-dimensional bone-to-implant contact to primary implant stability and peri-implant bone strain in immediate loading: microcomputed tomographic and in vitro analyses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28:367-374.
33. Liu C, Tsai MT, Huang HL, etal. Relation between insertion torque and bone-implant contact percentage: an artificial bone study. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16:1679-1684.
34. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, Johansson P, Strid CG, Lekholm U. Evaluation of bone density using cutting resistance measurements and microradiography: an in vitro study in pig ribs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6:164-171.
35. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, Lekholm U. Identification of bone quality in conjunction with insertion of titanium implants. A pilot study in jaw autopsy specimens. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6:213-219.
36. Iezzi G, Scarano A, Di Stefano D, etal. Correlation between the bone density recorded by a computerized implant motor and by a histomorphometric analysis: a preliminary in vitro study on bovine ribs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013 Jul 24. doi: 10.1111/cid.12121. [Epub ahead of print].
37. Di Stefano DA, Arosio P, Pagnutti S. A possible novel objective intraoperative measurement of maxillary bone density. Minerva Stomatol 2013; 62:259-265.
38. Mombelli A, Lang NP. Clinical parameters for the evaluation of dental implants. Periodontol 2000 1994; 4:81-86.
39. Huang HL, Tsai MT, Su KC, etal. Relation between initial implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact percentage: an in vitro model study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 116(5):e356-e361.
40. Elias CN, Rocha FA, Nascimento AL, Coelho PG. Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012; 16:169-180.
41. Moon SH, Um HS, Lee JK, Chang BS, Lee MK. The effect of implant shape and bone preparation on primary stability. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2010; 40:239-243.
42. Bilhan H, Geckili O, Mumcu E, Bozdag E, Sünbüloğlu E, Kutay O. Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37:900-907.
43. Javed F, Romanos GE. The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review. J Dent 2010; 38:612-620.