Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 231-238

  de Oliveira, Rubelisa Cândido Gomes ^a   Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues ^a   Normanha, Leonardo Martins ^b   Lindh, Christina ^c   Ribeiro Rotta, Rejane Faria ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

^b Goiano Institute of Radiology   (Brazil)

^c MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EDENTULOUSNESS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; JAW; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BONE DENSITY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 38949163700     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Esposito M., Hirsch J.M., Lekholm U., and Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 106 (1998) 527-551
2. Friberg B., Jemt T., and Lekholm U. Early failures in 4641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 6 (1991) 142-146
3. Hermann I., Lekholm U., Holm S., and Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20 (2005) 220-230
4. Jaffin R.A., and Berman C.L. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 62 (1991) 2-4
5. Jemt T., and Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 10 (1995) 303-311
6. Shahlaie M., Gantes B., Schulz E., Riggs M., and Crigger M. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 1. Quantitative computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18 (2003) 224-231
7. Lindh C., Nilsson M., Klinge B., and Petersson A. Quantitative computed tomography of trabecular bone in the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 25 (1996) 146-150
8. Lindh C., Petersson A., Klinge B., and Nilsson M. Trabecular bone volume and bone mineral density in the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 26 (1997) 101-106
9. Lindh C., Obrant K., and Petersson A. Maxillary bone mineral density and its relationship to the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and hip. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98 (2004) 102-109
10. Ericsson I., and Nilner K. Early functional loading using Branemark dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 22 (2002) 9-19
11. Lekholm U., and Zarb G.A. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark P.-I., Zarb G.A., and Albrektsson T. (Eds). Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry (1985), Quintessence, Chicago 199-209
12. Lindh C., Petersson A., and Rohlin M. Assessment of the trabecular pattern before endosseous implant treatment: diagnostic outcome of periapical radiography in the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 82 (1996) 335-343
13. Taguchi A., Tanimoto K., Akagawa Y., Suei Y., Wada T., and Rohlin M. Trabecular bone pattern of the mandible. Comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 26 (1997) 85-89
14. Beer A., Gahleitner A., Holm A., Tschabitscher M., and Homolka P. Correlation of insertion torques with bone mineral density from dental quantitative CT in the mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 14 (2003) 616-620
15. Friberg B., Sennerby L., Roos J., Johansson P., Strid C.G., and Lekholm U. Evaluation of bone density using cutting resistance measurements and microradiography. Clin Oral Implants Res 6 (1995) 164-171
16. Friberg B., Sennerby L., Roos J., Johansson P., Strid C.G., and Lekholm U. Identification of bone quality in conjunction with insertion of titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 6 (1995) 213-219
17. Chloel L., Duboeuf F., Bourgeois D., Briguet A., and Lissac M. Trabecular alveolar bone in the human mandible: a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95 (2003) 364-370
18. Devlin H., Horner K., and Ledgerton D. A comparison of maxillary and mandibular bone mineral densities. J Prosthet Dent 79 (1998) 323-327
19. Jager A., Radlanski R.J., Taufall D., Klein C., Steinhofel N., and Doler W. Quantitative determination of alveolar bone density using digital image analysis of microradiographs. Anat Anz 170 (1990) 171-179
20. Hans D., Fuerst T., and Uffmann M. Bone density and quality measurement using ultrasound. Curr Opin Rheumatol 8 (1996) 370-375
21. Norton M.R., and Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 12 (2001) 79-84
22. Frederiksen N.L. Diagnostic imaging in dental implantology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80 (1995) 540-554
23. Dula K., Mini R., Van Der Stelt P.F., Schneeberger P., and Buser D. Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral computed tomography of the maxilla and mandible. Eur J Oral Sci 104 (1996) 503-510
24. Ekestubbe A., Thilander A., Grondahl K., and Grondahl H.G. Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: comparison with conventional tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 22 (1993) 13-17
25. Guerrero M.E., Jacobs R., Loubele M., Schutyser F., Suetens P., and van Steenberghe D. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig 10 (2006) 1-7
26. Taguchi A., Tanimoto K., Ogawa M., Sunayashiki T., and Wada T. Effect of size of region of interest on precision of bone mineral measurements of the mandible by quantitative computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 20 (1991) 25-29
27. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
28. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 11 (1998) 491-501
29. Myoung H., Kim Y.Y., Heo M.S., Lee S.S., Choi S.C., Kim M.J., et al. Comparative radiologic study of bone density and cortical thickness of donor bone used in mandibular reconstruction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92 (2001) 23-29
30. Shapurian T., Damoulis P.D., Reiser G.M., Griffin T.J., and Rand W.M. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21 (2006) 290-297
31. Turkyilmaz I., Tozum T.F., and Tumer C. Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography. J Oral Rehabil 34 (2007) 267-272
32. Akdeniz B.G., Oksan T., Kovanlikaya I., and Genc I. Evaluation of bone height and bone density by computed tomography and panoramic radiography for implant recipient sites. J Oral Implantol 26 (2000) 114-119
33. Trisi P., and Rao W. Bone classification: clinical-histomorphometric comparison. Clin Oral Implants Res 10 (1999) 1-7
34. Molly L. Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy. Clin Oral Implants Res 17 Suppl 2 (2006) 124-135