Carbon/PEEK composite materials as an alternative for stainless steel/titanium hip prosthesis: a finite element study

Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 569-580

  Rezaei, Farshid ^a   Hassani, Kamran ^b   Solhjoei, Nosratollah ^a   Karimi, Alireza ^c,d  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^d KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Composite materials; Femoral prosthesis; Finite element analysis; Hip replacement; Strain; Stress

Indexed keywords

ALLOY STEEL; ARTHROPLASTY; BONE; COMPOSITE MATERIALS; DURABILITY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; HIP PROSTHESES; STAINLESS STEEL; STRAIN; STRESSES; SURGERY; THERMOELECTRICITY; TITANIUM ALLOYS;

ADJUSTABLE STIFFNESS; FEMORAL PROSTHESIS; FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATIONS; HIP REPLACEMENTS; LONG TERM DURABILITY; STAINLESS STEEL (316L); TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT (THR); TRANSVERSE ISOTROPIC;

PROSTHETICS;

CARBON FIBER; POLYETHERETHERKETONE; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; BIOMATERIAL; CARBON; KETONE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE STRESS; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CORTICAL BONE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; SIMULATION; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; VON MISES STRESS; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CARBON; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; KETONES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STAINLESS STEEL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM;

EID: 84952981267     PISSN: 01589938     EISSN: 18795447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13246-015-0380-3     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Froimson MI, Garino J, Machenaud A, Vidalain J (2007) Minimum 10-year results of a tapered, titanium, hydroxyapatite-coated hip stem: an independent review. J Arthroplast 22:1–7
2. Kayabasi O, Ekici B (2008) Probabilistic design of a newly designed cemented hip prosthesis using finite element method. Mater Des 29:963–971
3. Pal B, Gupta S, New AM (2010) Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 13:143–155
4. Gross S, Abel E (2001) A finite element analysis of hollow stemmed hip prostheses as a means of reducing stress shielding of the femur. J Biomech 34:995–1003
5. Wan Z, Dorr LD, Woodsome T, Ranawat A, Song M (1999) Effect of stem stiffness and bone stiffness on bone remodeling in cemented total hip replacement. J Arthroplast 14:149–158
6. Manivasagam G, Dhinasekaran D, Rajamanickam A (2010) Biomedical implants: corrosion and its prevention-a review. Recent Pat Corros Sci 2:40–54
7. Ramakrishna S, Mayer J, Wintermantel E, Leong KW (2001) Biomedical applications of polymer-composite materials: a review. Compos Sci Tech 61:1189–1224
8. Yoon S-W, Kim Y-H, Lee J-W, Kim H-B, Murakami R-I (2013) Tribological properties of carbon/PEEK composites. Science 14:98–106
9. Chang FK, Perez JL, Davidson JA (1990) Stiffness and strength tailoring of a hip prosthesis made of advanced composite materials. J Biomed Mater Res 24:873–899
10. Cilingir A, Ucar V, Kazan R (2007) Three-dimensional anatomic finite element modelling of hemi-arthroplasty of human hip joint. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 21:63–72
11. Katoozian H, Davy DT, Arshi A, Saadati U (2001) Material optimization of femoral component of total hip prosthesis using fiber reinforced polymeric composites. Med Eng Phys 23:505–511
12. Utzschneider S, Becker F, Grupp TM, Sievers B, Paulus A, Gottschalk O et al (2010) Inflammatory response against different carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK wear particles compared with UHMWPE in vivo. Acta Biomater 6:4296–4304
13. Scholz M-S, Blanchfield J, Bloom L, Coburn B, Elkington M, Fuller J et al (2011) The use of composite materials in modern orthopaedic medicine and prosthetic devices: a review. Compos Sci Tech 71:1791–1803
14. Boudeau N, Liksonov D, Barriere T, Maslov L, Gelin J-C (2012) Composite based on polyetheretherketone reinforced with carbon fibres, an alternative to conventional materials for femoral implant: manufacturing process and resulting structural behaviour. Mater Des 40:148–156
15. Oshkour A, Osman NA, Bayat M, Afshar R, Berto F (2014) Three-dimensional finite element analyses of functionally graded femoral prostheses with different geometrical configurations. Mater Des 56:998–1008
16. Steinberg EL, Rath E, Shlaifer A, Chechik O, Maman E, Salai M (2013) Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK Optima-a composite material biomechanical properties and wear/debris characteristics of CF-PEEK composites for orthopedic trauma implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 17:221–228
17. Skinner HB (1988) Composite technology for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:224–236
18. Davidson J (1987) The challenge and opportunity for composites in structural orthopaedic applications. Challenge 9:151–161
19. Magee FP, Weinstein AM, Longo JA, Koeneman JB, Yapp RA (1988) A canine composite femoral stem: an in vivo study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:237–252
20. Keaveny TM, Bartel DL (1995) Mechanical consequences of bone ingrowth in a hip prosthesis inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:911–923
21. Karimi A, Navidbakhsh M (2014) Measurement of the nonlinear mechanical properties of a poly (vinyl alcohol) sponge under longitudinal and circumferential loading. J Appl Polym Sci 131
22. Karimi A, Navidbakhsh M, Haghi AM (2014) An experimental study on the structural and mechanical properties of polyvinyl alcohol sponge using different stress-strain definitions. Adv Polym Tech 33
23. Wenz L, Merritt K, Brown S, Moet A, Steffee A (1990) In vitro biocompatibility of polyetheretherketone and polysulfone composites. J Biomed Mater Res 24:207–215
24. Puleo D, Nanci A (1999) Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials 20:2311–2321
25. Akay M, Aslan N (1996) Numerical and experimental stress analysis of a polymeric composite hip joint prosthesis. J Biomed Mater Res 31:167–182
26. Kwarteng KB, Stark C (1990) Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK (APC-2/AS-4) composites for orthopaedic implants. Sampe Q 22:10–14
27. Ryoo S, Kim K (2001) A study on friction and wear behavior of carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone. Korean Soc Mech Eng 25:930
28. Elhamian SMM, Alizadeh M, Shokrieh MM, Karimi A (2015) A depth dependent transversely isotropic micromechanic model of articular cartilage. J Mater Sci Mater Med 26:1–10
29. Elhamian MM, Karami H, Alizadeh M, Shokrieh MM, Karimi A (2014) Model for analyzing the mechanical behavior of articular cartilage under creep indentation test. J Appl Phys 116:184702–184710
30. Karimi A, Navidbakhsh M, Shojaei A (2015) A combination of histological analyses and uniaxial tensile tests to determine the material coefficients of the healthy and atherosclerotic human coronary arteries. Tissue Cell 47:152–158
31. Shahmohammadi M, Shirazi HA, Karimi A, Navidbakhsh M (2014) Finite element simulation of an artificial intervertebral disk using fiber reinforced laminated composite model. Tissue Cell 46:299–303
32. Williams PL (1989) Gray’s anatomy. Churchill livingstone, Edinburgh
33. Katzer A, Marquardt H, Westendorf J, Wening J, Von Foerster G (2002) Polyetheretherketone-cytotoxicity and mutagenicity in vitro. Biomaterials 23:1749–1759
34. Macnair R, Wilkinson R, MacDonald C, Goldie I, Jones D, Grant M (1996) Application of confocal laser scanning microscopy to cytocompatibility testing of potential orthopaedic materials in immortalised osteoblast-like cell lines. Cells Mater 6:71–78
35. Tan K, Chua C, Leong K, Cheah C, Cheang P, Bakar MA et al (2003) Scaffold development using selective laser sintering of polyetheretherketone-hydroxyapatite biocomposite blends. Biomaterials 24:3115–3123
36. Tan K, Chua C, Leong K, Naing M, Cheah C (2005) Fabrication and characterization of three-dimensional poly (ether-ether-ketone)/-hydroxyapatite biocomposite scaffolds using laser sintering. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 219:183–194
37. Uhthoff HK, Poitras P, Backman DS (2006) Internal plate fixation of fractures: short history and recent developments. J Orthop Sci 11:118–126
38. Lane WA (1895) Some remarks on the treatment of fractures. Br Med J 1:861
39. McMillin C. Evaluation of PEKEKK composites for spine implants. Soc Adv Mater Process Eng (USA) 1993:591–598
40. Polineni VK, Wang A, Essner A, Lin R, Chopra A, Stark C et al (1998) Characterization of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK composite for use as a bearing material in total hip replacements. ASTM Spec Tech Publ 1346:266–273
41. Li S, Burstein AH (1994) Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. The material and its use in total joint implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:1080–1090
42. Prendergast PJ, Galibarov P, Lowery C, Lennon A (2011) Computer simulating a clinical trial of a load-bearing implant: an example of an intramedullary prosthesis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4:1880–1887
43. Karimi A, Navidbakhsh M, Alizadeh M, Razaghi R (2014) A comparative study on the elastic modulus of polyvinyl alcohol sponge using different stress-strain definitions. Biomed Eng 59:439–446
44. Karimi A, Navidbakhsh M, Yousefi H (2014) Mechanical properties of polyvinyl alcohol sponge under different strain rates. Int J Mater Res 105:404–408
45. Karimi A, Rahmati M, Navidbakhsh M (2015) Mechanical characterization of the rat and mice skin tissues using histostructural and uniaxial data. Bioengineered 6(3):153–160