Three-dimensional finite element analyses of functionally graded femoral prostheses with different geometrical configurations

Materials and Design

Volumn 56, Issue , 2014, Pages 998-1008

  Oshkour, A A ^a   Osman, N A Abu ^a   Bayat, M ^b   Afshar, R ^c   Berto, F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^b AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Finite element analysis; Functionally graded femoral prosthesis; Hip replacement; Stress shielding

Indexed keywords

BONE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GEOMETRY; HIP PROSTHESES; HYDROXYAPATITE; SHIELDING;

ADJUSTABLE STIFFNESS; FEMORAL PROSTHESIS; GEOMETRICAL CONFIGURATIONS; HIP REPLACEMENTS; IMPLANT-BONE INTERFACE; STRAIN ENERGY DENSITY; STRESS SHIELDING; THREE DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS;

PROSTHETICS;

EID: 84891044869     PISSN: 02641275     EISSN: 18734197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.054     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Froimson MI, Garino J, Machenaud A, Vidalain J Minimum 10-year results of a tapered, titanium, hydroxyapatite-coated hip stem: an independent review. J Arthroplasty. 2007, 22:1-7.
2. Kayabasi O, Ekici B Probabilistic design of a newly designed cemented hip prosthesis using finite element method. Mater Des 2008, 29:963-971.
3. Pal B, Gupta S, New AM Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms. Comput Method Biomech Biomed Eng 2010, 13:143-155.
4. Gross S, Abel E A finite element analysis of hollow stemmed hip prostheses as a means of reducing stress shielding of the femur. J Biomech 2001, 34:995-1003.
5. Wan Z, Dorr LD, Woodsome T, Ranawat A, Song M Effect of stem stiffness and bone stiffness on bone remodeling in cemented total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty. 1999, 14:149-158.
6. Li C, Granger C, HD Progressive failure analysis of laminated composite femoral prostheses for total hip arthroplasty. Biomaterials 2002, 23:4249-4262.
7. Simões J A, Marques A T Design of a composite hip femoral prosthesis. Mater Des 2005, 26:391-401.
8. Asgari SA, Hamouda A, Mansor S, Singh H, Mahdi E, Wirza R, et al. Finite element modeling of a generic stemless hip implant design in comparison with conventional hip implants. Finite Elem Anal Des 2004, 40:2027-2047.
9. Bennett D, Goswami T Finite element analysis of hip stem designs. Mater Des 2008, 29:45-60.
10. Pyburn E, Goswami T Finite element analysis of femoral components paper III-hip joints. Mater Des 2004, 25:705-713.
11. Ramos A, Completo A, Relvas C, Simões J Design process of a novel cemented hip femoral stem concept. Mater Des 2012, 33:313-321.
12. Sabatini AL, Goswami T Hip implants VII: Finite element analysis and optimization of cross-sections. Mater Des 2008, 29:1438-1446.
13. Akay M, Aslan N Numerical and experimental stress analysis of a polymeric composite hip joint prosthesis. J Biomed Mater Res 1998, 31:167-182.
14. Bougherara H, Bureau M, Campbell M, Vadean A, Yahia LH Design of a biomimetic polymer-composite hip prosthesis. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007, 82:27-40.
15. A de Oliveira Simões J, Marques A T Determination of stiffness properties of braided composites for the design of a hip prosthesis. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 2001, 32:655-662.
16. De Santis R, Ambrosio L, Nicolais L Polymer-based composite hip prostheses. J Inorg Biochem 2000, 79:97-102.
17. Azim Ataollahi Oshkour, N.A. Abu Osman, M.M. Davoodi, Y.H. Yau, F. Tarlochan, W.A.B. Wan Abas, M. Bayat. Finite element analysis on longitudinal and radial functionally graded femoral prosthesis. International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering. 2013; . http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=23922316&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks.
18. Enab TA, Bondok NE Material selection in the design of the tibia tray component of cemented artificial knee using finite element method. Materials & Design 2013, 44:454-460.
19. BahraminasabM, Sahari BB, Edwards KL, Farahmand F, Hong TS, Naghibi H Materialtailoring of the femoral component in a total knee replacement to reduce theproblem of aseptic loosening. Materials& Design 2013, 52:41-51.
20. Miao X, Sun D Graded/gradient porous biomaterials. Materials 2009, 3:26-47.
21. Pompe W, Worch H, Epple M, Friess W, Gelinsky M, Greil P, et al. Functionally graded materials for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng A 2003, 362:40-60.
22. Afshar R, Bayat M, Lalwani RK, Yau YH Elastic behavior of glass-like functionally graded infinite hollow cylinder under hydrostatic loads using finite element method. Mater Des 2011, 32:781-787.
23. Nie G, Batra R Material tailoring and analysis of functionally graded isotropic and incompressible linear elastic hollow cylinders. Compos Struct 2010, 92:265-274.
24. Zhang Y, Sun M-j, Zhang D Designing functionally graded materials with superior load-bearing properties. Acta Biomaterialia 2011.
25. Askari E, Mehrali M, Metselaar I, Kadri N, Rahman MM Fabrication and mechanical properties of functionally graded material by electrophoretic deposition. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012.
26. 2/AISI316L functionally graded materials for joint prostheses. Mater Sci Eng A 2008, 475:141-147.
27. Kuiper J, Huiskes R Mathematical optimization of elastic properties: application to cementless hip stem design. Trans Am Soc Mechan Eng J Biomechan Eng 1997, 119:166-174.
28. Hedia H, Shabara M, El-Midany T, Fouda N Improved design of cementless hip stems using two-dimensional functionally graded materials. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomat 2006, 79:42-49.
29. Gong H, Wu W, Fang J, Dong X, Zhao M, Guo T Effects of materials of cementless femoral stem on the functional adaptation of bone. J Bionic Eng 2012, 9:66-74.
30. Al-Jassir FF, Fouad H, Alothman OY In vitro assessment of Function Graded (FG) artificial Hip joint stem in terms of bone/cement stresses: 3D Finite Element (FE) study. Biomed Eng Online. 2013, 12:5.
31. Huiskes R Stress Patterns, Failure Modes and Bone Remodeling. Non- 1998, Raven Press, New York. R.J. Fitzgerald (Ed.).
32. Kayabasi O, Ekici B The effects of static, dynamic and fatigue behavior on three-dimensional shape optimization of hip prosthesis by finite element method. Mater Des 2007, 28:2269-2277.
33. Senalp AZ, Kayabasi O, Kurtaran H Static, dynamic and fatigue behavior of newly designed stem shapes for hip prosthesis using finite element analysis. Mater Des 2007, 28:1577-1583.
34. Oshkour AA, Davoodi MM, Abu Osman NA, Yau YH, Tarlochan F, Wan Abas WAB Finite element analysis of circumferential crack behavior in cement-femoral prosthesis interface. Mater Des 2013, 49:96-102.
35. Prendergast PJ, Galibarov P, Lowery C, Lennon A Computer simulating a clinical trial of a load-bearing implant: an example of an intramedullary prosthesis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011, 4:1880-1887.
36. KhanujaHS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, Mont MA Cementlessfemoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 2011, 93:500-509.
37. Long M, Rack H Titanium alloys in total joint replacement-a materialsscience perspective. Biomaterials 1998, 19:1621-1639.
38. Saithna A The influence of hydroxyapatite coating of external fixator pins on pinloosening and pin track infection: a systematic review. Injury 2010, 41:128-132.
39. Ohgaki M, Yamashita K Preparation of Polymethylmethacrylate-Reinforced Functionally GradedHydroxyapatite Composites. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 2003, 86:1440-1442.
40. Pramanik S, Kar KK Nanohydroxyapatite synthesized from calcium oxide andits characterization. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2013, 66:1181-1189.
41. Singh S, Trikha S, Edge A Hydroxyapatite ceramic-coated femoral stems in young patientsA PROSPECTIVE TEN-YEAR STUDY. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume 2004, 86:1118-1123.
42. Huiskes R Failed innovation in total hip replacement. Diagnosis and proposals for a cure. Acta Orthop Scand 1993, 64:699-716.
43. Kuiper JH, Huiskes R Numerical optimization of hip-prosthetic stem material. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedicine 1993, 78-84. Gordon and Breach, New York. E.A. Middleton (Ed.).
44. Pal B, Puthumanapully PK, Amis AA Biomechanics of implant fixation. Orthopaedics and Trauma 2013, 27:76-84.
45. Ruben RB, Folgado J, Fernandes PR Three-dimensional shape optimization of hip prosthesesusing a multicriteria formulation. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2007, 34:261-275.
46. El-Sheikh H, MacDonald B, Hashmi M Material selection in the design of the femoral component of cemented total hipreplacement. Journal of materials processing technology 2002, 122:309-317.
47. Taylor M, Tanner K, Freeman M, Yettram A Cancellous bone stresses surrounding the femoral component of a hip: an elastic-plastic finite element analysis. Medical engineering & physics 1995, 17:544-550.