Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: Effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 143-155

  Pal, Bidyut ^a   Gupta, Sanjay ^a   New, Andrew M R ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ceramic; Contact analysis; Finite element analysis; Hip; Resurfacing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; CERAMICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; YOUNG MODULUS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; CERAMICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; ELASTIC MODULUS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 77954673698     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255840903067064     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abdul Kadir MR, Hansen U, Klabunde R, Lucas D, Amis A. 2008. Finite element modeling of primary hip stem stability: the effect of interference fit. J Biomech. 41:587-594.
2. Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. 2004a. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg. 86A:28-39.
3. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. 2004b. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg. 86A:1874-1877.
4. Anglin C, Masri BA, Tonetti J, Hodgson AJ, Greidanus NV. 2007. Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 465:71-79.
5. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda G. 2001. Hip contact forces and Gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 34:859-871.
6. Bernakiewicz M, Viceconti M. 2002. The role of parameter identification in finite element contact analyses with reference to orthopaedic biomechanics applications. J Biomech. 35:61-67.
7. Bistakos C, Kerner J, Fisher I, Amis AA. 2005. The effect of muscle loading on the simulation of bone remodelling in the proximal femur. J Biomech. 38(1):133-139.
8. Bogoch ER, Fornasier VL, Capello WN. 1982. The femoral head remnant in resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 167:92-105.
9. CeramTec AG. 2008. Scientific information and performance data, Biolox Delta-nanocomposites for arthroplasty. The Fourth Generation of Ceramics, Medical Product Division, CeramTec AG, Germany, p. 11.
10. Chang WCW, Christensen TM, Pinilla TP, Keaveny TM. 1999. Uniaxial yield strains for bovine trabecular bone are isotropic and asymmetric. J Orthop Res. 17:582-585.
11. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW. 2004. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg. 86B:177-184.
12. Davis JP, Burke DW, O'Connor DO, Harris WH. 1987. Comparison of the fatigue characteristics of centrifuged and uncentrifuged simplex-P bone cement. J Orthop Res. 5: 366-371.
13. Destresse B, Hobatho MC, Darmana R. 1995. Etude des proprietes mecaniques de l'os spongieux du tibia humain par une méthode ultrasonore. Innov Tech Biol Med. 16: 288-299.
14. Furuya K, Tsuchiya M, Kawachi S. 1978. Socket-cup arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 134:41-44.
15. Glyn-Jones S, Gill HS, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW. 2004. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 86B: 172-176.
16. Grigoris P, Roberts P, Panousis K, Jin Z. 2006. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the evolution of contemporary designs. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H, J Eng Med. 220:S95-S105.
17. Gupta S, New AMR, Taylor M. 2006. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head. Clin Biomech. 21(6): 594-602.
18. Heller M, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Durselen L, Pohl M, Claes L, Duda GN. 2001. Musculoskeletal loading conditions during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech. 34:883-893.
19. Hoffman O. 1967. The brittle strength of orthotropic material. J Compos Mater. 1:200-206.
20. Huiskes R, Strens PH, van Heck J, Slooff TJ. 1985. Interface stresses in the resurfaced hip: finite element analysis of load transmission in the femoral head. Acta Orthop Scand. 56(6):474-478.
21. Huiskes R, van Rietbergen B. 1995. Preclinical testing of total hip stems: the effects of coating placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 319:64-76.
22. Isaac GH, Thompson J, Williams S, Fisher J. 2006. Metal-on-metal bearings surfaces: materials, manufacture, design, optimization, and alternatives. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H, J Eng Med. 220:S119-S133.
23. Itayem R, Arndt A, Nistor L, McMinn D, Lundberg A. 2005. Stability of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty at two years. J Bone Joint Surg. 87B:158-162.
24. James AR, Mclardy Smith P, Desmet K, Smith TJ, Blunn GW, Murray DW, Gill HS. 2005. Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: an experimental study to determine if implant clearance determines femoral head cement penetration. Stanmore (UK): British Orthopaedics Society.
25. Kaplan SJ, Hayes WC, Stone JL. 1985. Tensile strength of bovine trabecular bone. J Biomech. 18:723-727.
26. Kohn DH. 2003. Bioceramics. In: Kutz M, editor. Standard handbook of biomedical engineering and design. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Standard Handbooks. Chapter 13: 13.1-13.24.
27. Learmonth ID, Gheduzzi S, Vail TP. 2006. Clinical experience with metal-on-metal total joint replacements: indications and results. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H, J Eng Med. 220: S229-S237.
28. Little CP, Ruiz A, Harding IJ, Mclardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Murray DW. 2005. Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg. 87B:320-323.
29. Little J, Taddei F, Viceconti M, Murray DW, Gill HS. 2007. Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads. Clin Biomech. 22:440-448.
30. McMinn D, Treacy R, Link Pynsent P. 1996. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip: experience of the McMinn prosthesis. Clin Orthop. 329:S89-S98.
31. Morgan EF, Keaveny TM. 2001. Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. J Biomech. 34: 569-577.
32. Morlock MM, Bishop N, Ruther W, Delling G, Hahn M. 2006. Biomechanical, morphological, and histological analysis of early failures in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H, J Eng Med. 220:S333-S344.
33. Nuno N, Amabili M. 2002. Modelling debonded stem-cement interface for hip implants: effect of residual stresses. Clin Biomech. 17:41-48.
34. Pal B, Gupta S, New AMR. 2009. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H, J Eng Med. 223(H4):471-484. DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM488.
35. Radcliffe IAJ, Taylor M. 2007a. Investigation into the affect of cementing techniques on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis. Clin Biomech. 22:422-430.
36. Radcliffe IAJ, Taylor M. 2007b. Investigation into the affect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis. Clin Biomech. 22:780-786.
37. Salzer M, Knahr K, Locke H, Stark N. 1978. Cement-free bioceramic double-cup endoprosthesis of the hip joint. Clin Orthop. 134:80-86.
38. Shimmin A, Back D. 2005. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg. 87B:463-464.
39. Shimmin A, Beaule PE, Campbell P. 2008. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 90A:637-654.
40. Siebel T, Maubach S, Morlock MM. 2006. Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASRA hip resurfacing implantations. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H, J Eng Med. 220:S345-S353.
41. Steffen RT, Smith SR, Urban JPG, Mclardy-Smith P, Beard DJ, Gill HS, Murray DW. 2005. The effect of hip resurfacing on oxygen concentration in the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg. 87B:1468-1474.
42. Stewart TD, Tipper JL, Insley G, Streicher R, Ingham E, Fisher J. 2003. Long-term wear of ceramic matrix composite materials for hip prostheses under severe swing phase microseparation. J Biomed Mat Res Appl Biomater, Part B. 66:567-573.
43. Stone JL, Beaupre GS, Hayes WC. 1983. Multiaxial strength characteristics of trabecular bone. J Biomech. 16:743-752.
44. Taddei F, Cristofolini L, Martelli S, Gill HS, Viceconti M. 2006. Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: an in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy. J Biomech. 39: 2457-2467.
45. Taddei F, Pancanti A, Viceconti M. 2004. An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. Med Eng Phys. 26: 61-69.
46. Taylor M. 2006. Finite element analysis of the resurfaced femoral head. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H, J Eng Med. 220:289-297.
47. Treacy R, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. 2005. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg. 87B:167-170.
48. Vena P, Verdonschot N, Contro R, Huiskes R. 2000. Sensitivity analysis and optimal shape design for bone-prosthesis interfaces in a femoral head surface replacement. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 3:245-256.
49. Viceconti M, Muccini R, Bernakiewicz M, Baleani M, Cristofolini L. 2000. Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone-implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration. J Biomech. 33:1611-1618.
50. Wagner H. 1978. Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop. 134:102-130.
51. Watanabe Y, Naota S, Shigeaki M, Fujio H, Yoshishiko T, Akio I. 2000. Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis of the femoral component. J Arthroplasty. 15(4):505-511.
52. Zannoni C, Mantovani R, Viceconti M. 1998. Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures: a new method. Med Eng Phys. 20:735-740.