Biases in Visual, Auditory, and Audiovisual Perception of Space

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 12, 2015, Pages

  Odegaard, Brian ^a   Wozny, David R ^a   Shams, Ladan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

AUDIO-VISUAL PERCEPTIONS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY STIMULI; CONDITION; LOCALISATION; MOTOR TASKS; SPATIAL LOCALIZATION; SPATIAL LOCATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VISUAL STIMULUS;

SENSORY ANALYSIS;

CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPECTATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MODEL; PERCEPTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SAMPLING BIAS; STIMULUS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HEARING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOUND DETECTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOUND LOCALIZATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84952929043     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004649     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Adam JJ, Davelaar EJ, van der Gouw A, Willems P, Evidence for attentional processing in spatial localization. Psychological Research. 2008 Jul 1;72(4):433–42. 17899176
2. Fortenbaugh FC, Robertson LC, When here becomes there: attentional distribution modulates foveal bias in peripheral localization. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Apr 1;73(3):809–28. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0075-5 21264747
3. Mateeff S, Gourevich A, Peripheral vision and perceived visual direction. Biol Cybernetics. 1983 Dec 1;49(2):111–8.
4. Müsseler J, Heijden AHCVD, Mahmud SH, Deubel H, Ertsey S, Relative mislocalization of briefly presented stimuli in the retinal periphery. Perception & Psychophysics. 1999 Dec 1;61(8):1646–61.
5. Osaka N, Effect of Refraction on Perceived Locus of a Target in the Peripheral Visual Field. The Journal of Psychology. 1977;95(1):59–62.
6. Parise CV, Spence C, Ernst MO, When Correlation Implies Causation in Multisensory Integration. Current Biology. 2012 Jan 10;22(1):46–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.039 22177899
7. Kerzel D, Memory for the position of stationary objects: disentangling foveal bias and memory averaging. Vision Research. 2002 Jan;42(2):159–67. 11809470
8. Sheth BR, Shimojo S, Compression of space in visual memory. Vision Research. 2001 Feb;41(3):329–41. 11164448
9. Bock O, Contribution of retinal versus extraretinal signals towards visual localization in goal-directed movements. Exp Brain Res. 1986 Nov 1;64(3):476–82. 3803485
10. Bock O, Localization of objects in the peripheral visual field. Behavioural Brain Research. 1993 Jul 30;56(1):77–84. 8397856
11. Bruno A, Morrone MC, Influence of saccadic adaptation on spatial localization: Comparison of verbal and pointing reports. J Vis. 2007 Dec 28;7(5):16. doi: 10.1167/7.5.16 18217856
12. Henriques DYP, Klier EM, Smith MA, Lowy D, Crawford JD, Gaze-Centered Remapping of Remembered Visual Space in an Open-Loop Pointing Task. J Neurosci. 1998 Feb 15;18(4):1583–94. 9454863
13. Cui QN, O’Neill WE, Paige GD, Advancing age alters the influence of eye position on sound localization. Exp Brain Res. 2010 Oct 1;206(4):371–9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2413-1 20857091
14. Lewald J, Ehrenstein WH, Auditory-visual spatial integration: A new psychophysical approach using laser pointing to acoustic targets. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1998 Sep 1;104(3):1586–97. 9745742
15. Razavi B, O’Neill WE, Paige GD, Auditory Spatial Perception Dynamically Realigns with Changing Eye Position. J Neurosci. 2007 Sep 19;27(38):10249–58. 17881531
16. Dobreva MS, O’Neill WE, Paige GD, Influence of age, spatial memory, and ocular fixation on localization of auditory, visual, and bimodal targets by human subjects. Exp Brain Res. 2012 Dec 1;223(4):441–55. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3270-x 23076429
17. Zahn JR, Abel LA, Dell’Osso LF, Audio-ocular response characteristics. Sens Processes. 1978 Mar;2(1):32–7. 705354
18. Hairston WD, Wallace MT, Vaughan JW, Stein BE, Norris JL, Schirillo JA, Visual Localization Ability Influences Cross-Modal Bias. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2003 Jan 1;15(1):20–9. 12590840
19. Charbonneau G, Véronneau M, Boudrias-Fournier C, Lepore F, Collignon O, The ventriloquist in periphery: Impact of eccentricity-related reliability on audio-visual localization. J Vis. 2013 Oct 28;13(12):20. doi: 10.1167/13.12.20 24167163
20. Uddin MK, Visual spatial localization and the two-process model. Psychological research of Kyushu University. 2006 Mar;7:65–75.
21. Fortenbaugh FC, Sanghvi S, Silver MA, Robertson LC, Exploring the edges of visual space: the influence of visual boundaries on peripheral localization. J Vis. 2012;12(2).
22. Bertelson P, Aschersleben G, Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1998 Sep 1;5(3):482–9.
23. Bertelson P, Radeau M, Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance. Perception & Psychophysics. 1981 Nov 1;29(6):578–84.
24. Lewald J, Guski R, Cross-modal perceptual integration of spatially and temporally disparate auditory and visual stimuli. Cognitive Brain Research. 2003 May;16(3):468–78. 12706226
25. Slutsky DA, Recanzone GH, Temporal and spatial dependency of the ventriloquism effect. Neuroreport. 2001 Jan 22;12(1):7–10. 11201094
26. Wallace MT, Roberson GE, Hairston WD, Stein BE, Vaughan JW, Schirillo JA, Unifying multisensory signals across time and space. Exp Brain Res. 2004 Sep 1;158(2):252–8. 15112119
27. Pick HL, Warren DH, Hay JC, Sensory conflict in judgments of spatial direction. Perception & Psychophysics. 1969 Jul 1;6(4):203–5.
28. Welch RB, Warren DH, Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin. 1980;88(3):638–67. 7003641
29. Chen L, Vroomen J, Intersensory binding across space and time: A tutorial review. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jul 1;75(5):790–811. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0475-4 23709064
30. Körding KP, Beierholm U, Ma WJ, Quartz S, Tenenbaum JB, Shams L, Causal Inference in Multisensory Perception. PLoS ONE. 2007 Sep 26;2(9):e943. 17895984
31. Wozny DR, Beierholm UR, Shams L, Probability Matching as a Computational Strategy Used in Perception. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Aug 5;6(8):e1000871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000871 20700493
32. Wozny DR, Shams L, Computational Characterization of Visually Induced Auditory Spatial Adaptation. Front Integr Neurosci [Internet]. 2011 Nov 4 [cited 2013 Feb 14];5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3208186/
33. Beierholm UR, Quartz SR, Shams L, Bayesian priors are encoded independently from likelihoods in human multisensory perception. J Vis. 2009 May 21;9(5):23. doi: 10.1167/9.5.23 19757901
34. Samad M, Chung AJ, Shams L, Perception of Body Ownership Is Driven by Bayesian Sensory Inference. PLoS ONE. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):e0117178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117178 25658822
35. Wozny DR, Beierholm UR, Shams L, Human trimodal perception follows optimal statistical inference. J Vis [Internet]. 2008 Mar 27 [cited 2013 Mar 3];8(3). Available from: http://www.journalofvision.org/content/8/3/24
36. Kayser C, Shams L, Multisensory Causal Inference in the Brain. PLoS Biol. 2015 Feb 24;13(2):e1002075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002075 25710476
37. Rohe T, Noppeney U, Cortical Hierarchies Perform Bayesian Causal Inference in Multisensory Perception. PLoS Biol. 2015 Feb 24;13(2):e1002073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002073 25710328
38. Alais D, Burr D, The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration. Current Biology. 2004 Feb 3;14(3):257–62. 14761661
39. Battaglia PW, Jacobs RA, Aslin RN, Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization. J Opt Soc Am A. 2003 Jul 1;20(7):1391–7.
40. Ernst MO, Banks MS, Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):429–33. 11807554
41. Ernst MO, Bülthoff HH, Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2004 Apr;8(4):162–9. 15050512
42. Ghahramani Z, Computation and psychophysics of sensorimotor integration [Internet]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1995 [cited 2015 Feb 18]. Available from: http://www.learning.eng.cam.ac.uk/zoubin/papers/thesis.pdf
43. Ocklenburg S, Hirnstein M, Hausmann M, Lewald J, Auditory space perception in left- and right-handers. Brain and Cognition. 2010 Mar;72(2):210–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.08.013 19786316
44. Wozny DR, Shams L, Recalibration of Auditory Space following Milliseconds of Cross-Modal Discrepancy. J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 23;31(12):4607–12. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6079-10.2011 21430160
45. Nagelkerke NJD, A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika. 1991 Sep 1;78(3):691–2.
46. Sato Y, Kording KP, How much to trust the senses: Likelihood learning. J Vis. 2014 Nov 14;14(13):13. doi: 10.1167/14.13.13 25398975
47. Kapoula Z, Robinson DA, Saccadic undershoot is not inevitable: Saccades can be accurate. Vision Research. 1986;26(5):735–43. 3750853
48. Harris CM, Does saccadic undershoot minimize saccadic flight-time? A Monte-Carlo study. Vision Research. 1995 Mar;35(5):691–701. 7900307
49. Harris CM, Wolpert DM, The Main Sequence of Saccades Optimizes Speed-accuracy Trade-off. Biol Cybern. 2006 Mar 23;95(1):21–9. 16555070
50. Connolly M, Van Essen D, The representation of the visual field in parvicellular and magnocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus in the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1984 Jul 10;226(4):544–64. 6747034
51. Fischer BJ, Peña JL, Owl’s behavior and neural representation predicted by Bayesian inference. Nat Neurosci. 2011 Aug;14(8):1061–6. doi: 10.1038/nn.2872 21725311
52. Wei X-X, Stocker AA, A Bayesian observer model constrained by efficient coding can explain “anti-Bayesian” percepts. Nat Neurosci [Internet]. 2015 Sep 7 [cited 2015 Sep 18];advance online publication. Available from: http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nn.4105.html
53. Rahnev D, Maniscalco B, Graves T, Huang E, de Lange FP, Lau H, Attention induces conservative subjective biases in visual perception. Nat Neurosci. 2011 Dec;14(12):1513–5. doi: 10.1038/nn.2948 22019729
54. Azzopardi P, Cowey A, Preferential representation of the fovea in the primary visual cortex. Nature. 1993 Feb 25;361(6414):719–21. 7680108
55. Gordon J, Abramov I, Color vision in the peripheral retina. II. Hue and saturation. J Opt Soc Am, JOSA. 1977 Feb 1;67(2):202–7.
56. Todd JT, Tittle JS, Norman JF, Distortions of three-dimensional space in the perceptual analysis of motion and stereo. Perception. 1995;24(1):75–86. 7617420
57. Bingham GP, Zaal F, Robin D, Alexander J, Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2000;26(4):1436–60. 10946724
58. Pagano CC, Bingham GP, Comparing measures of monocular distance perception: Verbal and reaching errors are not correlated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1998;24(4):1037–51. 9706709
59. Milner AD, Goodale MA, The visual brain in action. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press; 1995. 248 p.
60. Goodale MA, Milner AD, Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences. 1992 Jan;15(1):20–5. 1374953
61. Goodale MA, Jakobson LS, Servos P, Wing AM, Haggard P, Flanagan JR, The visual pathways mediating perception and prehension. In: Hand and brain: The neurophysiology and psychology of hand movements. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press; 1996. p. 15–31.
62. Lee J, Groh JM, Different Stimuli, Different Spatial Codes: A Visual Map and an Auditory Rate Code for Oculomotor Space in the Primate Superior Colliculus. PLoS ONE. 2014 Jan 15;9(1):e85017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085017 24454779
63. Salminen NH, Tiitinen H, May PJC, Auditory Spatial Processing in the Human Cortex. Neuroscientist. 2012 Dec 1;18(6):602–12. doi: 10.1177/1073858411434209 22492193
64. Stecker GC, Harrington IA, Middlebrooks JC, Location Coding by Opponent Neural Populations in the Auditory Cortex. PLoS Biol. 2005 Feb 22;3(3):e78. 15736980
65. Werner-Reiss U, Groh JM, A Rate Code for Sound Azimuth in Monkey Auditory Cortex: Implications for Human Neuroimaging Studies. J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 2;28(14):3747–58. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5044-07.2008 18385333
66. Salminen NH, May PJC, Alku P, Tiitinen H, A Population Rate Code of Auditory Space in the Human Cortex. PLoS ONE. 2009 Oct 26;4(10):e7600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007600 19855836
67. Salminen NH, Tiitinen H, Yrttiaho S, May PJC, The neural code for interaural time difference in human auditory cortex. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Feb;127(2):EL60–5. doi: 10.1121/1.3290744 20136180
68. Hubbard TL, Ruppel SE, Representational momentum and the landmark attraction effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 1999;53(3):242–56.
69. Hubbard TL, Ruppel SE, Spatial memory averaging, the landmark attraction effect, and representational gravity. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. 2000 Oct 1;64(1):41–55. 11109866