Visual localization ability influences cross-modal bias

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 20-29

  Hairston, W David ^a   Wallace, M T ^b   Vaughan, J W ^b   Stein, B E ^b   Norris, J L ^b   Schirillo, J A ^b  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SOUND LOCALIZATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0037244388     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089892903321107792     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bermant, R. I., & Welch, R. B. (1976). Effect of degree of separation of visual-auditory stimulus and eye position upon spatial interaction of vision and audition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 487-493.
2. Bertelson, P., & Aschersleben, G. (1998). Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory, location. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 482-489.
3. Bertelson, P., & Radeau, M. (1981). Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance. Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 578-584.
4. Brindley, G. S., & Lewin, W. S. (1968). The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 196, 479-493.
5. Carrasco, M., Evert, D. L., Chang, I., & Katz, S. M. (1995). The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 1241-1261.
6. Carrasco, M., & Frieder, K. S. (1997). Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search. Vision Research, 37, 63-82.
7. Choe, C. S., Welch, R. B., Guilford, R. M., & Juola, J. (1975). The "ventriloquist effect": Visual dominance or response bias? Perception and Psychophysics, 18, 55-60.
8. Giard, M. H., & Peronet, F. (1999). Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: A behavioral and electrophysiological study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 473-490.
9. Hairston, W. D., Vaughan, W. J., Wallace, M. T., Stein, B. E., & Schirillo, J. A. (2001). Cross-modal bias is related to variability, in visual localization. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 27, 1342.
10. Howard, I. P., & Templeton, W. B. (1966). Human spatial orientation. New York: Wiley.
11. Jack, C. E., & Thurlow, W. R. (1973). Effects of degree of visual association and angle of displacement on the "ventriloquism" effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 967-979.
12. Lewald, J., Ehrenstein, W. H., & Guski, R. (2001). Spatiotemporal constraints for auditory-visual integration. Behavioural Brain Research, 121, 69-79.
13. Mateeff, S., & Gourevich, A. (1983). Peripheral vision and perceived visual direction. Biological Cybernetics, 49, 111-118.
14. Radeau, M. (1985). Signal intensity, task context, and auditory-visual interactions. Perception, 14, 571-577.
15. Radeau, M., & Bertelson, P. (1987). Auditory-visual interaction and the timing of inputs. Psychological Research, 49, 17-22.
16. Ransom-Hogg, A., & Spillman, L. (1980). Perceptive fields in fovea and periphery, of the light and dark-adapted retina. Vision Research, 20, 221-228.
17. Roberson, G., Hairston, W., Vaughan, J., Wallace, M., Stein, B., Laurienti, P., & Schirillo, J. (2001). Integrating multisensory signals across time and space. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 27, 1342.
18. Rovamo, J., & Raninen, A. (1990). Cortical acuity and the luminous flux collected by retinal ganglion cells at various eccentricities in human rod and cone vision. Vision Research. 30, 11-21.
19. Shams, L. B., Allman, J., & Shimojo, S. (2001). Illusory, visual motion induced by sound. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 27, 1340.
20. Slutsky, D. A., & Recanzone, G. H. (2001). Temporal and spatial dependency of the ventriloquism effect. NeuroReport, 12, 7-10.
21. Thompson, S. E., Shams, L. B., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2001). Brain mechanisms underlying a sound-induced visual illusion. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 27, 1342.
22. Thurlow, W. R., & Jack, C. E. (1973). Certain determinants of the ventriloquism effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36, 1171-1184.
23. Thurlow, W. R., & Rosenthal, T. M. (1976). Further study of existence regions for the "ventriloquism effect". Journal of the American Audiology Society, 1, 280-286.
24. Virsu, V., & Rovamo, J. (1979). Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research, 37, 475-494.
25. Warren, D. H. (1979). Spatial localization under conflict conditions: Is there a single explanation? Perception, 8, 323-337.
26. Weerts, T. C., & Thurlow, W. R. (1971). The effects of eye position and expectation on sound localization. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 35-39.
27. Welch, R. B. (1972). The effect of experienced limb identity upon adaptation to simulated displacement of the visual field. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 453-456.
28. Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1986). Intersensory interactions. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance, vol. 1, Sensory processes and perception (pp. 1-36). New York: Wiley.