Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 482-489

  Bertelson, Paul ^a,b   Aschersleben, Gisa ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000284217     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03208826     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BERMANT, R. I., & WELCH, R. B. (1976). The effect of the degree of visual-auditory stimulus separation upon the spatial interaction of vision and audition. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 43, 487-493.
2. BERTELSON, P. (1998). Starting from the ventriloquist: The perception of multimodal events. In M. Sabourin, F. I. M. Craik, & M. Robert (Eds.), Advances in psychological science: Vol. 1. Biological and cognitive aspects (pp. 419-439). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
3. BERTELSON, P., & ASCHERSLEBEN, G. (1996). Visual bias of auditory location: Evidence for automaticity. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 1, 74.
4. BERTELSON, P., & RADEAU, M. (1976). Ventriloquism, sensory interaction, and response bias: Remarks on the paper by Choe, Welch, Gilford, and Juola. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 531-535.
5. BERTELSON, P., & RADEAU, M. (1981). Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 578-584.
6. BERTELSON, P., & RADEAU, M. (1987). Adaptation to auditory-visual conflict: Have top-down influences been overestimated here also? Paper presented at the 2nd meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Madrid.
7. BERTELSON, P., VROOMEN, J., WIEGERAAD, G., & DE GELDER, B. (1994). Exploring the relation between McGurk interference and ventriloquism. In International Congress on Spoken Language Processing 1994 (pp. 559-562). Yokohama: ICSLP.
8. CANON, L. K. (1970). Intermodality inconsistency of input and directed attention as determinants of the nature of adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 141-147.
9. CHOE, C. S., WELCH, R. B., GILFORD, R. M., & JUOLA, J. F. (1975). The "ventriloquist effect": Visual dominance or response bias? Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 55-60.
10. CORNSWEET, T. N. (1962). The staircase-method in psychophysics. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 485-491.
11. DRIVER, J. (1996). Enhancement of listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading. Nature, 381, 66-68.
12. GRAZIANO, M. S. A., & GROSS, C. G. (1996). Multiple pathways for processing visual space. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.) Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 181-207). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. HOWARD, I. P., & TEMPLETON, W. B. (1966). Human spatial orientation. London: Wiley.
14. JACK, C. E., & THURLOW, W. R. (1973). Effects of degree of visual association and angle of displacement on the "ventriloquism" effect. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 38, 967-979.
15. JACKSON, C. V. (1953). Visual factors in auditory localization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5, 52-65.
16. KLEMM, O. (1909). Localisation von Sinneneindrücken bei disparaten Nebenreizen. Psychologische Studien, 5, 73-161.
17. LEVITT, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 467-477.
18. PICK, H. L., JR., WARREN, D. H., & HAY, J. C. (1969). Sensory conflict in judgments of spatial direction. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 203-205.
19. PREDEBON, J., & WOOLLEY, J. S. (1994). The familiar-size cue to depth under reduced-cue viewing conditions. Perception, 23, 1301-1312.
20. RADEAU, M. (1985). Signal intensity, task context, and auditory-visual interaction. Perception, 14, 571-578.
21. RADEAU, M. (1992). Cognitive impenetrability in auditory-visual interaction. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Morais, & M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 41-55). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. RADEAU, M., & BERTELSON, P. (1974). The after-effects of ventriloquism. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 63-71.
23. RADEAU, M., & BERTELSON, P. (1976). The effect of a textured visual field on modality dominance in a ventriloquism situation. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 227-235.
24. RADEAU, M., & BERTELSON, P. (1977). Adaptation to auditory-visual discordance and ventriloquism in semirealistic situations. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 137-146.
25. RADEAU, M., & BERTELSON, P. (1987). Auditory-visual interaction and the timing of inputs: Thomas (1941) revisited. Psychological Research, 49, 17-22.
26. STEIN, B. E., & MEREDITH, M. A. (1993). The merging of the senses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
27. THOMAS, G. J. (1941). Experimental study of the influence of vision on sound localization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 167-177.
28. WARREN, D. H., WELCH, R. B., & MCCARTHY, T. J. (1981). The role of visual-auditory "compellingness" in the ventriloquism effect: Implications for transitivity among the spatial senses. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 557-564.
29. WELCH, R. B. (1978). Perceptual modification: Adapting to altered sensory environments. New York: Academic Press.
30. WITKIN, H. A., WAPNER, S., & LEVENTHAL, T. (1952). Sound localization with conflicting visual and auditory cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 58-67.