A quantitative system-scale characterization of the metabolism of clostridium acetobutylicum

mBio

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Yoo, Minyeong ^a,b,c   Bestel Corre, Gwenaelle ^d   Croux, Christian ^a,b,c   Riviere, Antoine ^a,b,c   Meynial Salles, Isabelle ^a,b,c   Soucaille, Philippe ^a,b,c,d  

^a INSA   (France)

^b UMR792 INGÉNIERIE DES SYSTÈMES BIOLOGIQUES ET DES PROCÉDÉS   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d Metabolic Explorer   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUTYRYL COENZYME A DEHYDROGENASE; GLYCERALDEHYDE 3 PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE; HYDROGENASE; MESSENGER RNA; PROTEOME;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL METABOLISM; CARBON METABOLISM; CLOSTRIDIUM ACETOBUTYLICUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; METABOLIC FLUX ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

CLOSTRIDIUM ACETOBUTYLICUM; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; METABOLIC FLUX ANALYSIS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEOME; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84952802569     PISSN: 21612129     EISSN: 21507511     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01808-15     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Jones DT. 2001. Applied acetone-butanol fermentation, p 125-168. In Bahl H, Dürre P (ed), Clostridia: biotechnology and medical applications. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, Germany.
2. Jones DT, Woods DR. 1986. Acetone-butanol fermentation revisited. Microbiol Res 50:484-524.
3. Jones DT, van der Westhuizen A, Long S, Allcock ER, Reid SJ, Woods DR. 1982. Solvent production and morphological changes in Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:1434-1439.
4. Dürre P. 2007. Biobutanol: an attractive biofuel. Biotechnol J 2:1525-1534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/biot.200700168.
5. Ni Y, Sun Z. 2009. Recent progress on industrial fermentative production of acetone-butanol-ethanol by Clostridium acetobutylicum in China. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 83:415-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2003-y.
6. Vasconcelos I, Girbal L, Soucaille P. 1994. Regulation of carbon and electron flow in Clostridium acetobutylicum grown in chemostat culture at neutral pH on mixtures of glucose and glycerol. J Bacteriol 176: 1443-1450.
7. Girbal L, Soucaille P. 1994. Regulation of Clostridium acetobutylicum metabolism as revealed by mixed-substrate steady-state continuous cultures: role of NADH/NAD ratio and ATP pool. J Bacteriol 176: 6433-6438.
8. Girbal L, Vasconcelos I, Saint-Amans S, Soucaille P. 1995. How neutral red modified carbon and electron flow in Clostridium acetobutylicum grown in chemostat culture at neutral pH. FEMS Microbiol Rev 16: 151-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1995.tb00163.x.
9. Girbal L, Croux C, Vasconcelos I, Soucaille P. 1995. Regulation of metabolic shifts in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. FEMS Microbiol Rev 17:287-297. http://dx.doi. org/1 0. 1111 / j. 1 5 7 4-6976.1995.tb00212.x.
10. Girbal L, Soucaille P. 1998. Regulation of solvent production in Clostridium acetobutylicum. Trends Biotechnol 16:11-16. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0167-7799(97)01141-4.
11. Wiesenborn DP, Rudolph FB, Papoutsakis ET. 1989. Phosphotransbutyrylase from Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 and its role in acidogenesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:317-322.
12. Wiesenborn DP, Rudolph FB, Papoutsakis ET. 1989. Coenzyme A transferase from Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 and its role in the uptake of acids. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:323-329.
13. Sauer U, Dürre P. 1995. Differential induction of genes related to solvent formation during the shift from acidogenesis to solventogenesis in continuous culture of Clostridium acetobutylicum. FEMS Microbiol Lett 125: 115-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07344.x.
14. Janssen H, Grimmler C, Ehrenreich A, Bahl H, Fischer R. 2012. A transcriptional study of acidogenic chemostat cells of Clostridium acetobutylicum-solvent stress caused by a transient n-butanol pulse. J Biotechnol 161:354-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.03.027.
15. Schwarz KM, Kuit W, Grimmler C, Ehrenreich A, Kengen SWM. 2012. A transcriptional study of acidogenic chemostat cells of Clostridium acetobutylicum-cellular behavior in adaptation to n-butanol. J Biotechnol 161:366-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.03.018.
16. Wang Q, Venkataramanan K, Huang H, Papoutsakis ET, Wu CH. 2013. Transcription factors and genetic circuits orchestrating the complex, multilayered response of Clostridium acetobutylicum to butanol and butyrate stress. BMC Syst Biol 7:120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ 1752-0509-7-120.
17. Venkataramanan KP, Jones SW, McCormick KP, Kunjeti SG, Ralston MT, Meyers BC, Papoutsakis ET. 2013. The clostridium small RNome that responds to stress: the paradigm and importance of toxic metabolite stress in C. acetobutylicum. BMC Genomics 14:849. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1471-2164-14-849.
18. Cornillot E, Soucaille P. 1996. Solvent-forming genes in Clostridia. Nature 380:489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/380489a0.
19. Cornillot E, Nair RV, Papoutsakis ET, Soucaille P. 1997. The genes for butanol and acetone formation in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 reside on a large plasmid whose loss leads to degeneration of the strain. J Bacteriol 179:5442-5447.
20. Nolling J, Breton G, Omelchenko MV, Makarova KS, Zeng Q, Gibson R, Lee HM, Dubois J, Qiu D, Hitti J, Wolf YI, Tatusov RL, Sabathe F, Doucette-Stamm L, Soucaille P, Daly MJ, Bennett GN, Koonin EV, Smith DR. 2001. Genome sequence and comparative analysis of the solvent-producing bacterium Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Bacteriol 183: 4823-4838. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.16.4823-4838.2001.
21. Alsaker KV, Papoutsakis ET. 2005. Transcriptional program of early sporulation and stationary-phase events in Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Bacteriol 187:7103-7118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.20.7103-7118.2005.
22. Janssen H, Döring C, Ehrenreich A, Voigt B, Hecker M, Bahl H, Fischer R. 2010. A proteomic and transcriptional view of acidogenic and solventogenic steady-state cells of Clostridium acetobutylicum in a chemostat culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87:2209-2226. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00253-010-2741-x.
23. Jones SW, Paredes CJ, Tracy B, Cheng N, Sillers R, Senger RS, Papoutsakis ET. 2008. The transcriptional program underlying the physiology of clostridial sporulation. Genome Biol 9:R114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ gb-2008-9-7-r114.
24. Sullivan L, Bennett GN. 2006. Proteome analysis and comparison of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 and Spo0A strain variants. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 33:298-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10295-005-0050-7.
25. Tomas CA, Alsaker KV, Bonarius HPJ, Hendriksen WT, Yang H, Beamish JA, Paredes CJ, Papoutsakis ET. 2003. DNA array-based transcriptional analysis of asporogenous, nonsolventogenic Clostridium acetobutylicum strains SKO1 and M5. J Bacteriol 185:4539-4547. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.185.15.4539-4547.2003.
26. Schaffer S, Isci N, Zickner B, Dürre P. 2002. Changes in protein synthesis and identification of proteins specifically induced during solventogenesis in Clostridium acetobutylicum. Electrophoresis 23:110-121. http:// dx.doi. org/1 0. 1 0 0 2 / 1 5 2 2-2 6 8 3 ( 2 0 0 2 0 1 ) 2 3: 1_110::AID-ELPS110_3.0.CO;2-G.
27. Paredes CJ, Senger RS, Spath IS, Borden JR, Sillers R, Papoutsakis ET. 2007.Ageneral framework for designing and validating oligomer-basedDNA microarrays and its application to Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:4631-4638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00144-07.
28. Servinsky MD, Kiel JT, Dupuy NF, Sund CJ. 2010. Transcriptional analysis of differential carbohydrate utilization by Clostridium acetobutylicum. Microbiology 156:3478-3491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ mic.0.037085-0.
29. Grimmler C, Held C, Liebl W, Ehrenreich A. 2010. Transcriptional analysis of catabolite repression in Clostridium acetobutylicum growing on mixtures of D-glucose and D-xylose. J Biotechnol 150:315-323. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.09.938.
30. Tan Y, Liu Z, Liu Z, Zheng H, Li F. 2015. Comparative transcriptome analysis between csrA-disruption Clostridium acetobutylicum and its parent strain. Mol Biosyst 11:1434-1442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/ C4MB00600C.
31. Mao S, Luo Y, Zhang T, Li J, Bao G, Zhu Y, Chen Z, Zhang Y, Li Y, Ma Y. 2010. Proteome reference map and comparative proteomic analysis between a wild type Clostridium acetobutylicum DSM 1731 and its mutant with enhanced butanol tolerance and butanol yield. J Proteome Res 9:3046-3061. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr9012078.
32. Mao S, Luo Y, Bao G, Zhang Y, Li Y, Ma Y. 2011. Comparative analysis on the membrane proteome of Clostridium acetobutylicum wild type strain and its butanol-tolerant mutant. Mol Biosyst 7:1660-1677. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0mb00330a.
33. Jang Y, Han M, Lee J, Im JA, Lee YH, Papoutsakis ET, Bennett G, Lee SY. 2014. Proteomic analyses of the phase transition from acidogenesis to solventogenesis using solventogenic and non-solventogenic Clostridium acetobutylicum strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:5105-5115. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5738-z.
34. Magdeldin S, Enany S, Yoshida Y, Xu B, Zhang Y, Zureena Z, Lokamani I, Yaoita E, Yamamoto T. 2014. Basics and recent advances of two dimensional-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Clin Proteomics 11:16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1559-0275-11-16.
35. Sivagnanam K, Raghavan VG, Shah M, Hettich RL, Verberkmoes NC, Lefsrud MG. 2011. Comparative shotgun proteomic analysis of Clostridium acetobutylicum from butanol fermentation using glucose and xylose. Proteome Sci 9:66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-5956-9-66.
36. Hou S, Jones SW, Choe LH, Papoutsakis ET, Lee KH. 2013. Workflow for quantitative proteomic analysis of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 using iTRAQ tags. Methods 61:269-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ymeth.2013.03.013.
37. Grimmler C, Janssen H, Krau_e D, Fischer R, Bahl H, Dürre P, Liebl W, Ehrenreich A. 2011. Genome-wide gene expression analysis of the switch between acidogenesis and solventogenesis in continuous cultures of Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 20:1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000320973.
38. Tracy BP, Jones SW, Papoutsakis ET. 2011. Inactivation of sigmaE and sigmaG in Clostridium acetobutylicum illuminates their roles in clostridialcell-form biogenesis, granulose synthesis, solventogenesis, and spore morphogenesis. J Bacteriol 193:1414-1426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ JB.01380-10.
39. Jones SW, Tracy BP, Gaida SM, Papoutsakis ET. 2011. Inactivation of sigmaF in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 blocks sporulation prior to asymmetric division and abolishes sigmaE and sigmaG protein expression but does not block solvent formation. J Bacteriol 193:2429-2440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.00088-11.
40. Venkataramanan KP, Min L, Hou S, Jones SW, Ralston MT, Lee KH, Papoutsakis ET. 2015. Complex and extensive post-transcriptional regulation revealed by integrative proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of metabolite stress response in Clostridium acetobutylicum. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:1-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0260-9.
41. Bahl H, Andersch W, Gottschalk G. 1982. Continuous production of acetone and butanol by Clostridium acetobutylicum in a two-stage phosphate limited chemostat. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 15:201-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00499955.
42. Boynton ZL, Bennet GN, Rudolph FB. 1996. Cloning, sequencing, and expression of clustered genes encoding beta-hydroxybutyryl-coenzyme A (CoA) dehydrogenase, crotonase, and butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase from Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. J Bacteriol 178:3015-3024.
43. Li F, Hinderberger J, Seedorf H, Zhang J, Buckel W, Thauer RK. 2008. Coupled ferredoxin and crotonyl coenzyme A (CoA) reduction with NADH catalyzed by the butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase/Etf complex from Clostridium kluyveri. J Bacteriol 190:843-850. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ JB.01417-07.
44. Sillers R, Chow A, Tracy B, Papoutsakis ET. 2008. Metabolic engineering of the non-sporulating, non-solventogenic Clostridium acetobutylicum strain M5 to produce butanol without acetone demonstrate the robustness of the acid-formation pathways and the importance of the electron balance. Metab Eng 10:321-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ymben.2008.07.005.
45. Dash S, Mueller TJ, Venkataramanan KP, Papoutsakis ET, Maranas CD. 2014. Capturing the response of Clostridium acetobutylicum to chemical stressors using a regulated genome-scale metabolic model. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-014-0144-4.
46. McAnulty MJ, Yen JY, Freedman BG, Senger RS. 2012. Genome-scale modeling using flux ratio constraints to enable metabolic engineering of clostridial metabolism in silico. BMC Syst Biol 6:42. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1752-0509-6-42.
47. Nair RV, Bennett GN, Papoutsakis ET. 1994. Molecular characterization of an aldehyde/alcohol dehydrogenase gene from Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. J Bacteriol 176:871-885.
48. Fischer RJ, Helms J, Durre P. 1993. Cloning, sequencing, and molecular analysis of the sol operon of Clostridium acetobutylicum, a chromosomal locus involved in solventogenesis. J Bacteriol 175:6959-6969.
49. Walter KA, Bennett GN, Papoutsakis ET. 1992. Molecular characterization of two Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 butanol dehydrogenase isozyme genes. J Bacteriol 174:7149-7158.
50. Welch RW, Rudolph FB, Papoutsakis ET. 1989. Purification and characterization of the NADH-dependent butanol dehydrogenase from Clostridium acetobutylicum (ATCC 824). Arch Biochem Biophys 273: 309-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(89)90489-X.
51. Sulzenbacher G, Alvarez K, Van Den Heuvel RHH, Versluis C, Spinelli S, Campanacci V, Valencia C, Cambillau C, Eklund H, Tegoni M. 2004. Crystal structure of E.coli alcohol dehydrogenase YqhD: evidence of a covalently modified NADP coenzyme. J Mol Biol 342:489-502. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.034.
52. Durre P, Kuhn A, Gottwald M, Gottschalk G. 1987. Enzymatic investigations on butanol dehydrogenase and butyraldehyde dehydrogenase in extracts of Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 26: 268-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00286322.
53. Schmidt CNG, Jervis L. 1980. Affinity purification of glutamate synthase from Escherichia coli. Anal Biochem 104:127-129. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90286-9.
54. Sakamoto N, Kotre AM, Savageau MA. 1975. Glutamate dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli: purification and properties. J Bacteriol 124:775-783.
55. Amador-Noguez D, Feng X, Fan J, Roquet N, Rabitz H, Rabinowitz JD. 2010. Systems-level metabolic flux profiling elucidates a complete, bifurcated tricarboxylic acid cycle in Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Bacteriol 192:4452-4461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.00490-10.
56. Senger RS, Papoutsakis ET. 2008. Genome-scale model for Clostridium acetobutylicum: part I. Metabolic network resolution and analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 101:1036-1052. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.22010.
57. Senger RS, Papoutsakis ET. 2008. Genome-scale model for Clostridium acetobutylicum: part II. Development of specific proton flux states and numerically determined sub-systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 101:1053-1071. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.22009.
58. Lee J, Yun H, Feist AM, Palsson BØ, Lee SY. 2008. Genome-scale reconstruction and in silico analysis of the Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 metabolic network. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 80:849-862. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1654-4.
59. Harris LM, Desai RP, Welker NE, Papoutsakis ET. 2000. Characterization of recombinant strains of the Clostridium acetobutylicum butyrate kinase inactivation mutant: need for new phenomenological models for solventogenesis and butanol inhibition? Biotechnol Bioeng 67:1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000105)67:1_1::AID-BIT1_3.0.CO;2-G.
60. Lee JY, Jang Y, Lee J, Papoutsakis ET, Lee SY. 2009. Metabolic engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicumM5for highly selective butanol production. Biotechnol J 4:1432-1440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ biot.200900142.
61. Neidhardt FC, Umbarger HE. 1996. Chemical composition of E. coli, p 13-16. In Neidhardt FC, Curtiss R, III, Ingraham JL, Lin ECC, Low KB, Magasanik B, Reznikoff WS, Riley M, Schaechter M, Umbarger HE (ed), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
62. Pramanik J, Keasling JD. 1997. Stoichiometric model of Escherichia coli metabolism: incorporation of growth-rate dependent biomass composition and mechanistic energy requirements. Biotechnol Bioeng 56: 398-421.
63. Miller JA, Menon V, Goldy J, Kaykas A, Lee C, Smith KA, Shen EH, Phillips JW, Lein ES, Hawrylycz MJ. 2014. Improving reliability and absolute quantification of human brain microarray data by filtering and scaling probes using RNA-Seq. BMC Genomics 15:154. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1471-2164-15-154.
64. Foster MW, Morrison LD, Todd JL, Snyder LD, Thompson JW, Soderblom EJ, Plonk K, Weinhold KJ, Townsend R, Minnich A, Moseley MA. 2015. Quantitative proteomics of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Proteome Res 14:1238-1249. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr501149m.
65. Bremer H, Dennis PP. 1996. Modulation of chemical composition and other parameters of the cell by growth rate, p 1553-1569. In Neidhardt FC, Curtiss R, III, Ingraham JL, Lin ECC, Low KB, Magasanik B, Reznikoff WS, Riley M, Schaechter M, Umbarger HE (ed), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
66. Fontaine L, Meynial-Salles I, Girbal L, Yang X, Croux C, Soucaille P. 2002. Molecular characterization and transcriptional analysis of adhE2, the gene encoding the NADH-dependent aldehyde/alcohol dehydrogenase responsible for butanol production in alcohologenic cultures of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. J Bacteriol 184:821-830. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.184.3.821-830.2002.
67. Amador-Noguez D, Brasg IA, Feng X, Roquet N, Rabinowitz JD. 2011. Metabolome remodeling during the acidogenic-solventogenic transition in Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:7984-7997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.05374-11.
68. Sabathé F, Bélaïch A, Soucaille P. 2002. Characterization of the cellulolytic complex (cellulosome) of Clostridium acetobutylicum. FEMS Microbiol Lett 217:15-22. http://dx.doi. org/1 0. 111 1 / j. 1 5 7 4-6968.2002.tb11450.x.
69. Harris LM, Welker NE, Papoutsakis ET. 2002. Northern, morphological, and fermentation analysis of spo0A inactivation and overexpression in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. J Bacteriol 184:3586-3597. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.184.13.3586-3597.2002.
70. Ravagnani A, Jennert KCB, Steiner E, Grunberg R, Jefferies JR, Wilkinson SR, Young DI, Tidswell EC, Brown DP, Youngman P, Morris JG, Young M. 2000. Spo0A directly controls the switch from acid to solvent production in solvent-forming clostridia. Mol Microbiol 37:1172-1185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02071.x.
71. Thormann K, Feustel L, Lorenz K, Nakotte S, Durre P. 2002. Control of butanol formation in Clostridium acetobutylicum by transcriptional activation. J Bacteriol 184:1966-1973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ JB.184.7.1966-1973.2002.
72. Tomas CA, Beamish J, Papoutsakis ET. 2004. Transcriptional analysis of butanol stress and tolerance in Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Bacteriol 186:2006-2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.7.2006-2018.2004.
73. Hu K, Zhao M, Zhang T, Zha M, Zhong C, Jiang Y, Ding J. 2013. Structures of trans-2-enoyl-CoA reductases from Clostridium acetobutylicum and Treponema denticola: insights into the substrate specificity and the catalytic mechanism. Biochem J 449:79-89. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1042/BJ20120871.
74. Schreiber W, Durre P. 1999. The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of Clostridium acetobutylicum: isolation and purification of the enzyme, and sequencing and localization of the gap gene within a cluster of other glycolytic genes. Microbiology 145:1839-1847. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1099/13500872-145-8-1839.
75. Iddar A, Valverde F, Serrano A, Soukri A. 2002. Expression, purification, and characterization of recombinant nonphosphorylating NADPdependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase from Clostridium acetobutylicum. Protein Expr Purif 25:519-526. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S1046-5928(02)00032-3.
76. Au J, Choi J, Jones SW, Venkataramanan KP, Antoniewicz MR. 2014. Parallel labeling experiments validate Clostridium acetobutylicum metabolic network model for C metabolic flux analysis. Metab Eng 26:23-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2014.08.002.
77. Roos JW, McLaughlin JK, Papoutsakis ET. 1985. The effect of pH on nitrogen supply, cell lysis, and solvent production in fermentations of Clostridium acetobutylicum. Biotechnol Bioeng 27:681-694. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.260270518.
78. Schwarz K, Fiedler T, Fischer R, Bahl H. 2007. A standard operating procedure (SOP) for the preparation of intra-and extracellular proteins of Clostridium acetobutylicum for proteome analysis. J Microbiol Methods 68:396-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2006.09.018.
79. Peterson GL. 1983. Determination of total protein. Methods Enzymol 91:95-119.
80. Hanson R, Phillips J. 1981. Chemical composition, p 328-364. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Costilow RN, Nester EW, Wood WA, Krieg NR, Phillips GB (ed), Manual of methods for general bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
81. Ferras E, Minier M, Goma G. 1986. Acetonobutylic fermentation: improvement of performances by coupling continuous fermentation and ultrafiltration. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:523-533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ bit.260280408.
82. Dusséaux S, Croux C, Soucaille P, Meynial-Salles I. 2013. Metabolic engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 for the high-yield production of a biofuel composed of an isopropanol/butanol/ethanol mixture. Metab Eng 18:1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2013.03.003.