Recombination patterns in maize reveal limits to crossover homeostasis

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 52, 2015, Pages 15982-15987

  Sidhu, Gaganpreet K ^a,c   Fang, Celestia ^a,d   Olson, Mischa A ^a   Falque, Matthieu ^b   Martin, Olivier C ^b   Pawlowski, Wojciech P ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^b INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^c Medical Center ^*  (United States)

^d WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Crossing over; Crossover homeostasis; Double strand breaks; Meiosis; Recombination

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA; CHROMATIN; PLANT PROTEIN; RAD51 PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CROSSOVER HOMEOSTASIS; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HOMEOSTASIS; MAIZE; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX; ANIMAL; CHROMATIN; CROSSING OVER; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GENETICS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MEIOSIS; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PLANT CHROMOSOME;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CROSSING OVER, GENETIC; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; HOMEOSTASIS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MEIOSIS; MICE; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; PLANT PROTEINS; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84952684306     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514265112     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Keeney S, Giroux CN, Kleckner N (1997) Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88(3):375-384.
2. Borde V (2007) The multiple roles of the Mre11 complex for meiotic recombination. Chromosome Res 15(5):551-563.
3. Hunter N, Kleckner N (2001) The single-end invasion: An asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106(1):59-70.
4. Bishop DK, Zickler D (2004) Early decision: Meiotic crossover interference prior to stable strand exchange and synapsis. Cell 117(1):9-15.
5. Börner GV, Kleckner N, Hunter N (2004) Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117(1):29-45.
6. Jones GH, Franklin FC (2006) Meiotic crossing-over: Obligation and interference. Cell 126(2):246-248.
7. Golubovskaya IN, Wang CJ, Timofejeva L, Cande WZ (2011) Maize meiotic mutants with improper or non-homologous synapsis due to problems in pairing or synaptonemal complex formation. J Exp Bot 62(5):1533-1544.
8. Dernburg AF, et al. (1998) Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell 94(3):387-398.
9. Hillers KJ, Villeneuve AM (2003) Chromosome-wide control of meiotic crossing over in C. elegans. Curr Biol 13(18):1641-1647.
10. Hollingsworth NM, Brill SJ (2004) The Mus81 solution to resolution: Generating meiotic crossovers without Holliday junctions. Genes Dev 18(2):117-125.
11. Guillon H, Baudat F, Grey C, Liskay RM, De Massy B (2005) Crossover and noncrossover pathways in mouse meiosis. Mol Cell 20(4):563-573.
12. Falque M, Anderson LK, Stack SM, Gauthier F, Martin OC (2009) Two types of meiotic crossovers coexist in maize. Plant Cell 21(12):3915-3925.
13. Higgins JD, Armstrong SJ, Franklin FC, Jones GH (2004) The Arabidopsis MutS homolog AtMSH4 functions at an early step in recombination: Evidence for two classes of recombination in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 18(20):2557-2570.
14. Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong SJ, Santos JL, Franklin FC, Jones GH (2002) Variation in chiasma frequency among eight accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 162(3):1415-1422.
15. Anderson LK, et al. (2003) High-resolution crossover maps for each bivalent of Zea mays using recombination nodules. Genetics 165(2):849-865.
16. Koehler KE, Cherry JP, Lynn A, Hunt PA, Hassold TJ (2002) Genetic control of mammalian meiotic recombination. I. Variation in exchange frequencies among males from inbred mouse strains. Genetics 162(1):297-306.
17. Baudat F, De Massy B (2007) Regulating double-stranded DNA break repair towards crossover or non-crossover during mammalian meiosis. Chromosome Res 15(5):565-577.
18. Cole F, et al. (2012) Homeostatic control of recombination is implemented progressively in mouse meiosis. Nat Cell Biol 14(4):424-430.
19. Pawlowski WP, Golubovskaya IN, Cande WZ (2003) Altered nuclear distribution of recombination protein RAD51 in maize mutants suggests the involvement of RAD51 in meiotic homology recognition. Plant Cell 15(8):1807-1816.
20. Crismani W, et al. (2012) FANCM limits meiotic crossovers. Science 336(6088):1588-1590.
21. Youds JL, Boulton SJ (2011) The choice in meiosis: Defining the factors that influence crossover or non-crossover formation. J Cell Sci 124(Pt 4):501-513.
22. Martini E, Diaz RL, Hunter N, Keeney S (2006) Crossover homeostasis in yeast meiosis. Cell 126(2):285-295.
23. Rosu S, Libuda DE, Villeneuve AM (2011) Robust crossover assurance and regulated interhomolog access maintain meiotic crossover number. Science 334(6060):1286-1289.
24. Yokoo R, et al. (2012) COSA-1 reveals robust homeostasis and separable licensing and reinforcement steps governing meiotic crossovers. Cell 149(1):75-87.
25. Buckler ES, et al. (2009) The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 325(5941):714-718.
26. McMullen MD, et al. (2009) Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 325(5941):737-740.
27. Liu K, et al. (2003) Genetic structure and diversity among maize inbred lines as inferred from DNA microsatellites. Genetics 165(4):2117-2128.
28. Creighton HB, McClintock B (1931) A correlation of cytological and genetical crossingover in Zea mays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 17(8):492-497.
29. Froenicke L, Anderson LK, Wienberg J, Ashley T (2002) Male mouse recombination maps for each autosome identified by chromosome painting. Am J Hum Genet 71(6):1353-1368.
30. Kleckner N, Storlazzi A, Zickler D (2003) Coordinate variation in meiotic pachytene SC length and total crossover/chiasma frequency under conditions of constant DNA length. Trends Genet 19(11):623-628.
31. Giraut L, et al. (2011) Genome-wide crossover distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana meiosis reveals sex-specific patterns along chromosomes. PLoS Genet 7(11):e1002354.
32. Dooner HK (2002) Extensive interallelic polymorphisms drive meiotic recombination into a crossover pathway. Plant Cell 14(5):1173-1183.
33. He L, Dooner HK (2009) Haplotype structure strongly affects recombination in a maize genetic interval polymorphic for Helitron and retrotransposon insertions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(21):8410-8416.
34. Chia JM, et al. (2012) Maize HapMap2 identifies extant variation from a genome in flux. Nat Genet 44(7):803-807.
35. Smagulova F, et al. (2011) Genome-wide analysis reveals novel molecular features of mouse recombination hotspots. Nature 472(7343):375-378.
36. Borde V, et al. (2009) Histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation marks meiotic recombination initiation sites. EMBO J 28(2):99-111.
37. Tischfield SE, Keeney S (2012) Scale matters: The spatial correlation of yeast meiotic DNA breaks with histone H3 trimethylation is driven largely by independent colocalization at promoters. Cell Cycle 11(8):1496-1503.
38. Mets DG, Meyer BJ (2009) Condensins regulate meiotic DNA break distribution, thus crossover frequency, by controlling chromosome structure. Cell 139(1):73-86.
39. De Boer E, Dietrich AJ, Höög C, Stam P, Heyting C (2007) Meiotic interference among MLH1 foci requires neither an intact axial element structure nor full synapsis. J Cell Sci 120(Pt 5):731-736.
40. Ferguson KA, Leung S, Jiang D, Ma S (2009) Distribution of MLH1 foci and inter-focal distances in spermatocytes of infertile men. Hum Reprod 24(6):1313-1321.
41. Lao JP, et al. (2013) Meiotic crossover control by concerted action of Rad51-Dmc1 in homolog template bias and robust homeostatic regulation. PLoS Genet 9(12):e1003978.
42. Rosu S, et al. (2013) The C. elegans DSB-2 protein reveals a regulatory network that controls competence for meiotic DSB formation and promotes crossover assurance. PLoS Genet 9(8):e1003674.
43. Thacker D, Mohibullah N, Zhu X, Keeney S (2014) Homologue engagement controls meiotic DNA break number and distribution. Nature 510(7504):241-246.
44. Berchowitz LE, Copenhaver GP (2010) Genetic interference: Don't stand so close to me. Curr Genomics 11(2):91-102.
45. Lhuissier FG, Offenberg HH, Wittich PE, Vischer NO, Heyting C (2007) Themismatch repair protein MLH1 marks a subset of strongly interfering crossovers in tomato. Plant Cell 19(3):862-876.
46. Garcia V, Gray S, Allison RM, Cooper TJ, Neale MJ (2015) Tel1 (ATM)-mediated interference suppresses clustered meiotic double-strand-break formation. Nature 520(7545):114-118.
47. Baier B, Hunt P, Broman KW, Hassold T (2014) Variation in genome-wide levels of meiotic recombination is established at the onset of prophase in mammalian males. PLoS Genet 10(1):e1004125.
48. Louis EJ, Borts RH (2003) Meiotic recombination: Too much of a good thing? Curr Biol 13(24):R953-R955.
49. Terasawa M, Shinohara A, Hotta Y, Ogawa H, Ogawa T (1995) Localization of RecAlike recombination proteins on chromosomes of the lily at various meiotic stages. Genes Dev 9(8):925-934.
50. Pawlowski WP, et al. (2009) Maize AMEIOTIC1 is essential for multiple early meiotic processes and likely required for the initiation of meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(9):3603-3608.
51. McPeek MS, Speed TP (1995) Modeling interference in genetic recombination. Genetics 139(2):1031-1044.
52. Gauthier F, Martin OC, Falque M (2011) CODA (crossover distribution analyzer): Quantitative characterization of crossover position patterns along chromosomes. BMC Bioinformatics 12:27.