CODA (crossover distribution analyzer): Quantitative characterization of crossover position patterns along chromosomes

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Gauthier, Franck ^a   Martin, Olivier C ^a   Falque, Matthieu ^a  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; CLOSE PROXIMITY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CROSSOVER PATTERNS; FITTING INTERFERENCES; HOMOLOGOUS CHROMOSOMES; QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERIZATION; SUMMARY STATISTIC;

SOFTWARE PACKAGES;

CHROMOSOMES;

ARABIDOPSIS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMOSOME; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CROSSING OVER; GENETICS; MAIZE; MOUSE; PLANT CHROMOSOME; WHEAT;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOMES, MAMMALIAN; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CROSSING OVER, GENETIC; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; SOFTWARE; TRITICUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 78651593667     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-27     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Jones GH, Franklin FCH. Meiotic Crossing-over: Obligation and Interference. Cell 2006, 126:246-248. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.010, 16873056.
2. Anderson LK, Stack SM. Meiotic Recombination in Plants. Current Genomics 2002, 3:507-525.
3. Sturtevant AH. The behavior of the chromosomes as studied through linkage. Molecular and General Genetics MGG 1915, 13:234-287.
4. Berchowitz LE, Francis KE, Bey AL, Copenhaver GP. The Role of AtMUS81 in Interference-Insensitive Crossovers in A. thaliana. PLoS Genet 2007, 3:e132. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030132, 1941751, 17696612.
5. Lhuissier FG, Offenberg HH, Wittich PE, Vischer NO, Heyting C. The Mismatch Repair Protein MLH1 Marks a Subset of Strongly Interfering Crossovers in Tomato. Plant Cell 2007, 19:862-876. 10.1105/tpc.106.049106, 1867368, 17337626.
6. Copenhaver GP, Housworth EA, Stahl FW. Crossover Interference in Arabidopsis. Genetics 2002, 160:1631-1639. 1462055, 11973316.
7. Housworth E, Stahl F. Crossover Interference in Humans. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2003, 73:188-197.
8. Falque M, Anderson LK, Stack SM, Gauthier F, Martin OC. Two Types of Meiotic Crossovers Coexist in Maize. Plant Cell 2009, 21:3915-3925. 10.1105/tpc.109.071514, 2814511, 20040539.
9. Kleckner N, Zickler D, Jones GH, Dekker J, Padmore R, Henle J, Hutchinson J. A mechanical basis for chromosome function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:12592-12597. 10.1073/pnas.0402724101, 515102, 15299144.
10. McPeek MS, Speed TP. Modeling Interference in Genetic Recombination. Genetics 1995, 139:1031-1044. 1206354, 7713406.
11. Zhao H, McPeek MS, Speed TP. Statistical Analysis of Chromatid Interference. Genetics 1995, 139:1057-1065. 1206356, 7713408.
12. Viswanath L, Housworth E. InterferenceAnalyzer: Tools for the analysis and simulation of multi-locus genetic data. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6:297. 10.1186/1471-2105-6-297, 1327689, 16343334.
13. Housworth E, Stahl F. Is There Variation in Crossover Interference Levels Among Chromosomes From Human Males?. Genetics 2009, 183:403-405. 10.1534/genetics.109.103853, 2746164, 19581450.
14. Saintenac C, Falque M, Martin OC, Paux E, Feuillet C, Sourdille P. Detailed Recombination Studies Along Chromosome 3B Provide New Insights on Crossover Distribution in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genetics 2009, 181:393-403. 10.1534/genetics.108.097469, 2644935, 19064706.
15. Broman KW, Rowe LB, Churchill GA, Paigen K. Crossover Interference in the Mouse. Genetics 2002, 160:1123-1131. 1462020, 11901128.
16. Anderson LK, Doyle GG, Brigham B, Carter J, Hooker KD, Lai A, Rice M, Stack SM. High-Resolution Crossover Maps for Each Bivalent of Zea mays Using Recombination Nodules. Genetics 2003, 165:849-865. 1462767, 14573493.
17. Foss E, Lande R, Stahl FW, Steinberg CM. Chiasma Interference as a Function of Genetic Distance. Genetics 1993, 133:681-691. 1205352, 8454209.