Two types of meiotic crossovers coexist in maize

Plant Cell

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 3915-3925

  Falque, Matthieu ^a   Anderson, Lorinda K ^b   Stack, Stephen M ^b   Gauthier, Franck ^a   Martin, Olivier C ^a  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 75649092991     PISSN: 10404651     EISSN: 1532298X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.109.071514     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderson, L.K., Doyle, G.G., Brigham, B., Carter, J., Hooker, K.D., Lai, A., Rice, M., and Stack, S.M. (2003). High-resolution crossover maps for each bivalent of Zea mays using recombination nodules. Genetics 165: 849-865.
2. Anderson, L.K., and Stack, S.M. (2002). Meiotic recombination in plants. Curr. Genomics 3: 507-525.
3. Anderson, L.K., Stack, S.M., Fox, M.H., and Zhang, C.S. (1985). The relationship between genome size and synaptonemal complex length in higher plants. Exp. Cell Res. 156: 367-378.
4. Barchi, M., Roig, I., Di Giacomo, M., de Rooij, D.G., Keeney, S., and Jasin, M. (2008). ATM promotes the obligate XY crossover and both crossover control and chromosome axis integrity on autosomes. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000076.
5. Basheva, E., Bidau, C., and Borodin, P. (2008). General pattern of meiotic recombination in male dogs estimated by MLH1 and RAD51 immunolocalization. Chromosome Res. 16: 709-719.
6. Berchowitz, L.E., Francis, K.E., Bey, A.L., and Copenhaver, G.P. (2007). The role of AtMUS81 in interference-insensitive crossovers in A. thaliana. PLoS Genet. 3: e132.
7. Bishop, D.K., and Zickler, D. (2004). Early decision: Meiotic crossover interference prior to stable strand exchange and synapsis. Cell 117: 9-15.
8. Borodin, P.M., Karamysheva, T.V., Belonogova, N.M., Torgasheva, A.A., Rubtsov, N.B., and Searle, J.B. (2008). Recombination map of the common shrew, Sorex araneus (Eulipotyphla, Mammalia). Genetics 178: 621-632.
9. Borodin, P.M., Karamysheva, T.V., and Rubtsov, N.B. (2007). Immunofluorescent analysis of meiotic recombination in the domestic cat. Cell and Tissue Biol 1: 503-507.
10. Broman, K.W., Rowe, L.B., Churchill, G.A., and Paigen, K. (2002). Crossover interference in the mouse. Genetics 160: 1123-1131.
11. Broman, K.W., and Weber, J.L. (2000). Characterization of human crossover interference. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66: 1911-1926.
12. Chelysheva, L., Gendrot, G., Vezon, D., Doutriaux, M.P., Mercier, R., and Grelon, M. (2007). Zip4/Spo22 is required for class I CO forma-tion but not for synapsis completion in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 3: e83.
13. Copenhaver, G.P., Housworth, E.A., and Stahl, F.W. (2002). Crossover interference in Arabidopsis. Genetics 160: 1631-1639.
14. Davis, G.L., et al. (1999). A maize map standard with sequenced core markers, grass genome reference points and 932 expressed sequence tagged sites (ESTs) in a 1736-locus map. Genetics 152: 1137-1172.
15. de Boer, E., Dietrich, A.J.J., Hoog, C., Stam, P., and Heyting, C. (2007). Meiotic interference among MLH1 foci requires neither an intact axial element structure nor full synapsis. J. Cell Sci. 120: 731-736.
16. de Boer, E., Stam, P., Dietrich, A.J.J., Pastink, A., and Heyting, C. (2006). Two levels of interference in mouse meiotic recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 9607-9612.
17. de los Santos, T., Hunter, N., Lee, C., Larkin, B., Loidl, J., and Hollingsworth, N.M. (2003). The Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease acts independently of double-Holliday junction resolution to promote a distinct subset of crossovers during meiosis in budding yeast. Genetics 164: 81-94.
18. Drouaud, J., Camilleri, C., Bourguignon, P.Y., Canaguier, A., Bérard, A., Vezon, D., Giancola, S., Brunel, D., Colot, V., Prum, B., Quesneville, H., and Mézard, C. (2006). Variation in crossing-over rates across chromosome 4 of Arabidopsis thaliana reveals the presence of meiotic recombination "hot spots". Genome Res. 16: 106-114.
19. Falque, M., Mercier, R., Mézard, C., de Vienne, D., and Martin, O.C. (2007). Patterns of recombination and MLH1 foci density along mouse chromosomes: Modeling effects of interference and obligate chiasma. Genetics 176: 1453-1467.
20. Foss, E., Lande, R., Stahl, F.W., and Steinberg, C.M. (1993). Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance. Genetics 133: 681-691.
21. Froenicke, L., Anderson, L.K., Wienberg, J., and Ashley, T. (2002). Male mouse recombination maps for each autosome identified by chromosome painting. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 71: 1353-1368.
22. Guillon, H., Baudat, F., Grey, C., Liskay, R.M., and de Massy, B. (2005). Crossover and noncrossover pathways in mouse meiosis. Mol. Cell 20: 563-573.
23. Higgins, J.D., Armstrong, S.J., Franklin, C.H., and Jones, G.J. (2004). The Arabidopsis MutS homolog AtMSH4 functions at an early step in recombination: evidence for two classes of recombination in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 18: 2557-2570.
24. Higgins, J.D., Buckling, E.F., Franklin, F.C.H., and Jones, G.H. (2008a). Expression and functional analysis of AtMUS81 in Arabidopsis meiosis reveals a role in the second pathway of crossing-over. Plant J. 54: 152-162.
25. Higgins, J.D., Vignard, J., Mercier, R., Pugh, A.G., Franklin, F.C.H., and Jones, G.H. (2008b). AtMSH5 partners AtMSH4 in the class I meiotic crossover pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana, but is not required for synapsis. Plant J. 55: 28-39.
26. Hollingsworth, N.M., and Brill, S.J. (2004). The Mus81 solution to resolution: Generating meiotic crossovers without Holliday junctions. Genes Dev. 18: 117-125.
27. Holloway, J.K., Booth, J., Edelmann, W., McGowan, C.H., and Cohen, P.E. (2008). MUS81 generates a subset of MLH1-MLH3independent crossovers in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000186.
28. Housworth, E.A., and Stahl, F.W. (2003). Crossover interference in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73: 188-197.
29. Housworth, E.A., and Stahl, F.W. (2009). Is there variation in crossover interference levels among chromosomes from human males? Genetics 183: 403-405.
30. Jones, G.H. (1984). The control of chiasma distribution. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 38: 293-320.
31. Jones, G.H., and Franklin, F.C.H. (2006). Meiotic crossing-over: Obligation and interference. Cell 126: 246-248.
32. Keeney, S., Giroux, C.N., and Kleckner, N. (1997). Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88: 375-384.
33. King, J., Roberts, L.A., Kearsey, M.J., Thomas, H.M., Jones, R.N., Huang, L., Armstead, I.P., Morgan, W.G., and King, I.P. (2002). A demonstration of a 1:1 correspondence between chiasma frequency and recombination using a Lolium perenne/Festuca pratensis substi-tution. Genetics 161: 307-314.
34. King, J.S., and Mortimer, R.K. (1990). A polymerization model of chiasma interference and corresponding computer simulation. Genetics 126: 1127-1138.
35. Kleckner, N., Storlazzi, A., and Zickler, D. (2003). Coordinate variation in meiotic pachytene SC length and total crossover/chiasma frequency under conditions of constant DNA length. Trends Genet. 19: 623-628.
36. Kleckner, N., Zickler, D., Jones, G.H., Dekker, J., Padmore, R., Henle, J., and Hutchinson, J. (2004). A mechanical basis for chromosome function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 12592-12597.
37. Lam, S.Y., Horn, S.R., Radford, S.J., Housworth, E.A., Stahl, F.W., and Copenhaver, G.P. (2005). Crossover interference on nucleolus organizing region-bearing chromosomes in Arabidopsis. Genetics 170: 807-812.
38. Lawrie, N.M., Tease, C., and Hultén, M.A. (1995). Chiasma frequency, distribution and interference maps of mouse autosomes. Chromosoma 104: 308-314.
39. Lhuissier, F.G., Offenberg, H.H., Wittich, P.E., Vischer, N.O., and Heyting, C. (2007). The mismatch repair protein MLH1 marks a subset of strongly interfering crossovers in tomato. Plant Cell 19: 862-876.
40. Lynn, A., Ashley, T., and Hassold, T. (2004). Variation in human recombination. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 5: 317-349.
41. Macaisne, N., Novatchkova, M., Peirera, L., Vezon, D., Jolivet, S., Froger, N., Chelysheva, L., Grelon, M., and Mercier, R. (2008). SHOC1, an XPF endonuclease-related protein, is essential for the formation of Class I meiotic crossovers. Curr. Biol. 18: 1432-1437.
42. Malkova, A., Swanson, J., German, M., McCusker, J.H., Housworth, E.A., Stahl, F.W., and Haber, J.E. (2004). Gene conversion and crossing over along the 405-kb left arm of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chromosome VII. Genetics 168: 49-63.
43. Martini, E., Diaz, R.L., Hunter, N., and Keeney, S. (2006). Crossover homeostasis in yeast meiosis. Cell 126: 285-295.
44. McPeek, M.S., and Speed, T.P. (1995). Modeling interference in genetic recombination. Genetics 139: 1031-1044.
45. Mehrotra, S., and McKim, K.S. (2006). Temporal analysis of meiotic DNA double-strand break formation and repair in Drosophila females. PLoS Genet. 2: e200.
46. Mercier, R., Jolivet, S., Vezon, D., Huppe, E., Chelysheva, L., Giovanni, M., Nogué, F., Doutriaux, M.P., Horlow, C., Grelon, M., and Mézard, C. (2005). Two meiotic crossover classes cohabit in Arabidopsis: One is dependent on MER3, whereas the other one is not. Curr. Biol. 15: 692-701.
47. Mézard, C., Vignard, J., Drouaud, J., and Mercier, R. (2007). The road to crossovers: Plants have their say. Trends Genet. 23: 91-99.
48. Muller, H.J. (1916). The mechanism of crossing-over. Am. Nat. 50: 193-221.
49. Ott, J. (1999). Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage, 3rd ed. (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
50. Page, S.L., and Hawley, R.S. (2003). Chromosome choreography: The meiotic ballet. Science 301: 785-789.
51. Sherman, J.D., and Stack, S.M. (1995). Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal complexes from Solanaceous plants. VI. High-resolution recombination nodule map for tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Genetics 141: 683-708.
52. Stahl, F.W., and Foss, H.M. (2009). On Spo16 and the coefficient of coincidence. Genetics 181: 327-330.
53. Stahl, F.W., Foss, H.M., Young, L.S., Borts, R.H., Abdullah, M.F.F., and Copenhaver, G.P. (2004). Does crossover interference count in Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Genetics 168: 35-48.
54. Sturtevant, A.H. (1915). The behavior of the chromosomes as studied through linkage. Mol. Gen. Genet. 13: 234-287.
55. Viswanath, L., and Housworth, E.A. (2005). InterferenceAnalyzer: Tools for the analysis and simulation of multi-locus genetic data. BMC Bioinformatics 6: 297.
56. Zhao, H., and Speed, T.P. (1996). On genetic map functions. Genetics 142: 1369-1377.
57. Zickler, D., and Kleckner, N. (1999). Meiotic chromosomes: Integrating structure and function. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33: 603-754.