Early decision: Meiotic crossover interference prior to stable strand exchange and synapsis

Cell

Volumn 117, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 9-15

  Bishop, Douglas K ^a   Zickler, Denise ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA;

BUDDING; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CROSSING OVER; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; HOLLIDAY JUNCTION; MEIOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; YEAST;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; MELANOGASTER; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 1842816557     PISSN: 00928674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00297-1     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Allers T., Lichten M. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell. 106:2001;47-57.
2. Bell L.R., Byers B. Homologous association of chromosomal DNA during yeast meiosis. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 47:1983;829-840.
3. Bishop D.K. RecA homologs Dmc1 and Rad51 interact to form multiple nuclear complexes prior to meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell. 79:1994;1081-1092.
4. Börner G.V., Kleckner N., Hunter N. Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell. 117:2004;29-45., this issue.
5. Carpenter A.T.C. Thoughts on recombination nodules, meiotic recombination, and chiasmata. Smith K.A. Genetic Recombination. 1988;529-548 American Society of Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
6. Colaiacovo M.P., MacQueen A.J., Martinez-Perez E., McDonald K., Adamo A., La Volpe A., Villeneuve A.M. Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination. Dev. Cell. 5:2003;463-474.
7. Egel R. The synaptonemal complex and the distribution of meiotic recombination events. Trends Genet. 11:1995;206-208.
8. Engebrecht J., Hirsch J., Roeder G.S. Meiotic gene conversion and crossing over. their relationship to each other and to chromosome synapsis and segregation Cell. 62:1990;927-937.
9. Fung J.C., Rockmill R., Odell M., Roeder G.S. Imposition of crossover interference through the nonrandom distribution of synapsis initiation complexes. Cell. 116:2004;795-802.
10. Gilbertson L.A., Stahl F.W. A test of the double-strand break repair model for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 144:1996;27-41.
11. Henderson K.A., Keeney S. Tying synaptonemal complex initiation to the formation and programmed repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:2004;4519-4524.
12. Holliday R. A mechanism for gene conversion in fungi. Genet. Res. 5:1964;282-304.
13. Hollingsworth N.M., Brill S.J. The Mus81 solution to resolution. generating meiotic crossovers without Holliday junctions Genes Dev. 18:2004;117-125.
14. Hunter N., Kleckner N. The single-end invasion. an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination Cell. 106:2001;59-70.
15. Jones, G.H. (1987). Chiasmata. In Meiosis, P.B. Moens, ed. (New York: Academic Press, Inc.).
16. Kaback D.B., Barber D., Mahon J., Lamb J., You J. Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic reciprocal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. the role of crossover interference Genetics. 152:1999;1475-1486.
17. Lee J.Y., Orr-Weaver T.L. The molecular basis of sister-chromatid cohesion. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17:2001;753-777.
18. Lynn A., Koehler K.E., Judis L., Chan E.R., Cherry J.P., Schwartz S., Seftel A., Hunt P.A., Hassold T.J. Covariation of synaptonemal complex length and mammalian meiotic exchange rates. Science. 296:2002;2222-2225.
19. Maguire M.P., Riess R.W. The relationship of homologous synapsis and crossing over in a maize inversion. Genetics. 137:1994;281-288.
20. Mazina O.M., Mazin A.V., Nakagawa T., Kolodner R.D., Kowalczykowski S.C. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mer3 helicase stimulates 3′ to 5′ DNA heteroduplex extension in Rad51-mediated DNA pairing. Implications for cross-over control in meiotic recombination Cell. 117:2004;., 47-56., this issue.
21. Nassif N., Penney J., Pal S., Engels W.R., Gloor G.B. Efficient copying of nonhomologous sequences from ectopic sites via P-element-induced gap repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:1994;1613-1625.
22. Osman F., Dixon J., Doe C.L., Whitby M.C. Generating crossovers by resolution of nicked Holliday junctions. a role for Mus81-Eme1 in meiosis Mol. Cell. 12:2003;761-774.
23. Page S.L., Hawley R.S. c(3)G encodes a Drosophila synaptonemal complex protein. Genes Dev. 15:2001;3130-3143.
24. Paques F., Haber J.E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:1999;349-404.
25. Porter S.E., White M.A., Petes T.D. Genetic evidence that the meiotic recombination hotspot at the HIS4 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae does not represent a site for a symmetrically processed double-strand break. Genetics. 134:1993;5-19.
26. Rabitsch K.P., Petronczki M., Javerzat J.P., Genier S., Chwalla B., Schleiffer A., Tanaka T.U., Nasmyth K. Kinetochore recruitment of two nucleolar proteins is required for homolog segregation in meiosis I. Dev. Cell. 4:2003;535-548.
27. Rockmill B., Fung J.C., Branda S.S., Roeder G.S. The Sgs1 helicase regulates chromosome synapsis and meiotic crossing over. Curr. Biol. 13:2003;1954-1962.
28. Shinohara M., Sakai K., Shinohara A., Bishop D.K. Crossover interference in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a TID1/RDH54- and DMC1-dependent pathway. Genetics. 163:2003;1273-1286.
29. Smith A.V., Roeder G.S. The yeast Red1 protein localizes to the cores of meiotic chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 136:1997;957-967.
30. Storlazzi A., Xu L., Schwacha A., Kleckner N. Synaptonemal complex (SC) component Zip1 plays a role in meiotic recombination independent of SC polymerization along the chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;9043-9048.
31. Sym M., Roeder G.S. Crossover interference is abolished in the absence of a synaptonemal complex protein. Cell. 79:1994;283-292.
32. Sym M., Roeder G.S. Zip1-induced changes in synaptonemal complex structure and polycomplex assembly. J. Cell Biol. 128:1995;455-466.
33. Sym M., Engebrecht J.A., Roeder G.S. Zip1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell. 72:1993;365-378.
34. Szostak J.W., Orr-Weaver T.L., Rothstein R.J., Stahl F.W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 33:1983;25-35.
35. Tarsounas M., Moens P.B. Checkpoint and DNA-repair proteins are associated with the cores of mammalian meiotic chromosomes. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 51:2001;109-134.
36. Tesse S., Storlazzi A., Kleckner N., Gargano S., Zickler D. Localization and roles of Ski8 protein in Sordaria meiosis and delineation of three mechanistically distinct steps of meiotic homolog juxtaposition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:2003;12865-12870.
37. Tsubouchi H., Roeder G.S. The importance of genetic recombination for fidelity of chromosome pairing in meiosis. Dev. Cell. 5:2003;915-925.
38. Zickler D., Kleckner N. Meiotic chromosomes. integrating structure and function Annu. Rev. Genet. 33:1999;603-754.
39. Zickler D., Moreau P.J., Huynh A.D., Slezec A.M. Correlation between pairing initiation sites, recombination nodules and meiotic recombination in Sordaria macrospora. Genetics. 132:1992;135-148.