Materials Data Science: Current Status and Future Outlook

Annual Review of Materials Research

Volumn 45, Issue , 2015, Pages 171-193

  Kalidindi, Surya R ^a   De Graef, Marc ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Materials data analytics; Materials data management; Materials database; Materials e collaboration platform; Process structure property linkage

Indexed keywords

BIG DATA; DIGITAL STORAGE; INFORMATION SERVICES;

DATA ANALYTICS; DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH; E-COLLABORATION; MATERIALS DATABASE; MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING; PROCESS STRUCTURES; SELECTION OF MATERIALS; STORAGE HARDWARE;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84952665515     PISSN: 15317331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-020844     Document Type: Article

References (148)

1. Cleveland WS. 2001. Data science: an action plan for expanding the technical areas of the field of statistics. ISI Rev. 69:21-26
2. Dhar V. 2013. Data science and prediction. Commun. ACM 56:64-73
3. Hey T, Tansley S, Tolle K, eds. 2009. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Res.
4. Anderson C. 2008. The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired Mag. 16:16.07
5. Linden G, Smith G, York J. 2003. Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. Internet Comput. IEEE 7:76-80
6. Li I, Dey A, Forlizzi J. 2010. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 557-66. New York: ACM
7. Hohman M, Gregory K, Chibale K, Smith P, Ekins S, Bunin B. 2009. Novel web-based tools combining chemistry informatics, biology and social networks for drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 14:261-70
8. Tien JM. 2003. Toward a decision informatics paradigm: A real-time, information-based approach to decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. C 33:102-13
9. Wan TT. 2006. Healthcare informatics research: from data to evidence-basedmanagement. J. Med. Syst. 30:3-7
10. Dropbox, Inc. 2014. http://www.dropbox.com
11. GitHub. 2014. https://github.com
12. HUBzero. 2014. https://hubzero.org
13. nanoHUB. 2014. https://nanohub.org
14. National Science Board. 2005. Long-lived digital data collections: enabling research and education in the 21st century. Rep. NSB-05-40, National Science Board. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2005/nsb0540
15. Yu H, Kanov K, Perlman E, Graham J, Frederix E, et al. 2012. Studying Lagrangian dynamics of turbulence using in-demand fluid particle tracking in a public turbulence database. J. Turbul. 13:1-29
16. CERN Open Data Portal. 2014. http://opendata.cern.ch
17. Hubble Legacy Archive. 2014. http://hla.stsci.edu
18. CERN. 2014. http://home.web.cern.ch/about
19. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. 2014. http://www.fnal.gov
20. Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. 2014. http://www.bnl.gov/rhic
21. Fuhrmann P. 2014. dCache, the overview. White Pap., dCache. http://www.dcache.org/manuals/ dcache-whitepaper-light.pdf
22. dCache. 2014. http://www.dcache.org
23. DESY (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron). 2014. http://www.desy.de
24. CERN: TheWorldwide LHC Computing Grid. 2014. http://home.web.cern.ch/about/computing/ worldwide-lhc-computing-grid
25. National Center for Biotechnology Information. 2014. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
26. McDonald E, Brown C. 2014. Working with Big Data in bioinformatics. http://www.aosabook.org/ en/posa/working-with-big-data-in-bioinformatics.html
27. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2014. http://www.nesdis.noaa.gov
28. NOAA View Data Exploration Tool. 2014. http://www.nnvl.noaa.gov/view
29. NOAA: National Operational Model Archive and Distribution System. 2014. http://nomads.ncdc. noaa.gov/data.php
30. GrADS Data Server. 2014. http://grads.iges.org/grads/gds/index.html
31. OPeNDAP. 2014. http://opendap.org
32. EarthObserving System Data and Information System. 2014. https://earthdata.nasa.gov/about-eosdis
33. National Snow and Ice Data Center. 2014. http://nsidc.org/daac/data-sets.html
34. White AA. 2013. Big data are shaping the future of materials science. MRS Bull. 38:594-95
35. Committee on Integrated Computational Materials Engineering, National Research Council. 2008. Integrated Computational Materials Engineering: A Transformational Discipline for Improved Competitiveness and National Security. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/ catalog/12199/integrated-computational-materials-engineering-A-transformational-disciplinefor-improved-competitiveness
36. National Science and Technology Council, Executive Office of the President. 2011. Materials genome initiative for global competitiveness. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ ostp/materials-genome-initiative-final.pdf
37. Van Tendeloo G, Van Dyck D, Pennycook SE. 2012. Handbook of Nanoscopy. Weinheim, Ger.: Wiley-VCH
38. Kalidindi SR. 2015. Data science and cyberinfrastructure: critical enablers for accelerated development of hierarchical materials. Int. Mater. Rev. 60:150-68
39. McNulty E. 2014. Understanding Big Data: The seven V's. http://dataconomy.com/seven-vs-big-data/
40. Lienert U, Li SF, Hefferan CM, Lind J, Suter RM, et al. 2011. High-energy diffraction microscopy at the Advanced Photon Source. JOM 63:70-77
41. Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory. 2014. https://www1.aps.anl.gov
42. Auciello O. 2013. The materials research community studies magnitude of Big Data. MRS Bull. 38:766-67
43. Mies D. 2002. Managing materials data. In Handbook of Materials Selection, ed.MKutz, Chapter 17. New York: JohnWiley & Sons
44. Citrine Informatics. 2014. http://www.citrination.com
45. Clean Energy Project. 2014. http://cleanenergy.molecularspace.org
46. The Materials Project. 2014. http://www.materialsproject.org
47. Automatic-FLOW for Materials Discovery. 2014. http://www.aflowlib.org
48. CALPHAD (Computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry). 2014. http://www. calphad.org
49. Open Quantum Materials Database. 2014. http://oqmd.org
50. NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) Data Gateway. 2014. http://srdata.nist. gov/gateway/gateway?dblist=1
51. NIST Material Measurement Laboratory. 2014. http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/
52. MatWeb. 2014. http://www.matweb.com/
53. Granta. 2014. http://www.grantadesign.com/products/ces/
54. MatNavi (NIMS Materials Database). 2014. http://mits.nims.go.jp/index-en.html
55. Freiman S, Madsen L, Rumble J. 2011. A perspective on materials databases. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 90:28-32
56. Kaufman J. 1986. The National Materials Property Data Network, Inc.-The technical challenges and the plan. Mater. Prop. Data 1:159-63
57. Adams BL, Kalidindi SR, Fullwood DT. 2012. Microstructure Sensitive Design for Performance Optimization. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann
58. Milton GW. 2001. The Theory of Composites. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
59. Torquato S. 2002. Random Hetereogeneous Materials. New York: Springer-Verlag
60. Panchal JH, Kalidindi SR,McDowell DL. 2013. Key computational modeling issues in integrated computational materials engineering. J. Comput. Aided Des. 45:4-25
61. DREAM.3D. 2014. http://dream3d.bluequartz.net
62. Materials Atlas. 2014. https://cosmicweb.mse.iastate.edu/wiki/display/home/materials+atlas+ home
63. ComputationalMaterials Data Network. 2014. http://www.asminternational.org/web/cmdnetwork/ about
64. Groeber MA, Jackson MA. 2014. DREAM.3D: A digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3D. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 3:5
65. Material Data Management Consortium. 2014. http://www.mdmc.net
66. TMS (The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society). 2014. http://www.tms.org/
67. The Materials Cyberinfrastructure Portal. 2014. http://www.tms.org/cyberportal/
68. Patterson DA, Gibson G, Katz RH. 1988. A case for redundant arrays of inexpensive disks (RAID). In Proc. 1988 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 109-16. Chicago: ACM
69. Schroeder B, Gibson G. 2007. Disk failures in the real world: What does an MTTF of 1,000,000 hours mean to you? In Proc. 5th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST'07). San Jose, CA: USENIX
70. Ghemawat S, Gobioff H, Leung ST. 2003. The Google File System. In Proc. 19th ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles. Bolton Landing, NY: ACM
71. Healey CG. 2014. CSC541: advanced data structures. Course Notes, Dep. Comput. Sci., NC State Univ. http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/healey/csc541/notes/file-sys.pdf
72. Rodeh O, Teperman A. 2003. zFS-A scalable distributed file system using object disks. In Proc. 20th IEEE Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technology, pp. 207-18. San Diego, CA: IEEE
73. Shvachko K, Hairong K, Radia S, Chansler R. 2010. The Hadoop distributed file system. In Proc. 26th IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies, pp. 1-10. Incline Village, NY: IEEE
74. Jackson M, Groeber M, Uchic M, Rowenhorst D, De Graef M. 2014. h5ebsd: an archival data format for electron back-scatter diffraction data sets. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 3:4
75. Jackson M, Simmons J, De Graef M. 2010. MXA: A customizable HDF5-based data format for multidimensional data sets. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18:065008
76. The HDF Group. 2014. http://www.hdfgroup.org/
77. NetCDF. 2014. http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/index.html
78. PDB (Protein Data Bank). 2014. http://www.pdb.org/pdb/home/home.do
79. FITS Support Office (NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center). 2014. http://fits.gsfc.nasa.gov/
80. DICOM. 2014. http://medical.nema.org/
81. National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program. 2014. http://www. digitalpreservation.gov
82. Community Owned Digital Preservation Tool Registry. 2014. http://coptr.digipres.org/main-page
83. ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 26234:2012. 2014. http://www.iso.org/iso/ catalogue-detail.htm?csnumber=43506
84. DOI. 2014. http://www.doi.org/
85. Handle.Net. 2014. http://www.handle.net/index.html
86. Corporation for National Research Initiatives. 2014. http://www.cnri.reston.va.us
87. Globus Online GridFTP. 2014. http://toolkit.globus.org/toolkit/docs/latest-stable/gridftp/
88. Internet Engineering Task Force. 2014. https://www.ietf.org
89. Globus Online. 2014. https://www.globus.org
90. Kumar S, Edwards J, Bremer PT, Knoll A, Christensen C, et al. 2014. Efficient I/O and storage of adaptive-resolution data. In Proc. International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, pp. 413-23. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
91. Li Y, Perlman E, Wan M, Yang Y, Meneveau C, et al. 2008. A public turbulence database cluster and applications to study Lagrangian evolution of velocity increments in turbulence. J. Turbul. 9:1-29
92. ASTM Int. 2013. Standard test methods for determining average grain size. ASTM E112, ASTM Int.
93. ASTM Int. 2008. Standard test methods for characterizing duplex grain sizes. ASTM E1181, ASTM Int.
94. Russ J. 1992. The Image Processing Handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC
95. Hall E. 1951. The deformation and ageing of mild steel. III. Discussion of result. Proc. Phys. Soc. B 64:747-53
96. Petch N. 1953. Cleavage strength of polycrystals. Iron Steel Inst. J. 174:25-28
97. Argon A. 2008. Strengthening Mechanisms in Crystal Plasticity. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
98. Reed-Hill R, Abbaschian R. 1994. Physical Metallurgy Principles. Boston: PWS. 3rd ed.
99. Rajan K. 2005. Materials informatics. Mater. Today 8:38-45
100. Gorse D, Lahana R. 2000. Functional diversity of compound libraries. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 4:287-94
101. Curtarolo S, Morgan D, Persson K, Rodgers J, Ceder G. 2003. Predicting crystal structures with data mining of quantum calculations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91:135503
102. Ceder G. 1998. Predicting properties from scratch. Science 280:1099-100
103. Breneman C, Brinson L, Schadler L, Natarajan B, Krein M, et al. 2013. Stalking the materials genome: A data-driven approach to the virtual design of nanostructured polymers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23:5746-52
104. Cebon D, Ashby M. 2006. Engineering materials informatics. MRS Bull. 31:1004-12
105. Serra J. 2006. A lattice approach to image segmentation. J. Math. Imag. Vis. 24:83-130
106. Waggoner J, Simmons J, De GraefM,Wang S. 2013. Multi-structure propagation incorporating homeomorphism for materials image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22:5282-93
107. Comer M, Bouman CA, De Graef M, Simmons JP. 2011. Bayesian methods for image segmentation. JOM 63:55-57
108. EM/MPM Workbench. 2014. http://www.bluequartz.net/?page-id=97
109. Simmons J, Chuang P, Comer M, De Graef M, Uchic M, Spowart J. 2009. Application and further development of advanced image processing algorithms for automated analysis of serial section image data. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 17:025002
110. MacSleyne J, Simmons J, De Graef M. 2008. On the use of 2-D moment invariants for the automated classification of particle shapes. Acta Mater. 56:427-37
111. MacSleyne J, Simmons J, De GraefM. 2008. On the use of moment invariants for the automated analysis of 3-D particle shapes. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 16:045008
112. Hütler M, Rutledge G, Armstrong R. 2005. Crystal shapes and crystallization in continuum modeling. Phys. Fluids 17:014107
113. MacPherson R, Srolovitz D. 2007. The von Neumann relation generalized to coarsening of threedimensional microstructures. Nature 446:1053-55
114. Ohser J, Mücklich F. 2000. Statistical Analysis of Microstructures in Materials Science. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons
115. Adams BL, Gao X, Kalidindi SR. 2005. Finite approximations to the second-order properties closure in single phase polycrystals. Acta Mater. 53:3563-77
116. Niezgoda SR, Fullwood DT, Kalidindi SR. 2008. Delineation of the space of 2-point correlations in a composite material system. Acta Mater. 56:5285-92
117. Fullwood DT, Niezgoda SR, Kalidindi SR. 2008. Microstructure reconstructions from 2-point statistics using phase-recovery algorithms. Acta Mater. 56:942-48
118. Fullwood DT, Niezgoda SR, Adams BL, Kalidindi SR. 2010. Microstructure sensitive design for performance optimization. Prog. Mater. Sci. 55:477-562
119. Niezgoda SR, Kalidindi SR. 2009. Applications of the phase-coded generalized Hough transform to feature detection, analysis, and segmentation of digital microstructures. Comput. Mater. Contin. 14:79-97
120. Niezgoda SR, TurnerDM, Fullwood DT, Kalidindi SR. 2010. Optimized structure based representative volume element sets reflecting the ensemble-averaged 2-point statistics. Acta Mater. 58:4432-45
121. Wargo EA, Hanna AC, Çeçen A, Kalidindi SR, Kumbur EC. 2012. Selection of representative volume elements for pore-scale analysis of transport in fuel cell materials. J. Power Sources 197:168-79
122. Qidwai SM, Turner DM, Niezgoda SR, Lewis AC, Geltmacher AB, et al. 2012. Estimating response of polycrystalline materials using sets of weighted statistical volume elements (WSVEs). Acta Mater. 60:5284-99
123. Fullwood DM, Kalidindi SR, Niezgoda SR, Fast A, Hampson N. 2008. Gradient-based microstructure reconstructions from distributions using fast Fourier transforms. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 494:68-72
124. Bochenek B, PyrzR. 2004. Reconstruction of random microstructures: A stochastic optimization problem. Comput. Mater. Sci. 31:93-112
125. Roberts AP. 1997. Statistical reconstruction of three-dimensional porous media from two-dimensional images. Phys. Rev. E 56:3203-12
126. Niezgoda SR, Kanjarla AK, Kalidindi SR. 2013. Novel microstructure quantification framework for databasing, visualization, and analysis of microstructure data. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 2:3
127. Kalidindi SR, Niezgoda SR, Salem AA. 2011. Microstructure informatics using higher-order statistics and efficient data-mining protocols. JOM 63:34-41
128. Kalidindi SR. 2012. Computationally-efficient fully-coupled multi-scale modeling of materials phenomena using calibrated localization linkages. ISRN Mater. Sci. 2012:305692
129. Fast T, Niezgoda SR, Kalidindi SR. 2011. A new framework for computationally efficient structurestructure evolution linkages to facilitate high-fidelity scale bridging in multi-scale materials models. Acta Mater. 59:699-707
130. Fast T, Kalidindi SR. 2011. Formulation and calibration of higher-order elastic localization relationships using the MKS approach. Acta Mater. 59:4595-605
131. LandiG,Niezgoda SR,Kalidindi SR. 2010. Multi-scale modeling of elastic response of three-dimensional voxel-basedmicrostructure datasets using novel DFT-based knowledge systems. Acta Mater. 58:2716-25
132. Yabansu YC, Patel DK, Kalidindi SR. 2014. Calibrated localization relationships for elastic response of polycrystalline aggregates. Acta Mater. 81:151-60
133. Salem AA, Shaffer JB, Satko DP, Semiatin SL, Kalidindi SR. 2014. Workflows for integrating mesoscale heterogeneities in materials structure with process simulation of titanium alloys. Integrating Mater. Manuf. Innov. 3:24
134. Google Docs. 2014. https://docs.google.com/
135. Authorea. 2014. https://www.authorea.com/
136. ShareLaTeX. 2014. https://www.sharelatex.com/
137. Mendeley. 2014. http://www.mendeley.com/
138. ResearchGate. 2014. http://www.researchgate.net/
139. Sourceforge. 2014. http://sourceforge.net/
140. Plotly. 2014. https://plot.ly/
141. Google+. 2014. https://plus.google.com/
142. LinkedIn. 2014. https://www.linkedin.com/
143. Materials Microcharacterization Collaboratory. 2014. http://web.ornl.gov/sci/doe2k/MICSReview/ 99/
144. TelePresence Microscopy Collaboratory. 2014. http://tpm.amc.anl.gov
145. MGI (Materials Genome Initiative) Digital Data Community. 2014. https://www.linkedin.com/ groups/mgi-digital-data-community-7459917
146. The PRISMS Center: Materials Commons. 2014. http://prisms.engin.umich.edu/#/prisms
147. Dabbish L, Stuart C, Tsay J, Herbsleb J. 2012. Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository. In Proc. ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1277-86. New York: ACM
148. maTIN. 2015. http://materials.gatech.edu/matin