Gender trends in radiology authorship: A 35-year analysis

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 206, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 3-7

  Piper, Crystal L ^a   Scheel, John R ^b   Lee, Christoph I ^b,c   Forman, Howard P ^a,d  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender; Medical literature; Radiology; Women physicians; Workforce issues

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RADIOLOGY; SEX DIFFERENCE; TREND STUDY; UNITED STATES; WRITING; BIBLIOMETRICS; FEMALE PHYSICIAN; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRENDS;

AUTHORSHIP; BIBLIOMETRICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PHYSICIANS, WOMEN; RADIOLOGY; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84952034962     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.15116     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Nonnemaker L. Women physicians in academic medicine: new insights from cohort studies. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:399-405
2. Andriole DA. Jeffe D. The road to an academic medicine career: a national cohort study of male and female U.S. medical graduates. Acad Med 2012; 87:1722-1733
3. Rowley BD, Baldwin DC Jr, McGuire MB. Selected characteristics of graduate medical education in the United States. JAMA 1991; 266:933-943
4. Association of American Medical Colleges website. U.S. Medical School Faculty, 2014. www. aamc.org/data/facultyroster/reports/420598/usmsf14.html. Accessed September 10, 2015
5. Association of American Medical Colleges website. www.aamc.org/download/411784/data/2014- table2.pdf2013. Accessed September 10, 2015
6. Campbell LG, Mehtani S, Dozier ME, Rinehart J. Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science. PLoS One 2013; 8:e79147
7. Wenger NK. Women in leadership positions in the medical academic enterprise: what are the next steps? Arch Intern Med 2008; 168:449-450
8. Klingensmith ME, Anderson KD. Educational scholarship as a route to academic promotion: a depiction of surgical education scholars. Am J Surg 2006; 191:533-537
9. Payton FC. Making STEM careers more accessible. Black Issues High Educ 2004; 21:90
10. Jagsi R, Guancial EA, Worobey CC, et al. The "gender gap" in authorship of academic medical literature: a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:281-287
11. Okike K, Liu B, Lin YB, et al. The orthopedic gender gap: trends in authorship and editorial board representation over the past 4 decades. Am J Orthop 2012; 41:304-310
12. Feramisco JD, Leitenberger JJ, Redfern SI, Bian A, Xie XJ, Resneck JS Jr. A gender gap in the dermatology literature? Cross-sectional analysis of manuscript authorship trends in dermatology journals during 3 decades. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 60:63-69
13. Schrager S, Bouwkamp C, Mundt M. Gender and frst authorship of papers in family medicine journals 2006-2008. Fam Med 2011; 43:155-159
14. Ahmed AA, Egleston B, Holliday E, Eastwick G, Takita C, Jagsi R. Gender trends in radiation oncology in the United States: a 30-year analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 88:33-38
15. Guelich JM, Singer BH, Castro MC, Rosenberg LE. A gender gap in the next generation of physician-scientists: medical student interest and participation in research. J Investig Med 2002; 50: 412-418
16. Donovan A. Views of radiology program directors on the role of mentorship in the training of radiology residents. AJR 2010; 194:704-708
17. Mainiero MB. Mentoring radiology residents: why, who, when, and how. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4:547-550
18. Steiner JF, Lanphear BP, Curtis P, Vu KO. Indicators of early research productivity among primary care fellows. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17:845-851
19. Association of American Medical Colleges. Table B12. In: AAMC data book: statistical information related to medical schools and teaching hospitals. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2014
20. Simon JL, Morris EK, Smith NG. Trends in women's participation at the meetings of the Association for Behavior Analysis: 1975-2005. Behav Anal 2007; 30:181-196
21. Ross RG, Greco-Sanders L, Laudenslager M, Reite M. An institutional postdoctoral research training program: predictors of publication rate and federal funding success of its graduates. Acad Psychiatry 2009; 33:234-240
22. Duch J, Zeng XH, Sales-Pardo M, et al. The possible role of resource requirements and academic career-choice risk on gender differences in publication rate and impact. PLoS One 2012; 7:e51332
23. Taira BR, Jahnes K, Singer AJ, McLarty AJ. Does reported funding differ by gender in the surgical literature? Ann Surg 2008; 247:1069-1073
24. Magnavita N. Is there a gender gap in Italian radiology? A cross-sectional study. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82:e502-e507
25. Yedidia MJ, Bickel J. Why aren't there more women leaders in academic medicine? The views of clinical department chairs. Acad Med 2001; 76:453-465
26. Leopold SS, Beadling L, Dobbs MB, et al. Fairness to all: gender and sex in scientifc reporting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472:391-392
27. Sandberg S. L ean in: women, work, and the will to lead. New York, NY: Knopf Doubleday, 2013
28. Valantine HA, Grewal D, Ku MC, et al. The gender gap in academic medicine: comparing results from a multifaceted intervention for Stanford faculty to peer and national cohorts. Acad Med 2014; 89:904-911
29. Slanetz PJ, Boiselle PM. Mentoring matters. AJR 2012; 198:[web]W11-W12
30. Isenberg SJ, Sanchez E, Zafran KC. The effect of masking manuscripts for the peer-review process of an ophthalmic journal. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93:881-884
31. Johansson EE, Risberg G, Hamberg K, Westman G. Gender bias in female physician assessments: women considered better suited for qualitative research. Scand J Prim Health Care 2002; 20:79-84
32. Sonnad SS, Goldsack J. McGowan KL. A writing group for female assistant professors. J Natl Med Assoc 2011; 103:811-815