Women in leadership positions in the medical academic enterprise: What are the next steps?

Archives of Internal Medicine

Volumn 168, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 449-450

  Wenger, Nanette K ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; EDITORIAL; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; UNITED STATES; CAREER MOBILITY; FEMALE; FEMALE PHYSICIAN; HUMAN; MANPOWER; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICINE; NOTE; PUBLISHING; STATISTICS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CAREER MOBILITY; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOURNALISM, MEDICAL; LEADERSHIP; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PHYSICIANS, WOMEN; PUBLISHING; SPECIALTIES, MEDICAL; WOMEN;

EID: 41949120927     PISSN: 00039926     EISSN: 15383679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.127     Document Type: Editorial

References (4)

1. Jagsi R, Tarbell NJ, Henault LE, Chang Y, Hylek EM. The representation of women on the editorial boards of major medical journals: a 35-year perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(5):544-548.
2. Gilbert JR, Williams ES, Lundberg GD. Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process. JAMA. 1994;272(2):139-142.
3. Timmis AD, Baker C, Banerjee S, et al; Working Group of the British Cardiac Society. Women in UK cardiology: report of a working group of the British Cardiac Society. Heart. 2005;91(3):283-289.
4. Wizeman TM, Paradue M-L, eds. Exploring the Biological Contributions to Human Health: Does Sex Matter? Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2001.