Trends in women's participation at the meetings of the association for behavior analysis: 1975-2005

Behavior Analyst

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 181-196

  Simon, Jennifer L ^a,b   Morris, Edward K ^a   Smith, Nathaniel G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b Kansas City Autism Training Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Association for behavior analysis; Conference participation; Gender; Journal authorship

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149075876     PISSN: 07386729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03392154     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (76)

1. American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: A study of major findings in education. Washington, DC: Author.
2. American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. (2004). Under the microscope: A decade of gender equity projects in the sciences. Washington, DC: Author.
3. American Psychological Association. (2000). Women in academe: Two steps forward, one step back. Retrieved August 11, 2004, from http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/academe.html
4. American Psychological Association. (2002). Directory survey. Retrieved August 11, 2004, from http://www.apa.org/about/division/profiles.html
5. Barry, H., Bacon, M. K., & Child, I. L. (1957). A cross-cultural survey of some sex differences in socialization. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 327-332.
6. Biglan, A. (1995). Changing cultural practices: A contextualistic framework for intervention research. Reno, NV: Context Press.
7. Blosser, P. E. (1990). Procedures to increase the entry of women in science-related careers. ERIC/SMEAC Science Education Digest 1. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education.
8. Broadhurst, K. (1988). Solving the exclusion problem: The key to sex equitable education in math, science, and technology. In A. O. Carelli (Ed.), Sex equity in education: Readings and strategies (pp. 145-154). Spring-field, IL: Charles C Thomas.
9. Bryan, A. I., & Boring, E. G. (1944). Women in American psychology: Prolegomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 41, 447-454.
10. Caldera, Y., Huston, A., & O'Brien, M. (1989). Social interactions and play patterns of parents and toddlers with feminine, masculine, and neutral toys. Child Development, 60, 70-76.
11. Catsambis, P. B. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 243-257.
12. Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (Eds.). (2006). Why aren't more women in science? Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13. Cole, J. R. (1987). Women in science. In D. N. Jackson & J. P. Rushton (Eds.), Scientific excellence: Origins and assessment (pp. 359-375). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1987). Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science. Scientific American, 256, 119-126.
15. Culig, K. M., Dickinson, A. M., McGee, H. M., & Austin, J. (2005). An objective comparison of applied behavior analysis and organizational behavior management research. Journal of Organizational Management, 25, 35-72.
16. Cynkar, A. (2007, June). The changing gender composition of psychology. Monitor on Psychology, 38(6), 46-47.
17. Daly, P. M. (1996). Sexism. In M. A. Mattaini & B. A. Thyer (Eds.), Finding solutions to social problems: Behavioral strategies for change (pp. 201-220). Washington. DC: American Psychological Association.
18. De Meuse, K. P. (1987). A historical examination of author sex and research funding in industrial/organizational psychology. American Psychologist, 42, 876-879.
19. Fagot, B. I., & Hagan. R. (1991). Observations of parent reactions to sex-stereotyped behaviors: Age and sex effects. Child Development, 62, 617-628.
20. Fagot, B. I., & Leinbach, M. D. (1993). Gender-role development in young children: From discrimination to labeling. Developmental Review, 13, 205-224.
21. Fagot, B. I., & Patterson, G. R. (1969). An in vivo analysis of reinforcing contingencies for sex role behaviors in the preschool. Developmental Psychology, 1, 563-568.
22. Green, V. A., Bigler, R., & Catherwood, D. (2004). The variability and flexibility of gender-typed toy play: A close look at children's behavioral responses to counter-stereotypic models. Sex Roles, 51, 371-386.
23. Guerin, B. (1984). Analyzing social behavior: Behavior analysis and the social sciences. Reno, NV: Context Press.
24. Handelsman, J., Cantor, N., Carnes, M., Denton, D., Fine, E., Grosz, B., et al. (2005). More women in science. Science, 309, 1190-1191.
25. Hayes, S. C., & Grundt, A. M. (1996). The top 50 researchers and institutions in behavior analysis and therapy, 1974-1994. The Behavior Therapist, 19, 141-142.
26. Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., Beane, W. E., Lucker, G. W., & Mathews, K. A. (1980). Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 896-908.
27. Hitchcock, M. E., & Tompkins, G. E. (1987). Basal readers: Are they still sexist? The Reading Teacher, 41, 288-292.
28. Hoffman, L. W. (1972). Early childhood experiences and women's achievement motives. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 129-156.
29. Hogan, J. D., & Sexton, V. S. (1991). Women and the American Psychological Association. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 623-634.
30. Hulme, M. A. (1988). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Biased reflections in textbooks. In A. O. Carelli (Ed.), Sex equity in education: Readings and strategies (pp. 187-208). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
31. Irvine, J. J. (1986). Teacher-student interactions: Effects of student race, sex, and grade level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 14-21.
32. Iwata, B. A., & Lent, C. E. (1984). Participation by women in behavior analysis: Some recent data on authorship of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 77-78.
33. Jarema, K., Snycerski, S., Bagge, S., Austin, J., & Poling, A. (1999). Participation of women as authors and participants in articles published in the Journal of Organizational Behavior Management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 19, 85-94.
34. Jones, M. G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84, 180-192.
35. Kite, M. E., Russo, N. F., Brehm, S. S., Fouad, N. A., Hall, C. C. I., Hyde, J. S., et al. (2001). Women psychologists in academe: Mixed progress, unwarranted complacency. American Psychologist, 56, 1080-1098.
36. Kleinman, S. S. (1998). Overview of feminist perspectives on the ideology of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 837-844.
37. Langlois, J. H., & Downs, A. C. (1980). Mothers, fathers, and peers as socialization agents of sex-typed play behaviors in young children. Child Development, 51, 1237-1247.
38. Laties, V. G. (1987). Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior: The first thirty years (1957-1987). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 495-512.
39. Leaper, C., Leve, L., Strasser, T., & Schwartz, R. (1995). Mother-child communication sequences: Play activity, child gender, and marital status effects. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 41, 307-327.
40. Liff, S., & Ward, K. (2001). Distorted views through the glass ceiling: The construction of women's understandings of promotion and senior management positions. Gender, Work, and Organization, 8, 19-36.
41. Lubbers, J., & Menting, C. (1987). Girls and science education: Selection in classroom interaction. In D. Brouwer & D. de Haan (Eds.), Women's language, socialization and self-image (pp. 77-88). Providence, RI: Foris.
42. McGee, H. M., Bucklin, B. R., Dickinson, A. M., & McSweeney, F. K. (2003). Participation of women in the Journal of Organizational Behavior Management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 23, 3-31.
43. McNair, S., Kirova-Petrova, A., & Bhargava, A. (2001). Computers and young children in the classroom: Strategies for minimizing gender bias. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29, 51-55.
44. McSweeney, F. K., Donahoe, P., & Swindell, S. (2000). Women in applied behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 267-277.
45. McSweeney, F. K., & Parks, C. D. (2002). Participation by women in developmental, social, cognitive, and general psychology: A context for interpreting trends in behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 25, 37-44.
46. McSweeney, F. K., & Swindell, S. (1998). Women in the experimental analysis of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 193-202.
47. Mitchell, M. B. (1951). Status of women in the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 6, 193-201.
48. Myers, D. L. (1993). Participation by women in behavior analysis: II. 1992. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 75-86.
49. National Science Foundation. (2003). New formulas for America's workforce: Girls in science and engineering. Retrieved November 5, 2005, from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2003/nsf03207/start.htm
50. Neef, N. A. (1993). Response to Myers on participation of women in behavior analysis: Right problem, wrong source. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 357-359.
51. Nibbelink, W. H., Stockdale, S. R., & Mangru, M. (1986). Sex-role assignments in elementary school mathematics textbooks. Arithmetic Teacher, 34, 19-21.
52. Oakes, J. (1990). Lost talent: The under-participation of women, minorities, and disabled persons in science. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
53. Odum, A. L. (2000). Reflections on the glass ceiling: Women in the experimental analysis of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 279-283.
54. Peterson, M. E. (1978). The Midwestern Association of Behavior Analysis: Past, present, future. The Behavior Analyst, 1, 3-15.
55. Pfafflin, S. M. (1984). Women, science, and technology. American Psychologist, 39, 1183-1186.
56. Poling, A., Grossett, D., Fulton, B., Roy, S., Beecher, S., & Wittkoopp, C. (1983). Participation by women in behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 145-152.
57. Posen, M., Templer, D., Forward, V., Stokes, S., & Stephens, J. (2005). Publication rates of male and female academic clinical psychologists in California. Psychological Reports, 97, 898-902.
58. Probert, B. (2005). "I just couldn't fit it in": Gender and unequal outcomes in academic careers. Gender, Work and Organization, 12, 50-72.
59. Rodgers, R. C., & Maranto, C. L. (1989). Causal models of publishing productivity in psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 636-649.
60. Ruiz, M. R. (2003). Inconspicuous sources of behavioral control: The case of gendered practices. The Behavior Analyst Today, 4, 12-16.
61. Russo, N. F., & Denmark, F. L. (1987). Contributions of women to psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 279-298.
62. Russo, N. F., & O'Connell, A. N. (1980). Models from our past: Psychology's foremothers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 11-54.
63. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1980). Sexism in teacher-education texts. Harvard Educational Review, 50, 36-46.
64. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1985). Sexism in the classroom. Vocational Education Journal, 7, 30-32.
65. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls. New York: Scribners.
66. Scarborough, E. (1994). Recognition for women: The problem of linkage. In H. E. Adler & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Aspects of the history of psychology in America: 1892-1992 (pp. 101-112). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
67. Scarborough, E., & Furumoto, L. (1987). Untold lives: The first generation of American women psychologists. New York: Columbia University Press.
68. Serbin, L. A., O'Leary, K. D., Kent, R. N., & Tonick, I. J. (1973). A comparison of teacher response to the preacademic and problem behavior of boys and girls. Child Development, 44, 796-804.
69. Shabani, D. B., Carr, J. E., Petursdottir, A. E., Esch, B. E., & Gillett, J. N. (2004). Scholarly productivity in behavior analysis: The most prolific authors and institutions from 1992 to 2001. The Behavior Analyst Today, 5, 235-243.
70. Simonton, D. K. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology's history. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
71. Urban Institute Education Policy Center. (2000). Summary report on the impact study of the National Science Foundation's program for women and girls. Retrieved December 5, 2005, from http://www.urban.org/publications/ 409348.html
72. U.S. Department of Education. (2001). Exemplary and promising gender equity programs 2000. Jessup, MD: Gender Equity Expert Panel.
73. Vargas, J. S. (1989). The road less traveled by. The Behavior Analyst, 12, 121-130.
74. Vetter, B. M. (1992). Women in science III: Ferment: yes; progress: maybe; change: slow. Mosaic, 23, 34-41.
75. Vogeltanz, N. D., Sigmon, S. T., & Vickers, K. S. (1998). Feminism and behavior analysis: A framework for women's health research and practice. In J. J. Plaud & G. H. Eifert (Eds.), From behavior theory to behavior practice (pp. 269-293). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
76. Women Employed Institute. (2000). Raising women's pay: An agenda for equity. Chicago: Author.