메뉴 건너뛰기
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Volumn 93, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 881-884
The effect of masking manuscripts for the peer-review process of an ophthalmic journal
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; MASKING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING;
EID: 67449097579     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.151886     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (27)
References (12)
  • 1
    • 0025100849 scopus 로고
    • The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence
    • DOI 10.1001/jama.263.10.1385
    • Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA 1990;263:1385-1389 (Pubitemid 20069945)
    • (1990) Journal of the American Medical Association , vol.263 , Issue.10 , pp. 1385-1389
    • Dickersin, K.1
  • 2
    • 0025055343 scopus 로고
    • The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review
    • McNutt RA, Evans AT, Fletcher RH, et al. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. JAMA 1990;263:1371-1376
    • (1990) JAMA , vol.263 , pp. 1371-1376
    • McNutt, R.A.1    Evans, A.T.2    Fletcher, R.H.3
  • 3
    • 77649173768 scopus 로고
    • Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models
    • Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986;73:13-22.
    • (1986) Biometrika , vol.73 , pp. 13-22
    • Liang, K.-Y.1    Zeger, S.L.2
  • 4
    • 33645739413 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance
    • Ross JS, Gross CP, Desai MM, et al. Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. JAMA 2006;295:1675-1680
    • (2006) JAMA , vol.295 , pp. 1675-1680
    • Ross, J.S.1    Gross, C.P.2    Desai, M.M.3
  • 6
    • 0032527564 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review
    • Van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, et al. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review. JAMA 1998;280:234-237
    • (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , pp. 234-237
    • Van Rooyen, S.1    Godlee, F.2    Evans, S.3
  • 7
    • 0032527565 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does masking author identity improve peer review quality?
    • Justice AC, Cho MK, Winker MA, et al. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? JAMA 1998;280:240-242
    • (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , pp. 240-242
    • Justice, A.C.1    Cho, M.K.2    Winker, M.A.3
  • 8
    • 0032527549 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking rhem to sign their reports
    • Godlee F, Gale CR, Martyn CN. Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking rhem to sign their reports. JAMA 1998;280:237-240
    • (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , pp. 237-240
    • Godlee, F.1    Gale, C.R.2    Martyn, C.N.3
  • 9
    • 0028291595 scopus 로고
    • Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process?
    • Gilbert JR, Williams ES, Lundberg GD. Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process? JAMA 1994;272:139-142
    • (1994) JAMA , vol.272 , pp. 139-142
    • Gilbert, J.R.1    Williams, E.S.2    Lundberg, G.D.3
  • 10
    • 0032527531 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • US and non-US submissions. An analysis of reviewer bias
    • DOI 10.1001/jama.280.3.246
    • Link AM. US and non-US submissions: an analysis of reviewer bias. JAMA 1998;280:246-247 (Pubitemid 28493896)
    • (1998) Journal of the American Medical Association , vol.280 , Issue.3 , pp. 246-247
    • Link, A.M.1
  • 11
    • 0032527550 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Masking author identity in peer review what factors influence masking success?
    • Cho MK, Justice AC, Winker MA, et al. Masking author identity in peer review what factors influence masking success? JAMA 1998;280:243-245
    • (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , pp. 243-245
    • Cho, M.K.1    Justice, A.C.2    Winker, M.A.3
  • 12
    • 0036893107 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Incidence and nature of unblinding by authors: Our experience at two radiology journals with double-blinded peer review policies
    • Katz DS, Proto AV, Olmsted WW. Incidence and nature of unblinding by authors: our experience at two radiology journals with double-blinded peer review policies. AJR 2002;179:415-417
    • (2002) AJR , vol.179 , pp. 415-417
    • Katz, D.S.1    Proto, A.V.2    Olmsted, W.W.3

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.