Stereoscopic neuroanatomy lectures using a three-dimensional virtual reality environment

Annals of Anatomy

Volumn 201, Issue , 2015, Pages 91-98

  Kockro, Ralf A ^a,c   Amaxopoulou, Christina ^b   Killeen, Tim ^a,d   Wagner, Wolfgang ^c   Reisch, Robert ^a,c   Schwandt, Eike ^c   Gutenberg, Angelika ^c   Giese, Alf ^c   Stofft, Eckart ^c   Stadie, Axel T ^c  

^a KLINIK HIRSLANDEN   (Switzerland)

^b Department of Pediatrics   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MAINZ   (Germany)

^d BALGRIST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Anatomical models; Dextrobeam; Medical education; Medical students; Neuroanatomy; Third ventricle; Three dimensional; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

BRAIN THIRD VENTRICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEUROANATOMY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VIRTUAL REALITY; ADULT; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVICES; EDUCATION; FEMALE; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEACHING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; NEUROANATOMY; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TEACHING; THIRD VENTRICLE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84951933156     PISSN: 09409602     EISSN: 16180402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2015.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abildgaard A., Witwit A.K., Karlsen J.S., Jacobsen E.A., Tennøe B., Ringstad G., Due-Tønnessen P. An autostereoscopic 3D display can improve visualization of 3D models from intracranial MR angiography. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2010, 5:549-554.
2. Barrows H.S. A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Med. Educ. 1986, 20:481-486.
3. Battulga B., Konishi T., Tamura Y., Moriguchi H. The effectiveness of an interactive 3-dimensional computer graphics model for medical education. Interact. J. Med. Res. 2012, 1:e2.
4. Beermann J., Tetzlaff R., Bruckner T., Schöebinger M., Müller-Stich B.P., Gutt C.N., Meinzer H.-P., Kadmon M., Fischer L. Three-dimensional visualisation improves understanding of surgical liver anatomy. Med. Educ. 2010, 44:936-940.
5. Berney S., Bétrancourt M., Molinari G., Hoyek N. How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2015, (February):1-7.
6. Coulter I., Brennan P. Simulation in neurosurgery: a survey of experiences and perceptions in the UK. Bull. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2013, 95:304-307.
7. Fritsch H., Kühnel W. Taschenatlas der Anatomie, Band 3, Nervensystem und Sinnesorgane 2001, Thieme, Stuttgart. 7th ed.
8. Garg A., Norman G., Spero L., Maheshwari P. Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning?. Acad. Med. 1999, 74:S87-S89.
9. Garg A., Norman G., Sperotable L. How medical students learn spatial anatomy. Lancet 2001, 357:363-364.
10. Garg A.X., Norman G.R., Eva K.W., Spero L., Sharan S. Is there any real virtue of virtual reality? The minor role of multiple orientations in learning anatomy from computers. Acad. Med. 2002, 77:S97-S99.
11. Gartner L.P. Anatomical sciences in the allopathic medical school curriculum in the United States between 1967-2001. Clin. Anat. 2003, 16:434-439.
12. Gopalakrishnakone P., Jianfeng L., Sun G.P., Abeykoon A., Noel O., Fernando N., Cheok A.D. A Multimodal Virtual Anatomy Learning Tool for Medical Education [Online] 2011, Available from http://www.academia.edu/1268456/A_Multimodal_Virtual_Anatomy_Learning_Tool_for_Medical_Education (accessed 17.04.15).
13. Hariri S., Rawn C., Srivastava S., Youngblood P., Ladd a. Evaluation of a surgical simulator for learning clinical anatomy. Med. Educ. 2004, 38:896-902.
14. Huang H.-M., Rauch U., Liaw S.-S. Investigating learners' attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: based on a constructivist approach. Comput. Educ. 2010, 55:1171-1182.
15. Kerby J., Shukur Z.N., Shalhoub J. The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by medical students. Clin. Anat. 2011, 24:489-497.
16. Khot Z., Quinlan K., Norman G.R., Wainman B. The relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional resources for education in anatomy. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2013, 6:211-215.
17. Kirkman M.A., Ahmed M., Albert A.F., Wilson M.H., Nandi D., Sevdalis N. The use of simulation in neurosurgical education and training. J. Neurosurg. 2014, 121:228-246.
18. Kirschner P.A., Sweller J., Clark R.E. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educ. Psychol. 2006, 41:75-86.
19. Kockro R., Hwang P. Virtual temporal bone: an interactive 3-dimensional learning aid for cranial base surgery. Neurosurgery 2009, 64:216-230.
20. Kockro R.A. Neurosurgery simulators - beyond the experiment. World Neurosurg. 2013, 80:120-121.
21. Kockro R.A., Stadie A., Schwandt E., Reisch R., Charalampaki C., Ng I., Yeo T.T., Hwang P., Serra L., Perneczky A. A collaborative virtual reality environment for neurosurgical planning and training. Neurosurgery 2007, 61:379-391.
22. Korf H.-W., Wicht H., Snipes R.L., Timmermans J.-P., Paulsen F., Rune G., Baumgart-Vogt E. The dissection course - necessary and indispensable for teaching anatomy to medical students. Ann. Anat. 2008, 190:16-22.
23. Lemole G.M., Banerjee P.P., Luciano C., Neckrysh S., Charbel F.T. Virtual reality in neurosurgical education: part-task ventriculostomy simulation with dynamic visual and haptic feedback. Neurosurgery 2007, 61:142-148.
24. Levinson A.J., Weaver B., Garside S., McGinn H., Norman G.R. Virtual reality and brain anatomy: a randomised trial of e-learning instructional designs. Med. Educ. 2007, 41:495-501.
25. Liebhardt H., Fegert J., Dittrich W., Nürnberger F. Medizin studieren mit Kind. Ein Trend der Zukunft. Dtsch. Arztebl. 2010, 107:1613-1615.
26. Liu K., Fang B., Wu Y., Li Y., Jin J., Tan L., Zhang S. Anatomical education and surgical simulation based on the Chinese Visible Human: a three-dimensional virtual model of the larynx region. Anat. Sci. Int. 2013, 88:254-258.
27. Marks S.C. Clinical anatomy for health care and medical education in the 21st century. J. Jpn. Res. Soc. Clin. Anat. 2002, 1:4-7.
28. Marks S.C. The role of three-dimensional information in health care and medical education: the implications for anatomy and dissection. Clin. Anat. 2000, 13:448-452.
29. Murgitroyd E., Marduska M., Gonzalez J., Watson A. 3D digital anatomy modelling - practical or pretty?. Surgeon 2015, 2-5.
30. Nicholson D.T., Chalk C., Funnell W.R.J., Daniel S.J. Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model. Med. Educ. 2006, 40:1081-1087.
31. Older J. Anatomy: a must for teaching the next generation. Surgeon 2004, 2:79-90.
32. Phelps A., Fritchle A., Hoffman H. Passive vs. active virtual reality learning: the effects on short- and long-term memory of anatomical structures. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2004, 98:298-300.
33. Preece D., Williams S.B., Lam R., Weller R. Let's get physical: advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2013, 6:216-224.
34. Rauber A., Kopsch F. Anatomie des Menschen Lehrbuch und Atlas, Band IV: Topographie der Organsysteme, Systematik der Leitungsbahnen 1988, Thieme, Stuttgart.
35. Rauber A., Kopsch F. Anatomie des Menschen Lehrbuch und Atlas, Band III. Nervensystem Sinnesorgane 1987, Thieme, Stuttgart.
36. Schirmer C.M., Elder J.B., Roitberg B., Lobel D.a. Virtual reality-based simulation training for ventriculostomy: an evidence-based approach. Neurosurgery 2013, 73:66-73.
37. Schünke M., Schulte E., Schumacher U., Voll M., Wesker K. Prometheus LernAtlas der Anatomie: Kopf, Hals und Neuroanatomie 2009, Thieme, Stuttgart. 2nd ed.
38. Serra L., Kockro R., Goh L.C., Ng H., Lee E.C.K. The DextroBeam: a stereoscopic presentation system for volumetric medical data. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2002, 85:478-484.
39. Shim K.-C., Park J.-S., Kim H.-S., Kim J.-H., Park Y.-C., Ryu H.-I. Application of virtual reality technology in biology education. J. Biol. Educ. 2003, 37:71-74.
40. Silén C., Wirell S., Kvist J., Nylander E., Smedby O. Advanced 3D visualization in student-centred medical education. Med. Teach. 2008, 30:e115-e124.
41. Spitzer V., Ackerman M.J., Scherzinger a.L., Whitlock D. The visible human male: a technical report. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 1996, 3:118-130.
42. Sugand K., Abrahams P., Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2010, 3:83-93.
43. Tam M., Hart A., Williams S. Is learning anatomy facilitated by computer-aided learning? A review of the literature. Med. Teach. 2009, 31:393-396.
44. Temkin B., Acosta E., Malvankar A., Vaidyanath S. An interactive three-dimensional virtual body structures system for anatomical training over the internet. Clin. Anat. 2006, 19:267-274.
45. Turney B.W. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2007, 89:104-107.
46. Venail F., Deveze A., Lallemant B., Guevara N., Mondain M. Enhancement of temporal bone anatomy learning with computer 3D rendered imaging software. Med. Teach. 2010, 32:e282-e288.
47. Yammine K., Violato C. A meta-analysis of the educational effectiveness of three-dimensional visualization technologies in teaching anatomy. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2014, (December):1-14.