Filter presence and tipping paper color influence consumer perceptions of cigarettes

BMC Public Health

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  O'Connor, Richard J ^a   Bansal Travers, Maansi ^a   Cummings, K Michael ^b   Hammond, David ^c   Thrasher, James F ^d   Tworek, Cindy ^e  

^a ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^e WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design; Perception; Tobacco

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERTISING; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PACKAGING; PSYCHOLOGY; SMOKING; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TOBACCO; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PRODUCT LABELING; PRODUCT PACKAGING; SMOKING; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84951818649     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2643-z     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Wakefield M, Morley C, Horan J, Cummings KM. The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control. 2002;11(suppl: 1):i73-80.
2. Borland R, Savvas S. Effects of stick design features on perceptions of characteristics of cigarettes. Tob Control. 2014;23:58-63.
3. Ferris RP. The influence of brand identification and imagery on subjective evaluation of cigarettes. Rep No RD.1752-C. 1980. Bates 102375094. Retrieved 21 December 2015 from Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, UCSF:. https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/htkc0196.
4. Johnston ME, Jr. Special Report No. 248. Market Potential of a health Cigarette. Phillip Morris. Bates No. 2040452500-2040452523. Retrieved 21 December 2015 from Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, UCSF:. https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/ktjv0125.
5. Fitzmaurice, R. A. (1979, August 2). Memorandum to H. Cullman and S. Pollack: Marlboro Red 100's. Philip Morris. Bates No. 2024984161-2024984163. Retrieved 21 December 2015 from Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, UCSF:. https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/yzcx0117
6. Phillip Morris International. Marlboro Lights, approximately 1986. Retrieved 21 December 2015 from Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, UCSF: https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/fswf0189
7. Hastrup JL, Cummings KM, Swedrock T, Hyland A, Pauly JL. Consumers' knowledge and beliefs about the safety of cigarette filters. Tob Control. 2001;10:84.
8. Czoli CD, Hammond D. Cigarette Packaging: Youth Perceptions of "Natural" Cigarettes, Filter References, and Contraband Tobacco. J Adolesc Health. 2014;54(1):33-9.
9. Pepples EC. Industry Response to Cigarette/Health Controversy. Retrieved 21 December 2015, from Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, UCSF: https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/jnxd0024
10. Pauly JL, Mepani AB, Lesses JD, Cummings KM, Streck RJ. Cigarettes with defective filters marketed for forty years: what Philip Morris never told smokers. Tob Control. 2002;11 suppl 1:i51-61.
11. Harris B. The intractable cigarette 'filter problem'. Tob Control. 2011;20:i10-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.040113.
12. Thun MJ, Carter BD, Feskanich D, Freedman ND, Prentice R, Lopez AD, et al. 50-year trends in smoking-related mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(4):351-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1211127.
13. US Department of Health and Human Services. How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health; 2010.
14. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress: a Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014.
15. Brooks DR, Austin JH, Heelan RT, Ginsberg MS, Shin V, Olson SH, et al. Influence of type of cigarette on peripheral versus central lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(3):576-81.
16. Burns DM, Anderson CM, Gray N. Has the lung cancer risk from smoking increased over the last fifty years? Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(3):389-97. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9708-1.
17. Burns DM, Anderson CM, Gray N. Do changes in cigarette design influence the rise in adenocarcinoma of the lung? Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(1):13-22. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9660-0.
18. Kozlowski LT, Dreschel NA, Stellman SD, Wilkenfeld J, Weiss EB, Goldberg ME. An extremely compensatible cigarette by design: documentary evidence on industry awareness and reactions to the Barclay filter design cheating the tar testing system. Tob Control. 2005;14:64-70.
19. Kozlowski LT, O'Connor RJ. Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents. Tob Control. 2002;11 Suppl 1:I40-50.
20. Rapp, K. E. (1979, June 4) Memorandum to R.A. Pages: Model III WSC activities in the Salmonella/microsome assay: WSC activity as a function of cigarette filter dilution. - Philip Morris. Bates No. 2501507859-2501507866. Retrieved 21 December 2015 from Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, UCSF:. https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/hrgh0115.
21. Pages, R. A. (1978, May 4) Research report: 6906 annual report-biological effects of smoke. - Philip Morris. Bates No. 2001243600-2001243673. Retrieved 21 December 2015 from Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, UCSF:. https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/smky0116.
22. Levins, R. J. (1984, August 15) Research report: 6908 contribution of the blend components of low tar reference cigarette to CCSC, PAH III yield and Salmonella activity. - Philip Morris. Bates No. 2001291173-2001291198. Retrieved 21 December 2015 from Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, UCSF:. https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/lxpd0123.
23. Novotny TE, Lum K, Smith E, Wang V, Barnes R. Cigarette butts and the case for an environmental policy on hazardous cigarette waste. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6(5):1691-705.
24. Novotny TE, Hardin SN, Hovda LR, Novotny DJ, McLean MK, Khan S. Tobacco and cigarette butt consumption in humans and animals. Tob Control. 2011;2011 suppl 1:I 17-i20.
25. King B, Borland R. What was "light" and "mild" is now "smooth" and "fine": new labelling of Australian cigarettes. Tob Control. 2005;14:214-5.
26. Barnes RL. Regulating the disposal of cigarette butts as toxic hazardous waste. Tob Control. 2011;20:i45-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.041301.
27. Schneider JE, Peterson NA, Kiss N, Ebeid O, Doyle AS. Tobacco litter costs and public policy: a framework and methodology for considering the use of fees to offset abatement costs. Tob Control. 2011;20:i36-41. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.041707.
28. Kozlowski LT, Goldberg ME, Yost BA, White EL, Sweeney CT, Pillitteri JL. Smokers' misperceptions of light and ultra-light cigarettes may keep them smoking. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15(1):9-16.
29. Shiffman S, Pillitteri JL, Burton SL, Rohay JM, Gitchell JG. Smokers' beliefs about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes. Tob Control. 2001;10 Suppl 1:i17-23.
30. Cummings KM, Hyland A, Bansal MA, Giovino GA. What do Marlboro Lights smokers know about low-tar cigarettes? Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6 Suppl 3:S323-32.
31. Bansal-Travers M, Hammond D, Smith P, Cummings P. The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):674-82.
32. Hammond D, Doxey J, Daniel S, Bansal-Travers M. Impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging in the United States. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13(7):579-88. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr045.
33. Hammond D, Parkinson C. The impact of cigarette package design on perceptions of risk. J Public Health (Oxf). 2009;31(3):345-53. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp066.
34. Yong HH, Borland R, Cummings KM, Hammond D, O'Connor RJ, Hastings G, et al. Impact of the removal of misleading terms on cigarette pack on smokers' beliefs about 'light/mild' cigarettes: cross-country comparisons. Addiction. 2011;106(12):2204-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03533.x.
35. Borland R, Fong GT, Yong HH, Cummings KM, Hammond D, King B, et al. What happened to smokers' beliefs about light cigarettes when "light/mild" brand descriptors were banned in the UK? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2008;17(4):256-62. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.023812.
36. National Cancer Institute. Risks associated with smoking cigarettes having low machine-measured yields of tar and nicotine. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph 13. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2001.
37. Hammond D, Reid JL, Driezen P, Boudreau C. Pictorial health warnings on cigarette packs in the United States: an experimental evaluation of the proposed FDA warnings. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(1):93-102.
38. Department of Health, Australian Government. Plain packaging of tobacco products. https://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/tobacco-plain. Accessed 21 December 2015.
39. Hammond D, Thrasher JF, Reid JL, Driezen P, Boudreau C, Arillo-Santillán E. Perceived effectiveness of pictorial health warnings among Mexican youth and adults: a population-level intervention with potential to reduce tobacco-related inequities. Cancer Causes and Control. 2012;23:69-80.
40. Thrasher JF, Arillo-Santillán E, Villalobos V, Pérez-Hernández R, Hammond D, Carter J, et al. Can pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages address smoking-related health disparities? Field experiments in Mexico to assess pictorial warning label content. Cancer Causes and Control. 2012;23:69-80.
41. Thrasher JF, Carpenter M, Andrews JO, Gray KM, Alberg AJ, Navarro A, et al. Cigarette warning label policy alternatives and smoking-related health disparities. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(6):590-600.