Mass media

The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 241-258

  Mutz, Diana C ^a   Goldman, Seth K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949769234     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446200919.n15     Document Type: Chapter

References (91)

1. Allport, G. W.(1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
2. Arkes, H., &Tetlock, P.E. Attributions of implicit prejudice, or would Jesse Jackson fail the implicit association test? Psychological Inquiry, 15,257-278. (2004).
3. Ball-Rokeach, S. Grube, J., &Rokeach, M. "Roots: The Next Generation" Who watched and with what effect? Public Opinion Quarterly, 45,58-68. (1981).
4. Bandura, A.(2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J.Bryant, & D.Zillman (Eds), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. (2nd edition, pp. 121-153).Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Bandura, A.(1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
6. Bandura, A.(1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
7. Bandura, A.(1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In D.Cervone, & Y.Shoda (Eds), The Coherence of Personality (pp. 185-241).New York:Guilford Press.
8. Bandura, A. Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3,265-299. (2001).
9. Bartels, L. M. Messages received: The political impact of media exposure. American Political Science Review, 87,267-285. (1993).
10. Battles, K., &Hilton-Morrow, W. Gay characters in conventional spaces: Will & Grace and the situation comedy genre. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19,87-105. (2002).
11. Bodenhausen, G. V. Schwarz, N. Bless, H., &Waenke, M. Effects of atypical exemplars on racial beliefs: Enlightened racism or generalized appraisals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31,48-63. (1995).
12. Bogle, D.(2001). Primetime Blues: African Americans on Network Television. New York:Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
13. Bowman, K., &Foster, A.(2006). Attitudes about Homosexuality and Gay Marriage. Washington, DC:American Enterprise Institute.
14. Brigham, J., &Giesbrecht, L. "All in the Family": Racial attitudes. Journal of Communication, 26,69-74. (1976).
15. Charles, C. Z. The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29,167-207. (2003).
16. Cooper, E., &Jahoda, M. The evasion of propaganda: How prejudiced people respond to anti-prejudice propaganda. Journal of Psychology, 23,15-25. (1947).
17. Dixon, J. C., &Rosenbaum, M. S. Nice to know you? Testing contact, cultural, and group threat theories of anti-black and anti-hispanic stereotypes. Social Science Quarterly, 85,257-279. (2004).
18. Dixon, T. L., &Linz, D. Overrepresentation and underrepresentation of African Americans and Latinos as lawbreakers on television news. Journal of Communication, 50,131-54. (2000a).
19. Dixon, T. L., &Linz, D. Race and the misrepresentation of victimization on local television news. Communication Research, 27,547-573. (2000b).
20. Dixon, T. L. Azocar, C. L., &Casas, M. The portrayal of race and crime on television network news. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47,498-523. (2003).
21. Donovan, R. J., &Leivers, S. Using paid advertising to modify racial stereotype beliefs. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57,205-218. (1993).
22. Dovidio, J. F. Gaertner, S. L., &Kawakami, K. Intergroup contact: The past, present, and the future. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6,5-21. (2003).
23. Entman, R. M. Blacks in the news: Television, modern racism and cultural change. Journalism Quarterly, 69,341-361. (1992).
24. Entman, R. M. Representation and reality in the portrayal of blacks on network television news. Journaiism Quarterly, 71,509-520. (1994).
25. Entman, R. M., &Rojecki, A.(2000). The Black Image in the White Mind: Media and Race in America. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
26. Eyal, K., &Rubin, A. M. Viewer aggression and homophily identification and parasocial relationships with television characters. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47,77-98. (2003).
27. Ford, T. E. Effects of stereotypical television portrayals of African-Americans on person perception. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60,266-275. (1997).
28. Gamson, J.(1998). Freaks Talk Back: Tabloid Talk Shows and Sexual Nonconformity. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
29. Gerbner, G. Gross, L. Morgan, M., &Signorielli, N. Aging with television: Images on television drama and conceptions of social reality. Journal of Communication, 30,37-47. (1980).
30. Gilens, M. Race and poverty in America. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60,515-541. (1996).
31. Giles, D. C. Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4,279-305. (2002).
32. Gilliam, F. D.Jr. Iyengar, S. Simon, A., &Wright, O. Crime in black and white: The violent, scary world of local news. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 1,6-23. (1996).
33. Gilliam, F. D.Jr., &Iyengar, S. Prime suspects: The influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science, 44,560-573. (2000).
34. Graves, S. B. Television and prejudice reduction: When does television as a vicarious experience make a difference? Journal of Social Issues, 55,707. (1999).
35. Green, M. C. Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38,247-266. (2004).
36. Green, M. C. Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication, 56S,163-183. (2006).
37. Green, M. C., &Brock, T. C. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79,701-721. (2000).
38. Green, M. C., &Brock, T. C.(2002). In the mind's eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C.Green, J. J.Strange, & T. C.Brock (Eds), Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations (pp. 315-342).Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
39. Greenland, K., &Brown, R. Categorization and intergroup anxiety in contact between British and Japanese nationals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29,503-21. (1999).
40. Greenwald, A. G., &Banaji, M. R. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102,4-27. (1995).
41. Gross, K.(2006). Covering crime in Washington D.C.: Examining the nature of local television news coverage of crime and its effect on emotional response. Research paper R-28. Cambridge, MA: The Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, Harvard University.
42. Gross, L.(1984). The cultivation of intolerance: Television, blacks and gays. In G.Melischek, K. E.Rosengren, & J.Stappers (Eds), Cultural Indicators: An International Symposium (pp. 345-363).Vienna:Osterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
43. Gross, L.(2001). Up from Invisibility: Lesbians, Gay Men, and the Media in America. New York:Columbia University Press.
44. Hawkins, R. P., &Pingree, S. Uniform messages and habitual viewing: Unnecessary assumptions in social reality effects. Human Communication Research, 7,291-301. (1981).
45. Herrett-Skjellum, J., &Allen, M.(1995). Television programming and sex stereotyping: A meta-analysis. In B. R.Burleson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 19 (pp. 157-185).Troy:NY: Sage.
46. Hoffner, C. Children's wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 40,389-402. (1996).
47. Horton, D., &Wohl, R.R. Mass communication and parasocial interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19,215-229. (1956).
48. Jhally, S., &Lewis, J.(1992). Enlightened Racism: The Cosby Show, Audiences, and the Myth of the American Dream. Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
49. Kanazawa, S. Bowling with our imaginary friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23,167-171. (2002).
50. Kendall, P. L., &Wolf, K. M.(1949). The analysis of deviant case studies in communications research. In P.Lazarsfeld, & F.Stanton (Eds), Communications Research 1948-1949 (pp. 152-179).New York:Harper.
51. Klite, P. Bardwell, R. A., &Salzman, J. Local TV news: Getting away with murder. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2,102-112. (1997).
52. Lee, B. A. Farrell, C. R., &Link, B. G. Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The case of public exposure to homelessness. American Sociological Review, 69,40-63. (2004).
53. Lippmann, W.(1922). Public Opinion. New York:Harcourt, Brace, & Co.
54. Logan, J.(2001). Ethnic diversity grows, neighborhood integration lags behind. Report by the Lewis Mumford Center. University at Albany, State University of New York.
55. Mares, M., &Woodard, E. Positive effects of television on children's social interactions: A meta-analysis. Media Psychology, 7,301-322. (2005).
56. Mendelberg, T.(2001). The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
57. Morgan, M. Television and adolescents" sex role stereotypes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43,947-955. (1982).
58. Morgan, M. Television, sex-role attitudes, and sex-role behavior. Journal of Early Adolescence, 7,269-282. (1987).
59. Mutz, D. C. Mass media and the depoliticization of personal experience. American Journal of Political Science, 36,483-508. (1992).
60. Oliver, M. B. Portrayals of crime, race, and aggression in "reality-based" police shows: A content analysis. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 38,179-93. (1994).
61. Oppliger, P. A.(2007). Effects of gender stereotyping on socialization. In R. W.Preiss, B. M.Gayle, N.Burrell, & M.Allen (Eds), Mass Media Effects Research: Advances Through Meta-Analysis (pp. 199-214).Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
62. Ortiz, M., &Harwood, J. Asocial cognitive theory approach to the effects of mediated intergroup contact on intergroup attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 51,615-631. (2007).
63. Paluck, E. L.(2007). Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict with the media: Afield experiment in Rwanda. Ph.D. Dissertation. Yale University.
64. Paluck, E. L. Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96,574-587. (2009).
65. Paluck, E. L., &Green, D. P. Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Review of Psychology, 60,339-67. (2009).
66. Paolini, S. Hewstone, M. Cairns, E., &Voci, A. Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reducing mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30,770-86. (2004).
67. Papa, m. J. Singhal, A. Law, S. Pant, S. Sood, S., &Rogers, E., et al. Entertainment-education and social change: An analysis of parasocial interaction, social learning, collective efficacy, and paradoxical communication. Journal of Communication, 50,31-55. (2000).
68. Pettigrew, T. F., &Tropp, L. R. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90,751-783. (2006).
69. Potter, W. J. Cultivation theory and research: A conceptual critique. Human Communication Research, 19,564-601. (1993).
70. Power, J. G. Murphy, S. T., &Coover, G. Priming prejudice: How stereotypes and counter-stereotypes influence attribution of responsibility and credibility among ingroups and outgroups. Human Communication Research, 23,36-58. (1996).
71. Price, V., &Zaller, J. Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their implications for public opinion research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57,133-164. (1993).
72. Reeves, B., &Nass, C.(1996). The Media Equation. New York:Cambridge University Press.
73. Riggle, E. D. B. Ellis, A. L., &Crawford, A. M. The impact of "media content" on attitudes toward gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 31,55-69. (1996).
74. Romer, D. Jamieson, K. H., &de Coteau, N. J. The treatment of persons of color in local television: Ethnic blame discourse or realistic group conflict? Communication Research, 25,286-305. (1998).
75. Rossler, P., &Brosius, H. Do talk shows cultivate adolescents" views of the world? A prolonged-exposure experiment. Journal of Communication, 51,143-163. (2001).
76. Schiappa, E. Gregg, P. B., &Hewes, D. E. The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72,92-115. (2005).
77. Schiappa, E. Gregg, P. B., &Hewes, D. E. Can one TV show make a difference? Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51,15-37. (2006).
78. Shapiro, M. A., &Lang, A. Making television reality: Unconscious processes in the construction of social reality. Communication Research, 18,685-705. (1991).
79. Shrum, L. J. Psychological processes underlying cultivation effects: Further tests of construct accessibility. Human Communication Research, 22,482-509. (1996).
80. Shrum, L. J., &O'Guinn, T. C. Processes and effects in the construction of social reality. Communication Research, 20,436-471. (1993).
81. Shrum, L. J. WyerJr., R. S., &O'Guinn, T. C. The effects of television consumption on social perceptions: The use of priming procedures to investigate psychological processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 24,447-458. (1998).
82. Signorielli, N. Television and conceptions about sex roles: Maintaining conventionality and the status quo. Sex Roles, 21,341-360. (1989).
83. Singhal, A., &Rogers, E. M. A theoretical agenda for entertainment-education. Communication Theory, 12,117-135. (2002).
84. Slater, M. D.(2002). Entertainment education and the persuasive impact of narratives. In M. C.Green, J. J.Strange, & T. C.Brock (Eds), Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations (pp. 157-181).Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
85. Stephan, W. G., &Stephan, C.W. Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41,157-75. (1985).
86. Tamborini, R. Mastro, D. Chory-Assad, R., &Huang, R. The color of crime and the court: A content analysis of minority representation on television. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77,639-654. (2000).
87. Turner, R. N. Crisp, R. J., &Lambert, E. Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10,427-41. (2007).
88. Vidmar, N., &Rokeach, M. Archie Bunker's bigotry: A study in selective perception and exposure. Journal of Communication, 24,36-47. (1974).
89. Voci, A., &Hewstone, M. Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The meditational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6,37-54. (2003).
90. Worth, S., &Gross, L. Symbolic strategies. Journal of Communication, 24,27-39. (1974).
91. Wright, S. C. Aron, A. McLaughlin, T., &Ropp, S. A. The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73,73-90. (1997).