Adaptation of the cecal bacterial microbiome of growing pigs in response to resistant starch type 4

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 81, Issue 24, 2015, Pages 8489-8499

  Metzler Zebeli, Barbara U ^a   Schmitz Esser, Stephan ^a   Mann, Evelyne ^a   Grüll, Dietmar ^b   Molnar, Timea ^b   Zebeli, Qendrim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE   (Austria)

^b Agrana Research and Innovation Center GmbH   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; CHAINS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FATTY ACIDS; MAMMALS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA;

BACTERIAL COMMUNITY; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; ENZYMATICALLY MODIFIED; K-MEANS CLUSTERING; LINEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; METABOLIC FUNCTION; OPERATIONAL TAXONOMIC UNITS; SHORT-CHAIN FATTY ACIDS;

STARCH;

ADAPTATION; BACTERIUM; FATTY ACID; FERMENTATION; PIG; STARCH;

ACTINOBACILLUS; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BACTEROIDETES; BILOPHILA; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; ENTEROCOCCUS; FIRMICUTES; LACTOBACILLUS; PROTEOBACTERIA; RUMINOCOCCUS; SUIDAE;

BACTERIAL DNA; RNA 16S; STARCH; VOLATILE FATTY ACID;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; BACTERIUM; CECUM; CLASSIFICATION; DIET; FERMENTATION; GENETICS; INTESTINE FLORA; MALE; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PIG;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; BACTERIA; CECUM; DIET; DNA, BACTERIAL; FATTY ACIDS, VOLATILE; FERMENTATION; GASTROINTESTINAL MICROBIOME; MALE; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; STARCH; SWINE;

EID: 84949668208     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02756-15     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Flint HJ, Duncan SH, Scott KP, Louis P. 2015. Links between diet, gut microbiota composition and gut metabolism. Proc Nutr Soc 74:13-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0029665114001463.
2. Lattimer JM, Haub MD. 2010. Effects of dietary fiber and its components on metabolic health. Nutrients 2:1266-1289. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu2121266.
3. Metzler-Zebeli BU, Hooda S, Pieper R, Zijlstra RT, van Kessel AG, Mosenthin R, Gänzle MG. 2010. Nonstarch polysaccharides modulate bacterial microbiota, pathways for butyrate production, and abundance of pathogenic Escherichia coli in the pig gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:3692-3701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00257-10.
4. Birt DF, Boylston T, Hendrich S, Jane JL, Hollis J, Li L, McClelland J, Moore S, Phillips GJ, Rowling M, Schalinske K, Scott MP, Whitley EM. 2013. Resistant starch: promise for improving human health. Adv Nutr 4:587-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/an.113.004325.
5. Kimura T. 2013. The regulatory effects of resistant starch on glycaemic response in obese dogs. Arch Anim Nutr 67:503-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2013.857081.
6. Zaman SA, Sarbini SR. 2015. The potential of resistant starch as a prebiotic. Crit Rev Biotechnol 7:1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2014.993590.
7. Singh J, Dartois A, Kaur L. 2010. Starch digestibility in food matrix: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 21:168-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2009.12.001.
8. Topping DL, Clifton PM. 2001. Short-chain fatty acids and human colonic function: roles of resistant starch and nonstarch polysaccharides. Physiol Rev 81:1031-1064.
9. Martinez I, Kim J, Duffy PR, Schlegel VL, Walter J. 2010. Resistant starches types 2 and 4 have differential effects on the composition of the fecal microbiota in human subjects. PLoS One 5:e15046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015046.
10. Erra-Pujada M, Debeire P, Duchiron F, O'Donohue MJ. 1999. The type II pullulanase of Thermococcus hydrothermalis: molecular characterization of the gene and expression of the catalytic domain. J Bacteriol 181:3284-3287.
11. MacGregor EA, Janecek S, Svensson B. 2001. Relationship of sequence and structure to specificity in the α-amylase family of enzymes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1546:1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4838(00)00302-2.
12. Louis P, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Flint HJ. 2007. Understanding the effects of diet on bacterial metabolism in the large intestine. J Appl Microbiol 102:1197-1208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03322.x.
13. Bird AR, Jackson M, King RA, Davies DA, Usher S, Topping DL. 2004. A novel high-amylose barley cultivar (Hordeum vulgare var. Himalaya 292) lowers plasma cholesterol and alters indices of large-bowel fermentation in pigs. Br J Nutr 92:607-615.
14. Bird AR, Vuaran M, Brown I, Topping DL. 2007. Two high-amylose maize starches with different amounts of resistant starch vary in their effects on fermentation, tissue and digesta mass accretion, and bacterial populations in the large bowel of pigs. Br J Nutr 97:134-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114507250433.
15. Macfarlane S, Macfarlane GT. 2003. Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production. Proc Nutr Soc 62:67-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/PNS2002207.
16. Nutrient Research Council. 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine, 10th ed. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
17. Metzler-Zebeli BU, Eberspächer E, Grüll D, Kowalczyk L, Molnar T, Zebeli Q. 2015. Enzymatically modified starch ameliorates postprandial serum triglycerides and lipid metabolome in growing pigs. PLoS One 10: e0130553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130553.
18. Naumann C, Bassler R. 2012. Die Chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. VDLUFA Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany.
19. Deckardt K, Metzler-Zebeli BU, Zebeli Q. 13 January 2015. Processing barley grain with lactic acid and tannic acid ameliorates rumen microbial fermentation and degradation of dietary fibre in vitro. J Sci Food Agric http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7085.
20. Metzler-Zebeli BU, Mann E, Schmitz-Esser S, Wagner M, Ritzmann M, Zebeli Q. 2013. Changing dietary calcium-phosphorus level and cereal source selectively alters abundance of bacteria and metabolites in the upper gastrointestinal tracts of weaned pigs. Appl Environ Microbiol 79: 7264-7272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02691-13.
21. Mullins CR, Mamedova LK, Carpenter AJ, Ying Y, Allen MS, Yoon I, Bradford BJ. 2013. Analysis of rumen microbial populations in lactating dairy cattle fed diets varying in carbohydrate profiles and Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product. J Dairy Sci 96:5872-5881. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6775.
22. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF. 2009. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, communitysupported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537-7541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01541-09.
23. Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD. 2013. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:5112-5120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01043-13.
24. Schloss PD. 2013. Secondary structure improves OTU assignments of 16S rRNA gene sequences. ISME J 7:457-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.102.
25. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. 2007. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res 35:7188-7196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm864.
26. Joachimiak MP, Weisman JL, May BCH. 2006. JColorGrid: software for the visualization of biological measurements. BMC Bioinformatics 7:225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-225.
27. de Hoon MJ, Imoto S, Nolan J, Miyano S. 2004. Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics 20:1453-1454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth078.
28. Page RD. 1996. TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12:357-358.
29. Stevenson DM, Weimer PJ. 2007. Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 75:165-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0802-y.
30. Muyzer G, de Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG. 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:695-700.
31. Langille MG, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, Clemente JC, Burkepile DE, Vega Thurber RL, Knight R, Beiko RG, Huttenhower C. 2013. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol 31:814-821.http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2676.
32. Regmi PR, Metzler-Zebeli BU, Gänzle MG, van Kempen TA, Zijlstra RT. 2011. Starch with high amylose content and low in vitro digestibility increases intestinal nutrient flow and microbial fermentation and selectively promotes bifidobacteria in pigs. J Nutr 141:1273-1280. http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.140509.
33. Umu ÖC, Frank JA, Fangel JU, Oostindjer M, da Silva CS, Bolhuis EJ, Bosch G, Willats WG, Pope PB, Diep DB. 2015. Resistant starch diet induces change in the swine microbiome and a predominance of beneficial bacterial populations. Microbiome 3:16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-015-0078-5.
34. Looft T, Allen HK, Cantarel BL, Levine UY, Bayles DO, Alt DP, Henrissat B, Stanton TB. 2014. Bacteria, phages and pigs: the effects of in-feed antibiotics on the microbiome at different gut locations. ISME J 8:1566-1576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.12.
35. Requena T, Cotter P, Shahar DR, Kleiveland CR, Marinez-Cuesta MC, Pelaez C, Lea T. 2013. Interactions between gut microbiota, food and the obese host. Trends Food Sci Technol 34:44-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2013.08.007.
36. Haenen D, Zhang J, Souza da Silva C, Bosch G, van der Meer IM, van Arkel J, van den Borne JJ, Pérez Gutiérrez O, Smidt H, Kemp B, Müller M, Hooiveld GJ. 2013. A diet high in resistant starch modulates microbiota composition, SCFA concentrations, and gene expression in pig intestine. J Nutr 143:274-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/jn.112.169672.