Progress Feedback and the OQ-System: The Past and the Future

Psychotherapy

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 381-390

  Lambert, Michael J ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical support tools; Effects of feedback; Outcome Questionnaire 45; prevention of treatment failure; progress monitoring and feedback

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; WELLBEING; CASE MANAGEMENT; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FORECASTING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MENTAL DISORDERS; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; SELF REPORT; STANDARDS; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRENDS;

CASE MANAGEMENT; FEEDBACK; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; SELF REPORT; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 84949639233     PISSN: 00333204     EISSN: 19391536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/pst0000027     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Amble, I., Gude, T., Stubdal, S., Andersen, B. J., & Wampold, B. E. (2014). The effect of implementing the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 feedback system in Norway: A multisite randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/10503307.2014.928756
2. Bauer, S., Lambert, M. J., & Nielsen, S. L. (2004). Clinical significance methods: A comparison of statistical techniques. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 60-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8201_11
3. Beckstead, D. J., Hatch, A. L., Lambert, M. J., Eggett, D. L., Goates, M. K., & Vermeersch, D. A. (2003). Clinical significance of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ 45.2). The Behavior Analyst Today, 4, 86-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0100015
4. Bergin, A. E. (1971). The evaluation of therapeutic outcomes. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 217-270). New York, NY: Wiley.
5. Bludworth, J. L., Tracey, T. J. G., & Glidden-Tracey, C. (2010). The bilevel structure of the Outcome Questionnaire-45. Psychological Assessment, 22, 350-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019187
6. Crits-Christoph, P., Ring-Kurtz, S., Hamilton, J. L., Lambert, M. J., Gallop, R., McClure, B., . . . Rotrosen, J. (2012). A preliminary study of the effects of individual patient-level feedback in outpatient substance abuse treatment programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 42, 301- 309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2011.09.003
7. de Jong, K., Nugter, M. A., Polak, M. G., Wagenborg, J. E. A., Spinhoven, P., & Heiser, W. J. (2007). The Outcome Questionnaire-45 in a Dutch population: A cross cultural validation. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 14, 288-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.529
8. de Jong, K., van Sluis, P., Nugter, M. A., Heiser, W. J., & Spinhoven, P. (2012). Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy Research, 22, 464-474. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/10503307.2012.673023
9. Drapeau, M. (Ed.) (2012). Ten tools for progress monitoring in psychotherapy. Integrating Science & Practice, 2, 2-45.
10. Elliott, R., Greenberg, L. S., Watson, J., Timulak, L., & Freire, E. (2013). Research on Humanistic-Experiential psychotherapies. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's Hand book of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 495-538). New York, NY: Wiley.
11. Ellsworth, J. R., Lambert, M. J., & Johnson, J. (2006). A Comparison of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 and Outcome Questionnaire-30 in classification and prediction of treatment outcome. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 13, 380-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.503
12. Hannan, C., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S. L., Smart, D. W., Shimokawa, K., & Sutton, S. W. (2005). A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 155-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20108
13. Hansen, N. B., Lambert, M. J., & Forman, E. M. (2003). An evaluation of the dose-response relationship in naturalistic treatment settings using survival analysis. Mental Health Services Research, 5, 1-12. http://dx .doi.org/10.1023/A:1021751307358
14. Harmon, C., Lambert, M. J., Slade, K. L., & Smart, D. W. (2007). Enhancing outcome for potential treatment failures: Therapist/client feedback and clinical support tools. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 379- 392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503300600702331
15. Hatfield, D., & Ogles, B. M. (2004). The use of outcome measures by psychologists in clinical practice. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 35, 485-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.35.5 .485
16. Hawkins, E. J., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Slade, K. L., & Tuttle, K. C. (2004). The therapeutic effects of providing patient progress information to therapists and patients. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 308-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptr/kph027
17. Hill, C. E., & Lambert, M. J. (2004). Methodological issues in studying psychotherapy processes and outcomes. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin & Garfield's Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 84-135). New York, NY: Wiley.
18. Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., Cogar, M., & Denman, D. W. (1993). Beneath the surface of long-term therapy: Therapist and client report of their own and each other's covert processes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 278-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.40.3.278
19. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19. http://dx.doi .org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12
20. Lambert, M. J. (2010). Prevention of treatment failure: The use of measuring, monitoring, & feedback in clinical practice. Washington, DC: APA Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/12141-000
21. Lambert, M. J. (2013). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin & Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (6th ed., pp. 169-218). New York, NY: Wiley.
22. Lambert, M. J., Bailey, R. J., White, M., Tingey, K. M., & Stevens, E. (2015). Clinical Support Tool Manual-Brief version-40. Salt Lake City, UT: OQMeasures.
23. Lambert, M. J., Bergin, A. E., & Collins, J. L. (1977). Therapist induced deterioration in psychotherapy patients. In A. S. Gurman, & A. M. Razin (Eds.), Effective Psychotherapy: A handbook of research (pp. 452-481). New York: Pergamon Press.
24. Lambert, M. J., Christensen, E. R., & DeJulio, S. S. (1983). The assessment of psychotherapy outcome. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons.
25. Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., & Bauer, S. (2008). Assessing the clinical significance of outcome results. In A. M. Nezu & C. Maguth-Nezu (Eds.), Evidence-based outcome research: A practical guide to conducting randomized controlled trials for psychological interventions (pp. 359-378). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26. Lambert, M. J., & Hawkins, E. J. (2001). Using information about patient progress in supervision: Are outcomes enhanced? Australian Psychologist, 36, 131-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00050060108259645
27. Lambert, M. J., Kahler, M., Harmon, C., Burlingame, G. M., Shimokawa, K., White, M. M. (2013). Administration and Scoring Manual: Outcome Questionnaire OQ®-45.2. Salt Lake City, UT: OQMeasures.
28. Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Bishop, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Gray, G. V., & Finch, A. E. (2002). Comparison of empirically derived and rationally derived methods for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 9, 149-164. http://dx.doi .org/10.1002/cpp.333
29. Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Smart, D. W., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2001). The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy: Are outcomes enhanced? Psychotherapy Research, 11, 49-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 713663852
30. Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Vermeersch, D. A., Smart, D. W., Hawkins, E. J., Nielsen, S. L., & Goates, M. K. (2002). Enhancing psychotherapy outcomes via providing feedback on client progress: A replication. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 9, 91-103. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/cpp.324
31. Lo Coco, G., Chiappelli, M., Bensi, L., Gullo, S., Prestano, C., & Lambert, M. J. (2008). The factorial structure of the Outcome Questionnaire-45: A study with an Italian sample. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 15, 418-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.601
32. Lunnen, K. M., & Ogles, B. M. (1998). A multiperspective, multivariable evaluation of reliable change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 400-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.400
33. Lutz, W., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, S. C., Stulz, N., Tschitsaz, A., & Schürch, E. (2006). The probability of treatment success, failure and duration-what can be learned from empirical data to support decision making in clinical practice? Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 13, 223-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.496
34. Mours, J. M., Campbell, C. D., Gathercoal, K. A., & Peterson, M. (2009). Training in the use of psychotherapy outcome assessment measures at psychology internship cites. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, 169-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016135
35. NREPP. (2014). OQ-Analyst. At SAMHSA's National Registry of Evidence Based Practices & Programs. Retrieved from www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/
36. O'Donovan, A., Halford, W. K., & Walters, B. (2011). Towards best practice supervision of clinical psychology trainees. Australian Psychologist, 46, 101-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00033.x
37. Probst, T., Lambert, M. J., Loew, T. H., Dahlbender, R. W., Göllner, R., & Tritt, K. (2013). Feedback on patient progress and clinical support tools for therapists: Improved outcome for patients at risk of treatment failure in psychosomatic in-patient therapy under the conditions of routine practice. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 75, 255-261. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.07.003
38. Probst, T., Lambert, M. J., Loew, T. H., Dahlbender, R. W., & Tritt, K. (2015). Extreme deviations from expected recovery curves and their associations with therapeutic alliance, social support, motivation, and life events in psychosomatic in-patient therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 277-281.
39. Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., & Eubanks-Carter, C. (2011). Repairing alliance ruptures. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Evidence-based responsiveness (pp. 224-238). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/ 9780199737208.003.0011
40. Shimokawa, K., Lambert, M. J., & Smart, D. W. (2010). Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 298-311. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/a0019247
41. Simon, W., Lambert, M. J., Busath, G., Vazquez, A., Berkeljon, A., Hyer, K., . . . Berrett, M. (2013). Effects of providing patient progress feedback and clinical support tools to psychotherapists in an inpatient eating disorders treatment program: A randomized controlled study. Psychotherapy Research, 23, 287-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307 .2013.787497
42. Simon, W., Lambert, M. J., Harris, M. W., Busath, G., & Vazquez, A. (2012). Providing patient progress information and clinical support tools to therapists: Effects on patients at risk of treatment failure. Psychotherapy Research, 22, 638-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012 .698918
43. Slade, K., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, S. C., Smart, D. W., & Bailey, R. (2008). Improving psychotherapy outcome: The use of immediate electronic feedback and revised clinical support tools. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 15, 287-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.594
44. Sparks, J. A., Kisler, T. S., Adams, J. F., & Blumen, D. G. (2011). Teaching accountability: Using client feedback to train effective family therapists. Journal of Family and Marital Therapy, 37, 452-467. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00224.x
45. Spielmans, G. I., Masters, K. S., & Lambert, M. J. (2006). A comparison of rational versus empirical methods in prediction of negative psychotherapy outcome. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 13, 202-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.491
46. Strupp, H. H., Horowitz, L. M., & Lambert, M. J. (1997). Measuring patient changes in mood, anxiety, & personality disorders: Toward a core battery. Washington, DC: APA Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 10232-000
47. Swift, J. K., Callahan, J. L., Rousmaniere, T. G., Whipple, J. L., Dexter, K., & Wrape, E. R. (2015). Using client outcome monitoring as a tool for supervision. Psychotherapy, 52, 180-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ a0037659
48. Ulich, R., Stachnik, T., & Mabry, J. J. (Eds). (1966). Control of human behavior (pp. 187-192). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman & Co.
49. Vermeersch, D. A., Whipple, J. L., Lambert, M. J., Hawkins, E. J., Burchfield, C. M., & Okiishi, J. C. (2004). Outcome Questionnaire: Item sensitivity to changes in counseling center clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 38-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.38
50. Walfish, S., McAlister, B., O'Donnell, P., & Lambert, M. J. (2012). An investigation of self-assessment bias in mental health providers. Psychological Reports, 110, 639-644. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/02.07.17.PR0 .110.2.639-644
51. Wampold, B. E. (2013). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. New York, NY: Routledge.
52. Whipple, J. L., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Smart, D. W., Neilsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2003). Improving the effects of psychotherapy: The use of early identification of treatment and problem-solving strategies in routine practice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 59-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.50.1.59
53. White, M., Lambert, M. J., Bailey, R. J., McLaughlin, S. B., & Ogles, B. M. (in press). Understanding the assessment for signal clients as a feedback tool for reducing treatment failure. Psychotherapy Research.
54. Wolf, M. M., Risley, T. & Mees, H. (1966). Application of operant conditioning procedures to the behavior problems of an autistic child. In R. Ulich, T. Stachnik, & J. Mabry (Eds.), Control of human behavior (pp. 187-192). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman & Co.
55. Worthen, V., & Lambert, M. J. (2007). Outcome oriented supervision: Advantages of adding systematic client tracking to supportive consultations. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 7, 48-53. http://dx.doi .org/10.1080/14733140601140873