A comparison of the outcome questionnaire-45 and outcome questionnaire-30 in classification and prediction of treatment outcome

Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 380-391

  Ellsworth, Jennifer R ^a   Lambert, Michael J ^a   Johnson, Jennifer ^b  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; MEASUREMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOTHERAPIST; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33751095434     PISSN: 10633995     EISSN: 10990879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.503     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bauer, S., Lambert, M.J., & Nielsen, S.L. (2004). Clinical significance methods: A comparison of statistical techniques. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(1), 60-70.
2. Brown, G.S., & Lambert, M.J. (1998). Tracking patient progress: Decision making for cases that are not benefiting from therapy. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Snowbird, UT.
3. Finch, A.E., Lambert, M.J., & Schaalje, B.G. (2001). Psychotherapy quality control: The statistical generation of expected recovery curves for integration into an early warning system. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 8, 231-242.
4. Froyd, J.E., Lambert, M.J., & Froyd, J.D. (1996). A review of practices of psychotherapy outcome measurement. Journal of Mental Health, 5, 11-15.
5. Garb, H.N. (2005). Clinical judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 67-59.
6. Hannan, C., Lambert, M.J., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S.L., Smart, D.W., Shimokawa, S., & Sutton, S.W. (2005). A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 155-163.
7. Hansen, N.B., Lambert, M.J., & Forman, E.V. (2005). An evaluation of the dose-response relationship is naturalistic treatment settings using survival analysis. Mental Health Services Research, 5, 1-12.
8. Harmon, S.C., Lambert, M.J., Smart, D.W., Hawkins, E.J., Nielsen, S.L., Slade, K., & Lutz, W. (2006). Enhancing outcome for potential treatment failures: Therapist/client feedback and clinical support tools. Psychotherapy Research, 16.
9. Haas, E., Hill, R., Lambert, M.I., & Morrell, B. (2002). Do early responders to psychotherapy maintain treatment gains? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1157-1172.
10. Hatfield, D.R., & Ogles, B.M. (2004). The use of outcome measures by psychologists in clinical practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36(5), 485-491.
11. Jacobson, N.S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
12. Kordy, H., Hannöver, W., & Richard, M. (2001). Computer-assisted feedback-driven quality management for psychotherapy provision: The Stuttgart-Heidelberg model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(2), 173-183.
13. Lambert, M.J. (June, 2002). The dominance of managed behavioral health provides unusual opportunities for psychotherapy outcome research and improvements in patient care. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting for the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Santa Barbara, CA.
14. Lambert, M.J., & Bergin, A.E. (1994). The effectiveness of psychotherapy. In A.E. Bergin, & S.L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed., pp. 143-189). New York: Wiley.
15. Lambert, M.J., Hansen, N.B., & Finch, A.E. (2001). Patient-focused research: Using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 159-172.
16. Lambert, M.J., Harmon, C., Slade, K., Whipple, J.L., & Hawkins, E.J. (2005). Providing feedback to psychotherapists on their patients' progress: Clinical results and practice suggestions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 165-174.
17. Lambert, M.J., Heufner, J.C., & Reisinger, C.W. (2000). Quality improvement: Current research in outcome management. In G. Stricker, W.G. Troy, & S.A. Shueman (Eds.), Handbook of quality management in behavioral health (pp. 95-110). New York: Kluwer-Plenum.
18. Lambert, M.J., Morton, J.J., Hatfield, D., Harmon, C., Hamilton, S., Reid, R.C., Shimokawa, K., Christopherson, C., & Burlingame, G.M. (2004a). Administration and scoring manual for the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2). Orem, UT. American Professional Credentialing Service.
19. Lambert, M.J., & Ogles, B.M. (2004). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M.J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 139-193). New York: Wiley.
20. Lambert, M.J., Veermersch, D.A., Brown, G.S., & Burlingame, G.M. (2004b). Administration and scoring manual for the Life Status Questionnaire (LSQ-30.2). Orem, UT: American Professional Credentialing Service.
21. Lambert, M.J., Whipple, J.L., Bishop, M.J., Vermeersch, D.A., Gray, G.V., & Finch, A.E. (2002). Comparison of empirically-derived and rationally-derived methods for identifying patients at risk for treatment failure. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9(3), 149-165.
22. Lueger, R.J., Howard, K.I., Martinovich, Z., Lutz, W., Anderson, E.E., & Grissom, G. (2001). Assessing treatment progress with individualized models of expected response. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 150-158.
23. Mohr, D.C. (1995). Negative outcome in psychotherapy: A critical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2(1), 1-27.
24. Ostee, B., & Malone, L.C. (1996). Statistics in Research: Basic concepts and Techniques for Research Workers (4th ed.), Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
25. Otto, M.W., Pollack, M.H., & Maki, K.M. (2000). Empirically supported treatments for panic disorder: Costs, benefits, and stepped care. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 556-563.
26. Richard, M., & Kordy H. (in press). Early treatment response: Conceptualization, predictive validity and application in quality management.
27. Schulte-Bahrenberg, T., & Schulte, D. (1993). Change in psychotherapy goals as a process of resignation. Psychotherapy Research, 3, 152-165.
28. Smith, M.L., Glass, G.V., & Miller, T.I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
29. Spielmans, G.I., Masters, K.F., & Lambert, M.J. (2006). A comparison of rational versus empirical methods in the prediction of psychotherapy-outcome. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13, 202-214.
30. Stanton, J.M., Sinar, E.F., Balzer, W.K., & Smith, P.C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55, 167-194.
31. Steinberg, L. (1994). Context and serial-order effects in personality measurement: Limits on the generality of measuring changes the measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(2), 341-349.
32. Steiner, D.L. (2003). Diagnostic testing: Using and administering diagnostic and screening tests. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 209-219.
33. Tang, T.Z., & DeRubies, R.J. (1999). Sudden gains and critical sessions in cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 894-904.
34. Thompson, K.C. (2004). The development of recovery curves for the life status questionnaire as a means of identifying patients at risk for psychotherapy treatment failure (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 2004). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64, 5238.
35. Vermeersch, D.A., Lambert, M.J., & Burlingame, G.M. (2000). Outcome Questionnaire 45: Item sensitivity to change. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74(2), 242-261.
36. Vermeersch, D.A., Whipple, J.L., Lambert, M.J., Hawkins, E.J., Burchfield, C.M., & Okiishi, J.C. (2004). Outcome questionnaire: Is it sensitive to changes in counselling center clients? Journal of Counselling Psychology, 51, 38-49.