The bilevel structure of the outcome questionnaire-45

Psychological Assessment

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 350-355

  Bludworth, Jamie L ^a   Tracey, Terence J G ^a   Glidden Tracey, Cynthia ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bilevel structure; Confirmatory factor analysis; Outcome Questionnaire 45 structure

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COUNSELING; DISTRESS SYNDROME; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN RELATION; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME QUESTIONNAIRE 45; RATING SCALE; SOCIAL ASPECT; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYMPTOM; UNIVERSITY;

COUNSELING; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROLE; STUDENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953897028     PISSN: 10403590     EISSN: 1939134X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019187     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bentler P.M. EQS structural equations program manual 1995, Multivariate Software, Encino, CA.
2. Browne M.W., Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models 1993, 136-162. Sage, Newbury Park, CA. K.A. Bollen, J.S. Long (Eds.).
3. Horowitz L.M., Rosenberg S.E., Baer B.A., Ureno G., Villasenor V.S. Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1988, 56:885-892.
4. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods 1998, 3:424-453.
5. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999, 6:1-55.
6. Lambert M.J. Introduction to assessment of psychotherapy outcome: Historical perspective and current issues. The assessment of psychotherapy outcome 1983, 3-32. Wiley, New York, NY. M.J. Lambert, E.R. Christensen, S.S. DeJulio (Eds.).
7. Lambert M.J., Hansen N.B., Umpress V., Lunnen K., Okiishi J., Burlingame G.M., Reisinger C.W. Administration and scoring manual for the OQ-45 2001, American Professional Credentialing Services, Orem, UT.
8. Levy R., Hancock G.R. A framework of statistical tests for comparing mean and covariance structure models. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2007, 42:33-66.
9. Marsh H.W., Balla J.R., McDonald R.P. Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effects of sample size. Psychological Bulletin 1988, 103:391-410.
10. Marsh H.W., Hau K., Grayson D. Goodness of fit in structural equation models. Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald 2005, 275-340. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. A. Maydeu-Olivares, J.J. McArdle (Eds.).
11. Mueller R.M., Lambert M.J., Burlingame G.M. Construct validity of the Outcome Questionnaire: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment 1998, 70:248-262.
12. Satorra A., Bentler P.M. A scaled difference chi-square statistic for moment structure analysis 1999, (UCLA Statistics Series No. 260), University of California, Los Angeles.
13. Tracey T.J., Kokotovic A.M. Factor structure of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychological Assessment 1989, 1:207-210.
14. Vandenberg R.J., Lance C.E. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods 2000, 3:4-70.
15. Weissman M.M., Bothwell S. Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Archives of General Psychiatry 1976, 33:1111-1115.