Simple surface engineering of polydimethylsiloxane with polydopamine for stabilized mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and multipotency

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Chuah, Yon Jin ^a   Koh, Yi Ting ^a   Lim, Kaiyang ^a   Menon, Nishanth V ^a   Wu, Yingnan ^a   Kang, Yuejun ^a  

^a Nanyang Technological University   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBLE COATED MATERIAL; COLLAGEN; DIMETICONE; INDOLE DERIVATIVE; NYLON; POLY(DIMETHYLSILOXANE)-POLYAMIDE COPOLYMER; POLYDOPAMINE; POLYMER;

CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; HUMAN; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL; PHYSIOLOGY;

CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; COLLAGEN; DIMETHYLPOLYSILOXANES; HUMANS; INDOLES; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; NYLONS; POLYMERS;

EID: 84949595392     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep18162     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Brown, X. Q., Ookawa, K. & Wong, J. Y. Evaluation of polydimethylsiloxane scaffolds with physiologically-relevant elastic moduli: interplay of substrate mechanics and surface chemistry effects on vascular smooth muscle cell response. Biomaterials 26, 3123-3129 (2005).
2. Park, J. Y., Yoo, S. J., Lee, E. J., Lee, D. H. & Young, J. Increased poly(dimethylsiloxane) stiffness improves viability and morphology of mouse fibroblast cells. BioChip J. 4, 230-236 (2010).
3. Palchesko, R. N., Zhang, L., Sun, Y. & Fenberg, A. W. Development of Polydimethylsiloxane Substrates with Tunable Elastic Modulus to Study Cell Mechanobiology in Muscle and Nerve. PLoS One 7, e51499-1-e51499-13 (2012).
4. Chuah, Y. J., Wu, Y., Yang, Z., Lee, E. H. & Kang, Y. Geometrical, Topographical, and Mechanical Cues on Stem Cell Fate in a Micro-/Nano-environment. Encyclopedia of Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 1-8, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-27758-0-1739-7 (2014).
5. Chung, S. et al. Cell migration into scaffolds under co-culture conditions in a microfluidic platform. Lab Chip 9, 269-275 (2009).
6. Huh, D., Hamilton, G. A. & Ingber, D. E. From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips. Trends Cell Biol. 21, 745-754 (2011).
7. Menon, N. V., Chuah, Y. J., Cao, B., Lim, M. & Kang, Y. A microfluidic co-culture system to monitor tumor-stromal interactions on a chip. Biomicrofluidics 8, 064118 (2014).
8. Duffy, D. C., McDonald, J. C., Schueller, O. J. A. & Whitesides, G. M. Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal. Chem. 70, 4974-4984 (1998).
9. McDonald, J. C. & Whitesides, G. M. Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a material for fabricating microfluidic devices. Acc. Chem. Res. 35, 491-499 (2002).
10. Mata, A., Fleischman, A. J. & Roy, S. Characterization of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) properties for biomedical micro/nanosystems. Biomed. Microdevices 7, 281-293 (2005).
11. Lee, J. N., Jiang, X., Ryan, D. & Whitesides, G. M. Compatibility of mammalian cells on surfaces of poly(dimethylsiloxane). Langmuir 20, 11684-11691 (2004).
12. Fuard, D., Chevolleau, T. T., Decossas, S., Tracqui, P. & Schiavone, P. Optimization of poly-di-methyl-siloxane (PDMS) substrates for studying cellular adhesion and motility. Microelectron Eng. 85, 1289-1293 (2008).
13. Chuah, Y. J., Kuddannaya, S., Lee, M. H. A., Zhang, Y. & Kang, Y., The Effects of Poly(dimethylsiloxane) Surface Silanization on Mesenchymal Stem Cell Fate. Biomater. Sci. 3, 383-390 (2015).
14. Hillborg, H. & Gedde, U. W. Hydrophobicity recovery of polydimethylsiloxane after exposure to corona discharges. Polymer 39, 1991-1998 (1998).
15. Tan, S. H., Nguyen, N. T., Chua, Y. C. & Kang, T. G. Oxygen plasma treatment for reducing hydrophobicity of a sealed polydimethylsiloxane microchannel. Biomicrofluidics 4, 32204 (2010).
16. Kuddannaya, S. et al. Surface chemical modification of Poly(dimethylsiloxane) surface for enhanced adhesion and proliferation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 5, 9777-9784 (2013).
17. Liu, Y., Ai, K. & Lu, L. Polydopamine and Its Derivative Materials: Synthesis and Promising Applications in Energy, Environmental, and Biomedical Fields. Chem. Rev. 114, 5057-5115 (2014).
18. Lee, H., Dellatore, S. M., Miller, W. M. & Messersmith, P. B. Mussel-Inspired Surface Chemistry for Multifunctional Coatings. Science 318, 426-430 (2007).
19. Yang, F. K. & Zhao, B. Adhesion Properties of Self-Polymerized Dopamine Thin Film. Open Surf. Sci. J. 3, 115-122 (2011).
20. Tsai, W. B., Chen, W. T., Chien, H. W., Kuo, W. H. & Wang, M. J. Poly(dopamine) coating of scaffolds for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Acta. Biomater. 7, 4187-4194 (2011).
21. Ko, E., Yang, K., Shin, J. & Cho, S. W. Polydopamine-assisted osteoinductive peptide immobilization of polymer scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration by human adipose-derived stem cells. Biomacromolecules 14, 3202-3213 (2013).
22. Tsai, W. B., Chen, W. T., Chien, H. W., Kuo, W. H. & Wang, M. J. Poly(dopamine) coating to biodegradable polymers for bone tissue engineering. J. Biomater. Appl. 28, 837-848 (2014).
23. Hong, S. et al. Attenuation of the in vivo toxicity of biomaterials by polydopamine surface modification. Nanomedicine 6, 793-801 (2011).
24. Wei, X. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells: a new trend for cell therapy. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 34, 747-754 (2013).
25. van der Westen, R. et al. Myoblast cell interaction with polydopamine coated liposomes. Biointerphases 7, 8 (2012).
26. Lee, J. H., Lim, Y. W., Kwon, S. Y. & Kim, Y. S. In vitro effects of mussel-inspired polydopamine coating on Ti6Al4V alloy. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 10, 273-278 (2013).
27. Low, W. C. et al. Nanofibrous scaffold-mediated REST knockdown to enhance neuronal differentiation of stem cells. Biomaterials 34, 3581-3590 (2013).
28. Luo, R. et al. In vitro investigation of enhanced hemocompatibility and endothelial cell proliferation associated with quinone-rich polydopamine coating. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 1704-1714 (2013).
29. Adams, J. C. & Watt, F. M. Regulation of development and differentiation by the extracellular matrix. Development 117, 1183-98 (1993).
30. Kleinman, H. K., Philp, D. & Hoffman, M. P. Role of the extracellular matrix in morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 14, 526-532 (2003).
31. Badylak, S. F. Regenerative medicine and developmental biology: the role of the extracellular matrix. Anat. Rec. B New Anat. 287, 36-41 (2005).
32. Clyman, R. I., McDonald, K. A. & Kramer, R. H. Integrin receptors on aortic smooth muscle cells mediate adhesion to fibronectin, laminin, and collagen. Circ. Res. 67, 175-186 (1990).
33. Heino, J. The collagen family members as cell adhesion proteins. Bioessays 29, 1001-1010 (2007).
34. Zhang, Y. et al. Tissue-specific extracellular matrix coatings for the promotion of cell proliferation and maintenance of cell phenotype. Biomaterials 30, 4021-4028 (2009).
35. Suzuki, S. et al. Effects of extracellular matrix on differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells into smooth muscle cell lineage: utility for cardiovascular tissue engineering. Cells Tissues Organs 191, 269-280 (2010).
36. Lee, S. J., Khang, G., Lee, Y. M. & Lee, H. B. The effect of surface wettability on induction and growth of neurites from the PC-12 cell on a polymer surface. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 15, 259, 228-235 (2003).
37. Curran, J. M., Chen, R. & Hunt, J. A. The guidance of human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in vitro by controlled modifications to the cell substrate. Biomaterials 27, 4783-4793 (2006).
38. Hao, L. et al. Directing the fate of human and mouse mesenchymal stem cells by hydroxyl-methyl mixed self-assembled monolayers with varying wettability. J. Mater. Chem. B Mater. Biol. Med. 2, 4794-4801 (2014).
39. Jiang, X., Christopherson, G. T. & Mao, H. Q. The effect of nanofibre surface amine density and conjugate structure on the adhesion and proliferation of human haematopoietic progenitor cells. Interface Focus 1, 725-733 (2011).
40. Lee, J. H., Jung, H. W., Kang, I. K. & Lee, H. B. Cell behaviour on polymer surfaces with different functional groups. Biomaterials 15, 705-711 (1994).
41. Spackman, D. H., Stein, W. H. & Moore, S. Automatic recording apparatus for use in chromatography of amino acids. Anal. Chem. 30, 1190-1206 (1958).
42. Moore, S. Amino acid analysis: Aqueous dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent for the ninhydrin reaction. J. Biol. Chem. 243, 6281-6283 (1968).
43. Klemm, D. J. et al. Insulin-induced adipocyte differentiation. Activation of CREB rescues adipogenesis from the arrest caused by inhibition of prenylation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 28430-28435 (2001).
44. Lennon, D. P., Edmison, J. M. & Caplan, A. I. Cultivation of Rat Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Reduced Oxygen Tension: Effects on In Vitro and In Vivo Osteochondrogenesis. J. Cell Physio. 187, 345-355 (2001).
45. Fu, Y., Luo, N., Klein, R. L. & Garvey, W. T. Adiponectin promotes adipocyte differentiation, insulin sensitivity, and lipid accumulation. J. Lipid Res. 46, 1369-1379 (2005).
46. Kyllönen, L. et al. Effects of different serum conditions on osteogenic differentiation of human adipose stem cells in vitro. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 4, 17 (2013).
47. Akiyama, S. K. Integrins in cell adhesion and signaling. Hum Cell 9, 181-186 (1996).
48. Lee, J. W. et al. Importance of integrin beta1-mediated cell adhesion on biodegradable polymers under serum depletion in mesenchymal stem cells and chondrocytes. Biomaterials 25, 1901-9 (2004).
49. Aubin, D., Gagnon, A. & Sorisky, A. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase is required for human adipocyte differentiation in culture. Int. J Obes. (Lond.) 29, 1006-1009 (2005).
50. Hamidouche, Z. et al. Priming integrin alpha5 promotes human mesenchymal stromal cell osteoblast differentiation and osteogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18587-18591 (2009).
51. Lee, J. S., Yi, J. K., An, S. Y. & Heo, J. S. Increased osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells on polydopamine film occurs via activation of integrin and PI3K signaling pathways. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 34, 1824-1834 (2014).
52. Chen, Q. et al. An osteopontin-integrin interaction plays a critical role in directing adipogenesis and osteogenesis by mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 32, 327-337 (2014).
53. Zhang, W. et al. Upregulation of BMSCs Osteogenesis by Positively-Charged Tertiary Amines on Polymeric Implants via Charge/iNOS Signaling Pathway. Sci. Rep. 5, 9369 (2015).
54. Jansen, E. J. et al. Hydrophobicity as a design criterion for polymer scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26, 4423-4431 (2005).
55. Toepke, M. W. & Beebe, D. J. PDMS absorption of small molecules and consequences in microfluidic applications. Lab Chip 6,1484-6 (2006).
56. Wu, H. W., Lin, C. C. & Lee, G. B. Stem cells in microfluidics. Biomicrofluidics 5, 013401 (2011).
57. Ertl, P., Sticker, D., Charwat, V., Kasper, C. & Lepperdinger, G. Lab-on-a-chip technologies for stem cell analysis. Trends Biotechnol. 32, 245-253 (2014).
58. Mehling, M. & Tay, S. Microfluidic cell culture. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 25, 95-102 (2014).
59. Shin, Y. et al. Microfluidic assay for simultaneous culture of multiple cell types on surfaces or within hydrogels. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1247-1259 (2012).
60. Liu, X. F., Yu, J. Q., Dalan, R., Liu, A. Q. & Luo, K. Q. Biological factors in plasma from diabetes mellitus patients enhance hyperglycaemia and pulsatile shear stress-induced endothelial cell apoptosis. Integr. Biol. 6, 511-522 (2014).
61. Yang, Z. et al. Improved mesenchymal stem cells attachment and in vitro cartilage tissue formation on chitosan-modified poly(Llactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) scaffold. Tissue. Eng. Part A 18, 242-251 (2012).