The effects of advanced monitoring on hemodynamic management in critically ill patients: a pre and post questionnaire study

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 511-518

  Perel, Azriel ^a   Saugel, Bernd ^b   Teboul, Jean Louis ^c   Malbrain, Manu L N G ^d   Belda, Francisco Javier ^e   Fernández Mondéjar, Enrique ^f   Kirov, Mikhail ^g   Wendon, Julia ^h   Lussmann, Roger ^i,j   Maggiorini, Marco ^k  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^d ZiekenhuisNetwerk Antwerpen   (Belgium)

^e HOSPITAL CLÍNICO UNIVERSITARIO   (Spain)

^f HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO VIRGEN DE LAS NIEVES   (Spain)

^g NORTHERN STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^h KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ CANTONAL HOSPITAL ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

^j KLINIK HIRSLANDEN   (Switzerland)

^k UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

more..

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Decision making; Extravascular lung water; Global end diastolic volume; Hemodynamic monitoring; Transpulmonary thermodilution

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; DECISION MAKING; MONITORING; PATIENT MONITORING; SURVEYS;

CARDIAC OUTPUT; END-DIASTOLIC; EXTRAVASCULAR LUNG WATERS; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; THERMODILUTION;

HEMODYNAMICS;

DIURETIC AGENT; INOTROPIC AGENT; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIOPULMONARY FUNCTION; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; EXTRAVASCULAR LUNG WATER INDEX; FEMALE; GLOBAL END DIASTOLIC VOLUME INDEX; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; THERMODILUTION; THERMODILUTION DEVICE; AGED; BLOOD VOLUME; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DECISION MAKING; EUROPE; HEMODYNAMICS; LUNG; LUNG EXTRAVASCULAR FLUID; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD VOLUME; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DECISION MAKING; EUROPE; EXTRAVASCULAR LUNG WATER; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; LUNG; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 84949558486     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-015-9811-7     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Sevransky J. Clinical assessment of hemodynamically unstable patients. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15:234–8. doi:10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832b70e5.
2. Eisenberg PR, Jaffe AS, Schuster DP. Clinical evaluation compared to pulmonary artery catheterization in the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1984;12:549–53.
3. Connors AF Jr, Dawson NV, Robert McCaffree D, Gray BA, Siciliano CJ. Assessing hemodynamic status in critically ill patients: Do physicians use clinical information optimally? J Crit Care. 1987;2:174–80.
4. Veale WN Jr., Morgan JH, Beatty JS, Sheppard SW, Dalton ML, Van de Water JM (2005) Hemodynamic and pulmonary fluid status in the trauma patient: are we slipping? Am Surg 71:621–625; discussion 625-626.
5. Egan JR, Festa M, Cole AD, Nunn GR, Gillis J, Winlaw DS. Clinical assessment of cardiac performance in infants and children following cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:568–73. doi:10.1007/s00134-005-2569-5.
6. Hoff RG, Rinkel GJ, Verweij BH, Algra A, Kalkman CJ. Nurses’ prediction of volume status after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2008;12:R153. doi:10.1186/cc7142.
7. Grissom CK, Morris AH, Lanken PN, Ancukiewicz M, Orme JF Jr, Schoenfeld DA, Thompson BT. Association of physical examination with pulmonary artery catheter parameters in acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2720–6.
8. Saugel B, Kirsche SV, Hapfelmeier A, Phillip V, Schultheiss C, Schmid RM, Huber W. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2013;28(537):e531–9. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.10.008.
9. Saugel B, Ringmaier S, Holzapfel K, Schuster T, Phillip V, Schmid RM, Huber W. Physical examination, central venous pressure, and chest radiography for the prediction of transpulmonary thermodilution-derived hemodynamic parameters in critically ill patients: a prospective trial. J Crit Care. 2011;26:402–10. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.11.001.
10. Wo CC, Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Bishop MH, Kram HB, Hardin E. Unreliability of blood pressure and heart rate to evaluate cardiac output in emergency resuscitation and critical illness. Crit Care Med. 1993;21:218–23.
11. Nowak RM, Sen A, Garcia AJ, Wilkie H, Yang JJ, Nowak MR, Moyer ML. The inability of emergency physicians to adequately clinically estimate the underlying hemodynamic profiles of acutely ill patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30:954–60. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2011.05.021.
12. Meregalli A, Oliveira RP, Friedman G. Occult hypoperfusion is associated with increased mortality in hemodynamically stable, high-risk, surgical patients. Crit Care. 2004;8:R60–5. doi:10.1186/cc2423.
13. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1774–81. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a25fd.
14. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, Jaeschke R, Mebazaa A, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL, Vincent JL, Rhodes A. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Med. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1795–815. doi:10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z.
15. Potter BJ, Deverenne B, Doucette S, Fergusson D, Magder S. Cardiac output responses in a flow-driven protocol of resuscitation following cardiac surgery. J Crit Care. 2013;28:265–9. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.09.008.
16. Bellomo R, Uchino S. Cardiovascular monitoring tools: use and misuse. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003;9:225–9.
17. Ospina-Tascon GA, Cordioli RL, Vincent JL. What type of monitoring has been shown to improve outcomes in acutely ill patients? Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:800–20. doi:10.1007/s00134-007-0967-6.
18. Greenberg SB, Murphy GS, Vender JS. Current use of the pulmonary artery catheter. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15:249–53. doi:10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832b302b.
19. Thompson JP, Mahajan RP. Monitoring the monitors–beyond risk management. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97:1–3. doi:10.1093/bja/ael139.
20. Robin ED, McCauley RF. Monitor wizards can be dangerous. Chest. 1998;114:1511–3.
21. Parker MM. Goals for fluid resuscitation: a real challenge. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:295–6. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000251846.58645.5a.
22. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15:85–91.
23. Steingrub JS, Celoria G, Vickers-Lahti M, Teres D, Bria W. Therapeutic impact of pulmonary artery catheterization in a medical/surgical ICU. Chest. 1991;99:1451–5.
24. Mimoz O, Rauss A, Rekik N, Brun-Buisson C, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Pulmonary artery catheterization in critically ill patients: a prospective analysis of outcome changes associated with catheter-prompted changes in therapy. Crit Care Med. 1994;22:573–9.
25. Marinelli WA, Weinert CR, Gross CR, Knoedler JP Jr, Bury CL, Kangas JR, Leatherman JW. Right heart catheterization in acute lung injury: an observational study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:69–76. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.160.1.9711079.
26. Vincent JL, Pinsky MR, Sprung CL, Levy M, Marini JJ, Payen D, Rhodes A, Takala J. The pulmonary artery catheter: in medio virtus. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:3093–6. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31818c10c7.
27. Richard C, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in 2011. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011;17:296–302. doi:10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283466b85.
28. Shah MR, Hasselblad V, Stevenson LW, Binanay C, O’Connor CM, Sopko G, Califf RM. Impact of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA. 2005;294:1664–70. doi:10.1001/jama.294.13.1664.
29. Vincent JL, Rhodes A, Perel A, Martin GS, Della Rocca G, Vallet B, Pinsky MR, Hofer CK, Teboul JL, de Boode WP, Scolletta S, Vieillard-Baron A, De Backer D, Walley KR, Maggiorini M, Singer M. Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring–a consensus of 16. Crit Care. 2011;15:229. doi:10.1186/cc10291.
30. Beale RJ, Hollenberg SM, Vincent JL, Parrillo JE. Vasopressor and inotropic support in septic shock: an evidence-based review. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:S455–65.
31. Cecconi M, Parsons AK, Rhodes A. What is a fluid challenge? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011;17:290–5. doi:10.1097/MCC.0b013e32834699cd.
32. Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, Bahloul M, Richard C, Teboul JL. Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest. 2003;124:1900–8.
33. Perel A. Extravascular lung water and the pulmonary vascular permeability index may improve the definition of ARDS. Crit Care. 2013;17:108. doi:10.1186/cc11918.
34. Vincent JL, Ince C, Bakker J. Clinical review: circulatory shock—an update: a tribute to Professor Max Harry Weil. Crit Care. 2012;16:239. doi:10.1186/cc11510.
35. Hanson J, Lam SW, Alam S, Pattnaik R, Mahanta KC, Uddin Hasan M, Mohanty S, Mishra S, Cohen S, Day N, White N, Dondorp A. The reliability of the physical examination to guide fluid therapy in adults with severe falciparum malaria: an observational study. Malar J. 2013;12:348. doi:10.1186/1475-2875-12-348.
36. Duan J, Cong LH, Wang H, Zhang Y, Wu XJ, Li G. Clinical evaluation compared to the pulse indicator continuous cardiac output system in the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32:629–33. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2014.03.023.
37. Dawson NV, Connors AF Jr, Speroff T, Kemka A, Shaw P, Arkes HR. Hemodynamic assessment in managing the critically ill: is physician confidence warranted? Med Decis Making. 1993;13:258–66.
38. Hilton AK, Bellomo R. A critique of fluid bolus resuscitation in severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2012;16:302. doi:10.1186/cc11154.
39. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:517–23. doi:10.1007/s00134-005-2586-4.
40. Trof RJ, Danad I, Reilingh MW, Breukers RM, Groeneveld AB. Cardiac filling volumes versus pressures for predicting fluid responsiveness after cardiovascular surgery: the role of systolic cardiac function. Crit Care. 2011;15:R73. doi:10.1186/cc10062.
41. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2642–7. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da.
42. Pino-Sanchez F, Lara-Rosales R, Guerrero-Lopez F, Chamorro-Marin V, Navarrete-Navarro P, Carazo-de la Fuente E, Fernandez-Mondejar E. Influence of extravascular lung water determination in fluid and vasoactive therapy. J Trauma. 2009;67:1220–4. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a5f1f1.
43. Roizen MF, Toledano A. Technology assessment and the “learning contamination” bias. Anesth Analg. 1994;79:410–2.
44. Young D, Griffiths J. Clinical trials of monitoring in anaesthesia, critical care and acute ward care: a review. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97:39–45. doi:10.1093/bja/ael107.
45. Vincent JL. We should abandon randomized controlled trials in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:S534–8. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f208ac.
46. Perner A, Myburgh J. Ten ‘short-lived’ beliefs in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2015;. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3733-1.
47. Tobin MJ (2008) Counterpoint: evidence-based medicine lacks a sound scientific base. Chest 133:1071–1074; discussion 1074-1077. doi:10.1378/chest.08-0077.
48. Tonelli MR, Curtis JR, Guntupalli KK, Rubenfeld GD, Arroliga AC, Brochard L, Douglas IS, Gutterman DD, Hall JR, Kavanagh BP, Mancebo J, Misak CJ, Simpson SQ, Slutsky AS, Suffredini AF, Thompson BT, Ware LB, Wheeler AP, Levy MM. An official multi-society statement: the role of clinical research results in the practice of critical care medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:1117–24. doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0638ST.