Bioinspired lubricating films of cellulose nanofibrils and hyaluronic acid

Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

Volumn 138, Issue , 2016, Pages 86-93

  Valle Delgado, Juan José ^a   Johansson, Leena Sisko ^a   Österberg, Monika ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cellulose nanofibrils; Colloid probe technique; Hyaluronic acid; Lubrication; Thin films

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE FILMS; CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTALS; FRICTION; IONIC STRENGTH; LUBRICATION; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; NANOFIBERS; ORGANIC ACIDS; PROBES; SOLS; THIN FILMS; TRIBOLOGY;

BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; CELLULOSE NANOFIBRILS; CELLULOSIC MATERIAL; COLLOID PROBE TECHNIQUE; LUBRICATING PROPERTIES; LUBRICATION PROPERTY; SOLVENT-FREE METHOD; TRIBOLOGICAL PROPERTIES;

HYALURONIC ACID;

CELLULOSE NANOFIBRIL; GLASS; HYALURONIC ACID; MICROSPHERE; NANOMATERIAL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELLULOSE; LUBRICATING AGENT; NANOFIBER; WATER;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; COLLOID PROBE TECHNIQUE; FILM; FRICTION; INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES; IONIC STRENGTH; LIQUID CULTURE; LUBRICATION; MECHANICAL STRENGTH; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; CHEMISTRY; MATERIALS TESTING; OSMOLARITY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

BIOMETRICS; CELLULOSE FIBERS; CELLULOSE FILM; FRICTION; HYALURONIC ACID; LUBRICATION;

CELLULOSE; FRICTION; GLASS; HYALURONIC ACID; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; LUBRICANTS; LUBRICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSPHERES; NANOFIBERS; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WATER;

EID: 84949309859     PISSN: 09277765     EISSN: 18734367     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.11.047     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Klemm D., Kramer F., Moritz S., Lindström T., Ankerfors M., Gray D., Dorris A. Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50:5438-5466.
2. Pääkkö M., Ankerfors M., Kosonen H., Nykänen A., Ahola S., Österberg M., Ruokolainen J., Laine J., Larsson P.T., Ikkala O., Lindström T. Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:1934-1941.
3. Iwamoto S., Abe K., Yano H. The effect of hemicelluloses on wood pulp nanofibrillation and nanofiber network characteristics. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9:1022-1026.
4. Saito T., Kimura S., Nishiyama Y., Isogai A. Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:2485-2491.
5. Isogai A., Saito T., Fukuzumi H. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 2011, 3:71-85.
6. Eyholzer Ch., Bordeanu N., Lopez-Suevos F., Rentsch D., Zimmermann T., Oksman K. Preparation and characterization of water-redispersible nanofibrillated cellulose in powder form. Cellulose 2010, 17:19-30.
7. Iwamoto S., Kai W., Isogai A., Iwata T. Elastic modulus of single cellulose microfibrils from tunicate measured by atomic force microscopy. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:2571-2576.
8. Tanpichai S., Quero F., Nogi M., Yano H., Young R.J., Lindström T., Sampson W.W., Eichhorn S.J. Effective Young's modulus of bacterial and microfibrillated cellulose fibrils in fibrous networks. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13:1340-1349.
9. Lee K.-Y., Tammelin T., Schulfter K., Kiiskinen H., Samela J., Bismarck A. High performance cellulose nanocomposites: comparing the reinforcing ability of bacterial cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4:4078-4086.
10. Österberg M., Vartiainen J., Lucenius J., Hippi U., Seppälä J., Serimaa R., Laine J. A fast method to produce strong NFC films as a platform for barrier and functional materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5:4640-4647.
11. Lucenius J., Parikka K., Österberg M. Nanocomposite films based on cellulose nanofibrils and water-soluble polysaccharides. React. Funct. Polym. 2014, 85:167-174.
12. Siró I., Plackett D. Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 2010, 17:459-494.
13. Eichhorn S.J., Dufresne A., Aranguren M., Marcovich N.E., Capadona J.R., Rowan S.J., Weder C., Thielemans W., Roman M., Renneckar S., Gindl W., Veigel S., Keckes J., Yano H., Abe K., Nogi M., Nakagaito A.N., Mangalam A., Simonsen J., Benight A.S., Bismarck A., Berglund L.A., Peijs T. Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 2010, 45:1-33.
14. Wang M., Olszewska A., Walther A., Malho J.-M., Schacher F.H., Ruokolainen J., Ankerfors M., Laine J., Berglund L.A., Österberg M., Ikkala O. Colloidal ionic assembly between anionic native cellulose nanofibrils and cationic block copolymer micelles into biomimetic nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:2074-2081.
15. Aulin C., Salazar-Alvarez G., Lindström T. High strength, flexible and transparent nanofibrillated cellulose-nanoclay biohybrid films with tunable oxygen and water vapor permeability. Nanoscale 2012, 4:6622-6628.
16. Shi Z., Phillips G.O., Yang G. Nanocellulose electroconductive composites. Nanoscale 2013, 5:3194-3201.
17. Bhattacharya M., Malinen M.M., Lauren P., Lou Y.-R., Kuisma S.W., Kanninen L., Lille M., Corlu A., GuGuen-Guillouzo C., Ikkala O., Laukkanen A., Urtti A., Yliperttula M. Nanofibrillar cellulose hydrogel promotes three-dimensional liver cell culture. J. Control. Release 2012, 164:291-298.
18. Lou Y.-R., Kanninen L., Kuisma T., Niklander J., Noon L.A., Burks D., Urtti A., Yliperttula M. The use of nanofibrillar cellulose hydrogel as a flexible three-dimensional model to culture human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2014, 23:380-392.
19. Favi P.M., Benson R.S., Neilsen N.R., Hammonds R.L., Bates C.C., Stephens C.P., Dhar M.S. Cell proliferation, viability, and in vitro differentiation of equine mesenchymal stem cells seeded on bacterial cellulose hydrogel scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2013, 33:1935-1944.
20. Ahrem H., Pretzel D., Endres M., Conrad D., Courseau J., Müller H., Jaeger R., Kaps C., Klemm D.O., Kinne R.W. Laser-structured bacterial nanocellulose hydrogels support ingrowth and differentiation of chondrocytes and show potential as cartilage implants. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10:1341-1353.
21. Petersen N., Gatenholm P. Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 91:1277-1286.
22. Lin N., Dufresne A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: current status and future prospect. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 59:302-325.
23. Ducker W.A., Senden T.J., Pashley R.M. Direct measurement of colloidal forces using an atomic force microscope. Nature 1991, 353:239-241.
24. Ralston J., Larson I., Rutland M.W., Feiler A.A., Kleijn M. Atomic force microscopy and direct surface force measurements. Pure Appl. Chem. 2005, 77:2149-2170.
25. Stiernstedt J., Brumer H., Zhou Q., Teeri T.T., Rutland M.W. Friction between cellulose surfaces and effect of xyloglucan adsorption. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7:2147-2153.
26. Salmi J., Österberg M., Stenius P., Laine J. Surface forces between cellulose surfaces in cationic polyelectrolyte solutions: the effect of polymer molecular weight and charge density. Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 2007, 22:249-257.
27. Ahola S., Salmi J., Johansson L.-S., Laine J., Österberg M. Model films from native cellulose nanofibrils. Preparation, swelling, and surface interactions. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9:1273-1282.
28. Nordgren N., Eronen P., Österberg M., Laine J., Rutland M.W. Mediation of the nanotribological properties of cellulose by chitosan adsorption. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:645-650.
29. Olszewska A., Junka K., Nordgren N., Laine J., Rutland M.W., Österberg M. Non-ionic assembly of nanofibrillated cellulose and polyethylene glycol grafted carboxymethyl cellulose and the effect of aqueous lubrication in nanocomposite formation. Soft Matter 2013, 9:7448-7457.
30. Olszewska A., Valle-Delgado J.J., Nikinmaa M., Laine J., Österberg M. Direct measurements of non-ionic attraction and nanoscaled lubrication in biomimetic composites from nanofibrillated cellulose and modified carboxymethylated cellulose. Nanoscale 2013, 5:11837-11844.
31. Huang F., Li K., Kulachenko A. Measurement of interfiber friction force for pulp fibers by atomic force microscopy. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44:3770-3776.
32. Theander K., Pugh R.J., Rutland M.W. Friction force measurements relevant to de-inking by means of atomic force microscope. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 291:361-368.
33. Greene G.W., Olszewska A., Österberg M., Zhu H., Horn R. A cartilage-inspired lubrication system. Soft Matter 2014, 10:374-382.
34. Eronen P., Laine J., Ruokolainen J., Österberg M. Comparison of multilayer formation between different cellulose nanofibrils and cationic polymers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 373:84-93.
35. Johansson L.-S., Campbell J.M. Reproducible XPS on biopolymers: cellulose studies. Surf. Interface Anal. 2004, 36:1018-1022.
36. Beamson G., Briggs D. High Resolution XPS of Organic Polymers 1992, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
37. Sader J.E., Chon J.W.M., Mulvaney P. Calibration of rectangular atomic force microscope cantilevers. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1999, 70:3967-3969.
38. Green C.P., Lioe H., Cleveland J.P., Proksch R., Mulvaney P., Sader J.E. Normal and torsional spring constants of atomic force microscope cantilevers. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2004, 75:1988-1996.
39. Udomkichdecha W., Kittinaovarat S., Thanasoonthornroek U., Potiyaraj P., Likitbanakorn P. Acrylic and maleic acids in nonformaldehyde durable press finishing of cotton fabric. Text. Res. J. 2003, 73:401-406.
40. Lu P., Hsieh Y.-L. Cellulose nanocrystal-filled poly(acrylic acid) nanocomposite fibrous membranes. Nanotechnology 2009, 20:415604.
41. Surina R., Andrassy M. Effect of preswelling and ultrasound treatment on the properties of flax fibers cross-linked with polycarboxylic acids. Text. Res. J. 2013, 83:66-75.
42. Biggs S., Healy T.W. Electrosteric stabilisation of colloidal zirconia with low-molecular-weight polyacrylic acid. An atomic force microscopy study. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1994, 90:3415-3421.
43. Benz M., Chen N., Israelachvili J. Lubrication and wear properties of grafted polyelectrolytes, hyaluronan and hylan measured in the surface force apparatus. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2004, 71:6-15.
44. Kumar P., Oka M., Toguchida J., Kobayashi M., Uchida E., Nakamura T., Tanaka K. Role of uppermost superficial surface layer of articular cartilage in the lubrication mechanism of joints. J. Anat. 2001, 199:241-250.
45. Bonnevie E.D., Baro V.J., Wang L., Burris D.L. In situ studies of cartilage microtribology: roles of speed and contact area. Tribol. Lett. 2011, 41:83-95.
46. Shi L., Brunski D.B., Sikavitsas V.I., Johnson M.B., Striolo A. Friction coefficients for mechanically damaged bovine articular cartilage. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109:1769-1778.
47. Fukubayashi T., Kurosawa H. The contact area and pressure distribution pattern of the knee. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1980, 51:871-879.
48. Spiller K.L., Maher S.A., Lowman A.M. Hydrogels for the repair of articular cartilage defects. Tissue Eng. 2011, 17:281-299.